for the SPIRIT IV Investigators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPIRIT IV A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing an Everolimus-Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Advertisements

2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
TITAX AMI Trial Y. Giraud-Sauveur on behalf of P.Karjalainen, MD, PhD : Principal Investigator BCIS 2009 London, UK A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing.
Welcome Ask The Experts March 24-27, 2007 New Orleans, LA.
A Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-­ Eluting Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: One-Year Angiographic and.
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
FRONTIER Registry The Guidant MULTI-LINK FRONTIER ™ Coronary Stent System for the Treatment of Pts with Native De Novo or Restenotic Bifurcation Coronary.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
Compare Trial 2 year follow-up Peter Smits Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Final One-Year Results from the.
Final 5 year results from the all-comer COMPARE trial: a prospective randomized comparison between Xience-V and Taxus Liberté TCT 2013 San Francisco Pieter.
Durable Polymer DES: 5 Year Outcomes RESOLUTE Update Sigmund Silber, MD FESC, FACC, FAHA Heart Center at the Isar Munich, Germany On Behalf of the RESOLUTE.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
Background & Study Design
The RIBS IV Clinical Trial
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Evaluation of XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting and Taxus Express2 Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Jailed Side Branches From the SPIRIT.
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
XIENCE V vs TAXUS: Game Over! The Studies are Definitive
Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators
New Generation Resolute Integrity Drug-Eluting Stent Superior to Benchmark Xience Drug-Eluting Stent: Primary Endpoint Results from the PROPEL Study –
12 Month Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Implanted with a Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent: Initial Results from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical.
BRS Next Large Trials: What is on the Horizon?
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
Xience V® Update Building the Future on the Foundation of Angiographic and Clinical Superiority Chuck Simonton MD, FACC, FSCAI Chief Medical Officer,
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
DES Should be Used as the Default Stent in ACS!
Stent Thrombosis Rates in Contemporary Clinical Practice: Insight from a Large Australian Multi-centre Registry BP Yan*, TJ Kiernan, SJ Duffy, DJ Clark,
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
The RESOLUTE Program: today and tomorrow
On behalf of J. Belardi, M. Leon, L. Mauri,
SPIRIT IV 2 Year Results and The SPIRIT Women Clinical Trial
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
FINAL FIVE-YEAR CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THE NOBORI2 TRIAL
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
Long-term follow-up of the DIABETES I (DIABETes and sirolimus Eluting Stent) trial: P Jiménez-Quevedo, M Sabaté, DJ Angiolillo, JA Gómez-Hospital, R Hernández-Antolín,
A Randomized, Prospective, Intercontinental Evaluation of a Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent: the CENTURY II Trial: an Update with 2 Years.
Kyoto University Hospital, Japan
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
for the SPIRIT IV Investigators
Efficacy of Xience/Promus versus Cypher to rEduce Late Loss in stENT
Long Term Safety and Effectiveness of XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in a Real-World Population: Three-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
Impact of Platelet Reactivity Following Clopidogrel Administration
STENT THROMBISIS Insights on Outcomes and Impact of DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY Permanent Discontinuation SPIRIT II, SPIRIT III, SPIRIT IV and COMPARE.
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
12-month clinical and 13-month angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. metallic drug-eluting.
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
Compare Trial 2 year follow-up
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Presented at TCT 2006.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Long-term Outcomes in the
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
DEScover: One-Year Clinical Results
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Ahmed A. Khattab, MD For the German Cypher Registry Investigators
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
Presentation transcript:

for the SPIRIT IV Investigators A Large-Scale Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: Three-Year Clinical Outcomes from the SPIRIT IV Trial Gregg W. Stone, MD Manejeh Yaqub, MD; Poornima Sood, MD, MBA; Ali Rizvi, MD; William Newman, MD; Kourosh Mastali, MD; John C. Wang, MD; Ronald E. Caputo, MD; Kyoko Hattori, RN, BSN; Xiaolu Su, MS; Charles A. Simonton, MD; Alexandra J. Lansky, MD; Donald E. Cutlip, MD; Krishnankutty Sudhir MD, PhD; and Dean J. Kereiakes, MD for the SPIRIT IV Investigators

Disclosures Gregg W. Stone, MD Consultant to Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific and Medtronic

Background In SPIRIT IV, the largest clinical trial to date comparing 2 DES, treatment with the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent compared to the TAXUS Express paclitaxel-eluting stent resulted in significantly reduced 1-year and 2-year rates of target lesion failure (TLF), ischemia-driven TLR, MI and stent thrombosis. Whether the benefits of XIENCE V compared to TAXUS Express are sustained at 3 years has not been reported.

Study Algorithm XIENCE V TAXUS 3690 pts enrolled at 66 U.S. sites RVD ≥2.5 mm - ≤3.75 mm; Lesion length ≤28 mm Max. 3 lesions with a maximum of 2 per epicardial vessel Pre-rand: ASA ≥300 mg, clopidogrel ≥300 mg load unless on chronic Rx Randomized 2:1 XIENCE V:TAXUS Express2 Stratified by diabetes and presence of complex lesions Pre-dilatation mandatory Everolimus-eluting XIENCE V Paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Aspirin ≥80 mg QD for 5 years; clopidogrel 75 mg QD for at least 12 mos (if not at high risk for bleeding) Clinical f/u only: 1, 6, 9 months and yearly for 1-5 years

Major Exclusion Criteria Any target lesion or vessel meets any of the following: Left main or ostial LAD/LCX In or distal to a bypass graft conduit Bifurcation with sidebranch diameter ≥2 mm AND ostial DS >50% OR requiring pre-dilatation Total occlusion, thrombus, restenotic, excessive tortuosity, angulation or heavy calcification Prior coronary brachytherapy High probability of additional PCI within 9 months

Patient Flow and Follow-up XIENCE V (N=2411) Randomized (N=3687) (N=2458) TAXUS (N=1229) 1-Year Follow-up* (N=3609; 97.9%) Lost to f/u = 39 Withdrawal = 8 Other = 0 22 = Lost to f/u 8 = Withdrawal 1 = Other Enrolled (N=3690) 3 = Randomization errors TAXUS (N=1198) 2-Year Follow-up* (N=3539; 96.0%) (N=2371) TAXUS (N=1168) Lost to f/u = 24 Withdrawal = 15 Other = 1 23 = Lost to f/u 7 = Withdrawal 3-Year Follow-up* (N=3506; 95.1%) (N=2348) TAXUS (N=1158) Lost to f/u = 9 Withdrawal = 11 Other = 3 4 = Lost to f/u 6 = Withdrawal *F/U window: ± 28 days

Baseline Demographics XIENCE V 2458 pts TAXUS 1229 pts P value Age (in years) 63.3 ± 10.5 63.3 ± 10.2 0.80 Male (%) 67.7 67.8 1.00 Hypertension (%) 77.4 76.1 0.41 Hypercholesterolemia (%) 75.5 0.74 Diabetes mellitus (%) 32.0 32.5 0.79 - Insulin requiring (%) 8.5 9.7 0.24 Current smoker (%) 21.9 22.4 0.70 Prior MI (%) 21.1 19.9 Unstable angina (%) 27.7 28.9 0.46

Baseline Angiography XIENCE V 3142 lesions TAXUS 1585 lesions P value Lesion location LAD 40.5% 39.8% 0.68 LCX 24.2% 25.4% 0.35 RCA 35.4% 34.8% LMCA 0.0% - QCA RVD (mm) 2.75 ± 0.48 2.75 ± 0.46 0.59 MLD (mm) 0.75 ± 0.38 0.76 ± 0.39 0.36 % DS 72.3 ± 12.6 72.0 ± 12.8 0.44 Lsn length (mm) 14.8 ± 6.7 14.5 ± 6.6 0.24

Antiplatelet Agent Utilization XIENCE V 2458 pts TAXUS 1229 pts P value Aspirin - At 1 year 97.0% 96.8% 0.76 - At 2 years 96.0% 96.2% 0.85 - At 3 years 94.5% 94.9% 0.74 Thienopyridine 94.0% 93.8% 0.82 70.2% 68.1% 0.22 60.3% 1.00 T7

Target Lesion Failure Through 3 Years Target lesion failure (%) 25 XIENCE V (n=2458) TAXUS Express (n=1229) 20 HR [95%CI] = 0.78 [0.63, 0.97] p=0.004 HR [95%CI] = 0.71 [0.56, 0.90] p=0.02 p=0.001 HR [95%CI] = 0.61 [0.46, 0.81] 15 11.7% Target lesion failure (%) 9.9% Δ 2.5% 10 Δ 2.9% 6.7% 9.2% Δ 2.7% 7.0% 5 4.0% 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Months Number at risk XIENCE V 2458 2390 2364 2323 2281 2238 2212 2187 2162 2132 2116 2095 2074 TAXUS 1229 1166 1138 1119 1095 1069 1060 1049 1029 1019 1008 994 979 TLF (primary endpoint at 1 year) = cardiac death, target vessel MI, or ischemia-driven TLR

Multivariable Predictors of TLF at 3 Years Variables Odds Ratio [95% CI] P Value Presence of thrombus (Yes vs No) 0.18 [0.04, 0.75] 0.02 RVD (per 1 mm) 0.60 [0.47, 0.78] 0.0001 ACC/AHA lesion class (A or B1 vs B2 or C) 0.67 [0.53, 0.84] 0.0006 Treatment (XIENCE V vs TAXUS) 0.74 [0.58, 0.93] 0.009 Diabetes requiring treatment 1.43 [1.13, 1.82] 0.003 Numbers of diseased vessels (≥2 vs 1) 1.29 [1.03, 1.63] 0.03

Ischemia-Driven TLR Through 3 Years Ischemia-driven TLR (%) 12 XIENCE V (n=2458) HR [95%CI] = 0.78 [0.60, 1.01] TAXUS Express (n=1229) HR [95%CI] = 0.65 [0.49, 0.87] 10 p=0.06 p=0.003 7.8% HR [95%CI] = 0.51 [0.35, 0.73] 8 6.9% Δ 1.6% p=0.0002 Ischemia-driven TLR (%) 6 Δ 2.4% 4.6% 6.2% 4 4.5% Δ 2.4% 2 2.2% 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Months Number at risk XIENCE V 2458 2420 2395 2355 2314 2271 2248 2225 2202 2172 2156 2136 2116 TAXUS 1229 1186 1159 1140 1116 1090 1081 1070 1051 1041 1033 1019 1005 Major secondary endpoint at 1 year

All-cause Death Through 3 Years 8 XIENCE V (n=2458) TAXUS Express (n=1229) HR [95%CI] = 0.66 [0.48, 0.93] 7 p=0.02 6 5.1% HR [95%CI] = 0.80 [0.52, 1.25] 5 p=0.33 Death (%) HR [95%CI] = 0.86 [0.46, 1.62] Δ 1.9% 4 2.7% 3 p=0.64 Δ 0.6% 3.2% 2 1.2% 2.1% Δ 0.2% 1 1.0% 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Months Number at risk XIENCE V 2458 2431 2417 2392 2362 2335 2323 2315 2302 2279 2272 2261 2250 TAXUS 1229 1207 1199 1187 1169 1147 1143 1139 1127 1118 1113 1102 1089

Target Vessel MI Through 3 Years 15 XIENCE V (n=2458) TAXUS Express (n=1229) 12 HR [95%CI] = 0.67 [0.46, 0.97] HR [95%CI] = 0.69 [0.46, 1.03] 9 p=0.03 HR [95%CI] = 0.65 [0.42, 1.02] Target Vessel MI (%) p=0.07 6 p=0.06 4.0% 3.4% 2.9% Δ 1.3% 3 Δ 1.1% Δ 1.0% 2.7% 2.3% 1.9% 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Months Number at risk XIENCE V 2458 2393 2378 2350 2319 2292 2277 2266 2251 2227 2218 2207 2194 TAXUS 1229 1180 1167 1155 1137 1116 1110 1106 1093 1084 1074 1062 1048

All Death or MI Through 3 Years 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 3 9 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 XIENCE V (n=2458) TAXUS Express (n=1229) HR [95%CI] = 0.67 [0.52, 0.85] p=0.001 HR [95%CI] = 0.77 [0.57, 1.04] 9.1% HR [95%CI] = 0.72 [0.50, 1.03] p=0.08 Δ 3.2% All Death or MI (%) 5.9% p=0.07 Δ 1.4% 4.0% 5.9% Δ 1.1% 4.5% 2.9% Months Number at risk XIENCE V 2458 2392 2378 2350 2319 2291 2276 2264 2247 2223 2214 2202 2187 TAXUS 1229 1179 1165 1153 1136 1114 1108 1104 1090 1080 1070 1057 1043

Clinical Outcomes at 3 Years XIENCE V (N=2458) TAXUS (N=1229) HR [95%CI] Log-rank P value Death, all 3.2% 5.1% 0.66 [0.48, 0.93] 0.02 - Cardiac 1.4% 1.9% 0.76 [0.44, 1.30] 0.31 - Non cardiac 1.8% 3.3% 0.61 [0.40, 0.93] MI, target vessel 2.7% 4.0% 0.67 [0.46, 0.97] 0.03 MI, all 3.0% 4.6% 0.65 [0.46, 0.93] - Q-wave 0.3% 0.9% 0.27 [0.10, 0.73] 0.005 - Non Q-wave 2.8% 3.9% 0.72 [0.49, 1.05] 0.08 ID-TLR 6.2% 7.8% 0.78 [0.60, 1.01] 0.06 PCI 5.6% 7.4% 0.74 [0.57, 0.97] CABG 0.7% 0.89 [0.41, 1.92] 0.76 K-M curves Rates (%) are Kaplan-Meier estimates 16

Stent Thrombosis (Protocol Definition)* 6 XIENCE V (n=2458) TAXUS Express (n=1229) 5 HR [95%CI] = 0.40 [0.22, 0.75] 4 p=0.02 HR [95%CI] = 0.42 [0.20, 0.92] p=0.003 Stent thrombosis (%) 3 p=0.01 HR [95%CI] = 0.30 [0.11, 0.82] 1.89% 2 1.17% Δ 1.12% 0.82% 1 Δ 0.71% Δ 0.57% 0.25% 0.77% 0.46% 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Months Number at risk XIENCE V 2458 2427 2413 2387 2358 2331 2319 2311 2295 2272 2264 2254 2242 TAXUS 1229 1199 1189 1178 1160 1140 1134 1130 1118 1109 1101 1089 1076 *ACS + angiographic thrombus, or unexplained death or STEMI/Q-wave MI in TL distribution within 30 days

Stent Thrombosis (Protocol Definition)* Early (0 – 30 days) Late (>30 days – 1 year) Very Late (>1 year) 0.08 XIENCE V N=2458 0.79% p=0.004 TAXUS N=1229 1.99% Stent thrombosis (%) *ACS + angiographic thrombus, or unexplained death or STEMI/Q-wave MI in TL distribution within 30 days

Stent Thrombosis (ARC Def or Prob) 4 XIENCE V (n=2458) TAXUS Express (n=1229) HR [95%CI] = 0.36 [0.18, 0.72] 3 HR [95%CI] = 0.36 [0.17, 0.79] HR [95%CI] = 0.27 [0.11, 0.67] p=0.003 p=0.008 Stent thrombosis (%) 2 p=0.003 1.60% 1.24% 1.06% Δ 1.01% 1 Δ 0.82% Δ 0.77% 0.59% 0.42% 0.29% 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Months Number at risk XIENCE V 2458 2427 2413 2387 2358 2331 2319 2311 2296 2272 2263 2254 2242 TAXUS 1229 1196 1186 1175 1157 1137 1131 1127 1115 1106 1098 1086 1073

Stent Thrombosis (ARC Def or Prob) Early (0 – 30 days) Late (>30 days – 1 year) Very Late (>1 year) XIENCE V N=2458 0.13 0.62% p=0.004 TAXUS N=1229 1.73% Stent thrombosis (%)

SPIRIT IV: 11 Subgroups Examined Age ≥ 65 (n=1578) Diabetes (n=1102) Age < 65 (n=1928) No diabetes (n=2400) Male (n=2390) Lesion number = Single (n=2633) Female (n=1116) Lesion number = Multi (≥2) (n=873) Hypertension* (n=2705) Lesion length > median (13.3 mm; n=1308) No hypertension (n=796) Lesion length ≤ median (13.3 mm; n=1311) Hypercholesterolemia* (n=2636) RVD > median (2.75 mm; n=1314) No hypercholesterolemia (n=816) RVD ≤ median (2.75 mm; n=1312) BMI ≥ 30 (n=1707) Bailout (n=305) BMI < 30 (n=1799) No bailout (n=3201) Stable angina (n=2030) No stable angina (n=1412) RVD and lesion length from the single lesion treated subgroup. * Requiring medication

SPIRIT IV Subgroup Analysis: TLF at 3 Years Xience V (%) Taxus Relative Risk (95% CI) P interaction All randomized (n=3687) 9.5 11.9 0.80 [0.65, 0.97] — Age ≥ 65 yrs (n=1578) 9.6 10.4 0.93 [0.68, 1.26] 0.20 Age < 65 yrs (n=1928) 9.4 13.2 0.71 [0.55, 0.93] Male (n=2390) 11.4 0.84 [0.66, 1.07] 0.46 Female (n=1116) 9.3 12.9 0.72 [0.51, 1.01] Hypertension* (n=2705) 10.0 12.3 0.82 [0.65, 1.02] 0.65 No hypertension (n=796) 7.6 10.6 0.72 [0.46, 1.13] Hypercholesterolemia* (n=2636) 9.0 11.7 0.77 [0.61, 0.98] 0.54 No hypercholesterolemia (n=816) 11.0 12.2 0.90 [0.60, 1.34] BMI ≥ 30 (n=1707) 10.1 0.86 [0.65, 1.14] BMI < 30 (n=1799) 8.9 12.1 0.74 [0.56, 0.98] Stable angina (n=2030) 12.7 0.73 [0.56, 0.94] 0.32 No stable angina (n=1412) 11.2 0.90 [0.65, 1.23] EES better PES better TLF = cardiac death, target vessel MI, or ischemia-driven TLR; 2 Years = 730 ± 28 days; *Requiring medication

SPIRIT IV Subgroup Analysis: TLF at 3 Years Xience V (%) Taxus Relative Risk (95% CI) P interaction All randomized (n=3687) 9.5 11.9 0.80 [0.65, 0.97] — Single lesion treated (n=2633) 8.2 10.6 0.78 [0.60, 0.99] 0.74 Multiple lesions (≥2) treated (n=873) 13.4 15.9 0.84 [0.60, 1.18] RVD > 2.75 mm (n=1314) 6.7 8.7 0.77 [0.52, 1.14] 1.00 RVD ≤ 2.75 mm (n=1312) 9.8 12.6 0.78 [0.56, 1.07] Lesion length > 13.3 mm (n=1308) 13.1 0.66 [0.47, 0.92] 0.19 Lesion length ≤ 13.3 mm (n=1311) 7.8 8.5 0.92 [0.63, 1.33] Bailout (n=305) 12.2 21.7 0.56 [0.33, 0.96] 0.18 No bailout (n=3201) 9.2 11.2 0.83 [0.67, 1.02] Diabetes (n=1102) 12.4 0.95 [0.68, 1.31] 0.21 No diabetes (n=2400) 11.4 0.72 [0.56, 0.93] EES better PES better TLF = cardiac death, target vessel MI, or ischemia-driven TLR; 2 Years = 730 ± 28 days Single lesion treated data are used for RVD & lesion length subgroup analyses

SPIRIT IV 3-Year Conclusions In the large-scale, prospective, multicenter, randomized SPIRIT IV trial, the benefits of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent compared to the TAXUS Express paclitaxel-eluting stent present at 1 year and 2 years were sustained at 3 years

SPIRIT IV 3-Year Conclusions With increasing duration of follow-up, the following insights have emerged: Significant differences in all-cause mortality are apparent at 3 years favoring XIENCE V Stent thrombosis rates continue to diverge favoring XIENCE V, with a 1% absolute difference in stent thrombosis present at 3 years The differences between the 2 stent types in ischemia-driven TLR have narrowed, and are no longer significant at 3 years Consistent relative reductions in TLF with EES were present in 11 pre-specified subgroups, including multiple lesions, long lesions and small vessels Non-significantly different rates of TLF were present in pts with diabetes, vs a 28% reduction in TLF in pts without diabetes