Development of Spherical Neutron Polarimetry Device

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Advertisements

Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
The Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 : A Measurement of the Extended GDH Integral Vincent Sulkosky (for the JLab Hall A Collaboration)
Focusing monochromators/analyzers Asymmetric diffraction geometry of the monochromator Dispersive double crystal monochromator Two wavelength sandwich.
Chapter2: Light and EM Spectrum 18.1 The Electromagnetic Spectrum 18.2 Interference, Diffraction, and Polarization 18.3 Special Relativity Professor Mohammad.
ELEG 479 Lecture #9 Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging
Nuclear Physics UConn Mentor Connection Mariel Tader.
IVA. Electromagnetic Waves and Optics
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.
Properties of Multilayer Optics An Investigation of Methods of Polarization Analysis for the ICS Experiment at UCLA 8/4/04 Oliver Williams.
The Persistent Spin Helix Shou-Cheng Zhang, Stanford University Les Houches, June 2006.
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
MICE Collaboration Meeting March 29 - April 1, CERN MICE alignment, tolerances and supports Tuesday March 30 Room Edgar Black/IIT March17-
Clayton Anderson Neutron Scattering Phys 211A - Solid State Physics 1 17 December 2014.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Basic principles of MRI This lecture was taken from “Simply Physics” Click here to link to this site.
Helium 3 Neutron Precision Polarimetry CHRISTOPHER CRAWFORD, ROEL FLORES, CHRISTOPHER MENARD*, ELISE MARTIN, University of Kentucky *present address: Washington.
experimental platform
Lecture II Non dissipative traps Evaporative cooling Bose-Einstein condensation.
K L University By G.SUNITA DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS.
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Development of Spin-Echo Scattering Angle Measurement Wai Tung Hal Lee 1, Roger Pynn 1,2, Paul Stonaha.
SEM (SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE) Özgen Buğdaycı Elif Topçuoğlu Yavuz Duran Hacettepe University
Small Angle Neutron Scattering SANS (Neutron scattering) by Samuel Ghebru.
Instrument Development Test Station at HFIR CG1 Lowell Crow, May 15, 2009.
Polarimetry of Proton Beams at RHIC A.Bazilevsky Summer Students Lectures June 17, 2010.
HYSPEC HYSPEC INSTRUMENT DESIGN – OUTLINE  The two “models” considered for HYSPEC – inside & outside (Mark)  A breakdown of the components of the two.
September, 2003BME 1450 Introduction to NMR 1 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a phenomenon discovered about 60 years ago.
NCNR, NIST Gaithersburg, MD Internet: Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy (NSE) Dobrin P. Bossev, Steven.
Lecture 20: More on the deuteron 18/11/ Analysis so far: (N.B., see Krane, Chapter 4) Quantum numbers: (J , T) = (1 +, 0) favor a 3 S 1 configuration.
P Spring 2003 L9Richard Kass Inelastic ep Scattering and Quarks Elastic vs Inelastic electron-proton scattering: In the previous lecture we saw that.
5th workshop on scientific collaboration/JINR/Dubna HJL Basis HFR IBR-2 user policy collaboration Project REMUR: Investigation of the structure.
Why Diffraction, Why Neutrons? J. A. Dura Neutron Small Angle Scattering and Reflectometry NCNR Summer School on June 26, 2006.
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
Applications of polarized neutrons V.R. Skoy Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
Proton-Proton Elastic Scattering at RHIC
Electron Detection for Compton Polarimetry Michael McDonald Outline -Compton Effect -Polarimetry -Detectors -Diamond Results.
Polarized Neutrons in ANSTO – From LONGPOL to Pelican, Taipan, Sika, Platypus and Quake Dehong Yu and Shane Kennedy Bragg Institute, ANSTO, Australia.
Collab 4/15/04 #1 EDMEDM UIUC meeting 12/3/2004 Walter Sondheim, P-25, Los Alamos for presentation to The EDM Collaboration UIUC meeting, Urbana, IL UCN.
Announcements HW set 10 due this week; covers Ch (skip 24.8) and Office hours: Prof. Kumar’s Tea and Cookies 5-6 pm today My office hours.
IConUSAS, Oak Ridge, 9-10 July 2003 SASProFit - program for USANS data evaluation Jan Šaroun Nuclear Physics Institute Řež, Czech Republic The program.
Wave Optics Light interferes constructively and destructively just as mechanical waves do. However due to the shortness of the wave length (4-7 x
STATUS OF PREPARATION OF dp-ELASTIC SCATTERING STUDY AT THE EXTRACTED BEAM OF NUCLOTRON. Yu.V.Gurchin LHE JINR September 2009.
Goddard February 2003 R.Bellazzini - INFN Pisa A new X-Ray Polarimeter based on the photoelectric effect for Black Holes and Neutron Stars Astrophysics.
A New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer at NIST J. A. Rodriguez 1,3, P. Brand 3, C. Broholm 2,3, J.C. Cook 3, Z. Huang 3, P. Hundertmark 3, J. Lynn.
RICH Simulation in LHCb LHC Detector Simulation Workshop S.Easo, RAL, On behalf of LHCb–RICH group.
Dipole radiation during collisions LL2 Section 68.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation 
Deuteron polarimetry from 1.0 to 1.5 GeV/c Ed Stephenson, IUCF EDM discussion April 14, 2006 Based on work from: France:POMME B. Bonin et al. Nucl. Inst.
HYSPEC IDT Polarized Beam Mode for the Hybrid Spectrometer (HYSPEC) at the Spallation Neutron Source. Outline Polarization analysis and the HYSPEC place.
Design and Measurement Results for the Permanent Magnet Undulators for the Linac Coherent Light Source Facility II D. Arbelaez BeMa2014, 01/02/2014.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
Brightfield Contrasting Techniques Kurt Thorn NIC.
Light and Optics  The Electromagnetic Spectrum  Interference, Diffraction, and Polarization Wave Properties of Light.
24 June 2013 GSI, Darmstadt Helmholtz Institut Mainz Bertalan Feher, PANDA EMP First Measurements for a Superconducting Shield for the PANDA Polarized.
CLAS Collaboration at Jefferson Lab Deuteron Spin Structure function g 1 at low Q 2 from EG4 Experiment Krishna P. Adhikari, Sebastian E. Kuhn Old Dominion.
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
Presentation on.  There are many methods for measuring of fiber structure. Such as:  The absorption of infrared radiation  Raman scattering of light.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Commissioning of the Waveguide RF Wien Filter at COSY June 27, 2016 Alexander Nass (on behalf of JEDI) CBAC Meeting,
CBM magnet overview of the BINP work
Novel Techniques for the Position Calibration of FAUST
Electromagnetic Waves
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
Preliminary study of HTS option for CEPC detector magnet
The NPDGamma Experiment at the SNS FnPB
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
CLAS Simulations for the E5 Data Set
DEMONSTRATION EXPERIMENTS
10.4 Continuous Wave NMR Instrumentation coherent detection
for the A1 collaboration
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
Presentation transcript:

Development of Spherical Neutron Polarimetry Device Tianhao Wang Advisor: Prof. Roger Pynn

Outline Introduction to Spherical Neutron Polarimetry technology (SNP) Current existing SNP devices (CryoPAD, MuPAD) Research goal Previous research experiment result Next step research plan [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

General Description of SNP Polarized neutron diffraction experiment method Makes maximum usage of neutron spin manipulation Introduce and detect neutron spin polarization at any direction * M. Janoshek (2007) X: Along Q Z: Vertical Y: Form a Cartesian coordinate [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007) Analyzer & Detector

Basic formulae Basic formula for polarized neutron scattering developed by Blume (1963) and Maleeve (1999) : Total scattering cross section : Final polarization : Initial polarization : Magnetic scattering vector component perpendicular to (x direction) Nuclear Incoherent Magnetic Interference Chiral Nuclear & incoherent Magnetic Interference Chiral

From formula to experiment - Example MnWO4 - Pure coherent, magnetic scattering Want to measure the magnetic and chiral scattering term

Existing SNP device – CryoPAD at ILL since 20 years ago Developed since over 20 years ago. pioneer work, massive improvement have been made nowadays most successful SNP device Can be mounted on Triple axis spectrometer - Not limited on scattering angle - Not limited on elastic scattering Independent sample control - temperature, external electric field etc. Expensive, Labor consuming - cryogenic liquid drive

Schematics of CryoPAD B B Nutator: shift neutron spin from parallel to propagation to perpendicular Precession coil: shift neutron spin via Larmor precesion

Alternative design - MuPAD Technique highlights Cryogenic free - less cost, less work Can be mounted on Triple axis spectrometer - available for all kinds of scattering experiment Polarization controlled by two precession field Need very careful engineering on Precession coil windings and resident field removal - High requirement on engineering support, also expensive

MuPAD Schematics MuPAD (prototype build in 2004) at FRM-II in German Design and developed by M. Janoschek

Research Goal Spherical Neutron Polarimetry is a very powerful experimental method to detect material structure and properties. Currently no similar device exists in U.S. Research target: Develop a device that could fulfill spherical neutron polarimetry experiment method, based on available neutron sources in U.S. (LENS at IU, HFIR at ORNL, NIST? Los Alamos?) Features of the device: Use High Tc superconducting material (YBCO) for magnetic field shielding. Use closed cycle cryogenic stats Not bound to one single source Taking advantage of Time of Flight source ? [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Research Plan Build and test precession field shielded by YBCO (Spin nutator) realize and calibrate Spherical neutron spin manipulation Small angle neutron scattering based SNP experiment Build Fully functional SNP device Condensed matter experiment (Further Improvement) (Time of Flight method, advanced sample manipulation……) [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Guide field on rotation stage Front precession field First Step of research Neutron spin nutator Crucial component of the whole device Test of High Tc YBCO superconducting material as B field shield Guide field on rotation stage (Spin rotator) Zero field chamber [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007) Front precession field (spin nutator) Back precession field (spin nutator)

Nutator component and Assemble Procedure [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Spin Nutator Simulation using Radia (Excellent Work from colleague Fankang Li) Field Integral mapping Wavelength: 4 Ang Current: 4 A 180 deg rotation Dephasing caused by Inhomogeneity: (20mm beam size) < 0.1% [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Cryogenic system setup [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Real Picture and Difficulties [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Beam Setup Cryogenic system Detector Guide Field Analyzer Pictures clockwise from the top – Front end view showing permanent magnet guide field and cryo-cup location, vies of instrument, detail of up stream pi flipper (not used except for setup) and detail of guide field/electromagnets around cup. Vacuum Chamber Nutator chamber Front Slit Back Slit Front Pi Flipper Front & Back Electro Magnets

Experiment Setup Simple measurement: Time of flight source – precession angle vs. neutron wavelength Shifting precession coil current - Precession angle vs. current Incoming Guide Field Outgoing Guide Field Precession Field Analyzer Field [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Polarization vs. Wavelength plot with different precession coil currents 4 Angstrom 8 Angstrom Wavelength

Plot of P/PI=0 and fitting to function 4 Angstrom 8 Angstrom Wavelength

Fitting Data and the Beam size Comparison Wavelength Depolarization: <2% with 20mm beam size <0.4% with 15mm beam size <0.1% with 10mm beamsize

Choosing a Specific Wavelength and plot polarization through different current Compared to CryoPAD precession: 123.65deg/(A [Ang]), CryoCUP has less precession power: 11.52deg /(A [Ang]).

Experiment summary: Through the experiment test, it is feasible to use YBCO superconducting film as a magnetic field shield to isolate precession region from outer field By adjusting the current going through coil, we are able to control the precession angle. The dephasing factor of <2% is within acceptable range so that the nutator is suitable for next step development The thermal anchor of cryogenic system is not good, which limited the highest current to 4A The homogeneity of field generated by Helmholtz coil is not ideal, also the field strength generated is not strong enough [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Next step development Research Steps: Neutron spin nutator Spherical neutron spin manipulation Spherical neutron polarimetry with SANS Fully functional SNP device Condensed matter experiment Further development (Time of Flight method, advanced sample manipulation……) [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Next step Device development Guide field on rotation stage (Spin rotator) Front precession field (spin nutator) Back precession field Zero field chamber Analyzing direction [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Capacity of Spin nutator for SANS experiment For a typical 90 nutation, 3.438 deg difference is generated, which causes ~ 0.17% depolarization 0.3deg – 5deg [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Next Step Device – What experiment? MnSi – Candidant for SANS experiment Curie temperature: 29K Below Tc: single chirality spiral structure Propagation vector: Small Angel scattering experiment Done by both CryoPAD and MuPAD Phase Diagram [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Research Plan Research Steps: Neutron spin nutator Spherical neutron spin manipulation Spherical neutron polarimetry with SANS Fully functional SNP device Condensed Matter Experiment (Further Improvement – Time of Flight method) [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Next step development Fully functional SNP device on a Optical Platform? Spin rotator Spin nutator Analyzer Detector Detachable Mu-Metal Shield Sample Optical Platform [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Summary Spherical Neutron Polarimetry is a very powerful experimental method to detect material. Develop a device that could fulfill spherical neutron polarimetry experiment method, based on available neutron sources in U.S. The first step of research, which is making spin nutator has finished, the nutator made is suitable for further development Still a lot of work to do. [1] Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD - M. Janoschek (2007)

Analyzer & Detector Slit Polarizaer & Monochromater V Coil Source Wollaston Prism Source Polarizaer & Monochromater Analyzer & Detector