European Urology Oncology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Advertisements

Cost of New Technologies in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy,
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Judith Bosschieter, André N. Vis, Henk G. van der Poel, Luc M
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
The Role of Radical Prostatectomy and Radiotherapy in Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Urol Int 2017;99:
The Effect of Other-cause Mortality Adjustment on Access to Alternative Treatment Modalities for Localized Prostate Cancer Among African American Patients 
Prostate Cancer: Highlights from 2006
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 73, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Hormone Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Exploring Current Controversies
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages (October 2018)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
What is New in Hormone Therapy for Prostate Cancer in 2007?
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
European Urology Oncology
Laurent Boccon-Gibod  European Urology Supplements 
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients  Timo F.W. Soeterik,
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
External Beam Radiotherapy as Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer
Current Status of Combined Radiation Therapy and Androgen Suppression in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: What Is the Way Forward?  Michel Bolla  European.
Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer  Valeria.
Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study  Stephen H. Culp, Paul.
Selma Masic, Janet E. Cowan, Samuel L. Washington, Hao G
European Urology Oncology
Risk Factors for the Development of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer
European Urology Oncology
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Optimal Control of Testosterone: A Clinical Case-Based Approach of Modern Androgen- Deprivation Therapy  Bertrand Tombal, Richard Berges  European Urology.
Impact of Biochemical Failure After Salvage Radiation Therapy on Prostate Cancer– specific Mortality: Competition Between Age and Time to Biochemical Failure 
European Urology Oncology
Satisfaction with Care Among Men with Localised Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Population-based Study  Oskar Bergengren, Hans Garmo, Ola Bratt, Lars Holmberg,
European Urology Oncology
Jacques Irani  European Urology Supplements 
European Urology Oncology
Is Robot-assisted Surgery Contraindicated in the Case of Partial Nephrectomy for Complex Tumours or Relevant Comorbidities? A Comparative Analysis of.
Optimizing the Timing of Salvage Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy and the Use of Concurrent Hormonal Therapy for Prostate Cancer  Amar U. Kishan, Rahul.
Long-Term Hormonal Therapy: Who Would Benefit?
European Urology Oncology
Improving Outcomes in Prostate Cancer: Time to Tackle Bone Disorders
Psychotherapeutic Interventions Targeting Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature  Liliana Vartolomei, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Mihai.
Correlations between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gleason Score in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review  Alexey Surov, Hans Jonas Meyer, Andreas.
Preventing Osteoporosis in Men Taking Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis  Joseph Sargon Joseph, Vincent.
European Urology Oncology
Axel Heidenreich  European Urology Supplements 
Improving Flexibility and Quality of Life for Your Patients: A Must?
European Urology Oncology
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Oncoforum Urology: Prostate Cancer 2008 at a Glance
Physical Function in Patients with Cancer
Axel Heidenreich  European Urology Supplements 
Does PSA Testing Influence the Natural History of Prostate Cancer?
European Urology Oncology
Salvage Local Treatments After Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Assessing a Patient’s Individual Risk of Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer: Be Aware of Case Mix Heterogeneity and A Priori Likelihood  Jan F.M. Verbeek,
European Urology Oncology
Presentation transcript:

European Urology Oncology Patient-reported Outcomes Following Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer and Their Association with Regret About Treatment Choices  Marie-Anne van Stam, Neil K. Aaronson, J.L.H. Ruud Bosch, Jacobien M. Kieffer, Jochem R.N. van der Voort van Zyp, Corinne N. Tillier, Simon Horenblas, Henk G. van der Poel  European Urology Oncology  DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.004 Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Recruitment, treatment, and follow-up. Patient-reported treatment information. aThe analytic cohort included those men who were diagnosed with a cT1 or cT2 tumour, started one of the four management strategies of interest, and completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one follow-up assessment. bSurgical technique: 186 robot-assisted laproscopic; prostatectomy; 5 open prostatectomy. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.004) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Association between initial treatment of prostate cancer and patient-reported outcomes. Higher scores indicate more symptoms or more distress. Data in the graphs are adjusted mean scores estimated by multivariable models that controlled for baseline domain score, age, comorbidity, and prostate cancer risk group. Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 contain unadjusted domain scores and number of patients for each subgroup by treatment. The purple shaded areas indicate the 99% confidence interval of the reference group (AS). For all scales except the Decision Regret Scale, baseline is defined as the mean baseline score of all patients included in the main analyses; a distinction between ER+ and ER− is made only when we observed significant differences between the ER subgroups (Supplementary Table 3); only pretreatment responses of patients who initially started active surveillance but changed to active treatment during follow-up were included in the analyses. AS=active surveillance; ASdisc.=changed to active treatment during active surveillance follow-up; BT=brachytherapy; CI=confidence interval; ER=external beam radiotherapy (with and without androgen deprivation therapy); ER+=external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy; ER−=external beam radiotherapy without androgen deprivation therapy; RP=radical prostatectomy. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.004) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions