EMYS Service Committee Core Service ProviderS Lead Agency Governance Model EMYS Board Selection Committee Role Establish TOR and develop/approve skills matrix Appoint Board Transitional Selection Committee Confirm new members recommended by selection committee TRANSITIONAL Selection Committee Mandate & TOR from current EMYS Board Structure 5 Members 1 EMYS (current or former board member) 1 CSP 1 Sectoral Expert (Academia, Gov’t, etc.) Community representative and 1 other Will determine staggered term members Board EMYS Board EMYS Service Committee TOR to provide: Service and community engagement mandate “Decision scope” Conflict of Interest protocols Structure 5 to 7 members, not to exceed 50% of board membership Governance Cmtee. Structure 9 to 15 members (12 members target) 3 years; 3 terms max 1, 2, 3 years staggered at outset Self-continuing via governance committee CSPAC and YFAC Chairs as “participating observers” Initially to include 5-7 current EMYS Board Members for one term (staggered) with an additional 5-7 new members selected by the TSC; gradual inclusion of 3 additional EMYS area members as required Finance & Audit Cmtee. Other Board Cmtee. Core Service ProviderS Working Groups Ad hoc working group Youth & Families Advisory Committee* Board approves TOR Annual report to Board Structure Up to 7 members approved by Board Minimum 2-year term Min. 2 meetings annually EMYS Board member observes meetings CSP Advisory Committee* Board approves TOR Annual report to Board Structure 10-12 members; 2 year term Rotating – initial membership by consensus or lot Min. 2 meetings annually Choose own Chair; possible ombuds role Consider urban & suburban representation EMYS Board member observer Direct Reporting or Responsibility Advisory or Structured Reporting Relationship *EMYS provides secretariat support to committees

Issues for Discussion 1. Overview 2. System Priorities How do you envisage your agency’s involvement in collective governance? To what extent does this model support such involvement? What are the strengths of this governance model (for the CYMH system, the Lead Agency, your Agency)? What are the potential challenges with this governance model (for the CYMH system, the Lead Agency, your Agency)? 2. System Priorities The survey suggested a number of areas for collective focus (defining priorities, system performance, best practices, etc.)? What do you regard as the collective priorities we should focus on? 3. Managing Dual Roles What do you regard as the conflict of interest risks under the lead agency system? Are there ways to improve the proposed “firewall” between Lead Agency governance and EMYS-specific issues? 4. Skills In seeking additional members, what skills should we focus on? What guidance or thoughts do you have for attracting these skills? 5. Core Service Providers Advisory Committee What should be the role/early focus of CSPAC? What is the best way to determine initial membership of CSPAC? What balances need to be managed in terms of composition (i.e. urban/suburban)? 6. Youth & Families Advisory Committee What early focus should there be for the Youth & Families Advisory Committee? Do you have any advice on how to attract and retain members on this committee? 7. Orientation/Education The Core Service Provider Governance Survey identified a high willingness to participate in governance relationship building and knowledge exchange events. What near-term initiatives do you suggest for building skills and systems competencies across the Toronto region?