Welcome to today’s Webinar We will begin shortly

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Community College Technical Center MIS Race/Ethnicity (R/E) Final Guidance for i mplementing OMB Race/Ethnicity.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
Reporting Race/Ethnicity Data PRESENTATION INFO HERE.
CIVIL RIGHTS DATA COLLECTION National Forum: PPI Committee: 2011 MIS Meeting.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) & ESEA Consolidated Application April 2009 — Part 2 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Changes to IPEDS Race and Ethnicity Reporting Fall 2010.
Title I Update  Preliminary Allocations were released to LEAs and Superintendents 2 weeks ago.  No word on final allocations, yet.  Submitted our FLEX.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Data Quality & the Consolidated District Performance Report (CDPR) Jesse Parsons & Russ Sweet, Education Specialists Oregon Department of Education August.
10/17/2015 State Board of Education 1 ANNUAL REPORT ON GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION Academic Year
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
Diversity in Quality Improvement Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine March 11, 2009, early afternoon Hyatt Regency Hotel, 1107 Jamboree Road,
GaETC 2008: Keys to Continuous Improvement New Reporting Requirements for Race and Ethnicity Effective Levette Williams, GaDOE November, 2008.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Workshop: ETA 9134 (Part 1) Focusing on Sections A through C Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010 March 2011.
Proposed Changes to the Title I, Part D, Federal Data Collection As of June 28, 2012.
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
 Marcie L. Gray, Testing Coordinator Courtney M. King, Principal PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Data.
2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference May 22, 2012 “ Your Got IT! Navigating Title VI and VII Data Requirements for.
Oregon Department of Education April 2016 ECR Audits in Consolidated Special Education Spring Collection Data Conference.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
CENSUS 2000 DATA ON RACE, HISPANIC ORIGIN, AND ANCESTRY Nancy M. Gordon Associate Director for Demographic Programs U.S. Census Bureau March 2001.
1 Ross Santy Director, Performance Information Management Service U.S. Department of Education EDFacts Consolidating and Using K-12 Performance Data within.
EAST BROAD STREET K-8 SCHOOL Title 1 Annual parent Meeting
Point in Time January 22, 2016 Results.
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2009
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools,
Title I-A Coordinators Conversation
Student October Collection
Essential Skills Update Oregon State Board of Education March 8, 2012
PRRS Data Collection Tool Training
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general population.
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
PRRS Data Collection Tool Training
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2016
Seniors' Practice Location, 2015, 2016, and 2017
Title I Part A Reporting
Consolidated district performance report (CDPR)
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2017
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2015
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2018
Starting Community Conversations
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
Total Faculty by Race and Ethnicity,
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2009
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Alaska’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2018
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2016
How Closely Do District of Columbia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of District of.
New Reporting Requirements for Race and Ethnicity Effective
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
How Closely Do District of Columbia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of District of.
Director of ESEA Programs
How Closely Do Alaska’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
Title I Part A Reporting
How Closely Do Maine’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
Title I Participation Data Collection
How Closely Do District of Columbia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of District of.
How Closely Do Alaska’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to today’s Webinar We will begin shortly Materials can be found at the following website: https://district.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=234

2015-16 Consolidated District Performance Report (CDPR) ESEA CDPR Title I-A: Students and Programs 15 – 16 August 3, 2016

Agenda: Welcome Data Collection Window Support Materials Data Elements Explanation Changes for 2015-16 from last year

Support Materials Consolidated District Performance Report: Data Collection User Guide (March 24, 2016) Today’s PowerPoint Slides

Data Collection Window Opens August 11, 2016 Closes September 23, 2016

Items 1 – 32: Schoolwide Program Performance and Proficiency Levels in Reading and Math What is being requested These data points are asking how many students took statewide assessments in Math and Reading and how many students met or exceeded the proficiency level Performance Level Student Count means how many students completed the assessment and received a score? Proficient Level Student Count means of the Performance Level Student Count, how many students met or exceeded the proficiency level on the assessment?

Items 1 – 32: Schoolwide Program Performance and Proficiency Levels in Reading and Math Data Checks The District Performance level count must equal the combined total of the individual Grade-level Performance level counts The District Proficiency level count must equal the combined total of individual Grade-level Proficiency level counts The Proficiency level counts are a subset of the Performance level counts and therefore the total must be a lower number

Items 33 – 64: TAS Program Performance and Proficiency Levels in Reading and Math What is being requested These data points are asking how many students took statewide assessments in Math and Reading and how many students met or exceeded the proficiency level Performance Level Student Count means how many students completed the assessment and received a score? Proficient Level Student Count means of the Performance Level Student Count, how many students met or exceeded the proficiency level on the assessment?

Items 33 – 64: TAS Program Performance and Proficiency Levels in Reading and Math Data Checks The District Performance level count must equal the combined total of individual Grade-level Performance level counts. This count is for all students in the Title I building The District Proficiency level count must equal the combined total of individual Grade-level Proficiency level counts and includes all students in the school regardless of whether or not they were served in the TAS program The Proficiency level counts are a subset of the Performance level counts and therefore must be a lower number

Items 65 – 68: Students with Disabilities, Limited English Proficient, Homeless and Migrant Students What is being requested These data points are asking for an unduplicated count of how many students in these subgroups were served in both Targeted Assistance and Schoolwide programs. Some students may be counted in one or all of these categories depending on his/her designation Even if a child leaves and then returns to the building/district, he/she is only counted once within each appropriate category These counts are not included in other counts, but rather are a subset of those counts (to be clarified later)

Items 69 – 75: Race and Ethnicity What is being requested These data points are asking an unduplicated count of students by Race and Ethnicity who were served in both Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance programs. The total of all seven Race and Ethnicity categories are used by the USED to validate data elsewhere in the CDPR

Items 69 – 75: Race and Ethnicity Reporting Race and Ethnicity data for CDPR States must report the data in the following seven aggregated racial ethnic categories: Hispanic/Latino of any race (Note: Respondents who identify as Hispanic/Latino ethnicity will be reported as “Hispanic/Latino,” regardless of the race they identify.) For individuals who are non-Hispanic/Latino: American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African-American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander White Two or more races (Note: The “two or more races” category is used for only non-Hispanic/Latinos who identify multiple races.)

Items 69 – 75: Race and Ethnicity Data Checks It is important to count each student in only one Race/Ethnicity category The total of all seven Race/Ethnicity categories will be used to validate other counts (to be described later)

Items 76 – 91: Title IA TAS Student Count Items 92 – 107: Title IA SWP Program Student Count What is being requested These data points are asking an unduplicated count of students by Age and Grade level who were served in both Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance programs. In Schoolwide programs this means all students In Targeted Assistance programs this means only those students who were served in the program The total counts in both SWP and TAS is used by the USED to validate data elsewhere in the CDPR

A word about Ungraded Student Count (Item 91 (TAS) and Item 107 (SWP)) What is being requested This is only to be used when a school operates an ungraded system as opposed to designating students as Grade 1, Grade 2, etc. This data point is not the sum of students reported in the “other” age and grade categories.

Items 76 – 107 Age and Grade Data Checks It is important to count each student only once regardless of whether they exited and then re-entered the program or school The total count of both TAS and/or SWP participants must equal the total count of all Race/Ethnicity categories

Items 108 – 123 Private School Participation What is being requested These data points are asking an unduplicated count of students by Age and Grade level who were served in Private School Title I-A program Please note that Item 123 is requesting an Ungraded Student Count. Use this only if the Private School does not designate students by individual grade levels (e.g., Grade 1, etc.)

Items 124 – 150: Remaining Items What is being requested Items 124 – 139 are for those districts that received funding for neglected students in their Title I-A allocation Items 140 – 145 is the count of students who received supplemental services through Title I-A in various core content areas Items 146 – 150 is count and/or comment about other services under Title I-A

Contact Information For Data Questions Russ Sweet, Education Specialist (503) 947-5638 russ.sweet@state.or.us Emily Swope, Administrative Support (503) 947-5642 emily.swope@state.or.us For problems with the web-based tool ODE Helpdesk (503) 947-5715 ode.helpdesk@state.or.us