Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.:IEEE /1275r0 Submission Laurent Cariou Nov, 2010 Slide 1 Complexity reduction for time domain H matrix feedback Authors: Date:
Advertisements

Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Doc.: IEEE /1489r0 Submission Nov Heejung Yu, ETRISlide 1 Green-Field 11ac Packet for TGah Date: Authors:
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0064r1 January 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Consideration on UL-MU overheads Date: Authors:
HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA
Submission doc.: IEEE /1081r3 September, 2015 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on receive behavior based on the cascading structure.
Submission Jul 2012 doc.: IEEE 11-12/0842r0 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Short Beamforming Report Poll Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0103r0 January 2016 Assaf KasherSlide 1 Beamforming Training proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0617r0 Submission NDP sounding May 2012 Yongho Seok (LG Electronics), Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell)Slide 1 Date: Authors:
VHT Frame Padding Date: Authors: Month Year
Inefficiency of 256-FFT per 20MHz
On the feasibility of 1Gbps for various MAC/PHY architectures
Discussions on Signaling for UL HE MU PPDU
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 September, 2015
Locationing Protocol for 11az
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Why we need Length Field in VHT SIG
MAC Calibration results
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
NDP Transmission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 September 2010
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
On DL Precoding for 11ac September 2010 Date: Month Year
Regarding UL MU protection
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Max Frame Length Changes
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
VHTSIG Considerations
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
DL MU-MIMO MAC efficiency issue
Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions
UL MU Random Access Analysis
CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for Explicit Beamforming
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
40 MHz Vs 20 MHz for video Date: Authors: July 2009
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
MAC Efficiency Gain of Uplink Multi-user Transmission
Fixed Inter Frame Spacing for BRP in ay
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Evaluation of PAPR in WUR FDMA transmission
Consideration on HARQ feedback
Presentation transcript:

Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0084r3 Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission Date: 2010-11-08 Authors: Brian Hart, Cisco Systems

Abstract MU-MIMO is a key technique to attain at least 1 Gbps throughput at MAC SAP for Multi-STA. But, the gain of MU-MIMO maybe shrink significantly due to mismatching of the lengths of co-transmission STA’s PSDU. A sustainable frame format is proposed here to exploit the gain of MU-MIMO against the mismatching problem for co-transmission STAs

The mismatching problem There exists a mismatching problem for MU-MIMO transmission for 802.11ac due to mismatching the lengths of co-transmission STA’s PSDU. An example is given here: STA1’s transmission rate is 500Mbps and 400Mbps for SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO transmission, respectively STA2’s transmission rate is assumed as same as that of STA1 for simple. PSDU data length of STA1 is 2000 kb, therefore 5ms for MU-MIMO transmission PSDU data length of STA2 is 800 kb, therefore 2ms for MU-MIMO transmission STA 1 STA1-PSDU STA 2 STA2-PSDU

Transmission schemes for Multi-STA with mismatching lengths of their PSDU Direct transmission utilizing MU-MIMO The LENGTH field in L-SIG is set according the maximum among the lengths of these multi-STA’s PSDU The LENGTH field in each STA’s VHT-SIG-B is set according the actual length of the STA’s PSDU The transmission duration for the example is 5ms Direct transmission utilizing SU-MIMO for each STA in turn The transmission duration for the example is 5.6ms without accounting for the overheads of preamble, SIFS, etc. STA1-PSDU STA2-PSDU

An efficient transmission scheme based on a new frame format A new frame format with sustainable VHT-segment proposed here: A series of VHT-segments with the maximum of 4 can be concatenated together to form the whole frame. Each VHT-segment consists of VHT-SIG-A, VHT-STF, VHT-LTFs, VHT-SIG-B and VHT data

An efficient transmission scheme based on a new frame format (con’t) A new frame format with sustainable VHT-segment proposed here: The LENGTH field in L-SIG is set according to the total length of the whole frame consisted of all VHT-segments

An efficient transmission scheme based on a new frame format (con’t) A new frame format with sustainable VHT-segment proposed here: Each STA’s NSTS field in VHT-SIG-A implies whether its PSDU has been ended or not

An efficient transmission scheme based on a new frame format (con’t) A new frame format with sustainable VHT-segment proposed here: The length field in VHT-SIG-B of each VHT-segment indicates the actual length of VHT-data in current VHT-segment.

Gain and Conclusion The transmission duration for the former example is 4.4ms, therefore a gain of more than 10% can be obtained. Although the transmission scheme based on the proposed frame format is somewhat like MU-TXOP, but it is superior to MU-TXOP due to omitting SIFS, L-STF and L-LTF. Nevertheless, TXOP/MU-TXOP isn’t substitutable in providing continuous transmission with longer duration (for example more than 5.4ms).

References Specification Framework for TGac, IEEE 802.11-09/0992r15, September 2010