A Visual Pigment Expressed in Both Rod and Cone Photoreceptors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From: Cone-like Morphological, Molecular, and Electrophysiological Features of the Photoreceptors of the Nrl Knockout Mouse Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci..
Advertisements

Zhuo-Hua Pan, Hui-Juan Hu, Paul Perring, Rodrigo Andrade  Neuron 
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Calcium Dynamics of Spines Depend on Their Dendritic Location
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Responses to Spatial Contrast in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nuclei
Soumya Chatterjee, Edward M. Callaway  Neuron 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Felice A. Dunn, Luca Della Santina, Edward D. Parker, Rachel O.L. Wong 
Retinal Representation of the Elementary Visual Signal
Coincidence Detection of Single-Photon Responses in the Inner Retina at the Sensitivity Limit of Vision  Petri Ala-Laurila, Fred Rieke  Current Biology 
Single-Photon Absorptions Evoke Synaptic Depression in the Retina to Extend the Operational Range of Rod Vision  Felice A. Dunn, Fred Rieke  Neuron  Volume.
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Noise Induces Hopping between NF-κB Entrainment Modes
Aleksander Sobczyk, Karel Svoboda  Neuron 
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Role of Noncovalent Binding of 11-cis-Retinal to Opsin in Dark Adaptation of Rod and Cone Photoreceptors  Vladimir J Kefalov, Rosalie K Crouch, M.Carter.
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Felix Felmy, Erwin Neher, Ralf Schneggenburger  Neuron 
Fast and Slow Contrast Adaptation in Retinal Circuitry
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Rebecca S. Jones, Reed C. Carroll, Scott Nawy  Neuron 
A Pixel-Encoder Retinal Ganglion Cell with Spatially Offset Excitatory and Inhibitory Receptive Fields  Keith P. Johnson, Lei Zhao, Daniel Kerschensteiner 
Artur Llobet, Vahri Beaumont, Leon Lagnado  Neuron 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
High-Density Presynaptic Transporters Are Required for Glutamate Removal from the First Visual Synapse  Jun Hasegawa, Takehisa Obara, Kohichi Tanaka,
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 80, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
Greg Schwartz, Sam Taylor, Clark Fisher, Rob Harris, Michael J. Berry 
Alon Poleg-Polsky, Huayu Ding, Jeffrey S. Diamond  Cell Reports 
Mark P Gray-Keller, Peter B Detwiler  Neuron 
Felice A. Dunn, Luca Della Santina, Edward D. Parker, Rachel O.L. Wong 
Inhibitory Actions Unified by Network Integration
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Zhuo-Hua Pan, Hui-Juan Hu, Paul Perring, Rodrigo Andrade  Neuron 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Mechanisms of Light Adaptation in Drosophila Photoreceptors
Volume 21, Issue 22, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Kwoon Y. Wong, Felice A. Dunn, David M. Berson  Neuron 
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
Origin and Functional Impact of Dark Noise in Retinal Cones
John B Reppas, W.Martin Usrey, R.Clay Reid  Neuron 
Color Signals in Human Motion-Selective Cortex
Diana L Pettit, Samuel S.-H Wang, Kyle R Gee, George J Augustine 
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (January 2005)
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Vikram A. Kanda, Anthony Lewis, Xianghua Xu, Geoffrey W. Abbott 
Dynamics of Cyclic GMP Synthesis in Retinal Rods
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Binding Specificity of Retinal Analogs to Photoactivated Visual Pigments Suggest Mechanism for Fine-Tuning GPCR-Ligand Interactions  Sundaramoorthy Srinivasan,
Encoding Light Intensity by the Cone Photoreceptor Synapse
AppA Is a Blue Light Photoreceptor that Antirepresses Photosynthesis Gene Expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides  Shinji Masuda, Carl E. Bauer  Cell  Volume.
Presentation transcript:

A Visual Pigment Expressed in Both Rod and Cone Photoreceptors Jian-xing Ma, Sergey Znoiko, Kashelle L. Othersen, James C. Ryan, Joydip Das, Tomoki Isayama, Masahiro Kono, Daniel D. Oprian, D.Wesley Corson, M.Carter Cornwall, David A. Cameron, Ferenc I. Harosi, Clint L. Makino, Rosalie K. Crouch  Neuron  Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 451-461 (November 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00482-2

Figure 1 Detection of the Blue-Sensitive Cone Opsin in Green Rods and Blue-Sensitive Cones (A) Specificities of the Blue-N and 4D2 antibodies tested by Western blot analysis of recombinant salamander UV- (lane 1) and blue-sensitive cone opsins (lane 2), red rod opsin (lane 3), and red-sensitive cone opsin (lane 4). Each of the recombinant pigments contained the 1D4 epitope (see Experimental Procedures), so the 1D4 antibody was included as a control for positive opsin expression. Blue-N only labeled the blue-sensitive cone opsin, while 4D2 only labeled the red rod opsin. (B) FITC-conjugated Blue-N labeled green rods (white arrows) and blue-sensitive cones (yellow arrowheads) in flat-mounted retinas. (C and D) Double labeling with FITC-conjugated Blue-N and 4D2 antibodies followed by Tex-as red-conjugated goat-anti-mouse IgG. (E) Phase contrast and fluorescent images of (left to right) an isolated blue-sensitive cone, green rod, and red rod. Scale bar = 10 μm in (B), (D), and (E); scale bar = 100 μm in (C) Neuron 2001 32, 451-461DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00482-2)

Figure 2 Green Rod and Blue-Sensitive Cone Spectra (A) Averaged absorbance spectra of four green rods (black line) and four blue-sensitive cones (gray line) obtained from MSP. Peak absorbance for the green rods was 0.046, while that for the blue-sensitive cones was 0.026. The wavelength maxima obtained from single-cell spectra were 429 ± 0.5 nm (n = 4) and 430 ± 1 nm (n = 4) for green rods and blue-sensitive cones, respectively. (B) Averaged spectral sensitivities of 13 green rods (open symbols) and 4 blue-sensitive cones (filled symbols); error bars show standard deviations. Maxima from template fittings (Govardovskii et al., 2000) were 429 and 430 nm for green rods (data not shown) and blue-sensitive cones (gray line), respectively. (C) Bleaching difference spectra obtained after replacement of the native chromophore in one green rod (black line) and two blue-sensitive cones (gray line) with exogenous 11-cis retinal. (Inset) Absorbance spectra of five green rods (black line) and four blue-sensitive cones (gray line) after bleaching and subsequent 11-cis retinal regeneration. (D) Spectral sensitivities of two green rods before (open symbols) and after chromophore replacement with 9-cis retinal (gray symbols). The spectral sensitivity of blue-sensitive cones with 9-cis retinal (gray line) (Makino et al., 1999) is superimposed for comparison. The black line is the template fit of the green rods containing native chromophore Neuron 2001 32, 451-461DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00482-2)

Figure 3 RT-PCR and Southern Blot Analysis of the Opsin from Isolated Cells (A) RT-PCR products: lane 1, 100 bp ladder; lanes 2 and 3, green rods; lanes 4 and 5, red rods; lanes 6 and 7, blue-sensitive cones. (B) Southern blot analysis of the PCR products with a nested oligonucleotide probe specific for SWS2,P432. (C) Southern blots of GAPDH PCR products from the same cells as in (B) Neuron 2001 32, 451-461DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00482-2)

Figure 4 Spectral and Chemical Properties of the Recombinant SWS2,P432 (A) Absorbance spectra of the A1 (light gray) and A2 (dark gray) SWS2,P432. Template fits (Govardovskii et al., 2000) yielded maxima at 432 nm and at 440 nm for A1 (continuous line) and A2 pigments (dashed line), respectively; respective baselines from the fits are shown. Decay of the red rod pigment (B) and SWS2,P432 (C) in 50 mM hydroxylamine (pH 7). An initial spectrum was taken, then hydroxylamine was added, and additional spectra were recorded at intervals. For red rod pigment, the intervals were 1, 28, 71, 128, 185, 242, 299, 449, and 569 min, while for SWS2,P432, they were 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 22, 28, 34, 58, and 90 min. The reactions were carried out at 4°C Neuron 2001 32, 451-461DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00482-2)

Figure 5 Colocalization of SWS2,P432 with Rod and Cone α Transducins Flat-mounted retinas were doubly labeled with Blue-N (green) and either TA1 (anti-rod Gαt) (A–C) or TA2 (anti-cone Gαt) (D–F) (red). Blue-N labeled blue-sensitive cones (yellow arrowheads) and green rods (white arrows) (A and D). TA1 labeled all of the rods (B), while TA2 appeared to label all of the cones (E). In the composite images, SWS2,P432 and rod α transducin colocalized in the green rods (C), while SWS2,P432 and cone α transducin colocalized in blue-sensitive cones (F). Scale bar = 10 μM Neuron 2001 32, 451-461DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00482-2)

Figure 6 Photoresponses of Green Rods and Blue-Sensitive Cones (A) Averaged responses of a green rod (left) and a blue-sensitive cone (right) to flashes at 440 nm. Output from the stimulus monitor is shown by the lowermost traces. (B) Stimulus-response relations of the cells in (A). Results were fitted with equation 2, where i0.5 = 17 photons μm−2 for the green rod and 473 photons μm−2 for the blue-sensitive cone. i0.3/i0.7 was 0.23 for the green rod and 0.15 for the blue-sensitive cone, indicating that the relation rose more steeply for the green rod. (C) Decrease in green rod sensitivity with the outer segment radius squared. Sensitivity was plotted on the ordinate as the multiplicative inverse of the product of i0.5 and collecting area. For tapered cells, the mean radius squared was used. Regression analysis indicated a negative trend (p < 0.0003, by comparison of the Pearson's correlation coefficient with a t distribution), where the slope of the line was −6.4e-4 photoisomerizations−1 μm−2, and the intercept was 1.4e-2 photoisomerizations−1. (D) Averaged responses from a green rod (left) and a blue-sensitive cone (right) to steps of light at 440 nm. These cells differ from those in (A). (E) Intensity-response relations of the blue-sensitive cone (filled symbols) and the green rod (open symbols) in (D) for the peak amplitudes (circles) and the amplitudes after 10 s of light exposure (triangles). Half-maximal responses were obtained with light producing 1900 (peak amplitude) and 17,833 photoisomerizations s−1 (amplitude at 10 s) for the blue-sensitive cone and 1525 and 4457 photoisomerizations s−1 for the green rod. The continuous line shows the fit of open circles to equation 2, substituting step intensity for flash strength Neuron 2001 32, 451-461DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00482-2)