Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Our Future:
Advertisements

Harris Creek Case Study: Oyster Restoration and GIT Collaboration Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board August 2, 2012 Peyton Robertson Fisheries Goal.
Salmon Conservation, Culture and Economy
1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO Action Plan, Progress Report.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.
The National Aquaculture Policy and The State Shellfish Initiative Perry Lund Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program 17 November 2011.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
By: Scott Rakes February 18, 2010 Endangered Species.
Being Accountable/Communicating Assessment Information to the Public in 2012 Update to the Management Board April 2012 Margaret Enloe, ACB CBPO and Nita.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
Cape Fear River Fisheries Restoration: An Economic Engine October 31, 2013 Dawn York, Coastal Scientist October 31, 2013 Dawn York, Coastal Scientist.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
Chesapeake Bay: An Introduction to an Ecosystem Section 4: Habitats II-1D View this quiz as a slide show from “the beginning” During the slide show, you.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,
Chesapeake Bay Initiatives John Kennedy VA DEQ, Chesapeake Bay Program
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Visual Decision Frameworks –Habitat GIT Adaptive Management based on annual review. Share progress and address challenges and opportunities Adjust management.
Abridged Chesapeake Bay Agreement: Initial Reactions WRTC September 6, 2013.
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
International Union for Conservation of Nature Conserving biodiversity Pioneering nature’s solutions to global challenges.
Planning for Restoration at the Landscape Scale: Desert LCC Case Study National Forest Foundation Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26-27, 2016.
Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment Context for Council Activities – Action Plan Guiding Principles (p. 5) Ecologically sustainable development.
Framework for Water Management – challenges at national/local and trans-boundary scale Water Framework Directive implementation Gordana Kozhuharova, REC,
Chesapeake Bay Program
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
CRC Staffer Update Megan Hession Habitat Goal Implementation Team.
Pa’s Most Mighty Migratory Fish
Tidal wetlands.
Section 1: What Is an Ecosystem?
Watersheds Review Science 8 SOL.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Tidal Wetlands and Shorelines in the Chesapeake Bay
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Chesapeake Bay Program Updates
Quarterly Progress Meeting - May 2017
Quarterly Progress Meeting - August 2017
Watershed Implementation Plan
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System (DRAFT) October 31, 2016 (DRAFT)
Intro to Stream Monitoring
Riparian Forest Buffers
Chesapeake Bay
We often celebrate trees…
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System DRAFT August 29, 2016 DRAFT 12/4/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
2016 – 17 Bay Barometer.
Local Government Advisory Committee
What’s an Estuary?.
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
Bay Grass Abundance 42% Bay Grass Abundance of Goal Achieved
LGAC Input on Outcomes.
Monitoring & Assessment, Adaptation Outcomes
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
CBP Organizational Structure
Striped bass: Predators and Prey
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program State of the Program: 2015 Chesapeake Executive Council Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program

Interconnectedness & Resiliency: A Journey Through the Watershed Today, I want to depart from the kind of State of the Program presentations that have been given in the past. I want instead to highlight what I consider to be one of the most important features of the new Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement, the inter-relationships and inter-dependence of the goals and outcomes which reflect how natural eco-systems are structured and function; sharing the ways that our work as Bay Program partners under the new agreement mirrors the structure of a healthy and complex ecosystem. To illustrate this, I plan to guide you on journey through the Watershed Agreement by describing the life of one of its inhabitants, a fish – the American shad. American shad are the most well-known river herring in the Chesapeake Bay. Shad form an important link in the Bay’s food web, and once supported the most valuable finfish fishery in the region. But pollution, historic overfishing and the construction of dams that block the migratory fish from reaching their spawning grounds have lowered shad populations. Commercial shad harvest is now closed across most of the region Their life’s journey through the ecosystem shows how incredibly important it is for all of the interconnected Bay systems to be balanced and healthy – not just for them but for all the Bay’s organisms, including us. Interconnectedness & Resiliency: A Journey Through the Watershed

Shad are one of the Chesapeake’s many anadromous fish – meaning they spawn in the upper, freshwater-reaches of the Bay’s tributaries and live their adult lives in the ocean, passing through all of the various waters of the Bay system. They start life as eggs, laid in fresh waters of the upper rivers of our Bay by adults who’ve made the long trip upstream. Because of our work to conserve lands and create forest buffers, there are clean waters that will support these river hatcheries for shad. And when a watershed is healthy and waters are clean, conditions are right not only for eggs to be laid and to hatch…. but also for streams to be full of insects and small creatures for the newly hatched shad fry to eat and thrive over their first summer, spent in fresh waters.

After spending their first summer in fresh waters, shad move downstream in the fall in schools, traveling alongside us and through a variety of environments – from rural and forested landscapes, to urban and suburban communities.

A species that is particularly sensitive to pollution, they are found in only cleaner tributaries. Because of our efforts to reduce pollution and toxins while also creating favorable fish habitats, they do best in clean waters with places where they can find shelter from predators, such as wetlands and underwater grass beds, alongside other creatures like vulnerable softshell crabs. This is why the new Agreement contains a continued commitment from each of the jurisdictions to the Watershed Implementation Plans. Underwater grasses serve as an important habitat for spawning fish and crabs. The Bay Program conducts annual aerial surveys of grass beds throughout the Bay. Next week we will be releasing the results of the 2014 survey, which will show that there has been an increase in the total acreage of grass beds throughout the Bay and a substantial increase in the middle Bay. Earlier this month, the Chesapeake Bay Stock Assessment Committee released its annual blue crab advisory report, which found that there were approximately 101 million female spawning-age crabs in the Chesapeake Bay at the start of the 2015 crabbing season. This is above the established threshold of 70 million, but not as many as the target of 215 million. Numbers of juvenile crabs are up from last year, as well. It is estimated that there were 269 million juvenile crabs in the Bay at the start of 2015 crabbing season. Some of these crabs will mature to be adults, and will be big enough to be harvested in early fall as well as contribute to next year’s spawning stock.

The young shad who reach the Bay will pass through to the ocean, where they will grow to adulthood. But first, they will continue to play an integral part of the saltwater food web, feeding off the bottom-dwelling worms and algae found in places like healthy oyster bars, and serving as forage fish – nutritious food for larger species such as rockfish and bluefish. The new agreement recognizes the importance of forage fish to the health of the Bay in providing a balanced ecosystem. The Forage Fish Outcome requires the partnership to develop a strategy for assessing the forage fish base as a food for predatory species with the aim of establishing a more balanced system.

As adults, shad will begin their journey in reverse, leaving the ocean, passing through healthy Bay waters and returning to our freshwater rivers and streams to spawn again.

Near Fletcher’s Boathouse, D.C. Along the way, a few will serve as sport for the recreational catch-and-release fishery. In addition to the ongoing challenges related to predation, as well as nutrient and sediment pollution and changing natural conditions, . . .their major challenge is navigating blockages such as dams, something they can not do with out the help of man-made fish passages. In May, the Bay Program announced the latest shad population numbers at Fletchers Cove along the Potomac. Between 2000 and 2014, we have seen a four-fold increase in the total shad population watershed-wide. The shad population in the Potomac is at 130% of its target; in the Rappahannock, 111%. In the York, the shad population more than doubled from 23% to 58% of its goal. Clearly we are making progress. Photo: Tom Guffain Near Fletcher’s Boathouse, D.C.

Bloede Dam, Patapsco River, Maryland Slated for removal Where shad populations have not recovered, like the James and the Susquehanna, we know why. Where water quality is good, where restrictions such as dams have been removed or fish ladders have been installed, where the fishery has been managed and re-stocked, we see shad populations rebound. The picture above is the Bloede Dam on the Patapsco River in Maryland which is slated for removal. There is a cultural component to the shad fishery as well. Communities in the watershed knew when the shad were running by when the “shadbush” blossomed. Linkages between humans and the natural environment like this have been lost over time. We are no longer in sync with the ecosystem. NOTE: The shadbush (which this is actually NOT a picture of afterall) -- also known as the serviceberry, shadblow and juneberry -- once served as cultural indicator of the start of shad fishing season for local communities in the watershed, because it blooms around the same time shad return to their spawning grounds in the Bay’s freshwater rivers and streams. Bloede Dam, Patapsco River, Maryland Slated for removal

Just as biological and ecological diversity build strong natural systems, Diversity in our restoration and conservation efforts will strengthen our work and our communities. While the Partnership has always been open to anyone willing to participate, over the past two year, with the development of the new agreement and its Management Strategies, our teams have actively sought public input on our work from individuals, organizations and communities, some of whom we had not previously engaged; With strong leadership from our Goal Implementation Team and Advisory Committee chairs, we have drawn on expertise from new groups such as the Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture, the Black Duck Joint Venture, the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives and local governments to help us improve our range of expertise and increase our understanding of the connections between these natural and human systems, as well as understanding the challenges of local implementation.

We need more adult shad to be able to make it upstream – just like we need to re-double our efforts as a partnership to restore this ecosystem. Through the life of a shad, we have traveled from fresh water streams to salt water marshes and the ocean and back upstream again – touching on many of the goals of the Watershed Agreement, illustrating how each is a critical link – both in the life cycle of the fish but in our collaborative efforts, too. I touched on more than half of the Outcomes for restoration: Protected Lands, Healthy Watersheds & Riparian Forest Buffers Water Quality, Toxics & Stream Health Fish Habitat & Fish Passage Wetlands & Underwater Grasses Oysters, Crabs and Forage Fish And Stewardship, Environmental Literacy and Diversity – which are vital to the health of every part of the ecosystem…including our communities. And finally climate resiliency Through this one fish, we can see how every part of the Agreement is connected to every other part and how all are essential if we want Abundant Life, Vital Habitats, Clean Water, and Engaged Citizens that can support and strengthen the Bay watershed’s resilience to challenges like Climate Change.

Through the new Watershed Agreement and the work we’ve done over the last year, we continue to break down some of the institutional boundaries and bureaucratic barriers that slow our progress. We are building a more collaborative future for the partnership, mirroring the way an ecosystem works in more ways than we have before. The Management Strategies that we present to you today are equally connected and fully integrated with each other, just as the Bay Program management structure and operations have become more integrated and coordinated. We are currently developing two-year workplans, – which carry over from the Executive Council’s vision and decisions made in 2009 to have not only long-term goals, but also short-term targets -- to enable us to measure and report on our progress, to use that information to make adjustments in our approaches and strategies as appropriate through a scientifically rigorous adaptive management process, to hold ourselves accountable to the public, to make our information more accessible and our decision-making more transparent.

In closing, I’ll state my belief that the Chesapeake Bay Watershed is one that, although still impaired, shows definite signs of resilience and recovery. Our ever-improving science tells us that it will take time for us to see the fruits of our work, just as it took time for the damage to be done and manifest itself. The signs of resilience across the watershed tell us that it’s worth our continued dedication and commitment to improve and strengthen our work and to continue to rebuild the natural support systems that will further its recovery and restore the balance of this important ecosystem. Your commitment in signing the 2014 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement provides us with a management and accountability framework, with clearer goals and outcomes, more opportunity for collaboration and coordination, greater accountability and transparency and improved access to the latest science to advance our restoration efforts. On behalf of the Principals Staff Committee, I have the honor to present to the Executive Council members the Program’s final Management Strategies. We look forward now, with your guidance, assistance and support, to implementing them over the next 10 years. www.chesapeakebay.net/watershedagreement www.chesapeakebay.net/managementstrategies