Veterans Employment Initiative

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

National Town Meeting – Demand Response and Smart Grid Hank Kenchington - Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.

Advertisements

7 th Annual Performance Report Scorecard by Maurice McTigue, Henry Wray, and Jerry Ellig A GENDA Welcome Hon. Maurice McTigue Study Results Dr. Jerry Ellig.

Proposed Maturity Model for

SBA Update MARC Winter Meeting January SBA Administrator Karen Gordon Mills Named in December to head the SBA “Small business will be an important.

Veterans Employment Initiative June 19, 2013 November 9, 2009 President Obama Launches the Veterans Employment Initiative “Honoring our sacred trust.

INCREASING THE PROBABILITY OF SUCCESS WITH COMPETITIVE GRANT PROPOSALS.

NOAA Science Advisory Board The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Strategic Plan James R. Mahoney, Ph.D. Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and.

A Very Big Branch You’ve ran across some acronyms in the reading. See if you can remember these:

FIRST STOP GUIDE to STIMULUS FUNDS Presented by The East Bay Community Foundation in cooperation with Congresswoman Barbara Lee (9th District of California)

The E-Authentication Initiative: A Status Report Presented at Educause Meeting June 16, 2004 The E-Authentication Initiative.

Chapter 11 Bureaucracy in a Democracy Bureaucracy Basics Most private and public organizations are bureaucracies Means “rule by office or desk” A hierarchical.

PL Supersedes FEMA 229 (April 1992). 2 What is the Federal Response Plan? Signed agreement among departments and agencies that: Supplements other.

Radon Overview Federal Radon Action Plan. Learning Outcomes Upon completion of this module you should be able to:  Identify which federal agencies collaborated.

CIVICS IN PRACTICE HOLT HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON1 Qualifications for the presidency: Native-born U.S. citizen At least 35 years of age A resident of.

By: Alex Lowman, Adam Marcus, and Chad Knapik Executive Branch.

Leadership for the Employment of Americans with Disabilities DON Senior Executive Seminar June 9, 2008.

Unit Four Lesson 24 How are National Laws Administered in the American Constitutional System?

Problem Resolution Subcommittee Presentation to the National Council on Federal Labor-Management Relations March 19, 2014.

Data-gov Wiki: Towards Linking Government Data Li Ding, Dominic DiFranzo, Alvaro Graves, James R. Michaelis, Xian Li, Deborah L. McGuinness and Jim Hendler.

1 IT Infrastructure Line of Business (ITILOB) Briefing for Chief Architects Forum August 25, 2008.

Federal Acquisition Service ETS2 Transition Planning Meeting 20 ETS2 Transition Planning Meeting 20 February 15, 2012.

PRISM Overview Matt Jillings - Compusearch. 2 Conference ‘09 Compusearch provides software and services to help governments SPEND funds enterprise software.

Leadership for the Employment of Americans with Disabilities Employment in the Federal Sector for People with Disabilities Cornell University / AAPD Forum.

Leadership for the Employment of Americans with Disabilities Federal Government: A Model Employer? ISE Conference June 25, 2008.

U.S. General Services Administration 2011 Government Transportation Forum sponsored by GSA.

The Small Business Innovation Research Program U S C E N G I N E E R I N G T E C H N O L O G Y T R A N S F E R C E N T E R A N A S A R E G I O N A L T.

Interagency Committee on Standards Policy (ICSP) Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Standards.

Chunk 6 - Implementation Definition: Implement – put into effect.

Chapter 7 Section 4- Executive Branch (Organized like a pyramid) President Vice President Executive Office of the President White House Office (Chief of.

National Radon Action Plan Illinois Radon Stakeholders Conference April 24, 2015 Patrick Daniels.

WI COMMODITY ORDERING SYSTEM. Commodity Allocation & Receipt Summary (CARS) Report Access.

1 Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade 1 Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona 1 OMB Scorecard on Energy/Sustainability FY14.

Eliminating Material Differences Robert Darragh U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Freeze the Footprint Update March 25, 2014 Presented for Monja Vadnais Facilities & Infrastructure Division (MA-652) Office of Acquisition and Project.

8 th Annual Performance Report Scorecard by Maurice McTigue, Henry Wray, and Jerry Ellig A GENDA Welcome Hon. Maurice McTigue Study Results Dr. Jerry Ellig.

Ch 14 Federal Budget.  Laswell- Who gets what, when and how?  Some definitions  Revenue  Expenditures  Deficit  Deficit + deficit + deficit +

Еxecutive branch By Ira Sahanda 11B form. The Executive Branch is headed by the President and the Vice President. In addition, it includes the executive.

Google Coordination FGDC Coordination Group Meeting August 7, 2007 Tony LaVoi NOAA Coastal Services Center.

1 | emwd.org Fiscal Year 2015 / 16 Fourth Quarter Enterprise Performance Measures Update John Ward September 7, 2016.

February 9 th, 2016 Scott Denniston, Executive Director National Veteran Small Business Coalition

EISA § 141 – Federal Fleets and Low GHG-Emitting Vehicles

DRAFT-Priority Positions Requiring Senate Conformation

R&D in the FY 2017 Budget Request

The Executive Branch NEXT.

Chapter 6 The Executive Branch

IT Infrastructure Line of Business (ITILOB) Chief Architects Forum

Promise Zone Kickoff September 27th, 2016

Accountability Overview Measures and Results

XBRL International Conference “A Roadmap for use of XBRL in

Transforming the Business of Government Through Shared Services JOHN SINDELAR Deputy Associate Administrator United States General Services Administration.

Family Friendly Policies on Turnover Rates in Public Sector

Evan Siemann for Faculty Senate 11/16/16

Chapter 6 The Executive Branch

Bureaucracy in a Democracy

Federal Government.

Federal User Experience Survey: 2014

State Employment Agencies

Forecasting Techniques

Leveraging America’s Seed Fund

Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD) Program Overview

The All Small Mentor-Protégé Program

Leadership Transitions in the Public Sector

Chapter 6 The Executive Branch

Chapter 6 The Executive Branch

420, , , ,000 1,300,000 One commercial 680, , ,000 1,200,000 1,800,000 Two commercial 680,000.

420, , , ,000 1,300,000 One commercial 680, , ,000 1,200,000 1,800,000 Two commercial 680,000.

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System

National Recycling Coalition Annual Members’ Meeting

FIAR/AUDIT UPDATE for ASMC 19 Jun 2019

Presentation transcript:

Veterans Employment Initiative Veteran Employment Performance Model Fiscal Years 2015 - 2017

Agency Groupings by Size 1 < 10K Employees (7 Agencies) Education USAID SBA OPM NRC HUD NSF 2 > 10K – 40K (6 Agencies) GSA Energy (State***) EPA NASA DOL 3 > 40K – 80K (4 Agencies) DOC DOI DOT SSA 4 > 80K – 250K (5 Agencies) DHS Treasury Justice USDA HHS 5 > 250K (2 Agencies) DoD VA

Rating Scheme Veteran New Hires D/Veteran New Hires Total Veterans On Board Veteran Retention Agency EOY % Against Previous Year’s Group Average Agency EOY Veteran Rate Against Agency Non-Veteran Rate

Rating Levels Exemplary (EX) 3.50 – 4.00 Highly Effective (HE) 2.75 – 3.49 Effective (E) 2.00 – 2.74 Needs Improvement (NI) 1.00 – 1.99

Veteran Employment Performance Model Performance Element FY Agency Results Rating Level Points Weight Points X Overall Ratings Veteran New Hires % NI to EX 1- 4 40% Performance Level 3.50 – 4.00 = EX 2.75 – 3.49 = HE 2.00 – 2.74 = E 1.00 – 1.99 = NI Disabled Veteran New Hires Total Veterans On-Board 10% Veteran New Hire Retention Rate TOTAL 100% Agency Result in Each Element = NI to EX Rating with Associated Points Sum of 4 Element Sub-Total = Total Points = Overall Rating Level

Agency Performance Standards Veteran and Disabled Veteran New Hires Performance Rating Definition Value Exemplary (EX) Exceeds the group average by 2 or more percentage points 4 Highly Effective (HE) Exceeds the group average by more than 1 but less than 2 percentage points 3 Effective (E) Exceeds the group average by 1 or less percentage points 2 Needs Improvement (NI) Below the group average percentage 1 Note: Agencies performing at or above 25% Veteran New Hires (10% Disabled Veteran New Hires) automatically receive an Exemplary Rating and should focus on other Veteran employment areas. Total Veteran On-Board Performance Rating Definition Value Exemplary (EX) Exceeds the group average by 2 or more percentage points 4 Highly Effective (HE) Exceeds the group average by more than 1 but less than 2 percentage points 3 Effective (E) Exceeds the group average by 1 or less percentage points 2 Needs Improvement (NI) Below the group average percentage 1 Note: Agencies performing at or above 25% of total Veterans On-Board automatically receive an Exemplary Rating and should focus on other Veteran employment areas.

Agency Performance Standards Cont’d Veteran New Hire Retention Rate Performance Rating Definition Value Exemplary (EX) 5 or less percentage points below the current year’s Non-Veteran New Hire Retention Rate 4 Highly Effective (HE) Less than 8 but more than 5 percentage points below the current year’s Non-Veteran New Hire Retention Rate 3 Effective (E) Less than 10 but more than 8 percentage points below the current year’s Non-Veteran New Hire Retention Rate 2 Needs Improvement (NI) More than 10 percentage points below the current year’s Non-Veteran New Hire Retention Rate 1

Automatic Exemplary Ratings If an agency is performing above: 25% in Veteran New Hires 10% in Disabled Veteran New Hires 25% of Total Veterans On-Board they will receive an “EX” for that element Does not apply to Veteran New Hire Retention Rate Element

Example FY-14 Performance Summary Performance Element EOY Group Results EOY Agency Results Rating Level/ Points Weight Assigned Points X Weight Assigned Summary Ratings Total Weighted Points Veteran New Hires 15.2 34.6% EX 4 40% 1.60 3.50-4.00 = EX 2.75-3.49 = HE 2.00-2.74 = E 1.00-1.99 = NI Disabled Veteran New Hires 5.6 15.9% Total Veterans On-Board 15.5 11.5% NI 1 10% 0.10 Veteran New Hire Retention Rate 87.8% * 74.7% TOTAL 100% 3.40 Highly Effective * Veteran New Hire Retention Rate results are compared against the agency’s non-veteran new hire retention rate.