Contractor Cost and Software Data Reporting: An Update Mike Augustus February 2005

Outline Outreach activities Changes in DAES Reporting Automation Status eRoom Pre-processor and Validator Training Update

Outreach Activities Coordination with DCAA Coordination with OSD(AT&L) Developed audit procedure Now conducting audits Coordination with OSD(AT&L) Acquisition Resources and Analysis (ARA) Include status of CSDR in DAES Assessments Update MIL-HDBK-881B Revise EVM DID Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy Turning attention to contracting community

4th Round GRP A/B/C ACAT 1 CCDR Status Green Advisory Yellow Yellow Advisory Red Not-rated Green GRP A: As of November 10, 2004 GRP B: As of December 6, 2004 GRP C: As of October 7, 2004

CCDR DAES Assessment CY 2004 Progress GRP A: As of November 10, 2004 GRP B: As of December 6, 2004 GRP C: As of October 7, 2004

DAES Reporting Summary Significant improvement since January 1St Round (end March): 44 Red/Yellow Advisory 10 Yellow 4 Green/Green Advisory 4th Round (end December): 9 Red/Yellow Advisory 21 Yellow 26 Green/Green Advisory Still have problem programs Recommend problem programs brief USD(AT&L)/CAIG re CSDR Status

Automation Status Significant delays in delivery of eRoom and Pre-processor/Validator Incumbent IT contractor departed 28 October 2004 New IT Contractor on contract November 29, 2004 Transition complete eRoom requirements analysis underway Pre-processor/Validator requirements analysis updated and near completion

Training Activities Revamped training methodology Looking at long-term plan CY 2004-CY 2005 plan Five sessions held Aircraft Systems: August 25-26: Lockheed Martin, Ft Worth 67 attendees (52 from industry) Missile/Ordnance: Sept 22-23: Raytheon, Tucson 90 attendees (74 from industry) Space Systems: Oct 16-17: Lockheed Martin, Sunnyvale 84 attendees (33 from industry) Ship Systems: Nov 16-17: Northrop Grumman, New Orleans 64 attendees (51 from industry) Electronic Systems: February 1-2: Northrop Grumman, Baltimore 66 attendees (41 from industry)

Summary Outreach Activities are bearing fruit Great coordination with AT&L on EVMS and WBS Turning attention to contracting community Analysis Activities are improving DAES process is a “double-edged sword” Improvements in cost data collection Quality issues continue Goal is to get “Green” fast without doing the hard work Dynamic process not a “one-time” thing Training Activities are illustrating process problems New training is well received Need participation by contracting community