An Outline for: A User-Based Systems Approach to the Evaluation, Selection, and Institutionalization of Safer Medical Devices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Why, What and How of Disaster Recovery Plan Testing Presented By: Ed Deveau.
Advertisements

WHO update on: Guidelines for the selection of RH medicines and prequalification of priority RH medicines Medicines Policy and Standards Health Technology.
“The GMC aims to encourage a culture where the patient and public perspective is sought and recognised across the spectrum of medical education” Paragraph.
Conducting Patient Safety Rounds with Staff. First Steps Set the stage –Unit and Hospital Leadership Support –Identify a “champion(s)” for each unit where.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Pharmacy Introduction to The Pharmacy Vocational Training Scheme Stages 2,3 and 4 August 2013.
Falls Risk Assessment and Management Plan (FRAMP).
Action 1: Mission/task analysis Action 2: List Hazards Action 3: List Causes STEP 1 IDENTIFY THE HAZARD STEP 2 ASSESS THE RISK Action 1: Assess hazard.
Schneider Institute for Health Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University Components of health services research projects.
EFFECTIVE DELEGATION AND SUPERVISION
THE SIMBASE PROJECT A SUMMARY James Ansell. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT 6 STAGES  WP1MANAGEMENT  WP2DEVELOPMENT OF IAM  WP3PILOT OF ICT BASED SIM ADOPTION.
1 The Effectiveness of a NIOSH Multimedia Training Program: The Lifting Equation William Bowles Education and Information Division NIOSH Best Practices.
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South Regional Resource Center, RRCP Document developed by members of the Systems.
Implementing Human Service Worker Safety Regulations
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Professional Practice III Lab (PHM 329) Course Coordinator: Annie Lee.
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
9 Closing the Project Teaching Strategies
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Where Results Begin. “We don’t have a health care delivery system in this country. We have an expensive plethora of uncoordinated, unlinked, economically.
Supporting Quality Care
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Health Technology Assessment & Innovation Don Juzwishin, Director September 21, 2010.
Monitoring, supervision and quality control IDSP training module for state and district surveillance officers Module 11.
Product Documentation Chapter 5. Required Medical Device Documentation  Business proposal  Product specification  Design specification  Software.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Kazakhstan Health Technology Transfer and Institutional Reform Project The Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
Cima, R., Kollengode, A., Storsveen, A., Weisbrod, C., Deschamps, C., Koch, M.,... Pool, S. (2009). A Multidisciplinary Team Approach to Retained Foreign.
Virginia Heart Attack Coalition/Mission Lifeline.
Assuring Safety for Clinical Techniques and Procedures MODULE 5 Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement Curriculum 2008.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Establishing an Effective CQI Program By: Shannon Bentley, RN,c And Lois Sacher, RN.
1 Overview of Fellowship Projects. Project to depend on what is available in host institution with strong mentorship Should address activities and tasks.
12/9/10 Pilot assessment impact- paperwork Findings of the expert panels- report + appendix Lessons learned- feedback from pilot institutions Examples.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Improving Situational Awareness by Conducting a Morning Briefing.
EDUC 3004 Group A Team Members Jennifer Bateman Ralph Herrera III Reupena Lesa Lucas Paxton.
Adult Education Assessment Policy Effective July 1 st, 2011.
Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Unit 8: Implementation, Part II Seminar Wednesday pm ET.
Program Approval Standard 22: Curriculum. Required Materials NAACLS Guide to Approval (add link) Section I: Core and Unique Standards For Approved Programs.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Dawn M. Saunders, BS, LMT, Owner Steps to Starting a Hospital-Based Massage Program at ABQ School of Massage.
EFFECTIVE DELEGATION AND SUPERVISION
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
Clinical Learning Environment Review GMEC January 8, 2013
Course Review 2017.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Russell Glasgow Marina McCreight Borsika Rabin
Chapter 2: Overview of the Action Research Process
Are Government Alliances a Threat to Workplace Safety
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
SUNY Applied Learning Resolution.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Controlling Measuring Quality of Patient Care
“Doing it better”.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Public Health Planning and Analysis
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
Integrating Best Practices of Participant Evaluation Clinical Instructor Intensive Adrienne Small, DNP, FNP-C, CNE, CHSE Medical Instructor Duke University.
Presentation transcript:

An Outline for: A User-Based Systems Approach to the Evaluation, Selection, and Institutionalization of Safer Medical Devices

I. Needs assessment II. Broad identification of all market available devices. III. Initial screening of devices IV. Simulation and intermediate selection V. Clinical pilot testing VI. Institutionalizing selected device VII. Ongoing training for device use VIII. Ongoing surveillance for efficacy IX. Ongoing surveillance for better devices Overview

Need Finding Identification of Available Devices Initial Screening of All Devices Simulation Studies Clinical Pilot Testing Institutionalization of Device Use Ongoing Surveillance for EfficacyPRELIMINARYINTERMEDIATE FINAL Failure Analysis Task Analysis

I. Needs Assessment A. Institutional data 1..Data as usually collected 2. Assessment of reporting rate 3. Reporting campaign 4. Post reporting campaign data B. Published data C. Site Specific TASK ANALYSIS by HCWs D. WORKSITE health and safety walk around

II. Broad Identification of all Market Available Devices A. Review of published lists or web sites B. Product fairs C. Manufacturers representatives

III. Initial Screening of Devices A. Establish a trained screening team which represents diverse units B. Review all market available devices and sizes in category C. Use written criteria to evaluate devices D. Screen all devices E. Test devices that passed for failure F. Do preliminary selection

IV. Simulation and Intermediate Selection A. Use Task Analysis of work site to create simulations for approximating clinical use of device being evaluated B. Use variables defined in the scenarios method as a guide C. Use rating sheet for assessment D. Retest for failure E. Select device(s) for clinical testing

V. Clinical Pilot Testing A. Determine sites where the device will be used B. Select representative test site C. Involve user in design of trial D. Have clearly defined protocol 1. Outcomes to be assessed 2. Minimum number of devices to be tested 3. Length of trial 4. Who are the participants 5. Impact on patients

V. Clinical Pilot Testing (cont.) E. Data gathering in the real world. 1. Evaluate each device at time of use 2. Develop and use an easy recording format 3. Collect and evaluate reports at regularly defined intervals 4. Examine contents of sterilized sharps boxes on a regular basis

V. Clinical Pilot Testing (cont.) F. Determine whether there will be access to old devices-(remember that old devices will turn up regardless of policy-role of subversion factor) G. Training of all participants H. Evaluate devices I. User selection of device

VI. Institutionalizing Selected Device A. Re-determine where device use is appropriate B. Understand the limitations of the device C. Based on Task Analysis, determine legitimate uses of old device D. Retain of old device where appropriate E. Institute appropriate training of all users F. Assure ongoing availability of device G. Allow time for learning curve

VII. Ongoing Training for Device Use A. Develop a system for user feedback B. Incorporate user concerns into ongoing training C. Create a device lab for ongoing skills training on an ongoing basis D. Reach all users 1. All shifts 2. Floaters

VII. Ongoing Training for Device Use (cont.) 3. Per diem staff 4. Medical staff who use the selected devices 5. Trainees

VIII. Ongoing Surveillance for Efficacy A. Establish a true baseline for sharps injuries B. Do a depth review and analysis of any reported injury C. Establish a method for reporting and analyzing near misses D. Monitor patient outcomes

IX. Ongoing Surveillance for Better Devices A. Impact of rapid device development. B. SUBSTITUTION!!!!!

Items to Be Included in Sharps Injury Reporting Form: (Interviewer should be familiar with devices available and all sharps devices used in the institution should be posted in the interview area) 1. Device, manufacturer 2. Procedure 3. Familiarity with device 4. Training with device

Items to Be Included in Sharps Injury Reporting Form (cont.): 5. Hours worked prior to injury 6. Consecutive days worked 7. Unit staffing 8. Devices available on unit 9. How device failed

Work Site Assessment for Sharps What procedures involve sharps/ specify sharps? - Type of patients receiving procedure. - Where procedure is done. - Who does the procedure. - Are there alternative methods of procedure What kind of sharps are available on the unit? - Are safer devices available - Are they widely used/ if not, Why Are the needle boxes within arms reach and in sight?