Sample fraud awareness presentation Combating Corruption and Fraud

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Fraud Expert and Man of Action
Advertisements

1 CLIENT CONSULTANT AGREEMENT. 2 Negotiations Types of Consulting Contracts Standard Form of Contract Form of Contract General Conditions Special Conditions.
ASARECA Procurement guidelines Goods and Works. PROCUREMENT OF GOODS By P rocurement and C ontracting Officer ITAZA MUHIIRWA.
The Expenditure Cycle: Purchasing to Cash Disbursements
1 Sample fraud awareness presentation Combating Corruption and Fraud Nigel Savage, JD, CFE International Fraud Expert and Man of Action SavageFraud.com.
1 Corruption Chapter What are the two principle schemes involving bribery? Pop Quiz.
OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention Unit
FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT, ALBRECHT, & ALBRECHT Fraud Against Organizations Chapter 15.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Thomas Chin October 5, Presentation Topics Requirements – Internal Control Time and Effort Reporting Statistics on Single.
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention Unit Zagreb –
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention Unit Naples
Corruption & The Human Factor
Audit Findings on Kindergarten Inspections Internal Audit Section Finance Division November 2014.
CRP Acquisition Fraud Awareness/UNCLASSIFIED1 ACQUISITION FRAUD AWARENESS Unclassified.
Procurement Fraud Awareness Andy Rush – Fraud Team Leader at Norwich City Council LGSS.
OH 2-1 Agenda Sign in for all classes to earn credit for class Sign up for Presentations A test final test question will come from each of the group presentations.
Audit Procedures for Misappropriation of Assets Pertemuan XXIV Matakuliah: F0184/Audit atas Kecurangan Tahun: 2007.
Basic Fraud Audit Pertemuan VII Matakuliah: F0184/Audit atas Kecurangan Tahun: 2007.
Chapter 4 Billing Schemes.
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention, Reporting and Analysis Unit Riga –
Fraud Scheme Pertemuan IV Matakuliah: F0184/Audit atas Kecurangan Tahun: 2007.
Role of Procurement Audit in Improving Procurement Performance
European Structural Funds Saxony-Anhalt Anti-Fraud Activities in Saxony-Anhalt especially in Public Procurements involving ERDF Mechthild von.
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI CORRUPTION RISKS & PREVENTION STRATEGIES 7 TH NOVEMBER 2014 PRESENTED AT THE SCHOOL OF MONETARY STUDIES BY: MR. MICHAEL KARUE FINANCE.
Forensic and Investigative Accounting Chapter 6 Indirect Methods of Reconstructing Income © 2011 CCH. All Rights Reserved W. Peterson Ave. Chicago,
FRAUD. Presenters Linda Giovannone, CIA, CGAP Bernard J. McHugh, CPA, CISA Roslyn Watrobski, CFE, CIA, CGAP.
Security Issues with Vendors, Employees, and Customers Chapter 10.
PROCUREMENT POST REVIEW OF WORLD BANK FINANCED PROJECTS IN INDIA October 11, 2007.
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT Đinita Fočo.
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement Irina Stefuriuc Office for Fight Against Fraud (OLAF) Unit D.2 –
Presentation CIFAL PRESENTATION Date: 13 JUNE 2012 Place : Durban.
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention Unit Bratislava –
GOVERNANCE AND ETHICS FOR THE BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Ethical Challenges in the Built and Natural Environment Sector and the Role of Professionals.
Public Procurement Seminar 16 th and 17 th June 2010 Savannah Hotel Fair Trading Commission Designing Tenders to Reduce Risk of Bid Rigging.
Audit Findings on Kindergarten Inspections Internal Audit Section Finance Division November 2013.
Provincial SCM Summit 03 February 2011 Bolivia Lodge Consolidated Policy inputs and Recommendations.
Chapter 4 Billing Schemes.
Anti Corruption Policy “Corruption hurts the poor disproportionately – by diverting funds intended for development, undermining a government’s ability.
ANTI - FRAUD AND CORRUPTION AWARENESS SECURITY & INVESTIGATION SERVICES:
Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention, Reporting and Analysis Unit Budapest.
Eastern African Association of Public Accounts Committees (EAAPAC) & Southern African Development Community Organisation of Public Accounts Committees.
1 Corruption Chapter What are the two principle schemes involving bribery? Pop Quiz.
Presentation to the GFOA Annual Conference on Contract Risks May 11, 2016 Ron Steinkamp, CPA, CIA, CFE, CRMA, CGMA |
PRE-BID MEETING CONSTRUCTION OF THE MEDUPI-BORUTHO TRANSMISSION LINE PRE-BID MEETING WORLD BANK GUIDELINES Presented by: Brendah Shange.
11 Office of Institutional Integrity Fiduciario Forum 29 April – 3 May New York Avenue, Washington, DC Phone (202) Fax (202)
Sourcebook on Deterring Corruption and Improving Governance In Urban Water Supply and Sanitation April Charles Kenny.
Building Capacity of SMEs for Participation in Public Procurement Draft Presentation for Training of Trainers June 2014.
Bribery Awareness … and the Tax Examiner. Economic and Social Effects of Corruption Important to remember it isn’t a vicitmless crime. Can take place.
Office of the State Comptroller
Preparing EOI and RFP.
BY: NASUMBA KIZITO KWATUKHA
New York State Attorney General’s Office Antitrust Bureau
Vendor Statements of Work: Your Role as an IT Professional
Trade Capacity Vietnam
Forensic and Investigative Accounting
Red flags OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention, Reporting and Analysis Unit
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Project Control
Presented by: AfDB Team Facilitator: Sophie DIMBUNGU
Contract Award Procedures
Does Corruption in Procurement have a Cure?
FRAUD RISK MANAGEMNET LESSONS LEARNED.
SA Michael S. Douglas AFOSI 3 FIS OL-C
Integrity Filters in eProcurement Systems
Purchasing with Public Fund$
Corruption Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement.
Problem EP 12-9 Listed below is a selection of items from the internal control questionnaire on payables in Appendix 12A, Page 694. Are invoices, receiving.
Corruption Risk Management (CRM)
2019/8/2 Topic 13 : Frauds 2019/8/2 Week 1.
Treasury of Russia INTERACTION BETWEEN INFORMATION SYSTEMS USED IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT – THE CASE OF RUSSIA. Alexandr.
Presentation transcript:

Sample fraud awareness presentation Combating Corruption and Fraud Nigel Savage, JD, CFE International Fraud Expert and Man of Action SavageFraud.com

Categories of corruption and fraud schemes Bribes and kickbacks Hidden interests in contractors by project officials Bid rigging Rigged specifications Unbalanced bidding Leaking of bid information Change order abuse Fraud False statements and claims False and inflated invoices Failure to meet contract specifications Product substitution Collusive bidding by contractors Agreements by bidders to inflate bid prices, rotate winning bidders, divide markets, etc.

The schemes often are linked… A BRIBE is offered or demanded in exchange for the promise of a contract award or other favor, which leads to… Some form of BID RIGGING to exclude the other, often more qualified and less expensive bidders, and finally… FRAUD in by the bribe payer, to cover the cost of the bribe and exploit the corrupt relationship. The fraud can take the form of: False, inflated or duplicate invoices Failure to meet contract specifications Substitution of cheaper inferior materials or products Fraud is the most costly and disruptive stage.

Corruption Bribes & kickbacks Conflict of interest

Bribes and kickbacks To influence a contract Giving a “thing of value” award or execution: S selection P price Q quantity Q quality D delivery…and F facilitate fraud Giving a “thing of value” “Gifts, travel & entertainment Sexual favors “Study tours” Rental of properties, etc. Cash payments Payments thru subs, local partners, consultants, etc. Hidden interests Lessons GTE etc recorded GTE inspections Cash INVOICES Siemens Liechtenstein Detect with Audit rights NEED DOWNSTREAM AUDIT RIGHTS Not detect with standard audits Direct or CE SPQQD link by CE or direct CHRONO key

Why were bribes paid? To be short listed For a contract award To expedite the payment of invoices For contract amendments and extensions To influence inspectors to accept sub-par work or goods To compromise auditors and NGOs To avoid cancellation of the contract for poor performance

Conflicts of interest For example, an employee: Secretly owns a supplier or contractor, or Sets up a “shell company” through which he or she purchases supplies at an inflated price, or Has an undisclosed interest in property sales or leases, etc. MIDDLEMAN KEY Eg Cameroon InterFace $45,000 Require that DISCLOSE name fee agreement eg Tomen IDENTIFY not listed no website ELIMINATE

Corruption red flags Complaints from losing bidders “SPQQD” factors Unjustified sole source awards Multiple awards just under procurement thresholds Pressure to select an unknown or unqualified contractor Pressure to select a particular subcontractor or agent Long delays in contract negotiations or award Involvement of unnecessary broker or questionable agent Undisclosed agent fees and commissions Questionable contract amendments and extensions Procurement staff live beyond their means

Bid rigging Unbalanced bidding Rigged specifications Excluding qualified bidders Leaking bid data Manipulation of bids after receipt Unjustified sole source awards Split purchases Change order abuse

Bid rigging red flags Repeat [sole source] awards to the same bidders Multiple awards just under thresholds (followed by change orders or contract extensions) Bids just at or close to budget or estimate Narrow specifications Ambiguous specifications Unreasonable pre-qualification procedures Short or inadequate notice to bidders Fewer than the average or required number of bidders Low bid awards followed by change orders

Collusive bidding People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776 12 12

Collusive bidding red flags Connections between bidders, e.g., common addresses, fax numbers or personnel; assignment of contract to losing bidder, etc. Persistent unexplained high prices Unusual bid patterns; e.g. bids an exact % apart Rotation of winning bidders Same bidders bid; new bidders excluded Losing bidders become subcontractors False or forged bid securities 13 13

Fraud Delivery of expired, fake or adulterated drugs Reporting of exaggerated cure rates and project results False CV’s and company histories False and plagiarized feasibility studies and reports Forged performance documents Forged bid securities & manufacturer’s certificates Delivery of substandard goods or equipment False and inflated invoices

Aid-financed rural “school” 15 15

New aid-financed hospital 16 16

Fraud red flags “Outliers,” “mismatches,” etc. Poor quality goods or works Missing or altered supporting documents Inconsistencies between contractor’s claims and inspections Culture of corruption of inspectors No costs booked by contractor for work claimed Complaints from users

Prevention tips Transparency Accountability Fraud awareness education Strong controls Confidential reporting systems Top level support

Thank you for your attention Questions?