Mechanical Forces of Fission Yeast Growth

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Advertisements

Date of download: 12/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/11/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Morphogenesis of the Fission Yeast Cell through Cell Wall Expansion
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Architecture and Connectivity Govern Actin Network Contractility
Wei-Hsiang Lin, Edo Kussell  Current Biology 
Mechanical Properties of Actin Stress Fibers in Living Cells
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Morphogenesis of the Fission Yeast Cell through Cell Wall Expansion
A Mechanical Feedback Restricts Sepal Growth and Shape in Arabidopsis
Volume 17, Issue 24, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 24, Pages (December 2011)
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Single-Cell Analysis of Growth in Budding Yeast and Bacteria Reveals a Common Size Regulation Strategy  Ilya Soifer, Lydia Robert, Ariel Amir  Current.
Asymmetric Microtubule Pushing Forces in Nuclear Centering
Tensile Properties of Single Desmin Intermediate Filaments
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 16, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 20, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Yuki Hara, Akatsuki Kimura  Current Biology 
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Nicolas Minc, Fred Chang  Current Biology 
Mitotic Membrane Helps to Focus and Stabilize the Mitotic Spindle
Enhanced Depolymerization of Actin Filaments by ADF/Cofilin and Monomer Funneling by Capping Protein Cooperate to Accelerate Barbed-End Growth  Shashank.
Libera Lo Presti, Sophie G. Martin  Current Biology 
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Creep Function of a Single Living Cell
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Insights into the Micromechanical Properties of the Metaphase Spindle
Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Michael J. Rosenbluth, Wilbur A. Lam, Daniel A. Fletcher 
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Establishing New Sites of Polarization by Microtubules
Volume 27, Issue 20, Pages R1106-R1107 (October 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages (October 2015)
Arpita Upadhyaya, Michael P. Sheetz  Biophysical Journal 
Stephanie C. Weber, Clifford P. Brangwynne  Current Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
The Elastic Properties of the Cryptococcus neoformans Capsule
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Rheological Analysis and Measurement of Neutrophil Indentation
Collective Growth in a Small Cell Network
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Rheology Current Biology
Locomotion Controls Spatial Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex
Regulation of Response Properties and Operating Range of the AFD Thermosensory Neurons by cGMP Signaling  Sara M. Wasserman, Matthew Beverly, Harold W.
R. Gueta, D. Barlam, R.Z. Shneck, I. Rousso  Biophysical Journal 
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Global Compression Reorients Cortical Microtubules in Arabidopsis Hypocotyl Epidermis and Promotes Growth  Sarah Robinson, Cris Kuhlemeier  Current Biology 
Actin-Filament Stochastic Dynamics Mediated by ADF/Cofilin
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages e4 (January 2019)
Contributions of Turgor Pressure, the Contractile Ring, and Septum Assembly to Forces in Cytokinesis in Fission Yeast  Stephen A. Proctor, Nicolas Minc,
A Visual Sense of Number
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
The Role of Network Architecture in Collagen Mechanics
Nadine Krüger, Iva M. Tolić-Nørrelykke  Current Biology 
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Mechanical Forces of Fission Yeast Growth Nicolas Minc, Arezki Boudaoud, Fred Chang  Current Biology  Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages 1096-1101 (July 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.031 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Microfabricated Chambers as Single-Cell Force Sensors for Studying the Mechanical Properties of Fission Yeast Cells (A) Parameters of a fission yeast cell. The cell-wall layer has an elastic modulus, Ecw, and a thickness h. The turgor pressure inside the cell is P. The rod-shaped cell has a radius R and a length L. (B) Schematic showing how yeast cells are placed into the PDMS chambers. (C) Top-view image of an array of chambers with cells inside. Scale bar represents 10 μm. Current Biology 2009 19, 1096-1101DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Measuring Fission Yeast Cell-Wall Elastic Modulus (A) Single fission yeast cells with similar cell lengths were pushed into chambers smaller than the cells. Chambers with decreasing elastic moduli Ech (from left to right) are shown. Scale bars represent 5 μm. (B) Illustration of the method used to compute chamber deformation. (Left) The initial chamber diameter, D, is measured on the surrounding chambers (precision better than 5%), and the deformation, d, is measured along the force axis. (Right) The force from the chamber deformation equilibrates the buckling force. Because this buckling force is proportional to the cell-wall surface modulus, this method allows for a direct calculation of the cell-wall surface modulus at the single-cell level. Scale bar represents 5 μm. (C) Plot of the chamber deformation as a function of the inverse of the scaled chamber elastic modulus (E∗, see Equation 4) obtained from 155 single cells. Different symbols correspond to different chamber elastic moduli, as shown in the legend. The fit used is parabolic to account for second-order saturations at larger deformation. The imprecision in the measurement is found to be higher than the scattering of the data around the proposed fit. The strain is NM11. Current Biology 2009 19, 1096-1101DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Force-Velocity Relations for Fission Yeast Cell Growth (A) Time-lapse sequence of a fission yeast cell growing in and deforming a chamber made of soft PDMS (elastic modulus, Ech = 0.16 Mpa). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (B) Schematic illustrating the basis of the experiments. The free growth rate, v0, is measured before the cell is deforming the chamber. When the cell deforms the chamber, the force from the deformation opposes turgor and may reduce the growth rate, v(F). As the cell deforms the chamber more and more, the force increases (F2 > F1), which may continue changing the growth rate. (C) Cell growth under an external force . (Left) Example of growth curve of a single cell growing in a stiff chamber (Ech = 0.65MPa). The dotted lines follow the free growth rate as measured before contact. The gray part highlights the phase of growth under external force. The left axis plots the cell elongation: ΔL = L(t)-L(t = 0). The right axis plots the external force of the deformed chamber. (Right) Force-velocity plot. Each point is averaged on typically 3–4 different experimental sets, and forces are binned so that a sample size is kept almost constant. The vertical error bars represent the standard deviations. The dotted line plots a linear fit that corresponds to Equation 5. (D) Free growth rate measured in bipolar wild-type and gpd1Δ cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of sorbitol (0. 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 M). n = 10 cells for each condition. (E) Force-velocity plot of gpd1Δ cells in the absence and in the presence of 0.05 M sorbitol. n = 15 cells in both conditions. (F) Stalling forces extrapolated from force-velocity curves in the indicated mutants and conditions. The yeast strains are: NM11, NM183, and NM209 (all in a cdc25-22 background and grown at 25C). Double asterisks represent a Student's t test, p < 0.005. Current Biology 2009 19, 1096-1101DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cell Buckling under Its Own Pushing Force (A) Time-lapse sequence of a fission yeast cell growing and buckling under its own pushing force in a rigid chamber. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (B) Example of a growth curve of a cell buckling in a 15 μm chamber. The delay, Δt, during which the cell length stalls is indicated. The angle between cell tips represented on the right axis in blue is used for detection of the onset of buckling. (C) Buckling force, FB, plotted as a function of the delay, Δt, along with values predicted from the model. The yeast strains are NM11 and FC1234. Current Biology 2009 19, 1096-1101DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.031) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions