Assessment & Evaluation Committee

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Engaging Online Faculty and Administrators in the Assessment Process at the American Public University System Assessment and Student Learning: Direct and.
LCME Self Study Kick Off. What is the LCME? Accrediting agency for programs leading to the M.D. degree in the U.S. and Canada Jointly sponsored by the.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
DEVELOPING DEPARTMENTAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLANS Jerry Rackoff Lois Huffines Kathy Martin.
Monroe Community College 1 Assessment of General Education Social Sciences Knowledge and Skills Area Presenters Frances Dearing, Assessment Coordinator.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Academic Assessment at UTB Steve Wilson Director of Academic Assessment.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
ARE STUDENTS LEARNING WHAT WE SAY THEY ARE? THE IMPORTANCE AND PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING EFFECTIVE PROGRAM REVIEWS IN THE BUSINESS CURRICULUM Presented by:
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
From Inputs to Process to Outcomes: the Quality Management Program at the American University in Bulgaria Steven F. Sullivan Dean of Faculty.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Assessment Small Learning Communities. The goal of all Small Learning Communities is to improve teaching, learning, and student outcomes A rigorous, coherent.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Mary Ann Roe e-Colorado Portal Coordinator Colorado Department of Labor and Employment Jennifer Jirous Computer Information Systems Faculty Pikes Peak.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Anna Parkman New Faculty Orientation ◦ ACCOUNTABILITY in Higher Education ◦ ASSESSMENT as validation of learning ◦ ASSESSMENT & ACCREDITATION ◦
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Erik Shearer, Professor of Art, Accreditation Faculty Co-chair
Course Director’s Strategy Day
Outstanding Professor Award Committee Presents:
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
Faculty Evaluations: Tenured, Tenure-Track, and Associate
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
SUNY Applied Learning Resolution.
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Preparing Future Faculty/FaCET Assessment Session
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Teaching Excellence Development Fund
Assessment Presentation
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Student Assessment and Evaluation
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Assessments: Beyond the Claims
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
SACSCOC Administrative Assessment Changes
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Faculty Senate President’s Report
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Fort Valley State University
Presented By Claudette H. Williams
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Responsibility for assessment at Brooklyn college – a distributed leadership model OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness September 9, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director Mary McLean, Research & Evaluation October 19, 2011

Assessment Evaluation Assessment & Evaluation A & E Committee Assessment Plan Next Steps

Assessment Process by which we measure student achievement of learning outcomes or attainment of aptitude.

Assessment Assessment Can… Answer questions about the learning of individual students Be used to determine the effectiveness of a single course, program, or institution Association of American Colleges and University. (2005). Levels of Assessment: From the Student to the Institution.

Assessment Student Learning Principles Evidence of student learning should be used for multiple levels of assessment: Classroom Level Course Level (across classroom sections of the same course) Program Level (across courses or learning units within a program) Institutional (across multiple programs within the institution) Best evidence of learning comes from direct observation of student work rather than from an input inventory (e.g., list of courses completed) or summary of self reports. Association of American Colleges and University. (2005). Levels of Assessment: From the Student to the Institution.

Assessment Evaluation Assessment & Evaluation A & E Committee Assessment Plan Next Steps

Evaluation Evaluation is a tool which can be used to help the institution judge whether a curriculum or instructional approach is being implemented as planned, and to determine the extent to which stated goals and objectives are being achieved. It allows the institution to answer the questions: Are we doing for our students what we said we would? Are students learning what we set out to teach? How can we make improvements to the curriculum and/or teaching methods? Fleischhman & Williams. (1996). Introduction to Program Evaluation for Classroom teachers.

Assessment Evaluation Assessment & Evaluation A &E Committee Assessment Plan Next Steps

Assessment & Evaluation Assessment and evaluation (program) are inevitably related. Assessment provides information about student learning and evaluation provides judgment on effectiveness. Assessment of student learning and evaluation of programs or courses are ongoing processes—not products.

Assessment & Evaluation: Levels Instructor Department & Administration Departments & Administration

Assessment & Evaluation: Challenge The difficulty of aggregating the results of student learning assessment up to the institution level presents a practical obstacle of using direct measures of student learning for institutional effectiveness. Volkwein. (September 2011). Gaining Ground: The role of institutional research in assessing student outcomes and demonstrating institutional effectiveness.

Assessment & Evaluation: Levels Class Answers questions about an individual student Is the student learning as expected? Has the student’s work improved over the semester? How well has the student achieved the learning outcomes set for the course? Are there any barriers (e.g., engagement, teacher effectiveness, curriculum, external factors) to student learning regarding the course content? Driven by an individual faculty member Association of American Colleges and University. (2005). Levels of Assessment: From the Student to the Institution.

Assessment & Evaluation: Levels Course Answers questions about groups of students in a class or across multiple-section courses Is student learning occurring as expected across multiple sections of a course? How well is the class collectively achieving the course’s content outcomes and objectives (at any one point, at the end)? Are the assignments helping students achieve the expected level of knowledge or skills? How well is the course fulfilling its purpose in a larger curriculum? Driven by faculty or the Department Association of American Colleges and University. (2005). Levels of Assessment: From the Student to the Institution.

Assessment & Evaluation: Levels Program Answers questions about programs (e.g., general education or concentration) Do the program’s courses, individually and collectively, contribute to its outcomes as planned? How well does the program fulfill its purposes in the entire curriculum? Are the courses organized in a coherent manner to allow for cumulative learning? Does the program advance institution-wide goals as planned? Driven by the Department and Administration Association of American Colleges and University. (2005). Levels of Assessment: From the Student to the Institution.

Assessment & Evaluation: Levels Institution Answers questions about the overall effectiveness of the institution to provide quality programming How well is the institution meeting the needs of its programs? Are the appropriate programs accredited or licensed? How well is student learning occurring in and evidenced from the institution’s programs? Driven by Departments and Administration.

Assessment Evaluation Assessment & Evaluation A &E Committee Assessment Plan Next Steps

A&E Committee: Responsibility Ensure that: Assessment and evaluation are occurring at all levels. Measurable and relevant learning outcomes are developed for the college’s programs. Program-level assessment and evaluation plan is created and executed. Assessment and evaluation plans address appropriate activities within the college’s annual plans. Assessment results and evaluative decisions are discussed with internal and external constituents, documented, and monitored. Decisions made about or change to curriculum or programs is further evaluated for effectiveness.

A&E Committee: Members Department: Chairs & faculty representative Program Directors (Nursing & Manufacturing Technology) Deans: Adult Education AVI Careers Continuing Education Instruction Student Services Vice President of Academic & Student Affairs President (ex-officio)

Assessment Evaluation Assessment & Evaluation A &E Committee Assessment Plan Next Steps

A & E Plan Course Level Step 1. Identify the leaders for the department (Chairs and Coordinators) Step 2. Define the mission of each department. Step 3. Define the goals of each department. Provide the basis for assessment and, therefore, should be defined adequately and clearly. Step 4. Define the student learning outcomes of each course.

A & E Plan Course Level Step 5. Inventory existing and needed assessment methods and select assessment measures and methods. Step 6. Select assessment methods and identify assessment targets. Step 7. Collect the data. Step 8. Analyze the results.

A & E Plan Course Level Step 9. Provide feedback. (Evaluation) The results and information gained should be distributed to the faculty and other appropriate parties to obtain their ideas on how to improve the program. Step 10. Implement changes. Step 11. Develop plan to monitor the changes and compare the results. Step 12. Review information. Review all of the information obtained from the assessment process and determine how this will affect the next assessment and evaluation plan. This provides the starting point for the next iteration of the assessment and evaluation cycle to continuously improve the course.

Assessment Evaluation Assessment & Evaluation A &E Committee Assessment Plan Next Steps

Next Steps Develop common vocabulary (review University of Central Florida document) Develop assessment plans for department-level (course-level) assessments Develop method for communication online (Sharepoint, Webplanner, etc.)

A&E Time Line

THANK YOU Daley on the move!