Code Administration Code of Practice

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Project Nexus Next Steps Xoserve/Large GT View – 6 December 2011.

Advertisements

Funding UKLink Process changes (User Pays). 2 Purpose of Presentation  Review of User Pays  Principles  Application to date  National Grid NTS observations.

Review of industry code governance 26 March 2010.

UNC Modification Proposal Revised Timescales for LDZ Shrinkage Arrangements Simon Trivella – 25 th September 2008 Distribution Workstream.

Pro’s and Con’s of Codes UNC Code Administrator Working Group 28 August 2008.

Code Administrator View Tim Davis. Ofgem Principles Inclusive, accessible and effective consultation Transparent easily understood rules and processes.

3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,

ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.

Code Administrator Working Group - BSC Chris Rowell ( ) 28 August 2008.

Amendments to NTS Shrinkage Reporting Process Nick Reeves.

Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Chris Shanley - National Grid NTS.

Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.

Overview of Balancing & Settlement Code Change Process By Gareth Evans on Behalf of Gazprom Marketing & Trading –Retail.

Force Majeure - Capacity Transmission Workstream 2 July 2009.

Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.

Moving the QSEC and AMSEC Auctions Update. 2  Presented proposal at October Workstream  Questions / suggestions received, mainly around  Over & Under.

Code Administrators Working Group (CAWG) Meeting 3, 29th October 2008.

Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.

Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.

Agency Charging Statement Overview of Consultation 11 th February 2008.

Code Administration Code of Practice Tim Davis KPIs Q

Legal Text Production Options for Discussion. Legal Text Production 2 Issues with current approach Issues with the current approach to legal text production.

Overview: Code Modification Process Summary. PROPONENT Step 1 - Proponent has a code change in mind MODIFICATION (Mod) Step 2 - Proponent enters the mod.

1 Package on food improvement agents Food additives Food enzymes Flavourings Common procedure Developments since earlier consultation.

Distribution workstream 29th January 2009

Supply Point Enquiry Service

Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update

Transmission Workstream February 2009

Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel

Manifest Errors for Entry Capacity Overruns Workgroup 364

Grid Code Development Forum – 6 September 2017

UNC Modifications 061 & 062 – An Overview

Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals

Grid Code Review Panel 16th August 2017

Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document

Global Aggregation Mod raised by ESB CS at Mods Meeting 24 ( )

CSEP NExA Update Marie Clark ScottishPower 28th September 2006.

CAP190: Workgroup Report CUSC Modifications Panel, 26th August 2011

UNC Trader User – Licence obligations

Electricity Governance Comparison

Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals

Development Modification Proposal 0337: Introduction of a Inter-day Linepack Product – OPEN LETTER Review Group August th November 2010.

Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision

The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal

Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244

Rebecca Hailes For 15 March 2018

Paper 7: Technical Updates

Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678

Workgroup Timetable Tim Davis.

Transmission Planning Code Review

QSEC auction timetable

Flow Swaps at NTS / LDZ offtakes

Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document

Proposer: Transporter /

Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements

Transmission Workstream 2nd December 2010

Richard Fairholme Transmission Workstream 4th September 2008

Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244

Mark Freeman 29th January 2007

Modification 0448 – European Driven Change Process Flow Diagram

CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process

Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism

Urgent Modification Process Flow Diagram

Gemini Code Contingency Review

Modification 0043 – Limitation on offering for sale unsold capacity

Key Impacts Modification Proposals Legal Text Modification Reports.

DCUSA PARTY PANEL SECRETARIAT OFGEM CHANGE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED

UNC MOD 213: USER PAYS GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS

Gas Customer Forum 28 July 2008

DSG Governance Group Recommendations.

Presentation transcript:

Code Administration Code of Practice KPIs Q3 2012 Tim Davis

Quality of assessment No reports “sent back” by Ofgem in Q3 Quarter 1 Ofgem Implement Reject Panel 3 5 4 Quarter 2 1 Quarter 3 32 out of 40 accord. No reports “sent back” by Ofgem in Q3 5 Q3 Ofgem Decisions accord with Panel (71%)

Effective communication Glossary and plain English summary to be provided with reports Part of standard documentation Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Number of Consultations 20 8 7 Average number of respondents 9.4 5.8 5.7

Efficient administration (1) Percentage of papers published outside of modification rules requirements Quarter 1 2 % UNC Modification Papers (Mods, DMRs, FMRs) 0% Quarter 1 2 3 Meetings 72 73 70 Papers 310 288 283 % Late 17.42% 26% 19%

Efficient Administration (2) Quarter 1 2 Quarter 3 Number and percentage of reports submitted to the authority in line with original timetable 9 (90%) 5 (71%) 5 (83%) Quarter 1 2 Quarter 3 Number of extensions to timetable requested 6 7 3

Efficient Administration (3) Average time between: Quarter 1 Days 2 3 Proposal being raised and submitted for decision 226 172 279 Proposal being submitted for decision and decision being published 168 68 83 Decision and implementation (separately identifying systems and non-system changes) 63 (no systems changes) 43 (no systems changes) 32 (no systems changes)

Implementation costs Quarter 1 2 3 Number and percentage of reports for which implementation cost estimates were not available for consultation 2 (10%) 0 (0%) Accuracy percentage difference (whether higher or lower) between estimated and actual implementation costs NA

Code Administration Code of Practice KPIs Q3 2012 Tim Davis