Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Second RNA-Binding Site in the NS1 Protein of Influenza B Virus
Advertisements

Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Structural Basis for Dimerization in DNA Recognition by Gal4
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Decoy Strategies: The Structure of TL1A:DcR3 Complex
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
A Second RNA-Binding Site in the NS1 Protein of Influenza B Virus
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Paolo A. Lobo, Lynn Kimlicka, Ching-Chieh Tung, Filip Van Petegem 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
A Second RNA-Binding Site in the NS1 Protein of Influenza B Virus
Crystal Structure of E. coli RecE Protein Reveals a Toroidal Tetramer for Processing Double-Stranded DNA Breaks  Jinjin Zhang, Xu Xing, Andrew B. Herr,
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Jianchao Li, Haiyang Liu, Manmeet H. Raval, Jun Wan, Christopher M
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (November 2017)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Structural Basis for Ligand Recognition and Activation of RAGE
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
The Human Cytomegalovirus UL44 C Clamp Wraps around DNA
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 1032-1043 (August 2010) The Structural Basis of 5′ Triphosphate Double-Stranded RNA Recognition by RIG-I C- Terminal Domain  Cheng Lu, Hengyu Xu, C.T. Ranjith-Kumar, Monica T. Brooks, Tim Y. Hou, Fuqu Hu, Andrew B. Herr, Roland K. Strong, C. Cheng Kao, Pingwei Li  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 1032-1043 (August 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2010.05.007 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 RIG-I CTD Binds RNA with or Without a 5′ Triphosphate (ppp) (A) Binding study of RIG-I CTD with a 14-bp GC-rich 5′ ppp dsRNA by gel filtration chromatography. RIG-I CTD is shown by the black chromatogram. The RNA is shown by the red chromatogram. The mixture of the protein and the RNA is shown by the green chromatogram. Elution volumes of four protein standards are shown above the chromatograms. (B) Stoichiometry between RIG-I CTD and the 14-bp GC-rich 5′ ppp dsRNA in a purified protein RNA complex determined by sedimentation velocity (inset) and equilibrium. The experimental molecular weight values from velocity (∼38 kDa) and equilibrium (37,339 Da) data were consistent only with the formation of a 2:1 complex. (C) Binding study of RIG-I CTD with a 13-nt 5′ ppp ssRNA by gel filtration chromatography. (D) Binding study of RIG-I CTD with a 14-bp blunt-ended dsRNA without a 5′ ppp. Structure 2010 18, 1032-1043DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.05.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RIG-I CTD Binds 5′ Triphosphate (ppp) dsRNA with High Affinity (A) Equilibrium binding study of RIG-CTD with the 14-bp GC-rich 5′ ppp dsRNA by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The dissociation constant (Kd) was derived by fitting of the equilibrium binding data to a one site binding model (lower panels). (B) Equilibrium binding study of RIG-I CTD with the 14-bp blunt-ended dsRNA. (C) Equilibrium binding study of RIG-I CTD with a 13-nt 5′ ppp ssRNA. (D) Kinetic binding studies of RIG-CTD with the 14-bp GC-rich 5′ ppp dsRNA. The association and dissociation rate constants (kon and koff) were derived from global fitting of the binding data to a 1:1 binding model (red curves). Half-life (t1/2) for each of the RNA: RIG-I CTD complex was calculated from the koff. The calculated dissociation constant (KD, calc) was derived by division of the dissociation rate constant (koff) by the association rate constant (kon). (E) Kinetic binding studies of RIG-I CTD with the 14-bp blunt-ended dsRNA. (F) Kinetic binding studies of RIG-I CTD with the 13-nt 5′ ppp ssRNA. Structure 2010 18, 1032-1043DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.05.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structures of RIG-I CTD Bound to 5′ Triphosphate (ppp) Double-Stranded RNA (A) Crystal structure of RIG-I CTD bound to the 14-bp GC-rich 5′ ppp dsRNA. The nucleotides at the 5′ ends of the dsRNA containing the triphosphate are shown as space filling models. The zinc ions bound to RIG-I CTD are shown as gray spheres. (B) Structure of the RIG-I CTD bound to the 12-bp AU-rich 5′ ppp dsRNA. The orientations of RIG-I CTD (Chain A) relative to the dsRNA are the same in the two structures. Structure 2010 18, 1032-1043DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.05.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structural Basis of 5′ Triphosphate (ppp) dsRNA Recognition by RIG-I CTD (A) Stereo close-up of the interface between RIG-I CTD (Chain A) and the terminus of the 14-bp 5′ ppp dsRNA. RIG-I CTD is shown as cyan ribbons and the dsRNA is shown as stick models. Key residues of RIG-I CTD involved in RNA binding are shown as stick models. (B) Stereo close-up of the interactions between RIG-I CTD and the 5′ ppp of the 14-bp GC-rich dsRNA. (C) Surface representation of RIG-I CTD bound to 5′ ppp dsRNA showing the shape and charge complementarity between RIG-I CTD and the terminus of the 5′ ppp dsRNA. Positively charged surfaces are colored blue, and negatively charged surfaces are red. The orientation of RIG-I CTD relative to the dsRNA on the left panel is similar to the orientation of the protein in panel A. Structure 2010 18, 1032-1043DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.05.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Distinct Binding by RIG-I and LGP2 CTDs to dsRNA with and Without 5′ Triphosphate (ppp) Stereo representation of the structure of RIG-I CTD bound to the 14-bp GC-rich 5′ ppp dsRNA superimposed on the structure of LGP2 CTD bound to an 8-bp dsRNA without 5′ ppp. The 14-bp 5′ ppp dsRNA bound to RIG-I CTD is shown as blue ribbons. The 8-bp dsRNA bound to LGP2 CTD is colored magenta. A 14-bp dsRNA (orange) is superimposed on the 8-bp dsRNA in the LGP2 CTD:dsRNA complex structure to show the different orientations of the dsRNA relative the proteins in the two complexes. Structure 2010 18, 1032-1043DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.05.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Similar Binding Surfaces of RIG-I CTD Mediate the Interactions with Different Forms of RNA (A) Binding studies of wild-type and mutants of RIG-I CTD for the 14-bp 5′ triphosphate (ppp) dsRNA by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). (B) Binding studies of RIG-I CTD mutants with a 14-bp blunt-ended dsRNA lacking 5′ ppp. (C) Binding studies of RIG-I CTD mutants with a 13-nt 5′ ppp ssRNA. Structure 2010 18, 1032-1043DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.05.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Mutations of Key Residues at the RNA-Binding Surface Affect RIG-I Signaling (A) Western blot showing the expression of wild-type and mutants of full-length RIG-I in transfected cells. (B) IFN-β luciferase assay showing the signaling of wild-type and mutants of RIG-I in HEK293T cells stimulated with a 24-bp 5′ triphosphate (ppp) dsRNA. Error bars correspond to the standard deviations of signals from three independent transfections. (C) IFN-β luciferase assay showing the signaling of wild-type and mutants of RIG-I in cells stimulated with a 27-nt 5′ ppp ssRNA. (D) IFN-β luciferase assay showing the signaling of wild-type and mutants of RIG-I in cells stimulated with a 27-bp blunt-ended dsRNA without the 5′ ppp. Structure 2010 18, 1032-1043DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.05.007) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions