SVR: Stage of Assessment SITE VISIT REPORT: Standard 5.1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
How Do We Know If Students Are Learning?* Maria Aristigueta and Kim Bodine University of Delaware NASPAA Meeting-October 2003 PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR DISTRIBUTE.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.
NASPAA Accreditation Managing the program strategically Standard 1.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
J-College 2015 Program-Level Outcomes Prepared by Eileen V. Brownell School of Management Assessment Cycle: Assess, Discuss, Review, Change, Repeat.
Norah McRae, Executive Director Co-operative Education Program and Career Services.
وحدة الاعتماد الأكاديمي 8/16/2015. ACCREDITATION Dr. ABD EL-SLAM HEMAID BADR A.A.U. DIRECTOR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING JAZAN UNIVERSITY 8/16/2015.
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
University Of North Alabama General Education Assessment Paradigm Shift: A plan for Revising General Education Assessment at UNA.
How do we go about program assessment? What we are doing and why? Robert Gabriner, San Francisco State University Debby Zambo, Arizona State University.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Assessment Report Public Administration School of Education and Human Services Celia A. Watt, Ph.D., Interim Chair Edward Downey, DPA, Assessment Coordinator.
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Learning Outcomes Made Easy Using the Best Tools Jeffrey D. Keith, Ph.D. J. Kelly Flanagan, Ph.D. Russell T. Osguthorpe, Ph.D. Danny R. Olsen, Ph.D. Tom.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
January 26, 2011 Careers Conference, Madison, Wisconsin Robin Nickel, Ph.D. Associate Director, Worldwide Instructional Design System.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Professional Education Unit Assessment System Model Operationalizing the Conceptual Framework Operationalizing.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Teams Thomas P. Holland, Ph.D., Professor Institute for Nonprofit Organizations.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
4/16/07 SACS Reaffirmation Process Susan P. Himburg SACS Director of Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Institutional Learner Outcomes Coffeyville Community College Assessment.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
System Office Performance Management
Conference on Practice Improvement December 3-5, 2015
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
Lisa Brun Western Kentucky University
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Program Learning Outcomes
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Effective Outcomes Assessment
COE Assessment The “Then” and “Now”.
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
The Assessment Toolbox: Capstone Courses & Portfolios
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Accreditation Pathway
Competency Based Learning and Development
Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment
Employer Engagement in Accreditation
Julie Kaiser, PhD Doctoral Professional Development Coordinator
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Assessment and Accreditation
Wm. Paul Meahan Melissa Barnard Andrew Wilson
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Task Force Orientation
Committee # 4: Educational Program For The MD
BALANCED ASSESSMENT.
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Session 6 2:30pm-4:00pm Site Visitor Training Facilitators:
Presentation transcript:

SVR: Stage of Assessment SITE VISIT REPORT: Standard 5.1 Standard 5.1 To Lead and Manage in Public Governance University of Delaware as excerpted by the NASPAA Competencies Task Force Delaware’s Definition: To lead and manage in public governance is to exercise a balance between formulating and articulating an accountable, effective vision of practice based on strong public service values with the application of the knowledge and skills for leadership and management needed to carry out that vision across sectors. Program Mission: to provide, diverse, talented graduate students with specific competencies for leadership and management, including the knowledge, skills and values essential to accountable and effective practice. The MPA program contributes directly to solutions to public challenges of our times…The program also seeks to develop relationships with practitioners… Link to Mission: This competency relates to our program mission by helping students: Acquire the knowledge, skills, and values essential to accountable and effective practice; Contribute directly to solutions to public challenges of our times Engaging individuals and institutions in this effort GOAL To lead and manage in public governance MEASURE Demonstrate normative knowledge of the principles of leadership and management: Exercise a balance between formulating and articulating an accountable, effective vision of practice Exhibit strong public service values in experiential learning activities ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE Direct evaluations Academic, experiential learning and professional practice performance Indirect evaluations Student surveys, graduate follow-ups, focus groups and exit surveys OUTCOMES Strong public service values Effective leadership and management COPRA –INTERIM REORT “The Commission requests information regarding the specific process that the program plans to use in articulating the comprehensive learning outcomes and formulating the assessment tools to measure student achievement.” COPRA DECISION No monitoring on Standard 5.1 SVR: Stage of Assessment Cycle is not complete Program needs to develop more specific measures of learning outcomes for each competency More work to do on operationalizing competencies SITE VISIT REPORT: Standard 5.1 Faculty working group established Outcomes added to syllabi Matrix linking Universal Competencies to Core Curriculum and evaluation instruments Added gateway and capstone courses Timeline for assessment cycle complete