Understanding evidence: The big picture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meta-analysis: summarising data for two arm trials and other simple outcome studies Steff Lewis statistician.
Advertisements

Study Designs By Az and Omar.
Marshall University School of Medicine Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology BMS 617 Lecture 10: Survival Curves Marshall University Genomics Core.
Challenges of Non-Inferiority Trial Designs R. Sridhara, Ph.D.
1October In Chapter 17: 17.1 Data 17.2 Risk Difference 17.3 Hypothesis Test 17.4 Risk Ratio 17.5 Systematic Sources of Error 17.6 Power and Sample.
AP Statistics Section 10.2 B. Comparative studies are more convincing than single-sample investigations. For that reason, one-sample inference is less.
Levels of evidence and Interpretation of a systematic review
Basics of Meta-analysis
* Chapter 8 – we were estimating with confidence about a population * Chapter 9 – we were testing a claim about a population * Chapter 10 – we are comparing.
From: Assessing the Risk of Progression From Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Dysfunction to Overt Heart Failure: A Systematic Overview and Meta-Analysis.
Figure 1. Consort diagram of manuscripts selected in this report.
Chapter 13 Logistic regression.
Figure 2 Forest plot of 3 studies evaluating the short-term patient-reported measures of activity limitations and participation restrictions (PRMALP) improvement.
Early Administration of Low-Dose Aspirin for the Prevention of Preterm and Term Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;31:141–146.
Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis  Stavros Stavrakis, MD  The American Journal.
Copyright © 2005 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Confidence Intervals and p-values
Systematic Review Systematic review
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(11): doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews
Thomas F. O’Donnell, MD, Joseph Lau, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials on the Use of Ursodeoxycholic Acid for the Prevention of Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease in Hematopoietic.
From: Epidural Injections for Spinal Pain:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Evaluating the “Control” Injections in Randomized Controlled Trials Anesthes.
Does Exercise Reduce Pain and Improve Physical Function Before Hip or Knee Replacement Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled.
Meta Analysis/Systematic Review Poster Template
Here is the graph of a function
دانشیار دانشکده دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید صدوقی یزد
Analyzing One-Variable Data
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of ondansetron in preventing postanesthesia shivering  Min Li, Xiaolan Hu, Yuan.
Safety and Efficacy of Incretin-Based Therapies in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis  Patricia M.
M. Hassan Murad, MD, MPH, Mohamed B. Elamin, MBBS, Anton N
Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS I)
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
Bayesian network meta-analysis of nitinol stents, covered stents, drug-eluting stents, and drug-coated balloons in the femoropopliteal artery  Konstantinos.
Thyroid antibodies and gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis
Erratum Regarding “Preemptive Correction of Arteriovenous Access Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials” (Am.
The effect of intravenous immunoglobulin passive immunotherapy on unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion: a meta-analysis  Si-Wei Wang, Song-Yang.
Non-opioid analgesics in adults after major surgery: systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized trials  V Martinez, H Beloeil, E Marret,
B. Cohen, Y. N. Schacham, K. Ruetzler, S. Ahuja, D. Yang, E. J
Fabrizio Zullo, M. D. , Emanuela Spagnolo, M. D. , Gabriele Saccone, M
Andrew H. Stewart, FRCS, Paul S. Eyers, FRCS, Jonothan J
A presentation to: Meeting name Date
Section 3: Estimating p in a binomial distribution
M. Hassan Murad, MD, MPH, Mohamed B. Elamin, MBBS, Anton N
Interpreting Basic Statistics
Thomas F. O’Donnell, MD, Joseph Lau, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as distension medium for diagnostic hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 
Extrema and the First-Derivative Test
Yousef Rezaei, MD  American Journal of Kidney Diseases 
Funnel plot of the 17 trials comparing haloperidol and placebo in schizophrenia (outcome: response rate). Funnel plot of the 17 trials comparing haloperidol.
Berger JS, et al. JAMA 2009;301:
Benefit and harm of pregabalin in acute pain treatment: a systematic review with meta- analyses and trial sequential analyses  M.L. Fabritius, C. Strøm,
Steroids in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Flow diagram for exclusions of trials identified RCT indicates randomized controlled trial Hulten E, et al. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:
A presentation to: Meeting name Date
Drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized.
Understanding evidence: The big picture
Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained.
KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: 2007 Update of Hemoglobin Target    American.
Level of Evidence Lecture 4.
Nicholas Z. Kerin, MD, Sony Jacob, MD  The American Journal of Medicine 
Giuseppe Remuzzi, Carlos Chiurchiu, Piero Ruggenenti 
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Zachary L. Steinberg et al. JACC 2017;69:
The Possible Effects of Clicking:
M. Hassan Murad, MD, MPH, David N. Flynn, BS, Mohamed B
Forest plot and random-effects meta-analysis of the general combined outcome (preterm delivery, SGA, NICU) in different selections of CKD stage 1 versus.
Benefit and risk of intrathecal morphine without local anaesthetic in patients undergoing major surgery: meta-analysis of randomized trials  N. Meylan,
Presentation transcript:

Understanding evidence: The big picture Systematic reviews are the best way to understand the effects of treatments because they consider all the relevant, reliable evidence. These slides will teach you how to interpret the main graph used to present the results of a systematic review of randomized trials. main graph

Forest Plot Main Graph Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Trial 5 Trial 6 Favours Treatment A Favours Comparator B Main Graph Many similar trials Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 1 Trial 5 Trial 6 Trial 7 Trial 4 Trial 1+2+3 +4+5+6+7 Relative Risk (RR)

Steroids given before preterm delivery reduce the number of babies who die.

Relative Risk (RR) of Death Favours steroid Favours placebo 11.2% RR = percent who died with placebo percent who died with steroid "No difference" RR=1 5% die with steroid 10% die with placebo RR = ?? 10% die with steroid 5% die with placebo RR = ?? 10% die with steroid 10% die with placebo RR = ?? 0.01 0.1 0.5 1 10 2 Relative Risk (RR) of Death Relative Risk (RR) of death

Relative Risk (RR) of Death Favours steroid Favours placebo #1 Trial Deaths Deaths Babies 1070 Steroid Placebo 6.8% 11.2% 11.2% RR = percent who died with placebo percent who died with steroid 6.8% = 0.61 11.2% 0.01 0.1 0.5 1 10 2 Relative Risk (RR) of Death Relative Risk (RR) of death

Relative Risk (RR) of Death Favours steroid Favours placebo Point estimate "best guess at truth" #1 Trial Deaths Babies 1070 Steroid Placebo 6.8% 11.2% 95% Confidence interval "truth probably in here" 0.01 0.1 0.5 1 10 2 Relative Risk (RR) of Death Relative Risk (RR) of death

Relative Risk (RR) of Death Favours steroid Favours placebo #1 Trial Deaths Babies 1070 Steroid Placebo 6.8% 11.2% #2 130 1.4% 8.2% #3 3.0% 11.9% 126 #4 9.0% 10.0% 127 #5 1.4% 6.7% #6 2.5% 15.9% #7 9.7% 10.0% 146 144 743 2486 Total 0.01 0.1 0.5 1 10 2 Relative Risk (RR) of Death Relative Risk (RR) of death

0.1 0.5 1 10 2

Relative Risk (RR) of Death Favours steroids Favours placebo Year Deaths "Cumulative Meta-analysis" Babies Steroid Placebo 1972 1070 36 60 1977 37 65 1200 1978 39 72 1326 1979 44 79 45 84 1980 47 94 1981 83 131 1453 1599 1743 2486 How long did it take to change practice? Another decade and 10 more trials! 0.1 0.5 1 2 10 Relative Risk (RR) of Death