Hierarchy of Decisions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy Efficient Steam Systems
Advertisements

PRESENTERS NDENGA D.L,ASSOCIATED BATTERY MANUFACTURERS,NAIROBI AND KILONZI F.M,MOI UNIVERSITY,ELDORET. APPLICATION OF PINCH TECHNOLOGY IN MINIMISATION.
Heat Exchanger Network Retrofit
Combustion Calculations
Thermal Power Station Plant. Introduction 150 MW Thermal power station plant, produce 450t/hr steam at full load The max steam pressure is 150 bar with.
Chapter 9 S,S&L T&S Section 3.5 Terry Ring University of Utah
Group Meeting #1 January 29 th, 2013 Michael Bentel Jeremy David Erik Peterson Arpit Shah 1.
Miscellaneous CHEN 4470 – Process Design Practice Dr. Mario Richard Eden Department of Chemical Engineering Auburn University Lecture No. 17 – Equipment.
“Energy Efficiency Guide for Industry in Asia”
Heat Exchanger Theory and Design
Heat and Power Integration CHEN 4460 – Process Synthesis, Simulation and Optimization Dr. Mario Richard Eden Department of Chemical Engineering Auburn.
MOCS Mike Hobbs Mike Steele Mike McGann Scott Daniels James Linder PBL-7-98 Chemical Heat Pump.
CWS 70ºF CWR 80ºF Cooling Tower Humid air Out with heat Dry air In Central Energy Plant A/C Unit Work EMCS 404 Chilled Water Supply 40ºF Chilled Water.
Heat and Power Integration CHEN 4460 – Process Synthesis, Simulation and Optimization Dr. Mario Richard Eden Department of Chemical Engineering Auburn.
UTC’s Central Energy Plant Humid air Out with heat Central Energy
Structure and Synthesis of Process Flow Diagrams ENCH 430 July 16, 2015 By: Michael Hickey.
Process Simulation and Integration of Methanol Production
ISAT Module V: Industrial Systems
Heat Exchange Network Optimization by Thermal Pinch Analysis
GROUP 11 MUHAMMAD FAIZ MOHD FUDZAILI MUHAMMAD FAUZI KHAMIS
Process Integration and Intensification Klemeš / Varbanov / Wan Alwi / Manan ISBN: © 2014 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Abbildungsübersicht.
University of Texas at AustinMichigan Technological University 1 Module 5: Process Integration of Heat and Mass Chapter 10 David R. Shonnard Department.
Plant Utility System (TKK-2210) 14/15 Semester 4 Instructor: Rama Oktavian Office Hr.: M-F
8 - Heat & Power Integration1 Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis, Part III Ref: Seider, Seader and Lewin (2004), Chapter 10.
Flow rates : Known Obtain : heat capacities (Cp) heat of vaporization/condensation Estimate : vapor loads in the column (design) Obtain heat loads of all.
Chapter 15 - Heat Exchange Networks
Heat Exchanger Network Design one aspect of process integration J. M. Shaw Instructor CHE 465 I would happily credit the authors who provided the example.
Heat Integration in Distillation Systems (1) Single Column.
Pinch technology series
6 - Intro HEN Synthesis1 Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis Part I: Introduction Ref: Seider, Seader and Lewin (2004), Chapter 10.
Summary for TEP 4215 E&P/PI T. Gundersen Reactor System (R)  Endothermic vs. Exothermic Reactions  Equilibrium vs. Kinetics  Temperature Dependence.
A. Aspelund, D. O. Berstad, T. Gundersen
Heat Integration Chapt. 10. Costs Heat Exchanger Purchase Cost – C P =K(Area) 0.6 Annual Cost –C A =i m [ΣC p,i + ΣC P,A,j ]+sF s +(cw)F cw i m =return.
Part 6 Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Networks. 6.1 Sequential Synthesis Minimum Utility Cost.
Pinch Technology: 기본 이론. Identify Opportunities by Inspection Process Unit 10 C 100 C 150 C 30 C SteamCooling Water FeedProduct An opportunity for heat.
Chapter 13 Pinch Technology
Area Target Section Stream Population j k Cold Streams Hot Streams H T QjQj enthalpy interval.
Heat Integration Chapter 9 S,S&L T&S Section 3.5 Terry Ring University of Utah.
Pinch Technology. Pinch technology 개요 Pinch technology systematic methodology for energy saving in processes and total sites Energy target Cross pinch.
Process design and integration Timo Laukkanen. The main objectives of this course To learn how to use tools that can be used to design heat recovery systems.
Pinch Technology and optimization of the use of utilities – part two Maurizio Fermeglia
Hierarchy of Decisions HEAT EXCHANGER NETWORK (HEN)
LECTURE DAY 2 Timo Laukkanen. What was important in Lecture 1 Process Integration/Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis (HENS) is an important step in process.
Unit 13 Oil-Burning Equipment
 II THE ADVANTAGES OF ELECTRICITY
Pinch Technology and optimization of the use of utilities – part two
Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Networks
LECTURE DAY 3 Timo Laukkanen.
Process design and integration
Euler’s network theorem
A biomass based 5 MW power plant operates on fuel wood
Hierarchy of Decisions
Pinch Technology and optimization of the use of utilities – part one
Program for North American Mobility in Higher Education
T H enthalpy interval Hot Streams Cold Streams Section Stream j
Process Equipment Design-III (CL 403)
Process design, process integration and energy system optimization
Chapter 8 Production of Power from Heat.
Sieder, Chapter 11 Terry Ring University of Utah
CH EN 5253 – Process Design II
SOME RESULTS IN GRAPH THEORY
Heat Integration in Distillation Systems
Pinch Technology and optimization of the use of utilities – part one
Heat Exchange Networks
LECTURE DAY 2 Timo Laukkanen.
Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Networks
Reading Materials: Chapter 9
Miroslav Variny, Otto Mierka
12. Heat Exchangers Chemical engineering 170.
Miscellaneous CHEN 4470 – Process Design Practice
Presentation transcript:

Hierarchy of Decisions

A DESIGN INSIGHT separate and distinct task in process design HEN synthesis can be identified as a separate and distinct task in process design

IDENTIFY HEAT RECOVERY AS A SEPARATE AND DISTINCT TASK IN PROCESS DESIGN. 9.60 200C 18.2 bar H1 1.089 36C 16 bar RECYCLE REACTION 7.841 126C 18.7 bar TO COLUMN D 201 C2 1.614 0 179 200C PURGE CW 180C 153C 35C 7 703 FLASH 141C 40C 115.5C 17.3 bar 120C 17.6 bar FEED 5C 19.5 bar 114C C1 Flowsheet for “front end” of specialty chemicals process

Heat exchange duties in specialty chemicals process: Reactor 35C 200C RECYCLE  TOPS Purge Reactor Product (H1) 35C 5C FEED (C1) PRODUCT (C2) 126C Heat exchange duties in specialty chemicals process: FOR EACH STREAM: TINITIAL, TFINAL, H = f(T).

。 。  = 1722  = 654 a ) DESIGN AS USUAL H 6 UNITS REACTOR C STEAM  = 1722  = 654 a ) DESIGN AS USUAL H 6 UNITS REACTOR C STEAM RECYCLE 70 1 。 。 STEAM 1652 3 2 654 COOLING WATER FEED PRODUCT

。 。 。 。  = 1068  = 0 b ) DESIGN WITH TARGETS H 4 UNITS REACTOR C  = 1068  = 0 b ) DESIGN WITH TARGETS H 4 UNITS REACTOR C STEAM 。 RECYCLE 1068 。 。 1 。 2 3 FEED PRODUCT

DESIGN PROCEDURE OF HEAT EXCHANGER NETWORKS Determine Targets. Energy Target - maximum recoverable energy Capital Targets minimum number of heat transfer units. minimum total heat transfer area Generate Alternatives to Achieve Those Targets. Modify the Alternatives Based on Practical Considerations. Equipment Design and Costing for Each Alternative. Select the Most Attractive Candidate.

ENERGY TARGETS (TWO-STREAM HEAT EXCHANGE)   T Q =CP(TT-TS) TT TS H H  

TWO-STREAM HEAT EXCHANGE IN THE T/H DIAGRAM 200 UTILITY HEATING 140 135 115 100 70 UTILITY COOLING 350 300 400 H (KW) TWO-STREAM HEAT EXCHANGE IN THE T/H DIAGRAM

TWO-STREAM HEAT EXCHANGE IN THE T/H DIAGRAM 200 UTILITY HEATING 130 135 T 120 100 70 UTILITY COOLING 350 300 400 H (KW) -100 +100 -100 =250 =400 =300 TWO-STREAM HEAT EXCHANGE IN THE T/H DIAGRAM

( ) ( ) CONCLUSIONS 1.   Total Utility Load  Increa se Increa se 2. in = in Hot Utility Cold Utility ( ) ( )

ENERGY TARGETS ( MULTIPLE HOT AND MULTIPLE COLD STREAMS) Construction of the Hot Composite Curve T T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 (T1-T2) (B) (T2-T3) (A+B+C) (T3-T4) (A+C) (T4-T5) (A) CP=B CP=A CP=C H

Construction of Hot Composite Curve (1) (2) (3) (4) T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 H  

PINCH POINT Minimum T hot utility “PINCH” minimum cold utility H Energy targets and “the Pinch” with Composite Curves

Generalized heat-exchange system m hot Streams Qin Heat Exchange System n cold Streams Qout - Qin = H Qout or

The “Problem Table” Algorithm ---Linnhoff and Flower, AIChE J. (1978) Stream No. CP TS TT and Type (KW/C) (C) (C) (C) (C) (1) Cold 2 20 25 T6 135 140 T3 (2) Hot 3 170 165 T1 60 55 T5 (3) Cold 4 80 85 T4 140 145 T2 (4) Hot 1.5 150 145 (T2) 30 25 (T6) Tmin = 10C

Subsystem # CPHot - CPcold TK HK T1* = 165C T2* = 145C T3* = 140C T4* = 85C T5* = 55C T6* = 25C 2 1 20 3.0 60 2 5 0.5 2.5 3 55 -1.5 -82.5 4 30 2.5 75 5 30 -0.5 -15 4 3 1

90C 145C Heat Exchange Subsystem (3) 80C 135C from subsystem #2 hot streams 145C Heat Exchange Subsystem (3) . . . . . Cold streams 80C 135C To subsystem #4

T1* = 165C -------------------------- ( 0 )------ FROM HOT UTILITY minimum hot utility 20 H1 = 60 H2 = 2.5 H3 = -82.5 Pinch H4 = 75 H5 = -15 minimum cold utility 60 TO COLD UTILITY

The Grand Composite Curve 80 60 40 20 -20 Q(KW) CU Qc,min “Pinch” HU Qh,min 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 T6* T5* T4* T3*T2* T1*

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PINCH POINT 1. Do not transfer heat across the pinch 2. Do not use cold utility above 3. Do not use hot utility below

Q Qh Qh HU Qc,min CU Qh,min Tc Tp Th T Qh  Qh,min Qc  Qc,min

Q CU Qc,min Qh,min HU Tc Tp T1 Th T

Q Qc CU2 Qh HU Qc,min CU1 Qh,min Tc Tp Th T

Q Qh,min HU Qc,min CU Tc Tp T1 Th T

Q Qh,min HU2 Qc,min Q1 CU Q2 HU1 Tc Tp T1 Tp’ Th T

A simple flowsheet with two hot streams and two cold streams. H=27MW H= -30MW FEED 2 140 PRODUCT2 230 REACTOR 2 200 80 H=32MW FEED 1 20 REACTOR 1 180 250 OFF GAS 40 H= -31.5MW 40 PRODUCT1 40 A simple flowsheet with two hot streams and two cold streams.

Heat Exchange Stream Data Supply Target capacity temp. temp. H flow rate CP Stream Type TS (C) TT (C) (MW) (MW C-1) 1. Reactor 1 feed Cold 20 180 32.0 0.2 2. Reactor 1 product Hot 250 40 -31.5 0.15 3. Reactor 2 feed Cold 140 230 27.0 0.3 4. Reactor 2 product Hot 200 80 -30.0 0.25

The heat-flow cascade. HOT UTILITY HOT UTILITY H= -1.5 H= -1.5 (b) HOT UTILITY 245C 0MW 7.5MW H= -1.5 H= -1.5 235C 1.5MW 9.0MW H= 6.0 H= 6.0 195C -4.5MW 3.0MW H= -1.0 H= -1.0 185C -3.5MW 4.0MW H= 4.0 H= 4.0 145C -7.5MW 0MW H= -14.0 H= -14.0 75C 6.5MW 14.0MW H= 2.0 H= 2.0 35C 4.5MW 12.0MW H= 2.0 H= 2.0 25C 2.5MW 10.0MW COLD UTILITY COLD UTILITY The heat-flow cascade.

The grand composite curve shows the utility requirements in both enthalpy and temperature terms.

Grand composite curve allows different utility mixes to be evaluated. Process HP Stream Process Fuel Boiler Feedwater (Desuperheat) BOILER LP Stream Condensate T* HP Steam LP Steam pinch CW H Grand composite curve allows different utility mixes to be evaluated.

Grand composite curve allows different utility mixes to be evaluated. Hot Oil Return Fuel FURNACE Process Hot Oil Flow T* Hot Oil pinch CW H Grand composite curve allows different utility mixes to be evaluated. .

Furnace Model Theoretical Flame Temperature T*TFT T*O T*STACK QHmin Flue Gas Air T*TFT Fuel T*STACK T*O Ambient Temperature Stack Loss ambient temp. QHmin H Fuel Furnace Model

Increasing the theoretical flame temperature by reducing excess air or combustion air preheat reduces the stack loss! T* T*’TFT T*TFT Flue Gas T*STACK T*O Stack Loss H

T* T*TFT T* T*TFT T*ACID DEW T*PINCH T*O T*ACID DEW T*PINCH T*O (a) Stack temperature limited by acid dew point (b) Stack temperature limited by process away from the pinch Furnace stack temperature can be limited by other factors than pinch temperature.

§ “PROBLEM TABLE” ALFORITHM  SUBSYSTEM TM TC=T 0 (T0) 1 (T1) 2 (T2) TP Tmin Hh2Hc2 Hh1 Hc1

§ “PROBLEM TABLE” ALFORITHM  ENTHALPY BALANCE OF SUBSYSTEM As T = T1 - T2  0

(a) TC 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 5 10 15 H(MW) HP Steam LP Steam HP Steam LP Steam 0 5 10 15 H(MW) Figure 6.26 Alternative utility mixes for the process in Fig. 6.2.

(b) TC 300 250 200 150 100 50 Hot Oil 0 5 10 15 H(MW) Figure 6.26 Alternative utility mixes for the process in Fig. 6.2.

T* 1800 1750 Flue Gas 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 5 10 15 H(MW) Figure 6.30 Flue gas matched against the grand composite curve of the process in Fig. 6.2