Plessy vs. Ferguson (1896).

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(1896), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in the jurisprudence of the United States, upholding the constitutionality of state laws requiring.
Advertisements

 Was a landmark decision of the supreme court of the U.S.A. concerning racial segregation.
By Bri Dickerson, Gillian Mendez, Kaitlyn Strada, & Stephanie Dellavia
1896 During the later part of Reconstruction, Southern State legislatures started enforcing more Jim Crow laws to legally make African Americans more.
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896 “ Separate But Equal ” Power point created by Robert L. Martinez Primary Content: The Americans.
Separate but Equal Each of the following situations offers separate accommodations for the people involved. Are those accommodations equal?
Segregation and Discrimination
Famous Civil Rights Cases and Events. Plessy vs. Ferguson Case 1892, Homer Plessy was jailed for sitting in the "White" car of the East Louisiana Railroad.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
Problems Faced by African Americans
PROJECT LEGAL TIPS PROGRAM DR. JAMES CARROLL, DIRECTOR MR. HOWARD KRIEGER,BA,MS., STAFF DEVELOPER LOIS M. WILLIAMS SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHER, IS166.
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Plessy vs. Ferguson Background Activists in Louisiana were looking for a person to help them challenge the Separate Car Act in Louisiana. The act.
Journal: What might you think of when you hear the phrase “separate but equal”?
Significant Supreme Court Cases that Started at a State Level
“Separate But Equal” The Brown v. Board of Education decision.
CIVIL RIGHTS. Civil Rights  Slavery, Missouri Compromise  Dred Scott(1856)  Civil War  Post Civil War Amendments  Reconstruction, 1877 Compromise,
Brown vs. Board of Education By Jackson Sullivan.
Mr. Homburg American Studies
Plessy V. Ferguson U.S. 537 Cassidy Osborne.
Ryan, Brandon, Mckayla, Alexis, Taylor
What it is: The US constitution was created to establish the principles that the citizens of the US wanted to be established in the government It lays.
Plessy v. Ferguson Big Papi Vinny. In 1892, Homer Plessy took a seat in the “whites only” car of a train and refused to move. He was arrested, and convicted.
Civil Rights Cases (1883) Background Civil Rights Act in 1875 declared it a crime to deny equal access to public accommodations on account of race or color.
Plessy V. Ferguson 1892 Homer Plessy 1/8 black, looked white Under state law he is black Bought train ticket and tried to sit in white section Arrested.
The Civil Rights Movement
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896  In 1890, the Louisiana state legislature passed the “Separate Car Act,” which required separate accommodations for blacks and.
African Americans become full citizens. 13 th Amendment – ended slavery. 14 th Amendment – forbid states from denying Constitutional rights to any citizens.
Plessy vs Ferguson By Raheem Roher. 1.The case In 1896 a man name Homer Plessy boarded a all whit train car Plessy was one eighth Black and seven eight.
 Reconstruction Amendments:  13 th Amendment ▪ Abolished slavery  14 th Amendment ▪ Granted citizenship, equal protection  15 th Amendment ▪ Suffrage.
Plessy v. Ferguson A Supreme Court Case By Juston Bass-McNeill and Jalen Dozier.
Plessy vs. Ferguson 1896 Angelina Uzueta, Emily Trevino, Elias Ybarra.
Plessy v. Ferguson. Background O Louisiana railways were to “provide equal but separate accommodations for the white & colored races” O Homer Plessy decided.
Plessy v. Ferguson (state of Louisiana) Unit 7 – The Times They Are A- Changin’
Plessy VS Ferguson Alexis, Chloe, Juan, and Katana.
PLESSY V FERGUSON Interdisciplinary lesson To Kill A Mockingbird and Jim Crow Miss Anthony and Miss Toner.
What it is: The US constitution was created to establish the principles that the citizens of the US wanted to be established in the government It lays.
Plessy VS. Ferguson (1896) Mor, Yuval P.3. Facts of the Case When Louisiana passed the Separate Car Act, legally segregating common carriers in 1892,
By: Kelsey Byers, Ethan Carter, Micah Hault Plessy vs. Ferguson.
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
WELCOME BACK!! Unit 7: 2 parts THIS WEEK: Quiz Thurs, 1/12B & Fri, 1/13A Segregation & Discrimination Westward Movement TEST IN MID-FEBRUARY Immigration.
Ali Lawson and Ethan Ealy
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896) By Colton Baburich.
SS8H7b: Evaluate key political, social, and economic changes that occurred in Georgia between 1877 and b. Analyze how rights were denied to African.
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896
Origins of the Civil Rights Movement
PROJECT LEGAL TIPS PROGRAM DR. JAMES CARROLL, DIRECTOR
Segregation.
Equal Protection & the 14th Amendment
The South’s Answer to the Reconstruction Amendments: Jim Crow Laws
Origins of the Civil Rights Movement
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Journal 1-21 What does “Separate but equal” mean?
Jim Crow.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) In 1890, the state of Louisiana passed the "Separate Car Act" Comité des Citoyens (Committee of Citizens) formed and decided.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
Section 3: Segregation and Discrimination
Overturned by the decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954
Section 3 Segregation and Discrimination
The Civil Rights Struggle
What are the affects of segregation?
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896
Civil Rights in the 1800’s SS8H7 The student will evaluate key political, social, and economic changes that occurred in Georgia between 1877 and 1918.
April 6, 2015 TURN IN YOUR SERVICE HOURS PAPERS. Look at
Monday – October 6th, 2014 Weekends Agenda Notes – 8-3 Worksheet
By: Isabella Armstrong and Brianna Dinch
Plessy v. Ferguson Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) 163 U.S. 537
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896.
Presentation transcript:

Plessy vs. Ferguson (1896)

Plessy vs. Ferguson is a landmark United states Supreme court decision, upholding the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation in public facilities under the doctrine of “separate but equal”

In 1890, the state of Louisiana passed a law (the "Separate Car Act") that required separate accommodations for blacks and whites on railroads, including separate railway cars. Concerned, a group of prominent black, and white New Orleans residents formed the Comité des Citoyens (Committee of Citizens) dedicated to repeal the law. They eventually persuaded Homer Plessy to participate in an orchestrated test case. Plessy was born a free man and was an “octoroon" (someone of seven-eighths Caucasian descent and one-eighth African descent). However, under Louisiana law, he was classified as black, and thus required to sit in the "colored" car.

On June 7, 1892, Plessy bought a first class ticket at the Press Street Depot and boarded a "whites only" car of the east louisana railroad in New Orleans, Louisana. The railroad company, which opposed the law on the grounds that it would require the purchase of more railcars, had been informed already as to Plessy's racial lineage. Additionally, the committee hired a private detective with arrest powers to detain Plessy, to ensure he was charged for violating the Separate Car Act, as opposed to a vagrancy or some other offense. After Plessy had taken a seat in the whites-only railway car, he was asked to vacate it and sit instead in the blacks-only car. Plessy refused and was arrested immediately by the detective. As planned, the train was stopped and Plessy was taken off the train at Press and Royal streets. Plessy was remanded for trial in Orleans Parish.

In his case, Homer Adolph Plessy v In his case, Homer Adolph Plessy v. The State of Louisiana, Plessy argued that the state law which required East Louisiana Railroad to segregate trains had denied him his rights under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. However, the judge presiding over his case, John Howard Ferguson, ruled that Louisiana had the right to regulate railroad companies as long as they operated within state boundaries. Plessy was convicted and sentenced to pay a $25 fine. He immediately sought to fight the case. Committee of Citizens took Plessy's appeal to the Supreme Court Of Louisana, where he again found an unreceptive ear, as the state Supreme Court upheld Judge Ferguson's ruling. Undaunted, the Committee appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1896. Two legal briefs were submitted on Plessy's behalf. Oral arguments were held before the Supreme Court on April 13, 1896.

Plessy’s lawyer built his case upon violations of Plessy's rights under the Thirteenth Amendment, prohibiting slavery, and the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees the same rights to all citizens of the United States, and the equal protection of those rights, against the deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. He argued that the reputation of being a black man was "property," which, by the law, implied the inferiority of African-Americans as compared to whites.

The Decision In a 7 to 1 decision handed down on May 18, 1896, the Court rejected Plessy's arguments based on the Fourteenth Amendment, seeing no way in which the Louisiana statute violated it. In addition, the majority of the Court rejected the view that the Louisiana law implied any inferiority of blacks, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Instead, it contended that the law separated the two races as a matter of public policy. The case helped cement the legal foundation for the doctrine of separate but equal, the idea that segregation based on classifications was legal as long as facilities were of equal quality. However, Southern state governments refused to provide blacks with genuinely equal facilities and resources in the years after the Plessy decision. The states not only separated races but, in actuality, ensured differences in quality. In January 1897, Homer Plessy pleaded guilty to the violation and paid the fine.