Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Das_Figure S1 USP15 USP4 USP11 49% 60% 39 % 71 % 52 % 54 %
Advertisements

Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p)
Shigehiro A. Kawashima, Ai Takemoto, Paul Nurse, Tarun M. Kapoor 
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (May 2012)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Protein Complex Discovery
Paul C Megee, Cathy Mistrot, Vincent Guacci, Douglas Koshland 
Spindle Position Is Coordinated with Cell-Cycle Progression through Establishment of Mitotic Exit-Activating and -Inhibitory Zones  Leon Y. Chan, Angelika.
Control of Shugoshin Function during Fission-Yeast Meiosis
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Sherilyn Grill, Valerie M. Tesmer, Jayakrishnan Nandakumar 
Shelley Chu, Ira Herskowitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
SpRap1 and spRif1, recruited to telomeres by Taz1, are essential for telomere function in fission yeast  Junko Kanoh, Fuyuki Ishikawa  Current Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 119, Issue 7, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Yuji Chikashige, Yasushi Hiraoka  Current Biology 
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages (July 2001)
Components and Dynamics of DNA Replication Complexes in S
Shigehiro A. Kawashima, Ai Takemoto, Paul Nurse, Tarun M. Kapoor 
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages (April 1999)
Allison J Bardin, Rosella Visintin, Angelika Amon  Cell 
Christine Michaelis, Rafal Ciosk, Kim Nasmyth  Cell 
Protein Complex Discovery
Shihori Yokobayashi, Yoshinori Watanabe  Cell 
SpRap1 and spRif1, recruited to telomeres by Taz1, are essential for telomere function in fission yeast  Junko Kanoh, Fuyuki Ishikawa  Current Biology 
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are Catalyzed by Spo11, a Member of a Widely Conserved Protein Family  Scott Keeney, Craig N Giroux, Nancy Kleckner 
Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends
Ordered Recruitment of Transcription and Chromatin Remodeling Factors to a Cell Cycle– and Developmentally Regulated Promoter  Maria Pia Cosma, Tomoyuki.
The Requirement for the Dam1 Complex Is Dependent upon the Number of Kinetochore Proteins and Microtubules  Laura S. Burrack, Shelly E. Applen, Judith.
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
The Microtubule Plus End-Tracking Proteins mal3p and tip1p Cooperate for Cell-End Targeting of Interphase Microtubules  Karl Emanuel Busch, Damian Brunner 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Christine Geil, Michael Schwab, Wolfgang Seufert  Current Biology 
Effects of Age on Meiosis in Budding Yeast
Yi-Ping Hsueh, Eunjoon Kim, Morgan Sheng  Neuron 
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Histone–GFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells  Teru Kanda, Kevin F. Sullivan, Geoffrey M. Wahl 
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Hong-Guo Yu, Douglas Koshland  Cell 
Penelope R Chua, G.Shirleen Roeder  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
RECQL4 is a MAP with a spindle function.
Cdc14 and Condensin Control the Dissolution of Cohesin-Independent Chromosome Linkages at Repeated DNA  Damien D'Amours, Frank Stegmeier, Angelika Amon 
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
CENP-C Functions as a Scaffold for Effectors with Essential Kinetochore Functions in Mitosis and Meiosis  Koichi Tanaka, Hui Li Chang, Ayano Kagami, Yoshinori.
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Chromosomal Cohesin Forms a Ring
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Brian H. Lee, Brendan M. Kiburz, Angelika Amon  Current Biology 
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Yuji Chikashige, Yasushi Hiraoka  Current Biology 
MED25 and JAZ7 Compete to Interact with MYC2.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 535-548 (April 2003) Kinetochore Recruitment of Two Nucleolar Proteins Is Required for Homolog Segregation in Meiosis I  Kirsten P. Rabitsch, Mark Petronczki, Jean-Paul Javerzat, Sylvie Genier, Barbara Chwalla, Alex Schleiffer, Tomoyuki U. Tanaka, Kim Nasmyth  Developmental Cell  Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 535-548 (April 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00086-8

Figure 1 Csm1 and Lrs4 Are Nucleolar Proteins Required for Chromosome Segregation during Meiosis (A) spo12Δ spo11Δ (strain K9277), spo12Δ spo11Δ mam1Δ (K9278), spo12Δ spo11Δ csm1Δ (K10016), and spo12Δ spo11Δ lrs4Δ (K10009) were sporulated on plate and dyads were dissected on YEPD and grown for 2 days (n = 100 spores) at 30°C. (B and C) Wild-type (K9466), lrs4Δ (K9971), and sir2Δ (K9970) cells expressing Csm1-Myc9 (B) and wild-type (K10139), csm1Δ (K10235), and sir2Δ (10217) cells expressing Lrs4-Myc18 (C) were grown to log phase in 2% YPA, and fixed and stained with antibodies against Myc and Nop1. (D) Wild-type (JS306), mam1Δ (K10049), sir2Δ (K10050), lrs4Δ (JS575), and two clones of csm1Δ (K10052 and 10053), which all harbored a RDN1::Ty1-MET15 construct (Smith et al., 1999), where grown on MLA plates for 5 days. Expression of MET15 at wild-type levels causes a light brown colony color. White colony color is an indication of elevated expression and black sectors indicate derepression of mitotic recombination in the rDNA. (E and F) Segregation of the URA3 locus (which was marked on both homologs by GFP) in wild-type (K8409), csm1Δ (K10312), lrs4Δ (K9928), and sir2Δ (K9972) tetrads. Shown are sample pictures (E) and quantification (n = 200) of different classes of tetrads (F). In many tetrads, fewer than four individual GFP signals were visible; in these cases, we used the number of spores lacking a signal as our classification criterion. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 535-548DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00086-8)

Figure 2 CSM1 and LRS4 Are Required for the First Meiotic Nuclear Division (A) Progression of wild-type (K10003), csm1Δ (K9797), and lrs4Δ (K10004) strains with the URA3 locus of one homolog marked by GFP and expressing Rec8-HA3 and Pds1-Myc18 through meiosis in liquid culture. At indicated time points, immunofluorescence was performed. Shown are fractions of cells that have undergone at least one nuclear division (blue diamonds), a second division (pink squares), that contain a short bipolar spindle (red circles), that have separated sister URA3 sequences (green triangles), and that contain Pds1 in the nucleus (black circles). (B) Composite images of cells from the same experiment as in (A) showing progression through meiosis from left to right. (C) Chromatin spreads of cells from the same experiment as in (A) were prepared and stained with antibodies against HA. The accumulation of spreads that contain Rec8 all over the chromatin (red squares) or Rec8 confined to one or two clusters (brown triangles) is shown. (D) Sample chromatin spreads from (C), which show staining for Rec8 confined to one or two clusters. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 535-548DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00086-8)

Figure 3 CSM1 and LRS4 Are Required for Monoorientation of Sister Kinetochores in Meiosis I (A) Progression of spo11Δ rec8Δ::SCC1 (K10512), spo11Δ rec8Δ::SCC1 csm1Δ (K9694), and spo11Δ rec8Δ::SCC1 lrs4Δ (K10515) strains with the URA3 locus of one homolog marked by GFP and expressing Rec8-HA3 and Pds1-Myc18 through meiosis in liquid culture. At indicated time points, immunofluorescence was performed. Shown are the fraction of cells that have undergone at least one nuclear division (blue diamonds), a second division (pink squares), that contain a short bipolar spindle (red circles), and that have separated sister URA3 sequences (green triangles). (B) Sample images of cells from the same experiment as in (A). (C) Progression of spo11Δ (K10506), spo11Δ csm1Δ (K9901), and spo11Δ lrs4Δ (K10509) strains with the URA3 locus of one homolog marked by GFP and expressing Rec8-HA3 and Pds1-Myc18 through meiosis in liquid culture. The experiment was carried out as in (A). Developmental Cell 2003 4, 535-548DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00086-8)

Figure 4 Csm1 and Lrs4 Are Transiently Released from the Nucleolus and Localize to Centromere Regions during Meiosis I (A) Cells expressing Ndc10-HA6 and Csm1-Myc9 (K9118) or Lrs4-Myc18 (K10418) were sporulated and immunofluorescence was performed. (B and C) Chromatin spreads of cells from the same experiment as in (A) were stained with antibodies against Myc, HA, and Zip1. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 535-548DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00086-8)

Figure 5 Mam1, Csm1, and Lrs4 Form a Ternary Monopolin Complex (A) Coimmunoprecipitation of Csm1 and Lrs4: protein extracts from mitotic cultures of strains expressing Lrs4-HA3 alone (K10249) and Csm1-Myc9 and Lrs4-HA3 together (K10253) were immunoprecipitated using an anti-Myc antibody. The extract (input lanes 1 and 3) and the precipitates (IP lanes 2 and 4) were subsequently analyzed by immunoblotting. (B–D) In vitro binding assays: maltose binding protein (MBP) fusion proteins of Csm1 (B), Lrs4 (C), and Mam1 (D) and various deletion variants thereof were immobilized on an amylose resin, incubated with in vitro-translated [35S] radioactively labeled Lrs4 (B) or Csm1 (C and D), and precipitated. The input (lane 1) and fractions of the labeled proteins bound to the MBP fusion protein-coupled resins (other lanes) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphor imaging. The in vitro-translated proteins were incubated with MBP alone as a control. (E) In vitro reconstitution of the ternary Mam1-Csm1-Lrs4 complex: in vitro-translated and radioactively labeled Csm1 (lanes 3 and 6), Lrs4 (lanes 4 and 7), and both Csm1 and Lrs4 together (lanes 5 and 8) were incubated with either MBP as a control (lanes 3–5) or an MBP-Mam1 fusion protein immobilized on an amylose resin (lanes 6–8) and precipitated. The input (lanes 1 and 2) and the fractions of the labeled proteins bound to the resin (lanes 3–8) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphor imaging. In all binding studies (A–E), 10% of the input used for the binding experiment is loaded in the input lane. (F) Molecular architecture of the monopolin complex: Lrs4 and Csm1 interact directly via their N-terminal coiled-coil domains. Csm1 binds to the C terminus of Mam1, linking Lrs4 to Mam1. The gray boxes indicate regions within Lrs4 and Csm1 with a high coiled-coil prediction. The dashed lines and gray bars indicate the determined interaction domains between the monopolin complex subunits. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 535-548DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00086-8)

Figure 6 Mam1, Csm1, and Lrs4 Associate with CEN3 DNA (A) Position of primer pairs relative to CEN3 on chromosome III used for ChIP analysis of monopolin association with chromatin around centromeres in (B). Indicated are the positions of oligonucleotides' 5′ ends relative to base 1 of CEN3 and the primer pairs' names. (B) PCR analysis of coprecipitated sequences with antibodies against Myc and HA in strains expressing no tagged protein (K10103), Ndc10-HA6 (K9692), or Ndc10-HA6 and Mam1-Myc9 (K9962), Csm1-Myc9 (K9118), or Lrs4-Myc18 (K10418). WCE lanes indicate PCR products generated from whole-cell extract for reference and Myc- and HA-labeled lanes show analysis of anti-Myc and anti-HA immunoprecipitates, respectively. The percentage of cells in metaphase I was measured by immunofluorescence on fixed cells: 20% of K10103, 21% of K9692, 16% of K9962, 21% of K9118, and 19% of K10418 cells. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 535-548DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00086-8)

Figure 7 Csm1 Is Conserved in Fungi and Its S. pombe Homolog Shares Csm1's Localization but Is Required for Mitosis (A) Multiple sequence alignment of Csm1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Csm1_Sc) and Pcs1 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Pcs1_Sp), and translations of ORF 19.7663 from Candida albicans (19.7663_Ca) and ORF NCU07984 from Neurospora crassa (NCU07984_Nc). (B) Schematic maps of the same proteins as in (A) indicating predicted (Lupas et al., 1991) coiled-coil regions in red. (C) Pcs1 localizes to the centromere cluster and nucleolus of S. pombe cells. Unfixed Pcs1-GFP-expressing G2 cells (strain JP1227) were stained with Hoechst and examined under the fluorescence microscope. (D) Segregation of chromosome I marked by GFP at cen1 in wild-type (JP1345) and Δpcs1 (JP1262) cells. Unfixed exponentially growing cells were stained with Hoechst and examined under the fluorescence microscope. (E) Lagging chromosomes are single chromatids in Δpcs1 cells. Shown is a sample unfixed anaphase cell (strain 1262) stained with Hoechst that has cen1 marked with GFP. (F) A model suggesting a common biological function for monopolin in S. cerevisiae and Pcs1 in S. pombe, namely clamping microtubule attachment sites. Developmental Cell 2003 4, 535-548DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00086-8)