Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE / 0052r0 Submission January 2011 Slide 1 Max Nss for SU BF Date: Authors: Sameer Vermani, Qualcomm.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Submission doc.: IEEE / 0431 r0 March 2015 Dmitry Cherniavsky, SiBEAM, Inc.Slide 1 Shared MIMO Architecture for ay. Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0627r0 May 2015 Hakan Persson, EricssonSlide 1 Beam Selection for Hybrid MIMO Precoding Date: Authors:
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0493r0 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0103r0 January 2016 Assaf KasherSlide 1 Beamforming Training proposals Date: Authors:
11ay MIMO BF Training Enhancements
Doc.: IEEE /0935r1 Submission July 2011 Fei Tong, CSRSlide 1 An improved non-compressed beamforming feedback format for 11ac Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0626r1 Submission Feedback Element Compression for ax May 2016 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
Doc.: IEEE /1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,
Doc.: IEEE /0632r1 Submission May 2016 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of Robust Transmission Modes for MIMO in 11ay Date:
EDMG Header Encoding and Modulation
Beam Tracking for ay Date: Authors: January 2017
MU MIMO beamforming protocol proposal
Multi-Stage, Multi-Resolution Beamforming Training for ay
Antenna Polarization Capability Format
Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2016
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
MU-MIMO codebook based transmission flow in IEEE802.11ay
EDMG capabilities for Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing in SU-MIMO
Implicit Sounding for HE WLAN
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
BRP Transmit Sector Sweep
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
Analog and Baseband Beam Tracking in ay
Analog and Baseband Beam Tracking in ay
TGn Sync Calibration for Beamforming
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Clarification on TXSS Sector List Feedback
MU-MIMO channel access flow for 11ay
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Multi-User MIMO Channel Measurements
Multi-BF Procedure for 11ay
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
First Path FTM SFD Text Date: Authors: December 2017
Multi-Beamforming in Polarized Channels for 11ay
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Consideration on multi-AP coordination for EHT
MU-MIMO codebook based transmission flow in IEEE802.11ay
11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback
Multi-BF Procedure for 11ay
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Generalized Multi-Beamforming for 11ay
Nulling and coordinated beamforming
Clarification on TXSS Sector List Feedback
EDMG capabilities for Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing in SU-MIMO
SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO link access
MIMO phase in MU-MIMO Beamforming
Discussion on Rank Adaptation
Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz
Fixed Inter Frame Spacing for BRP in ay
Channel Modeling with PAA Orientations
Feedback of Short SSW Packet Based Sector Sweep in DTI
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
Comparison of Coordinated BF and Nulling with JT
First Path FTM SFD Text Date: Authors: December 2017
Antenna Polarization Capability Format
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Presentation transcript:

Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in 802.11ay Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2017 Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in 802.11ay Date: 2017-03-12 Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital) Kome Oteri(InterDigital)

Hybrid Beamforming in 802.11ay March 2017 Hybrid Beamforming in 802.11ay Hybrid beamforming has been proposed in 802.11ay to enable transmission of multiple streams for SU and MU-MIMO [1]. It combines baseband beamforming with analog beamforming to improve performance In this contribution, we show the performance gain of hybrid beamforming over analog beamforming with and without feedback in SU-MIMO Tx. Finally, we present protocols to enable hybrid beamforming in SU/MU-MIMO. Hybrid Beamforming Architecture Analog Beamforming Architecture Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

Current Specification (D1.1) March 2017 Current Specification (D1.1) 10.38.9.2.1 General An EDMG STA may support hybrid precoding (defined as a combination of analog beamforming and digital baseband precoding) for SU-MIMO. An EDMG STA may support hybrid precoding (defined as a combination of analog beamforming and digital baseband precoding) for MU-MIMO. Editor Note: need to define the mechanisms to achieve the above. Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

Hybrid Beamforming 𝑌=𝐻 𝐹 𝐴 𝐹 𝐵𝐵 𝑥+𝑛 ; 𝐻 𝐵𝐵 = 𝐻 𝐹 𝐴 March 2017 Hybrid Beamforming 𝑌=𝐻 𝐹 𝐴 𝐹 𝐵𝐵 𝑥+𝑛 ; 𝐻 𝐵𝐵 = 𝐻 𝐹 𝐴 H = channel; HBB = effective baseband channel FA = Analog beamformer; FBB = Baseband beamformer F = Ideal baseband precoder; FAFBB = Hybrid beamformer; FAFBB ≈ F Case 1: FA and FBB unknown Estimate H Design F for H Design FA / FBB from F Case 2: FA and FBB unknown Estimate H Design FA and calculate HBB Design FBB from HBB Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

Beamforming Performance in 802.11ay Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11 March 2017 Beamforming Performance in 802.11ay We will compare the relative performance of three beamforming methods in 802.11ay Analog Beamforming with Random Selection: Design analog beamformer Randomly select N of the M Antenna Weighting Vectors (AWVs) No channel knowledge needed at transmitter Analog Beamforming with Selection: Select the best N of the M AWVs Channel knowledge needed at transmitter Hybrid Beamforming with ideal feedback: Feed back M-dimensional effective digital baseband channel. Use SVD based on the time domain channel matrix of the strongest path to transmit N streams Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

Simulation Assumptions March 2017 Simulation Assumptions Based on 11ad/ay SC PHY [2] 2 spatial streams with spatial stream parser Vertical Encoding MCS index is the same for all streams per PPDU, single CRC per PPDU (use MCS 14: π/2 16QAM, rate ¾) [2] MMSE receiver Enterprise Cubicle (CB) scenario in 11ay/ad channel model [3] STAs located on the table at a height of 0.7m in the cubicle AP positioned in the middle below the ceiling at a height of 2.9 m Real channel estimation at receiver Detailed assumptions can be found in the appendix Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

Simulated SU-MIMO Configurations Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11 March 2017 Simulated SU-MIMO Configurations We implement the following beamformers: Analog beamforming random selection Analog beamforming with selection Hybrid beamforming We simulate Configuration #4 of the SU-MIMO PAA configurations [3] 4x4 channel, 2 PAAs with dual polarization on each side Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

Hybrid beamforming shows gain over both types of analog beamforming Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11 March 2017 Numerical Results Hybrid beamforming shows gain over both types of analog beamforming Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

Protocols for Hybrid BF in 802.11ay March 2017 Protocols for Hybrid BF in 802.11ay To implement hybrid BF in 802.11ay, we need the following: Initiator and Responder to agree on hybrid BF support. Indicate that initiator can perform hybrid BF Indicate that responder can feed back detailed information for a given configuration needed to support hybrid BF Note that the actual use of the HB is transparent to the responder Explicit baseband channel feedback for baseband precoder design. However, explicit feedback to enable HB is required. Proposed protocol extends current procedures for SU- MIMO and MU-MIMO in D0.2 [4] Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

SU-MIMO Hybrid BF Protocol March 2017 SU-MIMO Hybrid BF Protocol Exchange hybrid beamforming capabilities AP indicates support for hybrid BF STA indicates ability to feed back detailed channel information AP indicates need for detailed feedback during MIMO setup Option 1: Detailed channel feedback occurs during MIMO feedback for SU-MIMO (D1.1: the feedback type for the responder link (e.g., SINR or time domain channel response)). Option 2: Detailed feedback occurs after MIMO feedback: HBB feedback Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

MU-MIMO Hybrid BF Protocol March 2017 MU-MIMO Hybrid BF Protocol Option 1: (No change between the BF setup and MU-MIMO selection): MU- MIMO FB Poll feeds back all channel details D1.1: The BF Feedback frame carries the list of received initiator’s transmit DMG antennas/sectors, each with its corresponding responder’s receive DMG antenna/sector and the associated quality indicated Indicate need for detailed feedback during setup Option 2: (No change between the BF setup and MU-MIMO selection): request for detailed feedback after MU-MIMO selection : Digital Baseband Tracking (see [5]) Option 3: MU-MIMO selection different from BF setup : Digital Baseband Tracking (see [5]) Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

March 2017 Conclusion In this contribution, we have shown that hybrid beamforming performs better than analog beamforming in SU-MIMO transmission. We have also presented hybrid beamforming protocols for SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO transmission in 802.11ay based on the existing protocols in P802.11ay D0.2 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

March 2017 References [1] K. Oteri et. al., “Beam Tracking for 802.11ay”, IEEE doc. 11-16/0040r2 [2] IEEE Std 802.11-2016, December 2016 [3] A. Maltsev, et al, “Channel models for IEEE 802 11ay”, IEEE doc. 11-15/1150r8 [4] IEEE P802.11ay™/D0.2, January 2017 [5] K. Oteri et. al., “Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for 802.11ay”, IEEE doc. 11-17/0426r0 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

March 2017 Straw Poll 1 Do you agree to the proposed hybrid beamforming protocol for SU- MIMO and MU-MIMO in the 802.11ay specification draft ? Kome Oteri (InterDigital)