The matrix is a decision-making tool

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Advertisements

Student Growth Measures Category “B” Teachers VENDOR (STAR)
How to Understand and Interpret Reports in the IBTP Heather P. Wright Polk County Schools Created by Heather P. Wright, Polk County Schools.
Student Growth Percentile Model Question Answered
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
NORMAL CURVE Needed for inferential statistics. Find percentile ranks without knowing all the scores in the distribution. Determine probabilities.
Normal Distributions What is a Normal Distribution? Why are Many Variables Normally Distributed? Why are Many Variables Normally Distributed? How Are Normal.
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Model
Other Measures of Student Academic Progress What should we know about how to include other measures of student academic progress? 0 August 2012.
99th Percentile 1st Percentile 50th Percentile What Do Percentiles Mean? Percentiles express the percentage of students that fall below a certain score.
1 New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Districtwide Metrics. Early Childhood Performance at a Glance SY 10-11SY 11-12SY 12-13**SY 13-14SY SY DistrictProviderDistrictProviderDistrictProviderDistrictProviderOne.
Joint Meeting of the Commissioner’s and AYP Task Force October 14, 2010 NH DOE 1Joint Task Force Meeting: October 14, 2010.
Student Learning Growth Details November 27 th and November 29th.
Using Student Growth Percentiles in Educator Evaluations
Assessing Charter School Performance: Tools for Predicting and Monitoring the Academic and Financial Risk of Charter Schools.
New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.
 z – Score  Percentiles  Quartiles  A standardized value  A number of standard deviations a given value, x, is above or below the mean  z = (score.
SGP Logic Model Provides a method that enables SGP data to contribute to performance evaluation when data are missing. The distribution of SGP data combined.
Steps for Using SGP Data in Performance Evaluation 1.Prepare and summarize data to show the number and percent of students demonstrating low growth, moderate.
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda:
Using Student Growth Percentiles in Educator Evaluations.
NH Commissioner’s Task Force Meeting September 21, 2010 NH DOE 1 Commissioner's Task Force Meeting: September 21, 2010.
Measures of Variability Percentile Rank. Comparison of averages is not enough. Consider a class with the following marks 80%, 80%, 80%, 90%, 20%, 70%,
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
Median Student Growth Percentile For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 ONGL-12/15/14.
Module 2: Joint Committee Decisions Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.
DISTRICT NAME HERE Using Student Growth Percentiles (Option A)
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA LAW CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TPGES SUMMATIVE OVERALL PERFORMANCE CATEGORY The Whole is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts…Putting It All Together.
MOBERLY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S 2008 TERRA NOVA RESULTS FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION NANCY FLEMING DISTRICT TEST COORDINATOR MOBERLY.
October 24, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Accountability and Reporting Oregon Department of Education.
Unit 3: Averages and Variations Part 3 Statistics Mr. Evans.
AZLEARNS Evaluations AZ LEARNS Evaluations.
2011 – 2012 School Year. * Walk-Throughs * Observation(s) * Pre-/Post-Evaluation Form * Year-End Evaluation * Summative Score Report.
Case Closed The New SAT Chapter 2 AP Stats at LSHS Mr. Molesky The New SAT Chapter 2 AP Stats at LSHS Mr. Molesky.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
{ SAGA & Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 Student Academic Growth Assessment & the Teacher Evaluation System Teachers are...
How the CAP Science and Social Studies Tests Measure Student Growth.
About My Fitness Test Results UNIT 1 By _______________________ P5– Interpret their test results and personal level of fitness. M2 – Explain their test.
TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)
It Begins With How The CAP Tests Were Designed
Welcome to the NMTEACH Summative Report Webinar 2015
Scoring the Technical Evaluation Maximum possible score
Understanding the District Level Growth and Achievement Report
IT’S ALL ABOUT GROWTH!. Hemet Unified School District’s Use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
الوحدة 20 مهارات التواصل مع الآخرين
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations
Using Student Growth Percentiles in Educator Evaluations
CORE Academic Growth Model: Results Interpretation
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Summative Reports Data Interpretation
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated
New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Chapter 3 The Normal Distribution
Evaluation and Assessment of the Individual: Week 2 Discussion
College/Career Ready for All
12.4 – Measures of Position In some cases, the analysis of certain individual items in the data set is of more interest rather than the entire set. It.
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Wednesday, December 1st Today’s Facilitators: Kim Glow & Cindy Dollman
Staff Finalization Using Thoughtful Classroom
Survey of Super LEAs Evaluation Systems
Student Growth Measures
Median: middle score - half of the data will fall below the median When data is placed in order… - half of the data will fall below the median.
Spring 2019 MCAS Grade 10 Annotated Parent/Guardian Reports
Presentation transcript:

The matrix is a decision-making tool The matrix is a decision-making tool. It is the instrument that bring two inputs (PP/PR and SLG) together to help you make a decision for the final performance level you need to report. Districts use the thresholds established by ODE to determine the rating for each axis. The Y axis represents overall performance related to Professional practice and responsibility and the X axis represents overall performance related to student learning and growth. It is important to note that the matrix is not a uniform percent model, and that by design the Y axis has more influence on the overall score (summative rating) than the X axis. For example, if you score a 4 on the Y-axis (PP/PR) and a 1 on the X-axis (SLG), the matrix shows that you’re still a 3 overall. In a 50/50 percentage model, you would be a 2.5. Going back to our example of Mr. Waters, recall that he had an SGP score of 3, and an SLG score of 3 which made his overall rating on the X axis a 3. Mr. Water’s professional practice and responsibility rating on the Y axis was a 3. You can see that with a 3 on the Y axis and a 3 on the X axis the overall rating is a 3 which would mean a Collegial path. This means that paths for professional growth are developed jointly by the educator and evaluator. Even if Mr. Waters had scored a 2 overall on the X axis he would still be a 3 overall and on the Collegial path. *Inquiry Process

Median Student Growth Percentile Criteria   Percentiles Median Student Growth Percentile Criteria 1 to 34 35 to 49 50 to 64 65 to 99 Category 1 SLG Rating 1 2 3 4 Interpretation Low growth Below average growth Above average growth High growth