TAPE Technology Assessment Protocol – Ecology Guidance for Evaluating Emerging Stormwater Treatment Technologies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EO TP3 SAMPLING WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS.
Advertisements

1 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, © 2005 Storm Water Best Management Practices Evaluation, Testing and Technology Transfer New England Stormwater.
The University of Massachusetts Water Resources Research Center works with MassDEP under a contract funded by the Federal 319 grant program to evaluate.
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill NSPS/EG Requirements Illinois EPA Bureau of Air Mike Davidson 217/
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
The Committee and Research – Where are we and where might we be going?
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Stormwater Issues in the Arid Southwest SBIR Phase I Pacific Southwest Solicitation.
Home Work Each day 3780 m3 of wastewater is treated at a municipal wastewater treatment plant. The influent contains 220 mg/L of suspended solids. The.
LOCAL IPP REGULATIONS SEWER USE ORDINANCES Sandra Diorka Director of Public Services Delhi Charter Township.
Summer Internship Program Outline
Capacity Development for New Public Water Systems.
Storm Water Blue Ribbon Panel Recommendations to the California State Water Resources Control Board The Feasibility of Numeric Effluent Limits Applicable.
Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Adopting a Local Program in Accordance with the Revised Stormwater Regulations Appomattox County February.
“How much soil is being lost from the fields in Tarland each year?” This is a very valid question since the soil is the farmer’s principal agricultural.
Nutrient Removal Objective: To understand the fundamental principles of nutrient removal using chemical and biological methods To know examples of the.
Practical Quantitation Limit Guidance Presentation to WQ Forum November 20, 2006.
DSS Decision Support System Tutorial: An Instructional Tool for Using the DSS.
Wastewater Permit Renewals
1 Overview of Regulations for Water Quality Protection in South Carolina n Federal Clean Water Act/ NPDES Storm Water Program n South Carolina Pollution.
General Permit for Low Hazard Potential Impounding Structures By Robert J. VanLier, P.E. Regional Dam Safety Engineer 900 Natural Resources Drive, Charlottesville,
SAND CLEANING STATFJORD C FIELD TEST Stavanger 18 – 19 January 2006 Henrik Dannström, MATOR AS.
Final Construction Stormwater General Permit Issued November 16, 2005 Jeff Killelea Department of Ecology.
Cytec Statement of Basis and Permit Modification July 16, 2012 Public Hearing Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations (Draft) Update Mohammed Karim, M.Eng., P.Eng. Senior Water & Wastewater Engineer Southern TC, LFN & UFN meeting.
Landfill Water Quality Project Paul Brooks, Lea Bullard, Leslie Harper, Amanda Strickland, Sarah van Schagen April 30, 2004 University of North Carolina.
REDUCING BURDEN WHILE INCREASING QUALITY AT A GOVERNMENT AGENCY David A. Marker (Westat), Mary K. Dingwall (Westat), and Marla D. Smith (U.S. EPA) Presented.
NPDES Boatyard Permit and Stormwater BMPs Kurt Baumgarten, Gary Bailey and Greg Stegman November 10, 2011.
WWTF’s MPCA Permit Renewal January 14,  Our current NPDES permit expired Sept. 30,  NPDES permits are a 5 year term.  Upon expiration,
MERCURY REQUEST FOR EFFLUENT DATA. MERCURY - BACKGROUND STATEWIDE CAMPAIGN TO ELIMINATE THE USE AND RELEASE OF HUMAN- CAUSED MERCURY IN WASHINGTON STATE.
Collecting a Stormwater Sample Annual CMTA Marine Trades Exposition October 5, 2010.
Wastewater Treatment Plants & Bacteria: Strategies for Compliance Wastewater Collection Systems Teague Harris Pate Engineers, Inc. John Montgomery Municipal.
TEXAS COMMISSION on ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PROPOSED STUCTURE FOR CHAPTER 217 < Subchapter A Administrative Provisions < Subchapter B Design Bases < Subchapter.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
2009 ENVIRONMENTAL SEMINAR Boat Bottom Pressure Washing Requirements & General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity.
Riparian Areas Regulation Implementation Guidebook January, 2006 Presented by Michael Roth Ministry of Environment, Ecosystems Branch.
Spokane River Forum Conference March 26,  About 1/3 of City  130 outfalls.
Introduction To The Highway Runoff Manual This introduction focus on: An overview of the Highway Runoff Manual. The definition of Minimum Requirements.
Deborah Helstrom, P.E. Utilities Technical Review Water Supply Division Membrane Bioreactors Treatment Systems.
Rule Change Update MPCA 1/13/ Mid-Sized ISTS (MSTS)
MRP Pollutants of Concern Copper Provisions Monday November 20, 2006 Richard Looker - RWQCB.
Tom Singleton Associate VP, Director, Integrated Water Resources an Atkins company Linking TMDLs & Environmental Restoration.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
LIFE THIRD COUNTRIES Development and Implementation of an Integrated System for the Control and Monitoring of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Plants in.
Guidance on Establishing Monitoring to Comply with CAM and Other Title V Requirements A Summary of Technical and Policy Materials Barrett Parker, EPA,
Toxics Management Plans Ecology Review Principles.
STATUS OF ECOLOGY’S DRAFT FLOW BLENDING POLICY WATER QUALITY PARTNERSHIP MEETING January 20, 2005.
Integrated Constructed Wetlands Regulatory Aspects - the EPA’s role Aoife Loughnane Inspector, Environmental Licensing Programme Environmental Protection.
EPA REGION VI MINIMUM QUANTIFICATION LEVELS (MQLs) WHAT THE “L” IS GOING ON? 25 th EPA Annual Pretreatment Workshop Addison, TX 8/5/09 Allen Gilliam ADEQ.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
Noboru Togawa  Ph.D Student at the University of Alabama, expected graduation, spring, 2010  Master in Environmental Engineering at the University of.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
ACWA – RECYCLE RESEARCH Presentation to the ACWA National Convention August 2009.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
Emission source sampling and monitoring Topic 6 Ms Sherina Kamal May
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Course TEN-702 Industrial waste management unit-2 Lecture -8 & 9.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
City of Clarksville Storm Water Management Manual Revisions 2014.
Grey Owl Municipal Water feasibility study
Chromium 6 Regulation Corrective Action Plan October 6, 2015
The Nuts & Bolts of TBLL Development
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
Van Wert, OH Water and Wastewater Element Training
Emulsion Task Force (ETF) Meeting
Wastewater Treatment: Characteristics and Systems
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
Presentation transcript:

TAPE Technology Assessment Protocol – Ecology Guidance for Evaluating Emerging Stormwater Treatment Technologies

Background In 2002 the first TAPE guidance was published. In 2004 this guidance was updated. Ecology is currently working on a new update.

Stormwater Management Manuals Volume V, Chapter 12 of the Western Washington manual and Chapter 5, Section 12 of the Eastern Washington manual are devoted to emerging technologies. Since emerging technologies are rapidly evolving and it is not practical to update the SWMM every time a new device comes out, the TAPE was created. Devices will be included in future updates to the manual.

Purpose TAPE Provides: a testing protocol for evaluating emerging stormwater technologies. a process for reporting on the appropriate uses of the technologies. a process for reporting on the performance of emerging technologies.

criteria for sizing emerging technologies. TAPE Provides: criteria for sizing emerging technologies. guidance to local governments who are asked to approve emerging technologies.

What are Emerging Stormwater Treatment Technologies? TAPE most directly deals with: Innovative proprietary devices that treat stormwater. Also known as “black box” treatment systems. As written it is not set up to deal with long detention type treatment systems or LID type of treatment. It is set up to evaluate short detention treatment BMPs.

The Technical Review Committee (TRC) Made up of local and governmental representatives Help Ecology review all submittals and make decisions regarding emerging technologies

The Tape Process Conduct initial testing on the stormwater treatment device. Submit an initial submittal packet to Ecology and the TRC chair. Ecology and the TRC chair will review the initial submittal packet for completeness. Submit initial submittal packet to Ecology and the TRC for review. Ecology and the TRC review packet and decide on a use level designation. Ecology issues a use level designation.

Step 1 – Initial Testing Financial burden of testing lies with manufacturer TAPE is not intended to be used for conducting research on experimental devices, devices must have performance data that demonstrates feasibility. Initial testing can be lab or field testing.

Step 2 – Initial Submittal Manufacturers submit a packet that contains performance claims, performance data, and a product description for review. Initial submittal must include what use level designation they would like to attain and in what treatment application.

Treatment Application Options Pretreatment Basic Treatment Enhanced Treatment Phosphorus Treatment Oil Treatment Retrofit Treatment Trains Treatment goals apply to the water quality design storm volume or flow rate and applies on an average annual basis to the entire annual discharge (treated plus bypasses).

Pretreatment Intended to achieve a goal of 50% removal of fine (50 micron size) particles or 80% removal of coarse (125 micron size) particles for influent concentrations between 100-200 mg/L. For concentrations less than 100 mg/L, effluent goals are 50 mg/L of fine particles and 20 mg/L of coarse particles. Used to extend performance of a downstream basic or enhanced treatment device. Used before infiltration.

Basic Treatment Intended to achieve a goal of 80% removal of total suspended solids for influent concetrations between 100-200 mg/L. Higher treatment is expected for influent concentrations greater than 200 mg/L. An effluent goal of 20 mg/L is expected for influent concentrations below 100 mg/L.

Enhanced Treatment Intended to achieve metals removal. Performance goals assume dissolved copper typically ranges from 0.003-0.02 mg/L and dissolved zinc ranges from 0.02-0.3 mg/L. Expected to achieve higher removal rates than basic treatment.

Phosphorus Treatment Intended to achieve a goal of 50% total phosphorus removal for a range of influent total phosphorus of 0.1-0.5 mg/L. Must achieve basic treatment goals as well.

Oil Treatment Goals of no ongoing or recurring visible sheen, and a daily average total petroleum hydrocarbon concentration no greater than 10 mg/L with a maximum of 15 mg/L for a grab sample.

Retrofit Not a treatment option that manufacturer would apply for. Devices should provide mostly coarse solids removal and improve the effectiveness of downstream treatment devices.

Treatment Train A treatment train is a combination of two or more basic treatment devices connected in series, or A combination of devices that can achieve one of the treatment goals.

Step 3 - Review of Initial Submittal Ecology and TRC chair check submittal for completeness and proper data. This is where manufacturer would be informed if they need to do further testing or a different type of testing.

Step 4 – Submission of Submittal to TRC and Ecology Ecology and TRC review submittal. In particular, the TRC makes sure that data is accurate and collected in a way that is in line with the TAPE protocol, that the device seems likely to work in Washington, and that the device is maintainable.

Step 5 – Ecology and TRC Review and Decide on a use level designation. Ecology and the TRC will review all submittals and decide on a use level designation. Use level designation include a description of how the device is to be used and how the device is to be sized. These can be found of the Ecology website at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/newtech/index.html

Step 6 - Ecology Issues a Use Level Designation Ecology issues one of three use level designations: Pilot Use Level Designation Conditional Use Level Designation General Use Level Designation

Use Level Designations Based on quality and amount of performance data. Devices that have pilot and conditional use level designations and have been installed in the field will not be removed if it is found after more testing that the device does not perform as expected.

Pilot Use Level Designation (PLD) Allows for limited use to complete field testing. All devices put in the ground must be tested. Testing should be completed to obtain a general use level designation (GULD) Municipalities that have an NPDES permit must notify Ecology if they plan to use a PLD device

Conditional Use Level Designation Devices are already in use in Washington Field testing must be completed on some sites. Testing should be completed to obtain a general use level designation.

General Use Level Designation (GULD) General acceptance for the device. Device requires no more testing. Device can be used anywhere in Washington. Device will be added to future stormwater management manual updates.

Quality Assurance Project Plans and Technology Evaluation Engineering Reports Devices that have obtained a conditional use level designation or a pilot use level designation must submit a quality assurance project plan (QAPP) to Ecology. This explains how the manufacturer plans to test the device and describes the test site. Ecology and the TRC will review this document to make sure test plans coincide with what is expected in the TAPE. QAPPs must be submitted before startup of any new devices. Technology Evaluation Engineering Reports are the final reports that are submitted to Ecology. They include all data that has been collected during the use level designation period and should be used to finalize any performance claims made about the treatment device.

Chemical Technology Assessment Protocol Ecology CTAPE Similar to TAPE but deals with construction site stormwater treatment technologies which are mainly chemical treatment options.

Questions? Mieke Hoppin : 360-407-6435 mhop461@ecy.wa.gov