Evaluation Procedures for Classified Employees

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Work Habits and the Ontario Skills Passport www. ontario
Advertisements

A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Orientation to EVALUATION PROCEDURES August, 2006.
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
PORTFOLIO.
Evaluations: Administrative & Classified Employees
Laboratory Personnel Dr/Ehsan Moahmen Rizk.
Continuing Competence in Nursing
Safety and Health Programs
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Control environment and control activities. Day II Session III and IV.
Teacher Assistant Guidelines Student Services 2009.
Teachers directing the work of paraprofessionals
Justice Information Network Strategic Plan Development Justice Information Network Board March 18, 2008 Mo West, JIN Program Manager.
ACGME OUTCOME PROJECT : THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR’S ROLE Jim Kerwin, MD University of Arizona.
DPW BD&C Employee Performance Evaluation Guideline Discussion
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Business Management, 13e Management, Supervision, and Decision Making Increasing Management Effectiveness.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Chapter 4 Performance Management and Appraisal
EVALUATIONS EVALUATIONS ARE REGULATED AND REQUIRED BY KDE (KAR’S AND KRS’S)
Supporting Services Mentoring Program. Mentoring Program Definition The Mentoring Program of MCPS provides mentors to both new employees and existing.
School Social Workers’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 School Social Workers Office, SSS Paulette Herbert, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office,
A Guide for Management. Overview Benefits of entity-level controls Nature of entity-level controls Types of entity-level controls, control objectives,
Performance Evaluation
New Supervisors’ Guide To Effective Supervision
Company: Cincinnati Insurance Company Position: IT Governance Risk & Compliance Service Manager Location: Fairfield, OH About the Company : The Cincinnati.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Physical Therapy Clinical Instructor Training Harriet Lewis, PT, MS Assistant Clinical Professor, Co ACCE.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
Performance Evaluations
Organizacional structure Rawhia salah Assistant Prof. of Nursing 2015/2016 Nursing Management and leadership 485.
Personnel.
School Learning Support Officers Working with the Primary Teacher
The ESP evaluation tool uses the same format as other WCSD employee groups’ evaluations. The ESP evaluation tool is aligned to ESPs’ roles and responsibilities.
Orientation to Practicum/Internship
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Performance Management
Coaching and Supervision:
PowerPoint to accompany:
First Impressions and an Ethical Foundation
Performance Management System
Auditor Training Module 1 – Audit Concepts and Definitions
Chapter 11 Management Functions and Decision Making
Bourbon County Schools
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Workplace Readiness Skills Personal Qualities and People Skills
EDU 675Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 675 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 675 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Human Resources Competency Framework
Competency Based Learning and Development
Objectives To define employability.
2017 Region 11: Core Competencies
Supporting Services Mentoring Program
Performance Review for County Educators
Performance Evaluations
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
Employee Performance Management System
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
Performance Review for County Educators
Workplace Readiness Skills and Professionalism in the Workplace
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
Gem Complete Health Services
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Performance Management and Appraisal
Competency Reflections
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Procedures for Classified Employees

The evaluation procedures for classified employees should incorporate the following principles: Accurate and fair assessment Ongoing, specific feedback Professional development recommendations Opportunities for evaluator-evaluatee discussion Completed online within the Frontline Performance Management/MLP system

Standards and Indicators The evaluation form represents a formal summary of the employee’s performance. All four standards must be addressed on the evaluation form. Each employee’s evaluation form contains performance standards and indicators which reflect the breadth of the job description. The list of performance indicators under each performance standard is not exhaustive and is not intended to be prescriptive.

Standard 1 Quality of Work The employee Performs job related tasks efficiently and effectively Plans, organizes, and prioritizes assignments to meet goals and deadlines Completes assigned duties accurately and in a timely manner Demonstrates knowledge of job specific tools, materials, and methods Maintains a neat and organized work environment

Standard 2 Job Knowledge The employee Demonstrates an understanding of LCPS policies and procedures Applies job specific knowledge and skills to assigned responsibilities and duties Utilizes appropriate resources, materials, and methods Acquires skills necessary to perform duties accurately Utilizes best practices and LCPS requirements in safety and security

Standard 3 Professionalism The employee Maintains a positive, respectful, and collaborative professional relationship with co-workers, supervisor, and community Demonstrates dependability, reliability, and responsiveness Displays flexibility when performing non-routine tasks Communicates in an appropriate and professional manner Maintains confidentiality and professional integrity Wears clothing that is appropriate for a professional, educational environment Is punctual and adheres to LCPS leave policies

Standard 4 Judgement and Leadership The employee Uses informed reasoning and good judgement when making decisions Informs his/her supervisor of an incident, event, or occurrence that may require attention or additional resources Works in an independent and self-directed manner Takes initiative to propose solutions and implement plans Coordinates with colleagues to perform responsibilities effectively

Complete Information The Evaluation Handbook and the LCPS Timeline for Classified Employees may be found on the intranet under Personnel. From the Human Resources and Talent Development page, click Oasys/Evaluations.