Theoretical differences between CDM and JI validation/determination JI technical workshop <Miguel Rescalvo Santandreu> <13 Feb 2007>
VALIDATION Vs DETERMINATION A different framework…. Version 24 February 2019
CDM JI GENERAL Kyoto Protocol Article 12 CDM modalities and procedures JI modalities and procedures GUIDANCE ON CRITERIA FOR BASELINE SETTING AND MONITORING. (annex 6 to JISC 4) Version 24 February 2019
BASELINE AND MONITORING CDM Approved CDM baseline and monitoring methodologies. Methodologies Panel. Procedures in place for requesting clarification, deviation and review of approved methodologies. JI Guidance provided by the JI Modalities and Procedures. Applying CDM approved methodologies is an option but not the onlu one. The accredited IE shall assess the methodology approach. (conservativeness, technical design, …) Version 24 February 2019
“Tool for demonstration and assessment of additionality” CDM “Tool for demonstration and assessment of additionality” JI Guidance provided by the JI Modalities and Procedures. Version 24 February 2019
VALIDATION Vs DETERMINATION A parallel process…. Version 24 February 2019
VALIDATION / DETERMINATION CDM Validation by DOE 30 days consultancy period. Validation against an approved meth. Submission for registration. During 8 /4 weeks a review can be requested Verification by DOE. Limitations. JI Determination by an AIE 30 days consultancy period Determination against an: approved CDM meth Meth based on a CDM METH New methodology Determination is final after 45 days. There is not registration as in CDM Determination of ERU. Version 24 February 2019
Practical experiences Methodologies applied for baseline and monitoring . Different role of the AIE compared to DOE. Version 24 February 2019
Version 24 February 2019