Impedance analysis for collimator and beam screen in LHC and Resistive Wall Instability Liu Yu Dong.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Wake Fields and Beam Dynamics Kai Meng Hock. 2 Overview Research Interests –Wake fields Electromagnetic fields are induced by charged particles interacting.
Advertisements

Talk given on ILC DR Workshop, December 18-20, 2007, KEK Preliminary estimates of impedance for the ILC damping ring Calculation of the impedances and.
Using the real lattice and an improved model for the wake field, the extraction jitter can now be calculated more accurately. Assuming an injection jitter.
Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Finite wall wake function Motivation: Study of multi-bunch instability in damping rings. Wake field perturbs Trailing bunches OCS6 damping ring DCO2 damping.
Particle Studio simulations of the resistive wall impedance of copper cylindrical and rectangular beam pipes C. Zannini E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant.
TDI longitudinal impedance simulation with CST PS A.Grudiev 20/03/2012.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Preliminary Simulation on Electron Cloud Build-up in SppC Liu Yu Dong.
Studies of impedance effects for a composite beam pipe for the experimental areas Request from M. Galilee, G. Schneider (TE/VSC)
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
SuperKEKB Vacuum System - for the positron ring - Y. Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group Outline Design and production status of key components Beam pipes for arc.
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
Beam observation and Introduction to Collective Beam Instabilities Observation of collective beam instability Collective modes Wake fields and coupling.
Agenda: General kickers analysis Wang-Tsutsui method for computing impedances Benchmarks Conclusions Bibliography Acknowledgments: E.Métral, M.Migliorati,
Status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff, B. Salvant.
Updated status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, B. Mikulec, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff,
FCC electron cloud study plan K. Ohmi (KEK) Mar FCC electron cloud study meeting CERN.
TDI impedance and power loss O. Aberle, F. Caspers, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, N. Mounet, B. Salvant.
Collimator wakefields - G.Kurevlev Manchester 1 Collimator wake-fields Wake fields in collimators General information Types of wake potentials.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy CERN 4 th TLEP Mini-Workshop 2013 Longitudinal Beam-Beam Effects at TLEP (Novosibirsk Phi factory experience.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
N. Mounet and E. Métral - HB /10/20101 News on the 2D wall impedance theory N. Mounet (EPFL/ CERN) and E. Métral (CERN) Thesis supervisor : Prof.
FCC-hh: First simulations of electron cloud build-up L. Mether, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo FCC Design meeting.
Main activities and news from the Impedance working group.
Coupled bunch Instabilities at ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University Refer to.
Geometric Impedance of LHC Collimators O. Frasciello, S. Tomassini, M. Zobov LNF-INFN Frascati, Italy With contributions and help of N.Mounet (CERN), A.Grudiev.
Beam screen cooling: scaling from LHC to FHC Philippe Lebrun FHC meeting on beam pipe design, CERN 20 December 2013.
Impedance & Instabilities
Impedance Measurement Techniques and Lessons from Light Sources
Beam Instability in High Energy Hadron Accelerators and its Challenge for SPPC Liu Yu Dong.
Loss of Landau damping for reactive impedance and a double RF system
Theory, observations and mitigation of dancing bunches in the Tevatron
T. Agoh (KEK) Introduction CSR emitted in wiggler
Instability issues in CEPC
Modeling of fast beam-ion instabilities
Heat load estimates for the Long Straight Sections of the HL-LHC
Electron Cloud Effects in SuperB
Observations and Predictions for DAFNE and SuperB
Kickers analysis and benchmark
New results on impedances, wake fields and electromagnetic fields in an axisymmetric beam pipe N. Mounet and E. Métral Acknowledgements: B. Salvant, B.
Measurement and analysis
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
A.KOLOMIETS & A.KOVALENKO
Impedance model and collective effects
FCC-ee: coupling impedances and collective effects
Laser-engineered surface structures (LESS) What is the beam impedance?
Summary on SPPC Accelerators
LHC at 7 TeV/c: comparison phase 1 / IR3MBC
General wall impedance theory for 2D axisymmetric and flat multilayer structures N. Mounet and E. Métral Acknowledgements: N. Biancacci, F. Caspers, A.
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant
Invited talk TOAC001 ( min, 21 slides)
N. Mounet, G. Rumolo and E. Métral
Electromagnetic fields in a resistive cylindrical beam pipe
Collective effects in CEPC
Laser-engineered surface structures (LESS) What is the beam impedance?
SuperB General Meeting June , Perugia (Italy)
A Head-Tail Simulation Code for Electron Cloud
NEWS ABOUT COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE
Tune shifts in LHC from collimators impedance
RESISTIVE HEAT LOAD FOR THE TDI = LHC injection beam stopper
Updated status of the PSB impedance model
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
Electron Cloud Build-up in ilcDR
Power loss in the LHC beam screen at 7 TeV due to the multi-layer longitudinal impedance N. Mounet and E. Métral Goal: Check the effect of the multi-layer.
Tune Shift Induced by Flat-Chamber Resistive Wall Impedance
A Mapping Approach to the Electron Cloud for LHC
Presentation transcript:

Impedance analysis for collimator and beam screen in LHC and Resistive Wall Instability Liu Yu Dong

Wall impedance for multilayer chamber Beam screen: stainless steel (0.6mm) with coating copper (50um) Injection protection collimator: hBN (hexagonal boron nitride, 六方氮化硼) coating with Ti(5um) Primary collimator: CFC (Carbon-Carbon) Secondary collimator: CFC Absorber: W

Axisymmetiric multilayer chamber According to reference : Nicolas Mounet, Doctoral thesis, 2012 The impedance for multilayer axisymmetiric chamber can be expressed as: (1) Here, the parameter α0TM and α0TM are decided by the properties of multilayer Above formula are general expression without any approximation

Flat multilayer chamber (collimator structure) the analysis process can be found in the same reference The impedance can be expressed as : (2) Here, the parameters αare decided by the properties of multilayer.

The impedance of flat multilayer chamber derived from equation (1) with constant Yokoyal’s(Laslett’s) form factors. (3) The above Yokoyal’s form factors expressed as: For single jaw collimator, the Yokoyal’s form factors expressed as The detail analytic process for formula (3) and Yokoyal’s form factors are in references: R. L. Gluckstern, J. van Zeijts, and B. Zotter. Coupling impedance of beam pipes of general cross section. Phys. Rev. E, 47:656–663, 1993. K. Yokoya. Resistive wall impedance of beam pipes of general cross section. Part. Acc., 41:221, 1993. Also published as KEK Preprint 92-196. A. Burov and V. Danilov. Suppression of transverse bunch instabilities by asymmetries in the chamber geometry. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82:2286–2289, 1999

Reference* give another formula to calculate the resistive wall impedance for multilayer flat chamber. (4) a is pipe radius and d is thickness of the layer The Yokoyal’s form factors have been considered in formula (4). *Alexey Burov and Valeri Lebedev, TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE WALL IMPEDANCE FOR MULTI-LAYER FLAT CHAMBERS, Proceedings of EPAC 2002, Paris, France *Alexey Burov and Valeri Lebedev, TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE WALL IMPEDANCE FOR MULTI-LAYER ROUND CHAMBERS, Proceedings of EPAC 2002, Paris, France

The single layer axisymmetric classic thick wall impedance formula: (5) Above four methods, formla (3)、 (2)、(4)、(5) were used to calculate the collimators in LHC by Nicolas Mounet in his thesis. Titanium-coated hBN collimator

Wall impedance for beam screen One layer of copper with thickness 50um and then infinite layer of stainless steel In the presence of high fields and low temperatures, copper is magnetoresistant and suffers from the anomalous skin effect. Equivalent elliptical shape for beam screen Magnetoresistance was taken into account with empirical law*: Yokoya factors for an elliptical shape** are applied in formula (3) to get the impedances of an elliptic structure approximating the beam screen cross-section *C. Rathjen. Electrical measurements of beam screen wall samples in magnetic fields, 2007. Investigation report, LHC, EDMS Document No. 329882, CERN **K. Yokoya. Resistive wall impedance of beam pipes of general cross section. Part. Acc., 41:221, 1993.

Nicolas Mounet’s calculation results for LHC beam screen The above calculation with formula (3)、 (2)、(4)、(5) have been implemented by Nicolas’s Mounet’s code, and he has sent me his source code.

Resistive Wall Instability The growth rate of the resistive wall instability described by rigid particle model is give by: is the averaged beta function over the ring. the real part of the resistive wall impedance, the beam curren, the beam energy, the betatron tune , the mode number of the coupled bunch oscillation and M the number of bunches.

Electron Cloud Instability for some super pp colliders   LHC FCC-hh SPPC Bunch particles (1011) 1.15 1.0 0.4/0.8/2.0 Bunch spacing (ns) 25 5/10/25 Beam energy (TeV) 7 50 31.7 Pipe radius (mm) 20 13 Parameter n 0.165 0.189 1.001/0.249/0.040 Neutralization line density (1010/m) 1.53 1.33 2.66 Neutralization volume density (1013/m3) 1.22 2.51 5.01 Wake field W/L (103/m2) 3.15 3.149 Betatron tune 43.3 - 60.3 Synchrotron tune 0.006 0.002 0.005 Growth time (ms) 4.31 1.752 Circumference (km) 26.7 100 Threshold electron density (1013/m3) 0.66 0.147 0.468

Simulation parameters for electron cloud density Value Bunch particles nb(1011) 2.0 Bunch spacing (ns) 25 Pipe radius (mm) 12 Circumference(km) 54.7 Tune 60.3 rms bunch length(mm) 75.5 Bunch size (rm) 1/1 Dipole magnetic field (T) 20 Quadrupole(T/m2) 1000

Electron Cloud in Drift Region

Electron Cloud in Dipole Magnetic Field

Thank you for attention!