The Three Chemical Steps of Tn10/IS10 Transposition Involve Repeated Utilization of a Single Active Site  Silvia Bolland, Nancy Kleckner  Cell  Volume.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biochemical Specialization within Arabidopsis RNA Silencing Pathways
Advertisements

Sebastian D Fugmann, David G Schatz  Molecular Cell 
The Orientation of Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 Integration Is Solely Dependent on the Central Dinucleotide of attP and attB  Pallavi Ghosh, Amy I Kim, Graham.
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (February 1998)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
DNA transposition: Assembly of a jumping gene machine
The Mu Three-Site Synapse
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (April 1998)
Unexpected Structural Diversity in DNA Recombination
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Sequence Diversity, Metal Specificity, and Catalytic Proficiency of Metal-Dependent Phosphorylating DNA Enzymes  Wei Wang, Lieven P Billen, Yingfu Li 
Hector Aldaz, Eugene Schuster, Tania A Baker  Cell 
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
John F Ross, Xuan Liu, Brian David Dynlacht  Molecular Cell 
Tn10 Transposition via a DNA Hairpin Intermediate
Tanya T. Paull, Martin Gellert  Molecular Cell 
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Hairpin Coding End Opening Is Mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Mu Transpososome Architecture Ensures that Unfolding by ClpX or Proteolysis by ClpXP Remodels but Does Not Destroy the Complex  Briana M. Burton, Tania.
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Polynucleotide Ligase Activity of Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Programmable RNA Cleavage and Recognition by a Natural CRISPR-Cas9 System from Neisseria meningitidis  Beth A. Rousseau, Zhonggang Hou, Max J. Gramelspacher,
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Endonucleolytic Function of MutLα in Human Mismatch Repair
VDJ Recombination Cell Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Base Excision Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage Activated by XPG Protein
Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
RNA-Independent DNA Cleavage Activities of Cas9 and Cas12a
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Sequence Diversity, Metal Specificity, and Catalytic Proficiency of Metal-Dependent Phosphorylating DNA Enzymes  Wei Wang, Lieven P Billen, Yingfu Li 
Progressive Structural Transitions within Mu Transpositional Complexes
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Coding Joint Formation in a Cell-Free V(D)J Recombination System
Three-Site Synapsis during Mu DNA Transposition: A Critical Intermediate Preceding Engagement of the Active Site  Mark A Watson, George Chaconas  Cell 
Mechanism of 5′-Directed Excision in Human Mismatch Repair
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Simone E. Nunes-Düby, Marco A. Azaro, Arthur Landy  Current Biology 
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts  Rajashree A. Deshpande, Ji-Hoon.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
DNA Looping and Catalysis
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Angela K Kennedy, David B Haniford, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell 
Vytautas Naktinis, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell  Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Generating Crossovers by Resolution of Nicked Holliday Junctions
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints
Capture and Visualization of a Catalytic RNA Enzyme-Product Complex Using Crystal Lattice Trapping and X-Ray Holographic Reconstruction  James B Murray,
DNA transposition: Assembly of a jumping gene machine
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

The Three Chemical Steps of Tn10/IS10 Transposition Involve Repeated Utilization of a Single Active Site  Silvia Bolland, Nancy Kleckner  Cell  Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages 223-233 (January 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80977-0

Figure 1 Conserved Residues in Transposases and Integrases Three regions of limited sequence similarity are indicated. Sequences for IS3 and MuA are from Baker and Luo 1994. HIV-1 sequence is from Engelman and Craigie 1992. Sequences for IS10, IS4, and IS231 are from Rezsöhazy et al. 1993, except for the N-terminal region, which were obtained from GenBank. In HIV integrase and MuA transposase, the shadowed DDE residues are reported to be involved in catalysis (Engelman and Craigie 1992; Baker and Luo 1994). Residues that have been mutated in IS10 transposase are indicated at the bottom. DA97, DA161, NK283, SA286, RA288, EA292, and KA299 were obtained by site-specific mutagenesis (this work). RH102, AV162, GD163, PS167, YF285, and MI289 were recovered in the screening for SOS+ Tnsp− mutants (Haniford et al. 1989). AV162 and MI289 were also identified as hypernicking mutants in Bolland and Kleckner 1995. Mutants with weak defects show >10% of the wild-type in vivo activity. Cell 1996 84, 223-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80977-0)

Figure 2 Transposition Reaction Using the Short Linear Fragment as Donor DNA (A) Transposon end substrate fragment contains 81 bp from the Tn10 outside end plus an additional 6 bp upstream and 49 bp of flanking DNA. Each asterisk represents one labeled nucleotide. Donor cleavage occurs as a flush double strand break exactly between the last base pair of the transposon end and the first base pair of the flanking DNA (Benjamin and Kleckner 1992). The transferred strand is cut first (1) and then the nontransferred strand (2) (Bolland and Kleckner 1995). (B) In the presence of IHF, transposase builds a synaptic complex with a pair of transposon end fragments (paired ends complex or PEC; Sakai et al. 1995). Upon addition of Mg2+, the DNA in the complex is cleaved: a double strand break at one end yields the SEB complex; double strand breaks at both ends yield DEB complex. When supercoiled DNA is added as a target, DEB complexes form a noncovalent complex with the target DNA (target capture) and the cleaved termini undergo strand transfer (J. Sakai and N. K., unpublished data; Kleckner et al. 1995). Transfer of only one of the transposon terminus yields a nicked strand transfer product (se ST), while transfer of the two termini gives a linear strand transfer product (de ST). Cell 1996 84, 223-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80977-0)

Figure 3 Mutant Transposase EA292 Is Catalytically Inactive but Proficient for Complex Formation and Target Capture (A) Using the short linear fragment assay, SEB and DEB complexes plus the released flanking DNA are detected in reactions with wild-type transposase and either Mg2+ or Mn2+. Complexes remain uncleaved (PECs) in reactions with mutant EA292. (B) DNAs contained in PECs from the gel in (A) were eluted and analyzed in a denaturing gel for nick detection. DNAs eluted from the SEB band and flanking DNA, both obtained in reactions with wild-type transposase and Mn2+, were used as markers (two left lanes). Nicks on the transferred strand are detected as a 49 nt band (wild-type reaction with Mn2+); nicks on the nontransferred strand would give an 87 nt band. Final concentration of divalent metal ions was 0.5 or 5 mM. (C) Assay for target capture and strand transfer using a precleaved substrate. Complexes were assembled using the precleaved ends in absence of target DNA and with IHF as accessory factor. Upon addition of target DNA, the complex changes its mobility in the gel (from bottom to top band). Target capture is detected as a labeled band with the size of the supercoiled target DNA (target capture complex) that disappears after phenol extraction. In the presence of target DNA and Mg2+, wild-type transposase yields a strand transfer product that is detected as a high molecular weight labeled linear fragment (ST). No strand transfer product is observed in the reaction with mutant EA292. Cell 1996 84, 223-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80977-0)

Figure 4 Mixtures of Wild-Type and EA292 Transposases Produce a Particular Distribution of Cleaved Complexes That Contain No Single-Strand Nicks (A) Two models that can explain the contributions of individual transposase monomers in the donor cleavage reaction. One model considers that two monomers are sufficient for the cleavage of both transposon ends. There are only four possible combinations to arrange two monomers in the complex, and none of these combinations gives single strand nicks. The second model considers that four monomers are needed for the cleavage at the two ends. There are 16 different ways to arrange the four monomers in a tetramer, and some of them give rise to nicks on one of the strands. In this particular model, nicks are expected when wild-type transposase cleaves the transferred strand and mutant transposase fails to cleave the nontransferred strand. We predict no nicks for the reverse situation because prior cleavage of the transferred strand is likely necessary for cleavage of the nontransferred strand. (B) Short linear fragment assay with mixtures of wild-type and EA292 transposases. Each protein mixture, at the indicated wild-type to mutant ratio, was used to form synaptic complex in the absence of divalent metal ion and then 5 mM Mg2+ was added to allow cleavage. The wild-type reaction contains a low proportion (8%) of SEB complexes, indicating that in the reaction shown cleavage was not complete. Different reactions might contain diverse amounts of total complexes because the efficiency of complex formation varies slightly depending on the protein elution. Abbreviations are as in Figure 2. (C) Complexes made with mixtures of wild-type and EA292 transposases were assayed for nicks. Cleaved complexes were formed as in (B). DNAs from PEC and SEB complex bands were eluted from the native gel and rerun in an 8% denaturing gel. In all cases, PECs contained mostly uncleaved substrate (136 nt band) while SEBs contained the two bands of 136 and 87 nt expected for unnicked DNA. The 49 nt band, indicative of nicks on the transferred strand, was nearly absent in all the reactions. Cell 1996 84, 223-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80977-0)

Figure 5 In Reactions with Mixtures of Wild-Type and EA292 Transposases, 100% of the Double End–Cleaved Complexes Undergo Strand Transfer at the Two Ends (A) Mixtures of wild-type and EA292 transposases at the indicated ratios were assayed for strand transfer. Synaptic complexes were made with the protein mixtures, incubated with Mg2+ and then with target DNA. After phenol extraction, the product of double end strand transfer is detected as labeled linear DNA (de ST). Single end strand transfer is undetected (se ST). (B and C) Strand transfer reactions performed with the protein mixtures were observed in a native gel without the previous phenol extraction step. An aliquot of the reaction was loaded in the gel before addition of target (B), and the rest was incubated with target DNA for 24 hr (C). Complexes change their mobility in the presence of supercoiled target DNA, presumably because IHF is titrated off (J. Sakai and N. K., unpublished data). Complexes were recovered into their original forms by addition of more IHF (10 ng) after the strand transfer reaction was complete and before loading the mixture on a gel. The target capture complex should be detected at the top of the gel in (C), but it is obscured by nonspecific aggregated species that stay in the wells. Complexes are labeled as in previous figures. Cell 1996 84, 223-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80977-0)

Figure 6 Single End Strand Transfer Is Detected in Mixed Reactions with Precleaved Ends Mixtures of wild-type and EA292 transposases at the indicated ratios were used to form synaptic complexes with the precleaved fragment. Synaptic complexes were formed in the presence of IHF and in the absence of metal ion (left five lanes). Strand transfer was assayed in the presence of Mg2+ and supercoiled target DNA. After phenol extraction, both double end transfer (de ST) and single end transfer (diffuse band below the wells, se ST) were detected. Cell 1996 84, 223-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80977-0)