Oocyte insemination techniques are related to alterations of embryo developmental timing in an oocyte donation model María Cruz, Nicolás Garrido, Blanca Gadea, Manuel Muñoz, Inmaculada Pérez-Cano, Marcos Meseguer Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 367-375 (October 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.017 Copyright © 2013 Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Optimal timing ranges according to insemination procedure. The following timings defined the inside (optimal) ranges as follows: t5=48.8–56.6 h (total IVF 617, ICSI 581); s2 ⩽0.76 h (total IVF 611, ICSI 580); and cc2 ⩽11.9 h (total IVF 622, ICSI 580). There were no significant differences between the treatments. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2013 27, 367-375DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.017) Copyright © 2013 Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Morphokinetic categories according to insemination procedure. A and B=t5 is within optimal range (48.8–56.6h). C and D=t5 falls outside the optimal range. A and C=s2 is within optimal range (⩽0.76h), depending on t5. B and D=s2 >0.76 h, depending also on t5 (total IVF=621; total ICSI=581). There were no significant differences between the treatments. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2013 27, 367-375DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.017) Copyright © 2013 Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Direct cleavage embryos (DC 1–3) according to insemination procedure (total IVF=558; total ICSI=533). There were no significant differences between the treatments. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2013 27, 367-375DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.017) Copyright © 2013 Terms and Conditions