Increasing the density in Wendelstein 7-X: Benefits and limitations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
9th TTF Spain September 11, 2002 B. J. Peterson, NIFS, Japan page 1 Radiative Collapse and Density Limit in the Large Helical Device.
Advertisements

1 J-W. Ahn a H.S. Han b, H.S. Kim c, J.S. Ko b, J.H. Lee d, J.G. Bak b, C.S. Chang e, D.L. Hillis a, Y.M. Jeon b, J.G. Kwak b, J.H. Lee b, Y. S. Na c,
1 G.T. Hoang, 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Euratom Turbulent Particle Transport in Tore Supra G.T. Hoang, J.F. Artaud, C. Bourdelle, X. Garbet and.
Density Limit Studies in LHD B. J. Peterson, J. Miyazawa, K. Nishimura, S. Masuzaki, Y. Nagayama, N. Ohyabu, H. Yamada, K. Yamazaki, T. Kato, N. Ashikawa,
Confinement Study of Net-Current Free Toroidal Plasmas Based on Extended International Stellarator Database H.Yamada 1), J.H.Harris 2), A.Dinklage 3),
N.P. Basse 1 Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA USA 1 Present address: ABB Switzerland Ltd. Corporate.
IPP Stellarator Reactor perspective T. Andreeva, C.D. Beidler, E. Harmeyer, F. Herrnegger, Yu. Igitkhanov J. Kisslinger, H. Wobig O U T L I N E Helias.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
49th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2007, Orlando, Florida Ion Temperature Measurements and Impurity Radiation in.
Energy “Laws” Energy “Producers” Energy “Consumers” Next step: Panels Sustainable Energy: Complex problem that requires long term planning and government.
RFX-mod Workshop – Padova, January Experimental QSH confinement and transport Fulvio Auriemma on behalf of RFX-mod team Consorzio RFX, Euratom-ENEA.
Nils P. Basse Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA USA ABB seminar November 7th, 2005 Measurements.
Effects of global MHD instability on operational high beta-regime in LHD IAEA FEC2004, Vilamoura, Nov.3, 2004 EX3/3 IAEA FEC2004, Vilamoura, Nov.3, 2004.
1 A. Weller CWGM W7-AS high beta profile data for the ISHPDB Arthur Weller essential contributions from : A. Dinklage, J. Geiger, J. Knauer, A. Kus,
The optimized stellarator as a candidate for a fusion power plant Thomas Klinger C. Beidler, J. Boscary, H.S. Bosch, A. Dinklage, P. Helander, H. Maaßberg.
R. Doerner, ITPA SOL/DIV meeting, Avila, Jan. 7-10, R. P. Doerner, G. De Temmerman, M.J. Baldwin, D. Nishijima Center for Energy Research, University.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
1 Plasma Rotation and Momentum Confinement – DB ITPA - 1 October 2007 by Peter de Vries Plasma Rotation and Momentum Confinement Studies at JET P.C. de.
Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD
ASIPP HT-7 The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by impurity injection The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.
MCZ Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations M.C. Zarnstorff 1 Presented by E. Fredrickson 1 With thanks to A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2,
T. Bolzonella – 9 February 2011 – RFX-mod programme workshop TF1: Physics integration for high performance RFP Proposals and discussion T. Bolzonella,
HT-7 ASIPP The measurement of the light impurity radiation profiles for the impurity particle transport in the HT-7 tokamak Qian Zhou, B.N.Wan, Z.W.Wu,
Edge Turbulence in High Density Ohmic Plasmas on NSTX K.M. Williams, S.J. Zweben, J. Boedo, R. Maingi, C.E. Bush NSTX XP Presentation Draft 5/25/06.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
SMK – APS ‘06 1 NSTX Addresses Transport & Turbulence Issues Critical to Both Basic Toroidal Confinement and Future Devices NSTX offers a novel view into.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
1 Peter de Vries – ITPA T meeting Culham – March 2010 P.C. de Vries 1,2, T.W. Versloot 1, A. Salmi 3, M-D. Hua 4, D.H. Howell 2, C. Giroud 2, V. Parail.
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Chicago, Illinois 5-pin Langmuir probe configured to measure floating potential.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah 5-pin Langmuir probe configured to measure the Reynolds.
HT-7 ASIPP Investigation on Z eff and impurities behavior with molybdenum limiter in lithium coating experiments on HT-7 tokamak Presented by Y.J.Chen.
1 V.A. Soukhanovskii/IAEA-FEC/Oct Developing Physics Basis for the Radiative Snowflake Divertor at DIII-D by V.A. Soukhanovskii 1, with S.L. Allen.
56 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. October 27-31, New Orleans, LA Using the single reservoir model [3], shown on right, to:
17th ISHW Oct. 12, 2009, Princeton, NJ, USA Effect of Nonaxisymmetric Perturbation on Profile Formation I-08 T. Morisaki, Y. Suzuki, J. Miyazawa, M. Kobayashi,
Measurements of Reynolds stress flow drive and radial electric fields in the edge of HSX Bob Wilcox HSX Plasma Laboratory University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Ringberg Theory Meeting
ISPDB_CERC and materials for NC discussion from LHD
Neoclassical Predictions of ‘Electron Root’ Plasmas at HSX
Recent Progress in Stellarator Optimization
ECH Experiments and Stray Radiation Study in Wendelstein 7-X in the Context of Steady-State Operation of Fusion Devices D. Moseev1, H.P. Laqua1, T. Stange1,
Study on Plasma Startup Scenario of Helical DEMO reactor FFHR-d1
Carlos Hidalgo Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión CIEMAT Madrid, Spain
CREC in the AC operation theory via simulation and experiment
Modeling Neutral Hydrogen in the HSX Stellarator
0.5 T and 1.0 T ECH Plasmas in HSX
Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS
24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference – IAEA CN-197
Integrated discharge scenario
Recycling and impurity retention in high-density,
Generation of Toroidal Rotation by Gas Puffing
Gyrofluid Turbulence Modeling of the Linear
Targeted Physics Optimization in HSX
Equilibrium Plasma Parameters Turbulent Wave Number Spectra
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
ITERに係わる原子分子過程 Atomic and Molecular Processes in ITER SHIMADA, Michiya ITER International Team Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear.
First Experiments Testing the Working Hypothesis in HSX:
Targeted Physics Optimization in HSX
The Gas Dynamic Trap (GDT) Neutron Source
T. Morisaki1,3 and the LHD Experiment Group
Mikhail Z. Tokar and Mikhail Koltunov
KTM & CWGM 2006 Kyoto University, Kyoto ( Sep., 2006)
[EX / P7-8] 27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference – J. Jang, et. al
CHARACTERIZATION OF ISOTOPE EFFECT ON CONFINEMENT
T. Morisaki1,3 and the LHD Experiment Group
H. Nakano1,3, S. Murakami5, K. Ida1,3, M. Yoshinuma1,3, S. Ohdachi1,3,
Modelling of pulsed and steady-state DEMO scenarios G. Giruzzi et al
Increasing the density in Wendelstein 7-X: Benefits and limitations
Presentation transcript:

Increasing the density in Wendelstein 7-X: Benefits and limitations G. Fuchert1*, K.J. Brunner1, K. Rahbarnia1, T. Stange1, D. Zhang1, J. Baldzuhn1, M.N.A. Beurskens1, S.A. Bozhenkov1, C.D. Beidler1, S. Brezinsek2, R. Burhenn1, H. Damm1, A. Dinklage1, M. Hirsch1, Y. Kazakov3, J. Knauer1, Y. Feng1, A. Langenberg1, H.P. Laqua1, S. Lazerson4, N. Pablant4, E. Pasch1, T. Sunn Pedersen1, E.R. Scott1, F. Warmer1, V. Winters5, R.C. Wolf1,6 and W7-X team 1Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, 17491 Greifswald, Germany 2Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany, 3Royal Military Academy, Brussels, Belgium, 4Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton NJ, USA, 5University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison WI, USA, 6Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany x5 Int. 2. Critical density for radiative collapses Analytical models to predict the critical density nc Critical density from the detachment model by Itoh [K. Itoh and S. Itoh, J. Phs. Soc. Jpn. 57 (1988)] Sudo density limit [S. Sudo et al., Nucl. Fusion 30 (1990)] Limits with different transport and radiation models [H. Wobig, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 42 (2000)] Modified Itoh model for W7-AS [L. Giannone et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45 (2003)] Implicit dependences on transport and edge impurities (low Z) have to be made explicit [Zanca et al., Nucl. Fusion 57 (2017)] Experimental results from W7-X Large scatter and weaker power scaling in nc when using the line-averaged density. Mainly explained by profile effects. After boronization, radiation from oxygen and carbon lines went down significantly (by a factor of 5 to 10). At the same time, nc increased by a factor of ~3. According to the scaling law this would correspond to a reduction of fimp by a factor of 5 to 10. Configurational effects are either absent or subtle. Abstract/Motivation Empirical energy confinement time scalings for stellarators, like ISS04 [1], indicate a positive density scaling and a negative power scaling („power degradation“). Due to this scaling behavior, the triple product in a stellarator benefits from increasing the density. The exact reason for the positive density scaling is, however, unknown and it is, hence, not clear how it extrapolates to reactor relevant plasmas. Furthermore, operational density limits restrict tE. Wendelstein 7-X is the ideal experiment to address these questions. Configuration c Standard 0.56 High-iota 0.59 High-mirror 0.57 1. Energy confinement time scaling Most extensive cross-machine scaling so far: ISS04 [1] Power and density scaling agree with neoclassical plateau regime [2]. ISS04 close to a gyro-Bohm scaling: turbulent transport? Predictions for W7-X from neoclassical transport modeling suggests a power degradation close to ISS04 and a stronger positive density scaling [3]. Wendelstein 7-X before boronization Both in limiter [4] and divertor operation the tE scaling is close to ISS04. Before boronization, tE showed a scaling close to ISS04 in hydrogen. Densities above ~4∙1019/m3 were only accessible transiently with pellet fueling due to radiative collapses. W7-X Details on the magnetic configurations: [5] Common phenomenon in stellarators: LHD: [J. Miyazawa et al., Fusion Sci. Technol. 58 (2010)] TJ-II: [M.A. Ochando, 41st EPS Conference on Plasma Physics (2014)] W7-AS: [L. Giannone et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45 (2003)] W7-A: [G. Cannici et al., Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Plasma Phys. and Control. Nucl. Fusion (1978)] Spread of experimental data, not error 3. Energy confinement after boronization For simplicity, only X2-heated plasmas are shown. In O2 similar observations, but Pabsorbed < Pheat. Also in these experiments a positive ne scaling of tE is found. This trend can be observed even in single experiments. Density scaling gets weaker at high frad = Prad/PECRH or densities close to nc. Before boronization, the ne scaling becomes weaker above 0.5·nc,5%. After boronization, the ne scaling becomes weaker above 1.0·nc,5%. frad increases with ne/nc, but high ne as such is not an issue. tE ~ a0naPb Scenario a0 α β Before boronization 0.16 0.56 -0.78 After boronization 0.38 -0.59 … ne > 4∙1019 /m3 0.11 0.62 -0.64 ISS04 - 0.54 -0.61 X2-heated hydrogen plasmas with divertor Conclusions Energy confinement time in W7-X Improves with density, roughly in-line with ISS04 (tE~n0.54). Improvement obviously limited by radiative collapses. Critical density can be estimated from analytical models. Boronization crucial to achieve relevant densities. Not one single scaling law for the entire parameter range. Unravelling the main transport/loss channels has only started. Plasmas with pellet-fueling or O2 and NBI-heating are not even included in the analysis yet.  tE–scalings need to take different regimes and operational limits into account. This is well established for tokamaks, but not yet for stellarators. References [1] H. Yamada et al., Nucl. Fusion 42 (2005) [2] A. Dinklage et al., Nucl. Fusion 47 (2007) [3] Y. Turkin et al., Phys. Plasmas 18 (2011) [4] G. Fuchert et al., Nucl. Fusion 58 (2018) [5] J. Geiger et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 57 (2015)