Session B3: Powerful Partnerships

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Advertisements

WP Operative Plan WP 4 : Functional requirements Task Responsible: Regione Piemonte.
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS CORRELATES 1. Strong instructional leadership 2. Clear-focused mission 3. Safe and orderly environment 4. Climate of high expectations.
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
MINNESOTA P-16 EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP January 28, 2009 Overview of Potential Future P-16 Partnership Initiatives to Strengthen Teacher Effectiveness.
INCLUSIVE LEARNING COMMUNITIES “A Place of Mind, Not a Place”
Performance Development Online (PDO) Information Session 2009.
Policy 4373 Revision Process Student Code of Conduct Expected Behavior in Safe and Supportive Schools.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
Performance and Development Process What to take from 2014/15 Improved understanding of the guidelines Reflective Teacher Practice Genuine and meaningful.
The Education Adjustment Program Profile – Revised.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Nevada Counselor / Psychologist Survey Data Prepared for the Legislative Committee on Education July, By Marina McHatton CTE Counseling and Assessments,
Toward International Collaboration on Competencies and Accreditation in Health Promotion and Health Education: The Galway Consensus Conference Viv Speller.
Illinois Principal Preparation Summit June 17, 2011 Checklist of Requirements Application for Approval Support Documents Dr. Michele Seelbach Special Projects.
Independent Monitoring & Evaluation for Accountability Presented to Health Sector Steering Committee, 21 st July 2009.
What’s New in PARCC: What ELC Members Need to Know February 2013 Margaret Horn, Vice President, State Engagement & Outreach Lesley Muldoon, Associate Director,
Reflection on Practice Process Series.aspx Step 1: Highlight or circle the descriptors.
Assistant Principal Frank Little William Pinderhughes Elementary/Middle September 8, 2009.
CAIU 15 October 14,  Introductions ◦ Name, District, School(s), Years as a coach  Announcements ◦ Schedule of network meetings for this year ◦
Developing a Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Dr Tim Wyatt Dr Bob Carbines Erebus International Victorian Annual Conference 7 July 2007.
1 Conservation and Development Network A Smithsonian Institution and the World Bank collaborative effort within the Global Tiger Initiative Smithsonian.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Bernard Rahming Lee Ann Pruske Rosann Hollinger Sharonda Harris Assessment Session PRIME Framework: Teaching and Learning Leadership Principle MTL Meeting,
Math Math Communication January 21, 2010 ESU#3 Facilitated by: Pam Krambeck and Debbie Schraeder.
Purpose : Discuss the use of HSTW/MMGW Key Practices and their link to High Performance Beliefs and Foundations in creating High Performing Schools and.
Learning for Life: The Place of Assessment Encouraging, Guiding and Creating.
School Year Session 3: October 16, 2013 Deconstructing Geometric Understanding 1.1.
NATSPEC Annual Conference Raising Aspirations –Transforming Lives Gill Reay SHMI Birmingham May 2013.
Illinois School Leader Task Force Recommendations Dr. Diane Rutledge on behalf of Illinois School Leader Task Force.
Implementing edTPA: Best Practices for Capacity Building and Using Data to Inform Decisions 2015 GaPSC Certification and Program Officials Conference December.
Quality Assurance on School Direct Routes Phil Duggan Liverpool John Moores University.
Oregon SEC Resources The Oregon SEC Collaborative is a partnership between the OAESD Instructional Leadership Council and the Oregon Department of Education.
Information about Foundations of Excellence ® Illustration of Academic & Student Affairs Partnerships.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
MODULE 3 INTRODUCTION AND MODULE OVERVIEW STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS ASSIGNMENTS.
CEL5D+ Teacher Panel Tips and tricks for a successful first year. ASD CEL5D+ Training1.
Learning to Teach System Skill Building Three.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Clinical Educators Design Team CAEP State Alliance for Clinical Partnership Presented by team members Laurie Henry, University of Kentucky & Nicole Nickens,
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Evaluation of Priority Gender Equality
NHN member organizations
New External BIDMC Web Site
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Teacher Performance Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Progress on ESS Validation Project
Self-Directed Learning in Formal Education Settings
Using the Learning plan tool
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
OCTEO Conference ODE Update ∙ October 27, 2017.
Teacher Prep.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Session 2F Research-to-Practice Partnerships to Strengthen Research-Based Principal Evaluation Systems Stephen Lipscomb, “Do Principals’ Professional Practice.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
SVR: Stage of Assessment SITE VISIT REPORT: Standard 5.1
USE OF PEMPAL KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTS
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
Standard one: revisions
Formative Progress Review
WSC 2.0 Task Force - WSC Improvement -
PSC Update GASPA May 7, 2010 Penney McRoy 1.
TILT Summer Conference
Presentation transcript:

Session B3: Powerful Partnerships Aspiring for a New Level of Performance Julie Beck, Penney McRoy, and Paquita Morgan December 2, 2015

Partnership Task Force _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Partnership Task Force Members P-12 Schools/Districts—7 RESAs—3 Private IHEs—3 Public IHEs—6 Agencies/Orgs--3 Timeline—3 meetings Feb – June 2015

Task Force Charge Engage P-20 practitioners representing each region of the state in… Further defining our expectations for P- 20 partnerships and describing what is meant by the term, Powerful Partnership; and Developing a framework for evaluating EPP partnerships with P-12 schools.

Powerful Partnerships Using existing rule language TF developed aspirational descriptors in each of the four domains: Formalized as Partnerships Preparation of Candidates Professional Development of P-20 Educators Focused on Continuous School Improvement and Student Achievement

Table Discussions Each table discusses the descriptor for one of the four domains What do you like? What will this look like in practice? What evidence would substantiate performance at this level? 1 person @ each table--post responses in Today’s Meet at: http://today.io/194Pc

Evidence Sample sources of evidence At tables discuss: Did you identify any on the list? What should be added to the list? Post responses to Q2 in Today’s Meet at: http://today.io/194Pc

our partnership is powerful? Self-assessment Tool How do we know… our partnership is powerful? Self-assessment Tool

Table Discussions Self-assessment Tool What do you like? How frequently should it be used? How might this tool be useful in the approval review process? Should it be applied at the program or EPP level, or both? 1 person @ each table--post responses in Today’s Meet at: http://today.io/194Pc

Research Citations identified by the task force Discuss… How can we contribute to the research? How might you involve your Regional P- 20 Collaborative? 1 person @ each table--post responses in Today’s Meet at: http://today.io/194Pc

Questions?

Thank You Survey Link