Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Advertisements

Regulation of Cell Number by MAPK-Dependent Control of Apoptosis
Stem Cell Factor Functions as an Outgrowth-Promoting Factor to Enable Axon Exit from the Midline Intermediate Target  Bryan B. Gore, Karen G. Wong, Marc.
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
Marios Agelopoulos, Daniel J. McKay, Richard S. Mann  Cell Reports 
Alternative Splicing of the Robo3 Axon Guidance Receptor Governs the Midline Switch from Attraction to Repulsion  Zhe Chen, Bryan B. Gore, Hua Long, Le.
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 18, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Luyuan Pan, Yong Q. Zhang, Elvin Woodruff, Kendal Broadie 
The Conserved Immunoglobulin Superfamily Member SAX-3/Robo Directs Multiple Aspects of Axon Guidance in C. elegans  Jennifer A Zallen, B.Alexander Yi,
Repulsive Axon Guidance
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Genetic Analysis of the Mechanisms Controlling Target Selection: Complementary and Combinatorial Functions of Netrins, Semaphorins, and IgCAMs  Margaret.
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 1-7 (January 2013)
Unrestricted Synaptic Growth in spinster—a Late Endosomal Protein Implicated in TGF- β-Mediated Synaptic Growth Regulation  Sean T Sweeney, Graeme W Davis 
Slit Is the Midline Repellent for the Robo Receptor in Drosophila
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
ELAV, a Drosophila neuron-specific protein, mediates the generation of an alternatively spliced neural protein isoform  Sandhya P. Koushika, Michael J.
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Lethal Giant Larvae Acts Together with Numb in Notch Inhibition and Cell Fate Specification in the Drosophila Adult Sensory Organ Precursor Lineage  Nicholas.
The Regulation of the Drosophila msl-2 Gene Reveals a Function for Sex-lethal in Translational Control  Greg J Bashaw, Bruce S Baker  Cell  Volume 89,
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
Axon/Dendrite Targeting of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors by Their Cytoplasmic Carboxy-Terminal Domains  Julia Nash Stowell, Ann Marie Craig  Neuron 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (August 2018)
Whole-Genome Analysis of Muscle Founder Cells Implicates the Chromatin Regulator Sin3A in Muscle Identity  Krista C. Dobi, Marc S. Halfon, Mary K. Baylies 
The Control of Semaphorin-1a-Mediated Reverse Signaling by Opposing Pebble and RhoGAPp190 Functions in Drosophila  Sangyun Jeong, Katarina Juhaszova,
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Recruitment of Ectodermal Attachment Cells via an EGFR-Dependent Mechanism during the Organogenesis of Drosophila Proprioceptors  Adi Inbal, Talila Volk,
A Hierarchy of Cell Intrinsic and Target-Derived Homeostatic Signaling
Benjamin J. Matthews, Wesley B. Grueber  Current Biology 
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Pallavi Lamba, Diana Bilodeau-Wentworth, Patrick Emery, Yong Zhang 
Tyson J. Edwards, Marc Hammarlund  Cell Reports 
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages (January 2007)
MAX-1, a Novel PH/MyTH4/FERM Domain Cytoplasmic Protein Implicated in Netrin- Mediated Axon Repulsion  Xun Huang, Hwai-Jong Cheng, Marc Tessier-Lavigne,
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Guidance Cues at the Drosophila CNS Midline: Identification and Characterization of Two Drosophila Netrin/UNC-6 Homologs  Robin Harris, Laura Moore Sabatelli,
Magalie Lecourtois, François Schweisguth  Current Biology 
A Conserved Circadian Function for the Neurofibromatosis 1 Gene
Aeri Cho, Masato Kato, Tess Whitwam, Ji Hoon Kim, Denise J. Montell 
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (September 2015)
The sterol-sensing domain of Patched protein seems to control Smoothened activity through Patched vesicular trafficking  Verónica Martı́n, Graciela Carrillo,
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Interaxonal Interaction Defines Tiled Presynaptic Innervation in C
Volume 15, Issue 23, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Christopher C. Quinn, Douglas S. Pfeil, William G. Wadsworth 
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)
Blocking Apoptotic Signaling Rescues Axon Guidance in Netrin Mutants
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Rab3 Dynamically Controls Protein Composition at Active Zones
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)
The Transmembrane Semaphorin Sema I Is Required in Drosophila for Embryonic Motor and CNS Axon Guidance  Hung-Hsiang Yu, Houmam H Araj, Sherry A Ralls,
Brent Neumann, Massimo A. Hilliard  Cell Reports 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Sema-1a Reverse Signaling Promotes Midline Crossing in Response to Secreted Semaphorins  Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports  Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 174-184 (January 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.027 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 18, 174-184DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sema-1a Is a Positive Regulator of Midline Crossing (A–F) Stage 15–16 embryos of the indicated genotypes carrying eg-GAL4 and UAS-CD8 GFP transgenes, stained with anti-HRP (magenta) and anti-GFP (green) antibodies. Anti-GFP labels cell bodies and axons of the eagle neurons (EG and EW). Anterior is up in all images. Scale bar represents 15 μm (F). Dotted lines indicate segment boundaries. EG neurons project through the anterior commissure of each segment, while EW neurons project through the posterior commissure. Arrowheads indicate segments with non-crossing EW axons and asterisks indicate rescued EW crosses. (A) EW neurons cross in the posterior commissure in 100% of segments in wild-type embryos (starred arrowhead). (B) In fra mutants EW neurons fail to cross in 27% of segments (arrowheads). (C) Expression of UAS-FraΔC selectively in eagle neurons produces a Fra-like phenotype where EW neurons fail to cross in 32% of segments. (D) Heterozygosity for sema-1a dominantly enhances the EW crossing defects in a FraΔC background to 64%. (E) Complete loss of sema-1a further enhances the EW crossing defect to 99% of segments. (F) EW crossing defects in the sema-1a-null-expressing FraΔC are robustly rescued (99% versus 24%) when UAS Sema-1a is expressed in eagle neurons. (G) Quantification of EW midline crossing defects in the genotypes shown in (B)–(F) as well as sema-1a-null mutants. Df(2L)ED623 is a chromosomal deficiency containing sema-1a. Data are presented as mean ± SEM n, number of embryos scored for each genotype. Significance was assessed by multiple comparisons using ANOVA (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). Cell Reports 2017 18, 174-184DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Sema-1a Promotes Midline Crossing Independent of Netrin-fra (A–F) Stage 16 embryos of the indicated genotypes stained with anti-HRP. Arrowheads indicate thin/defective commissures, arrows indicate missing commissures and asterisks indicate rescued commissures. Scale bar represents 15 μm (F). (A) Thick anterior and posterior commissures are formed as axons cross the midline in every segment. (B) fra (fra3/fra4) mutants show thin (29%) and occasionally missing commissures (10%). (C) sema-1a mutants show no obvious signs of commissural defects. (D) Embryos heterozygous for both sema-1a and fra appear wild-type. (E) fra, sema-1a double mutants show a 68% loss of commissures. (F) Pan-neural expression of Sema-1a partially rescues these defects, and reduces missing commissures to 25%. (G) Quantification of commissural defects as absent (black bar), thin/defective (dark gray) or wild-type (light gray) in the genotypes shown in (A–F). Data are represented as mean ± SEM n, number of embryos scored for each genotype. Significance was assessed by multiple comparisons using ANOVA (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). Cell Reports 2017 18, 174-184DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sema-1a Protein Is Expressed on Eg Axons An artificial exon inserted into the endogenous locus for sema-1a allows for tissue-specific labeling of endogenous Sema-1a expression. (A) Schematic of sparse labeling strategy adapted from Pecot et al. (2013). In the presence of FLP recombinase, Sema-1a becomes tagged with a V5 epitope and LexA driven membrane bound GFP labels Sema-1a positive cells. (B and C) An early stage 15 embryo carrying the artificial exon, egGal4, UAS-FLP, and LexAop-myrGFP stained with anti-GFP (green) and anti-V5 (magenta) antibodies. (B) Eagle neurons endogenously express Sema-1a during midline crossing. Scale bar represents 15 μm. (C) Magnification of the boxed region in B. (C′) GFP only staining shows two EW axons crossing the midline (C″) V5 staining reveals that Sema-1a protein is expressed throughout the growing axon. Scale bar represents 15 μm. Cell Reports 2017 18, 174-184DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Sema-1a Expression Rescues Midline Crossing Cell Autonomously (A–D) Stage 15–16 embryos of the indicated genotypes carrying eg-GAL4, UAS-FraΔC, and UAS-CD8 GFP transgenes, stained with anti-GFP (green) antibodies to reveal cell bodies and axons of the eagle neurons (EG and EW). Arrowheads indicate segments with non-crossing EW axons and asterisks indicate rescued EW axons. Scale bar represents 15 μm (D). (A) In sema-1a-null embryos expressing FraΔC, EW axons fail to cross the midline in 98% of segments (arrowheads). (B) Expression of a full-length Sema-1a transgene strongly rescues these defects (asterisk), with only 26% non-crossing (arrowheads). (C) In contrast, a Sema-1a transgene lacking a small region of the cytoplasmic domain (from amino acids 31–60) rescued the defects to a much lesser extent (80%). (D) Expression of a Sema-1a transgene lacking its entire cytoplasmic domain does not significantly rescue crossing defects. (E) Diagram of transgenic rescue constructs with relevant cytoplasmic regions labeled. (F) Quantification of EW midline crossing defects in the genotypes shown in (A)–(D). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. n, number of embryos scored for each genotype. Significance was assessed by multiple comparisons using ANOVA (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). Cell Reports 2017 18, 174-184DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 rhoGAPp190, but Not pebble, Significantly Enhances Crossing Defects in the FraΔC Background (A) Quantification of EW midline crossing defects in the FraΔC screening background. Heterozygosity for rhoGAPp190 does not show a significant enhancement in crossing defects; however, rhoGAPp190 nulls do strongly enhance these defects (81%). pebble heterozygotes significantly suppressed these defects (10%). In addition, heterozygosity for rho1 or expression of a Rho1 dominant negative also suppresses the FraΔC phenotype. Data are represented as mean ± SEM n, number of embryos scored for each genotype. Significance was assessed by multiple comparisons using ANOVA (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05). (B) Model of functional responses of Sema-1a reverse signaling through its downstream effectors. Cell Reports 2017 18, 174-184DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Sema-2a Significantly Enhances Crossing Defects in fra Mutants, while plexins Do Not (A–F) Stage 16 embryos of the indicated genotypes stained with anti-HRP antibodies. Arrowheads indicate thin and/or defective commissures and arrows indicate missing commissures. Scale bar represents 15 μm (F). (A) fra (fra3/fra4) mutants show thin (29%) and occasionally missing commissures (10%). (B) fra; plexinA (plexAEY16548/plexAEY16548) double mutants resemble fra single mutants with 12% absent, 34% thin/defective, and 54% wild-type commissures. (C) fra; plexin B (plexBKG00878/plexBKG00878) double mutants also show no significant enhancement of the fra single mutants with 16% absent, 35% thin/defective, and 49% wild-type commissures. (D) Embryos mutant for sema-1a and fra display severe commissural defects. (E) Loss of sema-2a significantly worsens the crossing defects of fra single mutants with 24% absent, 52% thin/defective, and only 24% wild-type commissures. (F) Triple mutants lacking fra, sema2a, and sema-2b are not significantly different from the fra, sema-2a double mutants. (G) Quantification of commissural defects as absent (black bar), thin/defective (dark gray) or wild-type (light gray) in the genotypes shown in (A–F). Data are represented as mean ± SEM n, number of embryos scored for each genotype. Significance was assessed by multiple comparisons using ANOVA (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). Cell Reports 2017 18, 174-184DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Sema-2a Is Required for Sema-1a-Mediated Midline Crossing (A) Histogram quantifies EW midline crossing defects in sema-1a-null mutants carrying the transgenes for egGal4 and UAS-FraΔC. This background shows strong EW crossing defects (97%) that can be rescue cell autonomously when full-length Sema-1a is expressed selectively in eagle neurons (33%). In the absence of plexA, this rescue is not significantly reduced (43%). However, loss of sema-2a significantly suppresses this rescue and embryos still exhibit severe crossing defects (63%), suggesting that sema-2a is required for sema-1a-mediated midline crossing. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. n, number of embryos scored for each genotype. Significance was assessed by multiple comparisons using ANOVA (∗∗p < 0.01). (B) Model of Sema-1a-mediated midline crossing. Cell Reports 2017 18, 174-184DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.027) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions