Retrospective report of the past year

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1TAP Masterplanning kick-off25 September 2012 TAP TSI Masterplanning Overview of RU/IM obligations Masterplanning Kick-off Brussels, 25 September 2012.
Advertisements

Road Manager Module National Heavy Vehicle Regulator
Czech-Slovak Corridor
"Step by Step" Guide to implement TAF TSI
Oracle Subledger Accounting
* MARKET SYSTEM RELEASE UPDATE Modifications Committee Meeting 9 August 2011 * 1##
 BUT …. Terminal pilot REQUEST TO THE CCB
Monthly Report For January 2017
For Using of TAF Test Manager (TTM)
PCS Technical Board Vienna, 28th February 2017.
TAF/TAP workshop Brussels, September 2017.
PCS Follow up Project Preliminary results.
New Functionality in ARIN Online
Engineering Processes
TTR IT Implementation Capacity Offer/Request/Allocation
Non-RU Applicant (NRA), PCS UG
RFC Short Term Path Request Pilots
Current activities Vienna, 10th May 2017.
Content Management System
Redesign of the International Timetabling Process (TTR)
PCS Technical Board 17th October 2017, Vienna.
SAD ::: Spring 2018 Sabbir Muhammad Saleh
Envelope Concept report, PCS UG
Temporary Capacity Restrictions: TCR WG & TCR tool
Yearly Maintenance Process (for existing messages)
ctclink Steering Committee
TRACES TRAde Control and Expert System
PCS Outlook PCS User Group 12th September 2018, Vienna.
PCS Minor Release th February 2018, PCS UG.
PCS CCB Group 22nd February, 2017.
TAF-TSI Train Object 25th June 2018, Prague.
PaP Publication strategy TT2019 – Combined PaP
EEC Core Team 6th February 2018, Vienna.
PCS Day - Feedback 23th November 2016, Vienna.
Development roadmap PCS Day 2017.
PCS IT Day Operation Points updates from SNCF-Réseau’s interface.
The new C-OSS Timetable features are not fully in line with C-OSS expectations
Timetable Process Quality PCS User Group
Update on Data Use Task Force
IT Support for TTR Pilots
Using Use Case Diagrams
Road Manager Module National Heavy Vehicle Regulator
Removal of national particularities
PCS User Group 15th February, 2017.
PCS User Group Vienna, 13th September 2017.
PCS Developments – PCS CCB
PCS IT Day 23 November 2017, Vienna.
Update timetable in PCS dossier from national system
PCS Groups and Boards PCS Day 2016
TTR IT Landscape PCS-TTR Day Vienna, 21 November 2018.
TAF-TSI Pilot PCS Day 2017.
PaP Product Definition
JS Pilot and TEG Meeting, Vienna, 12/02/2019
TSI Compliant PCS Mandatory Interface
JS Handbook overview of changes
ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG Network Access – Customer Care Patrick Wögenstein
PR deadline experiences, PCS UG
CAPACITY strategy & MODEL atlantic 2020 PILOT
RFC Short Term Path Request developments
Envelope concept changes
Colorado PSAT/SAT SBD Training
Executive Project Kickoff
Connecting Europe, Railway Undertakings and ProRail
Developments Confirmation by the CCB that the TAF TSI components have been successfully implemented into PCS Confirmation by the CCB that PCS has been.
Envelope Concept report, PCS TB
Training timeline Train the trainer RFC 1st round RFC 3rd round
Modelling of Train and Path in TAF/TAP TSIs
"Step by Step" Guide to implement TAF TSI
TT Quality monitoring on borders
Railway timetabling tools with automatic solutions
Presentation transcript:

Retrospective report of the past year PCS-TTR Day 2018, Vienna

Customer satisfaction survey and stats

General Survey Workflow Result Review by GA and PCS Day Survey analysis Survey for the users Survey preparation Presentation to the GA 23 February 2019

General Survey Timeline Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Presentation General Assembly TIS Survey Results Preparation and Analysis Results Review General Assembly CIS Survey CIP Survey Reporting Survey PCS Survey 23 February 2019

PCS Survey: Number of participants: 61

Importance of PCS for your business

PCS Usage

Performance, usability, usefulness, support

Performance, usability, usefulness, support (Average results)

Showing the purpose, the story and the future of this action Frozen zone Showing the purpose, the story and the future of this action

Frozen zone is a step in the timetable process when an actor is not allowed to make an update on the dossier. This year, IMs were allowed to update their offer in Observations. „

6% of the dossiers were touched by IMs during Observations

Where was it used? Although it was only 6% of the dossiers, the opportunity was widely used.

It was available only for TT2019 Game over It was available only for TT2019

23 February 2019

GDPR in PCS: New users 23 February 2019

New users in PCS 23 February 2019

OPTIONAL

Dossier closure

Showing the possibilities Open and Harmonization Leading RU can close the dossier 01. Observations* 02. Active Timetable Leading RU or leading IM can close the dossier, after the timetable is started 05. Final Offer* Leading RU can close the dossier and new automatic promotion with all red lights 04. Post-processing* Leading IM or RFC can close the dossier 03. Dossier closure Showing the possibilities

Dwell time

What is dwell time? In PCS General Definition Dwell time is the time spent in the same position, area, stage of a process, etc. Non obligatory field Implemented also in Web services, with its own error code. In PCS the user can include the dwell time to indicate the minimum amount of time needed to stay in one location.

Dwell time should have a standard format defined in minutes and should be taken into account when validating times. Dwell time format

the dwell time (DT) needs to be equal or smaller than 90 minutes In the example, the dwell time (DT) needs to be equal or smaller than 90 minutes DT ≤ Dep – Arr Dwell time formula

Missing arrival or departure times

Other considerations PCS will calculate automatically overnight shifts (offsets) If a time zone change is implemented, PCS will adjust automatically the calculation The system won't check the operation point type In PCS IP error code indicates to the uploader agency if the web-service request contains invalid dwell time. The error code is: 659 INVALID_DWELL_TIME

Hello TSI world! <html> <header><title>This is title</title></header> <body> Hello TSI world! </body> </html>

Instructions for the presentation PCS CI: Common Interface endpoint of PCS (for the TSI communication) PCS IP: Integration Platform endpoint of PCS (for the usual PCS web-service communication) TTM: TAF-TSI Test Manager that simulates pre-defined actions and triggers messages to PCS TIL: Transition and Integration Layer that maps the TSI message content to PCS web-services SOAP UI: the most popular platform for Application Programming Interface functional tests. Substituting your real application

Communication Options TTM PCS CI TIL PCS IP PCS CI TIL PCS IP SOAP RU/IM national tool PCS CI TIL PCS IP PCS IP SOAP RU/IM national tool PCS IP

Messages „…Path Coordination, Path Request, Path Details, Path Not Available, Path Details Confirmed, Path Details Refused, Path Booked, Receipt Confirmation, Error message…” Path Coordination For harmonization purposes. RU-RU or IM-IM communication Receipt confirmation Thank you! I got your message, I could import it in my system and I started to process your request. Path Not Available Something went wrong, the path is no longer available. We will inform you about the possible alternative options And the attributes… Message status, type of information, type of request, code lists, etc.

Scope of the pilot (runs until 2020 Q2) Path request and offer procedure among the RUs and IMs, including also the harmonization of the requests and the offers Path Request process 01 Updating the contracts after the allocation either from the RU or from the IM side. Reviewing the process and message workflow Path modification, alteration, cancellation process 02 Checking all the TSI identifiers, like Train ID, Path Request ID, Path ID and Case Reference ID, if they are suitable for their task Identification 03 Testing FTE’s candidates for the planning and commercial train numbers Train number candidates 04

Presentation