Box Jellyfish Use Terrestrial Visual Cues for Navigation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Advertisements

Visual Perception Human Body Systems © 2014 Project Lead The Way, Inc.
Yvonne Aratyn-Schaus, Margaret L. Gardel  Current Biology 
Biological Bifocal Lenses with Image Separation
Visual Perception Human Body Systems © 2014 Project Lead The Way, Inc.
A Sensorimotor Role for Traveling Waves in Primate Visual Cortex
Harold A. Burgess, Hannah Schoch, Michael Granato  Current Biology 
Topography of Head Direction Cells in Medial Entorhinal Cortex
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)
A Motion Direction Map in Macaque V2
Flying Drosophila Orient to Sky Polarization
From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing
Visual Perception Human Body Systems © 2014 Project Lead The Way, Inc.
Responses to Spatial Contrast in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nuclei
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
How Ants Use Vision When Homing Backward
Visual Perception Human Body Systems © 2014 Project Lead The Way, Inc.
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Volume 17, Issue 24, Pages (December 2007)
Biological Bifocal Lenses with Image Separation
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
A Unique Advantage for Giant Eyes in Giant Squid
Polarized Light Helps Monarch Butterflies Navigate
Ant Navigation: One-Way Routes Rather Than Maps
Depth Affects Where We Look
Andres Laan, Tamar Gutnick, Michael J. Kuba, Gilles Laurent 
Real-Time Visualization of Neuronal Activity during Perception
Matthew W. Self, Timo van Kerkoerle, Hans Supèr, Pieter R. Roelfsema 
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Nimish Khanna, Yan Hu, Andrew S. Belmont  Current Biology 
Hongbo Yu, Brandon J. Farley, Dezhe Z. Jin, Mriganka Sur  Neuron 
Yitao Ma, Dinara Shakiryanova, Irina Vardya, Sergey V Popov 
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Molecular Mechanisms of Root Gravitropism
A Map for Horizontal Disparity in Monkey V2
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Rémi Bos, Christian Gainer, Marla B. Feller  Current Biology 
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Gal Aharon, Meshi Sadot, Yossi Yovel  Current Biology 
Target Detection Is Enhanced by Polarization Vision in a Fiddler Crab
Anna Lisa Stöckl, David Charles O’Carroll, Eric James Warrant 
Keram Pfeiffer, Uwe Homberg  Current Biology 
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation  Joshua B. Julian, Jack Ryan, Roy H. Hamilton,
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Fangtu T. Qiu, Rüdiger von der Heydt  Neuron 
Cornelia Buehlmann, Paul Graham, Bill S. Hansson, Markus Knaden 
Non-overlapping Neural Networks in Hydra vulgaris
Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets
Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Perception Matches Selectivity in the Human Anterior Color Center
Neural Circuit Components of the Drosophila OFF Motion Vision Pathway
Greg Schwartz, Sam Taylor, Clark Fisher, Rob Harris, Michael J. Berry 
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Visual Sensitivity Can Scale with Illusory Size Changes
Volume 100, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Tracking Route Progression in the Posterior Parietal Cortex
Active Vision: Adapting How to Look
MT Neurons Combine Visual Motion with a Smooth Eye Movement Signal to Code Depth-Sign from Motion Parallax  Jacob W. Nadler, Mark Nawrot, Dora E. Angelaki,
Albert V. van den Berg, Jaap A. Beintema  Neuron 
Visually Mediated Motor Planning in the Escape Response of Drosophila
Goal-Driven Behavioral Adaptations in Gap-Climbing Drosophila
How Navigational Guidance Systems Are Combined in a Desert Ant
Visual Optics: Remarkable Image-Forming Mirrors in Scallop Eyes
Vision and Cortical Map Development
A Visual Sense of Number
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Visual Motion Induces a Forward Prediction of Spatial Pattern
Nimish Khanna, Yan Hu, Andrew S. Belmont  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Box Jellyfish Use Terrestrial Visual Cues for Navigation Anders Garm, Magnus Oskarsson, Dan-Eric Nilsson  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 798-803 (May 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.054 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Rhopalial Orientation and Visual Field of the Upper Lens Eye (A and B) In freely swimming medusae, the rhopalia maintain a constant vertical orientation. When the medusa changes its body orientation, the heavy crystal (statolith) in the distal end of the rhopalium causes the rhopalial stalk to bend such that the rhopalium remains vertically oriented. Thus, the upper lens eye (ULE) points straight upward at all times, irrespective of body orientation. The rhopalia in focus are situated on the far side of the medusa and have the eyes directed to the center of the animal. (C) Modeling the receptive fields of the most peripheral photoreceptors in the ULE (the relative angular sensitivity of all peripheral rim photoreceptors are superimposed and normalized according to the color template). The demarcated field of view reveals a near-perfect match to the size and orientation of Snell's window (dashed line). (D) The visual field of the ULE, of just below 100°, implies that it monitors the full 180° terrestrial scene, refracted through Snell's window. LLE denotes lower lens eye. Scale bars represent 5 mm in (A) and (B) and 500 μm in insets. Current Biology 2011 21, 798-803DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.054) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Snell's Window Seen through the Jellyfish Eyes The first column shows wide-angle still pictures of Snell's window, captured just below the surface at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 m from the lagoon edge. The missing part of Snell's window opposite the canopy was removed because it contained the photographer. The second column shows the same images processed by the optical model to mimic the view seen through the upper lens eyes of T. cystophora medusae (the gray level represents the calculated relative photon catch in the receptor cells of the retina). The third column shows the difference between images from the experimental distances and a 20 m image. Green indicates higher intensities at 20 m. Red line indicates 12% contrast. Modeling of the image in the upper lens eyes indicates that, despite the poor resolution, jellyfish vision is good enough to detect the mangrove canopy through Snell's window at 8 m, but not at 12 m. Current Biology 2011 21, 798-803DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.054) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Navigation Behavior of Medusae of T. cystophora When Displaced from Their Habitat (A) Swim trajectories within the circular tank, at the five experimentally tested distances (the green bar indicates the direction to the nearest canopy). At all five distances, the medusae swam along the edge of the tank, demonstrating that the medusae respond to the displacement from their habitat between the mangrove roots. (B) Statistical analysis of the swim pattern. The red arrow indicates the mean vector of the preferred swimming direction for all medusae at the given distance to the mangrove canopy (a longer arrow indicates a more uniform swimming direction). The red dots mark the preferred direction of the individual medusae. At 2, 4, and 8 m, the mean vector differs significantly from random and coincides with the direction to the nearest canopy. NS denotes not significant; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001. Current Biology 2011 21, 798-803DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.054) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Complete 180° Underwater Visual Scene in the Mangrove Lagoon The picture is an average of five pictures taken straight downward just under the surface at a distance of 4 m from the canopies, where the depth is approximately 2.5 m. No visually detectable objects are present, and the light distribution is close to symmetrical, suggesting that navigation by underwater visual cues is not possible in the mangrove lagoon. Current Biology 2011 21, 798-803DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.054) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mangrove Canopy Obscured by a White Sheet (A) The visual scene in Snell's window when a 2 × 5 m white sheet is put up about 4 m in front of the canopy. The sheet completely blocks sight of the canopy, and this disrupts the ability of the medusae to navigate. (B) The picture from (A) when processed by the optical model of the upper lens eye. The canopy signature is close to cancelled by the white sheet. (C) Results from the experiments with obscured canopy. The open circle is the release point of the five meduse; the colored arrows indicate the approximate initial heading. The colored circles indicate the approximate end point of each medusa after 2 min. Current Biology 2011 21, 798-803DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.054) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions