Approximation Employed in Spontaneous Emission Theory / D. F

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interferometric Measurement of Spatial Wigner Functions of Light Bryan Killett Brian J. Smith M. G. Raymer Funded by the NSF through the REU and ITR programs.
Advertisements

Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 8. Semiclassical Radiation Theory 8.1 Introduction Semiclassical theory of light-matter interaction (Ch. 6-7)
METO 621 Lesson 6. Absorption by gaseous species Particles in the atmosphere are absorbers of radiation. Absorption is inherently a quantum process. A.
Quantum trajectories for the laboratory: modeling engineered quantum systems Andrew Doherty University of Sydney.
Q.E.D. (Quantum Electro Dynamics) Physics 43, SRJC, spring 2008 Richard P. Feynman (the father of Quantum Electro Dynamics)
Quantum Computing with Trapped Ion Hyperfine Qubits.
Some quantum properties of light Blackbody radiation to lasers.
Scattering: Raman and Rayleigh 0 s i,f 0 s 0 s i Rayleigh Stokes Raman Anti-Stokes Raman i f f nnn
PH 401 Dr. Cecilia Vogel. Review Outline  Time dependent perturbations  integrating out the time  oscillatory perturbation  stimulated emission (laSEr)
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011 Karine Chesnel.
– Atom in its normal (non-excited) state – Atom in excited state Definition of the symbols:
Acceleration-induced spontaneous excitation of a ground state atom: Transition Rate A. Calogeracos (HAFA, Greece) with G. Barton (Sussex, UK) Leipzig,
PG lectures Spontaneous emission. Outline Lectures 1-2 Introduction What is it? Why does it happen? Deriving the A coefficient. Full quantum description.
The semiclassical Rabi problem. We have a two level atom,with We look for the solution of the Schrödinger equation as: The atom has a hamiltonian: The.
Suprit Singh Talk for the IUCAA Grad-school course in Inter-stellar medium given by Dr. A N Ramaprakash 15 th April 2KX.
The Harmonic Oscillator
Vibrational Spectroscopy
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Chapter 18 Bose-Einstein Gases Blackbody Radiation 1.The energy loss of a hot body is attributable to the emission of electromagnetic waves from.
Average Lifetime Atoms stay in an excited level only for a short time (about 10-8 [sec]), and then they return to a lower energy level by spontaneous emission.
10 lectures. Mo 3 pm Mon 3 pm Tue 3 pm Wed 3 pm ( 2 x 45 ) Wed 3 pm ( 2 x 45) Thu 3 pm Fri 3 pm.
Bohr and Quantum Mechanical Model Mrs. Kay Chem 11A.
Absorption and Emission of Radiation:
Collective Vibration In general, forbidden – density change! forbidden – CM moves! OK... λ=0 λ=1 λ=2 λ=3 time.
Ch ; Lecture 26 – Quantum description of absorption.
Quantization via Fractional Revivals Quantum Optics II Cozumel, December, 2004 Carlos Stroud, University of Rochester Collaborators:
مدرس المادة الدكتور :…………………………
Semilinear Response Michael Wilkinson (Open University), Bernhard Mehlig (Gothenburg University), Doron Cohen (Ben Gurion University) A newly discovered.
Simple Harmonic Oscillator (SHO) Quantum Physics II Recommended Reading: Harris: chapter 4 section 8.
Atomic transitions and electromagnetic waves
For long wavelength, compared to the size of the atom The term containing A 2 in the dipole approximation does not involve atomic operators, consequently.
Electromagnetism Around 1800 classical physics knew: - 1/r 2 Force law of attraction between positive & negative charges. - v ×B Force law for a moving.
Physics Lecture 11 3/2/ Andrew Brandt Monday March 2, 2009 Dr. Andrew Brandt 1.Quantum Mechanics 2.Schrodinger’s Equation 3.Wave Function.
REVIEW OF QUANTUM MECHANICS IMRANA ASHRAF ZAHID DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS QUAID-I-AZAM UNIVERSITY ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN.
Time Dependent Perturbation Theory
Shanxi University Atomic Physics Chapter 7 The interaction of atoms with radiation Atomic Physics.
Absorption Small-Signal Loss Coefficient. Absorption Light might either be attenuated or amplified as it propagates through the medium. What determines.
Optical Vortices and Electric Quadrupole transitions James Bounds.
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2012 Karine Chesnel.
QM2 Concept Test 14.3 Choose all of the following statements that are correct when incoherent thermal radiation acts as a perturbation on the hydrogen.
Einstein’s coefficients represent a phenomenological description of the matter-radiation interaction Prescription for computing the values of the A and.
Saturation Roi Levy. Motivation To show the deference between linear and non linear spectroscopy To understand how saturation spectroscopy is been applied.
Quantum Mechanics for Applied Physics
(Instrument part) Thanundon Kongnok M
Quantum optics Eyal Freiberg.
QUANTUM TRANSITIONS WITHIN THE FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION REAL FUNCTIONAL
FDTD Modeling of FID Signal in Chirped-Pulse Millimeter Wave Spectroscopy Alexander Heifetz1, Sasan Bakhtiari1, Hual-Teh Chien1, Stephen Gray1, Kirill.
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Charge in very strong EM field
Time Dependent Perturbation Theory
Open quantum systems.
CHAPTER 6 Structure of the Atom
Ultrafast processes in molecules
Remote tuning of an optical resonator
The Bohr Model of the Atom
Kyle Schmitt University of Tennessee December 4, 2008
Interactions of Electromagnetic Radiation
Quantum mechanics II Winter 2012
Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory
Do all the reading assignments.
Perturbation Theory Lecture 5.
Nonleptonic Two Body Decays of Charmed Mesons
H’(t)=E-M field D  = - fi Transition dipole moment.
It means anything not quadratic in fields and derivatives.
Chapter II Klein Gordan Field Lecture 1 Books Recommended:
Perturbation Theory Lecture 5.
Linear Vector Space and Matrix Mechanics
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #20
Lecture 15: Time-Dependent Perturbation
Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian
Presentation transcript:

Approximation Employed in Spontaneous Emission Theory / D. F Approximation Employed in Spontaneous Emission Theory / D.F. Walls and C.W. Gardiner (Physics Letters 41A (1972)) Roy Elkabetz

Outline Motivation Atom – Field Hamiltonian Derivation of the Wigner - Weisskopf approximations Comparison between the R.W.A and the Ladder approximation Conclusions

Motivation Solving Schrodinger’s equation using non – perturbative methods Introduce the equivalence of the WWI approximation to the RWA Show the resemblance between the RWA, the Ladder approximation and the WWI approximation

Two level Atom in radiation field Hamiltonian Background Two level Atom in radiation field Hamiltonian radiation atom 𝐻= 𝐻 0 + 𝐻 1 𝐻 0 = 𝑘 ℏ 𝜔 𝑘 𝑎 𝑘 † 𝑎 𝑘 +ℏ𝜔 𝜎 𝑧 𝑔> <𝑒 atomic operator 𝐻 1 = 𝑗 ℏ 𝜅 𝑗 𝑎 𝑗 † + 𝑎 𝑗 𝜎 + + 𝜎 − coupling constant creation of photon annihilation of photon

Derivation of the Wigner - Weisskopf Approximations Wigner – Weisskopf Ι approximation (WWΙ) |𝑒,0> excited atom, no photons |𝑔, 1 𝑘 > atom in ground state, one photon in mode 𝑘 𝜓 𝑡 > = 𝑐 0 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 0 𝑡 𝑒,0> + 𝑘 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 𝑘 𝑡 |𝑔, 1 𝑘 > 𝜔 0 is the Bohr frequency 𝜔 𝑘 =𝑐𝑘

Derivation of the Wigner - Weisskopf Approximations Wigner – Weisskopf Ι approximation (WWΙ) 𝜓 𝑡 > = 𝑐 0 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 0 𝑡 𝑒,0> + 𝑘 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 𝑘 𝑡 |𝑔, 1 𝑘 > 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 𝑛 𝑡 = 𝑐 0 𝑡 𝑒 𝑖 𝜔 𝑛0 𝑡 <𝑔, 1 𝑛 𝐻 1 𝑒,0> 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 0 𝑡 = 𝑘 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 𝑘0 𝑡 <𝑒,0 𝐻 1 𝑔, 1 𝑘 > 𝜔 𝑘0 =: 𝜔 𝑘 − 𝜔 0

Derivation of the Wigner - Weisskopf Approximations Wigner – Weisskopf Ι approximation (WWΙ) 𝜓 𝑡 > = 𝑐 0 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 0 𝑡 𝑒,0> + 𝑘 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 𝑘 𝑡 |𝑔, 1 𝑘 > 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 𝑛 𝑡 = 𝑐 0 𝑡 𝑒 𝑖 𝜔 𝑛0 𝑡 <𝑔, 1 𝑛 𝐻 1 𝑒,0> 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 0 𝑡 = 𝑘 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 𝑘0 𝑡 <𝑒,0 𝐻 1 𝑔, 1 𝑘 > The WWΙ Approximation

Derivation of the Wigner - Weisskopf Approximations Solving for 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑐 0 𝑡=0 =1 𝑐 𝑛 𝑡=0 =0 Initial conditions: ⇒ 𝑐 𝑛 𝑡 = 1 𝑖ℏ 0 𝑡 𝑑 𝑡 ′ 𝑐 0 𝑡 ′ 𝑒 𝑖 𝜔 𝑛0 𝑡 ′ <𝑔, 1 𝑛 𝐻 1 𝑒,0> 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 0 𝑡 = 𝑘 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 𝑘0 𝑡 <𝑒,0 𝐻 1 𝑔, 1 𝑘 >

Derivation of the Wigner - Weisskopf Approximations Solving for 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 0 𝑡 =−𝑖 𝜔 0 𝑐 0 0 − 1 ℏ 2 𝑛 <𝑔, 1 𝑛 𝐻 1 𝑒,0> 2 0 𝑡 𝑑 𝑡 ′ 𝑐 0 𝑡 ′ 𝑒 𝑖 𝜔 𝑛0 ( 𝑡 ′ −𝑡) Defining the next transformation: 𝛼 𝑡 = 𝑐 0 𝑡 𝑒 𝑖 𝜔 0 𝑡 𝒩 𝑡 = 1 ℏ 2 𝑛 <𝑔, 1 𝑛 𝐻 1 𝑒,0> 2 𝑒 𝑖 𝜔 0 − 𝜔 𝑛 𝑡

Derivation of the Wigner - Weisskopf Approximations Solving for 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 0 𝑡 =−𝑖 𝜔 0 𝑐 0 0 − 1 ℏ 2 𝑛 <𝑔, 1 𝑛 𝐻 1 𝑒,0> 2 0 𝑡 𝑑 𝑡 ′ 𝑐 0 𝑡 ′ 𝑒 𝑖 𝜔 𝑛0 ( 𝑡 ′ −𝑡) ⇓ 𝑑 𝑑𝑡 𝛼 𝑡 =− 0 𝑡 𝑑𝜏𝒩 𝜏 𝛼(𝑡−𝜏) 𝜏=𝑡− 𝑡 ′

Derivation of the Wigner - Weisskopf Approximations Wigner – Weisskopf ΙΙ approximation (WWΙΙ) Markov Process: A Markov process is a process where a future outcome of a system depends only on the present state of itself and not on former states from the past. Memoryless Process

Derivation of the Wigner - Weisskopf Approximations Wigner – Weisskopf ΙΙ approximation (WWΙΙ) 𝑑 𝑑𝑡 𝛼 𝑡 =− 0 𝑡 𝑑𝜏𝒩 𝜏 𝛼(𝑡−𝜏) Recall: WWΙΙ approximation ~ Markov process ⟹ 𝑑 𝑑𝑡 𝛼 𝑡 ≃−𝛼(𝑡) 0 ∞ 𝑑𝜏𝒩 𝜏

Derivation of the Wigner - Weisskopf Approximations Wigner – Weisskopf ΙΙ approximation (WWΙΙ) ⟹ 𝑐 0 𝑡 = 𝑒 − Γ 𝑏 2 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 0 + Δ 𝑏 𝑡 The probability to stay in |𝑒,0> : P 𝑡 = 𝑐 0 𝑡 2 = 𝑒 − Γ 𝑏 𝑡 Exponential Decay

R.W.A and Ladder Approximation Rotating Wave approximation (RWA) 𝐻 1 𝑅𝑊𝐴 =ℏ 𝑗 𝜅 𝑗 ( 𝑎 𝑗 𝜎 + + 𝑎 𝑗 † 𝜎 − ) Annihilate a photon and excite the atom create a photon and atom in ground state The RWA holds for weak intensity and for 𝜔≈ 𝜔 0

R.W.A and Ladder Approximation Equivalence of WWΙ and RWA 𝐻 1 𝑅𝑊𝐴 =ℏ 𝑗 𝜅 𝑗 ( 𝑎 𝑗 𝜎 + + 𝑎 𝑗 † 𝜎 − ) ⇓ 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 𝑛 𝑡 = 𝑐 0 𝑡 𝑒 𝑖 𝜔 𝑛0 𝑡 <𝑔,𝑛 𝐻 1 𝑅𝑊𝐴 𝑒,0> 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 0 𝑡 = 𝑘 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 𝑘0 𝑡 <𝑒,0 𝐻 1 𝑅𝑊𝐴 𝑔,𝑘>

R.W.A and Ladder Approximation Equivalence of WWΙ and RWA We get the same set of equations as in the WWΙ approximation The WWΙ approximation and the RWA are equivalent 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 𝑛 𝑡 = 𝑐 0 𝑡 𝑒 𝑖 𝜔 𝑛0 𝑡 <𝑔,𝑛 𝐻 1 𝑅𝑊𝐴 𝑒,0> 𝑖ℏ 𝑐 0 𝑡 = 𝑘 𝑐 𝑘 𝑡 𝑒 −𝑖 𝜔 𝑘0 𝑡 <𝑒,0 𝐻 1 𝑅𝑊𝐴 𝑔,𝑘>

R.W.A and Ladder Approximation 𝐻= 𝐻 0 + 𝐻 𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝐻 0 = 𝑘 ℏ 𝜔 𝑘 𝑎 𝑘 † 𝑎 𝑘 +ℏ𝜔 𝜎 𝑧 𝐻 𝑖𝑛𝑡 =− 𝒑 ∙ 𝑨 ⊥ Atom basis: |1>, |0> Field basis: |0>, | 1 a >,| 2 a >,…,| n a −1>, | n a > Single photon approximation

R.W.A and Ladder Approximation Ladder Approximation: Diagrams Single photon approximation: | n a −1>, | n a > zero photon scattering, virtual transitions single photon scattering + virtual transitions Figure 1: Diagrams included in Ladder approximation

R.W.A and Ladder Approximation Ladder Approximation: Diagrams Figure 2: Diagrams excluded from Ladder approximation

R.W.A and Ladder Approximation Ladder Approximation: Another Diagrams Figure 3: a) Diagrams included in Ladder approximation. b) Diagrams excluded from Ladder approximation.

R.W.A and Ladder Approximation The Ladder and the WWI Approximations We sum over infinite number of terms Notice that |1, n a −1>, |0, n a > ~ |𝑒,0>, |𝑔, 1 𝑘 > Ladder basis WWI basis ⇒ The Ladder approximation and the WWI approximation has close resemblance

R.W.A and Ladder Approximation Ladder Approximation and RWA Under the assumptions: Single photon process Close to resonance ⇒ There is a close resemblance between the RWA and the Ladder approximation

For spontaneous emission of a two level atom in radiation field Conclusions For spontaneous emission of a two level atom in radiation field The RWA and the WWI approximation are equivalent Using the approximations above has a clear superiority over finite perturbation techniques Under proper assumptions the RWA and the Ladder approximation are with close resemblance

Thank You For Listening The End Thank You For Listening