An INTRODUCTION TO THE California School Dashboard

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan Stakeholders Meeting March 12, 2014.
Advertisements

LCFF & LCAP. Key Precepts of LCFF Based on specific considerations: Equity, additional resources for students with greater needs Low-income students English.
LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA (LCFF) & LOCAL CONTROL ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN (LCAP)
An Overview of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) January 25, 2014 FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Educate Challenge Inspire.
Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Connecting the Pieces Presented by Mary Stires Director School Support, SCOE 1/21/2014.
Los Angeles Unified School District Edgar Zazueta, Chief of Staff-External Affairs Valley Schools Task Force 1/29/14 Los Angeles Unified School District.
Developing a New Accountability System
LCFF and LCAPs Presented to the 4 th District PTA March 18, 2014.
IMPORTANCE OF CLEAR VISION. EIGHT +2 STATE PRIORITIES AND 3 CATEGORIES Who can name them?
The State Budget  IT’S A BRAND NEW WORLD  Local Control Funding Formula Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Common Core Standards CAASPP:
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
BY LINA DURAZO AND MARISOL GUILLEN Hueneme Elementary School District.
Local Control Accountability Plan Update, Renewal, Review Santa Barbara Unified School District
State Board of Education Meeting Update May 11-12, 2016 Riverside County Regional Assessment Network May 27, 2016.
Local Indicators Chronic Absenteeism Statements of Model Practice
The California Model: Academic Indicator
State Accountability Overview
State Accountability Overview
California’s New LCFF Accountability Rubrics and School DAshboard
State Accountability System CDE Dashboard Overview
Presented by xxxxxxxxx, Principal, xxxxxxxxx
Regional Assessment Network (RAN)
California School Dashboard
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Engagement
Overview of the new State Accountability System
Maeola Beitzel Elementary School
Redwood City School District
California Educational Research Association
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Riverside Assessment Network Meeting August 18, 2018
LCAP Quarterly Network Meeting
Message to Principals This PPT can be used both with your school staff and school community (parents and families). Feel free to customize as needed to.
Melanie Schoeppe, Director Improvement and Accountability Division
Accountability and the Fall 2017 California School Dashboard Release
Regional Assessment Network Meeting
Regional Assessment Network Meeting
Cindy Kazanis, Director
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
California's Accountability System
Local Control and Accountability Plan Committee
California School Dashboard
Local Control Accountability Plan Input
Assessment and Accountability Update
Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Committee
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Old (API State/AYP Federal) to New
Using Data for Improvement
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Assessment and Accountability Update
WASC LCAP, LAUSD GOALS, FHS GOALs Tuesday, April 24th
State Board of Education Meeting Update May 11-12, 2016
California School Dashboard
Assessment & Accountability
Developing a New Accountability System
LCAP Support Meeting January 11, 2017
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Dashboard 101 Toolkit Resource
Driving Through the California Dashboard
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Engagement
DELAC Meeting March 14, 2017.
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Old (API State/AYP Federal) to New
CA Dashboard 2018 Overview Presentation to the Governing Board
Local and Federal Accountability
Purpose of This Deck This slide deck is intended for use by site administrators to provide information to Parents about the California School Dashboard.
Presentation transcript:

An INTRODUCTION TO THE California School Dashboard

California School Dashboard The California School Dashboard is the new accountability website that illustrates how well districts and schools are meeting the needs of California’s diverse student population.

English Learner Proficiency Rates Then “Snapshots” “Standardized Tests” STAR Test (All Grades) ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies CAHSEE 10th Grade ELA, Math API AYP Now “Multiple Measures” “Continuous Improvement” CAASPP (7,8,11 Grades) English Learner Proficiency Rates School Climate (suspension rates) Student Engagement (graduation rates, chronic absenteeism, drop outs, non-promotees)

Then 897 Now

Key Features

Indicators by Priority Areas LCAP Priority Areas State Indicators Local Indicators Basic Services or Basic Condition at schools Priority 1   Basics Conditions at School Implementation of State Academic Standards Priority 2 Implementation of State Academic Standards Parental Engagement Priority 3 Parent Engagement Student Achievement Priority 4 Academic Indicator English Learner Indicator Student Engagement Priority 5 Chronic Absence Indicator Graduation Rate Indicator* School Climate Priority 6 Suspension Rate Indicator Local Climate Survey Access to a Broad Course of Study Priority 7 College/Career Indicator* Outcomes in a Broad Course of Study Priority 8 Coordination of Services for Expelled Students Priority 9 Coordination of Services for Expelled Students** Coordination of Services for Expelled Students Priority 10 Coordination of Services for Foster Youth**

State Versus Local Performance Met Not Met Not Met for Two or More Years

Performance Levels combine both Status and Change on 5 color wheels Blue Highest Green Yellow Orange Red Lowest

The Five-by-Five Colored Table Change By measuring both status and change, the Dashboard encourages continuous improvement Level Declined Significantly Declined Maintained Increased Increased Significantly Very High Yellow Green Blue High Orange Medium Low Red Very Low Status For example, a school with a Status of “high” and yet “declined significantly” in Change will receive an Orange performance level, while a school with a Status of “medium” and “increased” in Change will receive a Green performance level. The State Board approved the methodology for measuring performance on state indicators: Status (outcome) is based on the current year performance. Change (improvement) is the difference between performance from the prior year and current year, or between the current year and a multi-year average—if available. This slide displays the 5x5 or what is known as the reference chart, and this is based on a methodology that uses equally weighted percentile cut scores for status and change to make an overall determination of performance for each of the state indicators Jenny Singh and her team that the Department completed many data simulations to set cut scores for each state indicator with extensive input from their Technical Design Group, in addition to other key stakeholder groups like the California Practitioners Advisory Group, our partners at the county offices, and many others provided input on the analyses completed. Status is determined using current performance, the results for all LEAs are ordered from highest to lowest and four cut scores were selected to create five status levels were are very high, high, medium, low, and very low Change is the difference between the current year performance and past performance. For some of the state indicators this is just prior year but for the indicators with multiple years of data collection, like graduation rate, it can subtracted from the average of prior performance, the results for LEAs were ordered on a distribution to identify four cut points to create five change levels that range from declined significantly, declined, maintained, increased and increased significantly So by combining the five status levels and the five change levels you have the 5x5 grid which tell you the performance level In this example an LEA with a high status and increased change will result in a green performance level

https://caschooldashboard.org/#/coordinator

Local Decision-Making Key Themes < Single Number Equity Local Decision-Making A quality education should not be defined by a single test score Focus on performance gaps among student groups Information to support the local strategic planning These are key characteristics of our new accountability system that will remain central as the SBE builds on this initial phase of the accountability tool. As we talk about the new system and the Dashboard with stakeholders and the public, this is the core messaging. Sample TPs based on these core messages will be provided to LEAs as part of the roll out (as part of toolkit that will be available Feb 13)

Dashboard Public LAUNCH March 15, 2017