Beam spot size measurements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low Emittance Tuning (LET). Through Dispersion Free Steering.
Advertisements

W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 8 Mar 07  MD goals  Experimental procedure  HER-only x & y scans + high-current extrapolation  [LER only X & y scans +
Optics modeling and correction Yiton T. Yan Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Thanks to: Y. Cai, W. Colocho, F-J. Decker, M. Donald, Y. Nosochkov, J.
W. KozaneckiPEP-II MAC meeting, Dec 04Slide 1 Run-4 Beam-beam Performance Summary  Time evolution of beam currents, spot sizes, tunes & luminosity.
W. KozaneckiMD planning meeting, 20 Jan 04 Background characterization strategy  MD goals  Background sources  Operational procedures  Open questions.
W. KozaneckiPEP-II MAC Review, 9-11 Oct 03 Beam-beam: Experimental Status  Introduction: PEP-II collision parameters & recent performance  Interplay.
MCC meeting, 2 May 03W. Kozanecki Current-dependence of PEP-II beam sizes Current-dependence of PEP-II beam sizes as measured on 30 Apr 03, after moving.
PEPII MAC Meeting, 14 Dec 04 Luminous Region Measurements with BaBar  Real-time Measurements  x,y,z centroids, RMS widths, x-z tilt  Offline Measurements.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 9 Mar 07  MD goals  Experimental procedure  HER-only x & y scans + high-current extrapolation  [LER only X & y scans] + high-current.
January 15, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity December/January vs September/October -Machine studies and instrumentation -Simulation.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 24 Apr 06 Slide 1 Using the gas-induced beam blowup to measure vertical IP beam sizes  Principle  heat PR02 VP8020.
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meetiing, 20 May 04 Serendipitous measurement of beam-beam tune shift in the LER  Principle  measure colliding tunes (tune tracker.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
S. White, LBS 17 May Van Der Meer Scans: Preliminary Observations.
Optics measurement, modeling, and correction - PEP-II experience Yiton Yan SLAC.
Beam Commissioning Workshop, 19th January Luminosity Optimization S. White, H. Burkhardt.
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 29 July 04  Goal: measure the luminosity degradation associated with  parasitic crossings  horizontal crossing angle  Principle.
August 9, 2007M. Palmer1 CESR Machine Studies Planning Overview Principal Projects Other Milestones and Dates Machine Studies Schedule Proposed Plan.
FFS Issues in the 2011 autumn continuous operation Toshiyuki OKUGI (KEK) 1/13/2011 The 11 th ATF2 project meeting SLAC, USA.
J. Turner 02/07/05 SLAC PEPII Accelerator Physics LER WIGGLER PLAN J. Turner, M. Donald, M. Sullivan, U. Wienands, J. Yocky Motivation and Concerns Details.
:00: Prepared new fill B1: Q X =0.293, Q Y =0.269; lifetime = 25h ✔ B2: Q X =0.297, Q Y =0.267; lifetime = 5h ✗ Strong 50Hz and 100hz lines.
‘BBA’ Goals Understand BPM performance –validate use for precision optics tests –justify & specify hardware/software upgrades Beam – Based ‘Alignment’
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
U. Wienands, Y. Cai, F.-J. Decker, M. Donald, W. Kozanecki, Yu. Nosochkov, T. Raubenheimer, J. Safranek, D. Sagan., A. Seryi, K. Sonnad, C. Steier, P.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Comparing Luminosity Scans and Profile Monitor Results The size of the overlap of the two beams can be calculated from the individual beam sizes using:
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
Recent MIA Results Yiton T. Yan Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Acknowledgement: Y. Cai, F-J. Decker, S. Ecklund, J. Irwin, J. Seeman, M. Sullivan,
Beamspot Longitudinal Profile Analysis Christopher O’Grady, Benoit Viaud March 17, 2006 Input from: Witold Kozanecki, Josh Thompson, Matt Weaver F.-J.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
11/18/2004 FNAL Advanced Optics Measurements at Tevatron Vadim Sajaev ANL V. Lebedev, V. Nagaslaev, A. Valishev FNAL.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
Accuracy of the orbit measurement by KEKB BPM system for the study of ILC damping ring H. Fukuma (KEK) Requirement for the accuracy of BPM data.
TBT Data & Lattice Measurement for Recycler Ming-Jen Yang December 17, 2014.
Fabio Follin Delphine Jacquet For the LHC operation team
B. Viaud, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C 3J7
Synchrotron-Light Monitors
Vertical emittance measurement and modeling Correction methods
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Design and Parameters for a linearly colliding Super B-FACTORY
Ben Cerio Office of Science, SULI Program 2006
New algorithms for tuning the CLIC beam delivery system
Beam-beam limits: MD proposal
2nd Workshop on a Super B-Factory INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy
LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
Boost Angles Measurement Technique Crossing Angle Measurement
Tilt Correction to Geometric Hourglass Effect
A.Kulikov SLAC MAC review October 2003
Beam-beam Experience at PEP-II
U. Wienands, PEP-II Run Coordinator …for the PEP-II team
Status and Plan for the PEP-II Lattices
PEP-II Status and Plans e+e- Factories Workshop
Beam beam simulations with disruption (work in progress...)
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Tuesday 9th November 10:02 Fill beams dumped
e- tunes-witness bunch 42
e- Cloud Studies-Tune Studies with 45 Bunch Trains
with Model Independent
Orbit Bumps in PEP-II to Maximize Luminosity
Background characterization: MD plan
Luminosity performance comparison: 5-6 Jun vs. 23 Dec 03
Beam Size Flip-Flop Measurements
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
e+ tunes-witness bunch 42
Impact of orbit perturbations on luminosity calibrations
Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Presentation transcript:

Beam spot size measurements A. Fisher & W. Kozanecki See details in PEP-II e-logbook, 25 Apr 06 day shift Single-beam & IP beam size measurements  scans at moderate currents (to minimize beam-beam effects) simultaneously measure beam sizes @ HER & LER SLM, interferometer & SXM both in collision and in single-beam mode with (almost?) the same lattices as characterized on 21/22 Apr 06 will then use R-matrices derived from MIA data of 21-22 Apr to estimate HER & LER IP beam sizes, using  measurements as a constraint Calibration of HER SLM scale using local closed-orbit bump

 scans Beam conditions Data files: PHYSICS5_DATA (FJD, MS, JT, GY) standard by-2, 1722 bunches I- / I+ = 535/230 mA (.31/.13 mA/b) 1 round of tune optimization in collision before beam-bean scans Data files: PHYSICS5_DATA [pep2.ip.witold.spr06]*25Apr [pep2.char.25apr06]

Beam currents & luminosity Stable collisions e- only e+ only current Lsp Hcurrent

 Stable collisions e+ only SLM X interf Y SXM X SXM Y

x-tilt & HER  Stable collisions e+ only SXM  Stable collisions e- only Stable collisions e- only HSLM X Hinterf Y

Beam size measurement summary Spot size data file: LUMSIZ_2B_25Apr HER dispersion: 21 Apr 06 LER collide/ e+ only HER collide/ e- only IP Ib [mA/bunch)] 0.31 / 0.41 0.13 / 0.13 - x (SLM) [mm] 1.75 / 1.60 1.335 / 1.360 y (interf) [mm] 0.23 / 0.24 0.207 / 0.204 1(M) (SXM) [mm] 0.410 / 0.406 2(m) (SXM) [mm] 0.238 / 0.236  (SXM) [deg] 9.5 / 8.6 x (major) [m] 169.4 y [m] 6.7 x (SLM) [mm] -892.1 1138 y (interf) [mm] 100.8 20.1 x (SXM) [mm] 328.5 y (SXM) [mm] 19.7

HER SLM calibration Two steps Data files: HSLM_XCALIB_2_25APR HSLM_YCALIB_1_25APR HER SLM calibration Two steps SLM response vs. knob: d centroid_x, y / d Knob_x, y x: 0.840 y: 0.850 (d SLM / d knob) knob calibration wrt BPMs using orbit fit x: 0.952 y: 0.982 (d OrbFit / d kknob) Overall: x (y) measured / true = 0.882 (0.867) Note that this vertical calibration applies to the HER SLM only, NOT to the corresponding interferometer

Spares

Bump closure & orbit fits at HER SLM for a 0.5mm bump

SLM/interf off-diagonal response X scan: Y centroid Y scan: X centroid X scan: Y size Y scan: X size

Dispersion at HER & LER SLM/SXM LER SXM HER SLM