Ins:PIRE What the evaluation team brings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Istanbul Forum Country Exercise: Standard slides for country delegations.
Advertisements

Digital inclusion – a CS perspective Alex Poulovassilis ESRC TLRP-TEL Inclusion and Impact conference, June 2010.
What makes a good NIHR application? 9 February 2012 Professor Jonathan Michaels.
Prepared by the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology - SIOP © 2002 Industrial-Organizational Psychology Learning Module Training in Organizations.
Performance Based Contracting and Quality Assurance: Building Systems to Support Success National Quality Improvement Center on the Privatization of Child.
Learning Event 3 6 th March 2013 Middlesbrough Leadership and Improvement Programme.
Measuring Ethical Goals of Research Oversight Holly Taylor, PhD, MPH Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Berman.
Planning your Project Prepared by: Alison Hunter, Improvement Advisor, Acute Adult Safety.
1. 2 Implementing and Evaluating of an Evidence Based Nursing into Practice Prepared By Dr. Nahed Said El nagger Assistant Professor of Nursing H.
Action Research Designs
Informing Policy Through Research: The Ghana ABBA Experience Prof John Gyapong & Dr Ato Selby Research & Development Division Ghana Health Service.
Geog 100 Themes in World Geography Dr. Julie Cidell Fall 2004 Section 7.
The Idea Factory An exercise to engage undergraduate students in self-directed learning David Stuart Department of Biochemistry.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 18 Action Research Designs.
Defining Leadership.
SE503 Advanced Project Management Dr. Ahmed Sameh, Ph.D. Professor, CS & IS Agile Principles: Leadership-Collaboration.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
EVALUATION AND THE RESIDENCY PROGRAM Caroline C. Nielsen, Ph.D.
Contd. Assign responsibilities Structure team Clarify roles & authority Collect internal, information Select processes.
Software Project Management
Regional Seminar 2005 EVALUATING POLICY Are your policies working? How do you know? School Development Planning Initiative.
Management & Development of Complex Projects Course Code MS Project Management Project Life Cycle & PM Process Groups Lecture # 4.
John F. Kennedy By Mr. Hernandez. Background Time Period: When did John F. Kennedy live or when did the important events of this person’s life occur?
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.
© 2007 SRI International CPATH Principal Investigators Meeting: Program Evaluation Update March 26, 2010 By the Center for Education Policy Dr. Raymond.
Evaluation in the NCCP An overview for Curling. How do we determine competency for a job that is as much an art as it is a science?
Systems Development AIMS 2710 R. Nakatsu. Overview Two philosophies of systems development –Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) –Prototyping Alternative.
Organizational Design, Diagnosis, and Development Session 14 The Management of Change.
Groups and teams Class: Z Group members: Tatjana, Aleksandra, Aya, Sandip, Vicky.
Overview of Socio-cognitive Engineering General requirements Theory of Use Design Concept Contextual Studies Task model Design space System specification.
Chapter 4 Test Design Techniques MNN1063 System Testing and Evaluation.
05/27/07 India Focus Group (IFG) Problem Asha India proposals in general queue leading to increased frustrations at the grass root level SV’s proposed.
Better Together Schools Pilot Projects Presented by: Naomi Parker AADAC Provincial Prevention Unit April 21, 2008.
A Software Engineering Model Based Curriculum Development Approach Leon Pan University of the Fraser Valley.
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide The Model for Improvement Wednesday 16 June 2010 Presenter: Dr Jonathon Gray.
The Human Side of Project Management
Action Research Designs
Kotter’s Leadership Taxonomy
Disaster Frontline Supervisor
Team 1: 32 responses Team 2: 55 responses Team 3: 29 responses
Evaluation: what’s next?
Building a Culture of Learning
مبررات إدخال الحاسوب في رياض الأطفال
Solve: 1. 4<
Evaluation of Health Promotion Programs
Assessment & The Institute for Teaching and Learning
Heather Morgan on behalf of the Evaluation Team
Kotter’s Leadership Taxonomy
Wickedness In a wicked world - R&D&I PROJECT management
Judgment Decision-making Learning Collaboration Assessment Planning
Agile Software Process And its Limitations
Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. It is a decision-making process in which the basic.
Using Data for Leadership/Implementation Planning
@inspireICU #inspireLS4
Defining Leadership.
21twelveinteractive.com/ twitter.com/21twelveI/ facebook.com/21twelveinteractive/ linkedin.com/company/21twelve-interactive/ pinterest.com/21twelveinteractive/
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
Instructional Methods Lessons Learned & Next Steps
1. Identify the following mixed number.
A Framework for Program Evaluation
DUALL Deliberative approach to the living lab Dr Richard Bull and team
From Pockets of Excellence
Engaging Stakeholders in the Development and Evaluation of the Aging, Community and Health Research Unit (ACHRU) – Community Partnership Program (CPP)
Academic Standards Review Committee
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Overview of the Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Change Management Tool.
Presentation transcript:

Ins:PIRE What the evaluation team brings @hsru_aberdeen

The evaluation team Professor Marion Campbell Professor John Norrie Dr Heather Morgan Mixed methods experience Extensive track in ICU research

The evaluation Initial evaluation Is the proposed work coherent & feasible? Clarify roles and remits Formative evaluation Identifying and solving problems, providing feedback to the teams Help with the curation (‘document as we go’)

The evaluation Summative evaluation At the conclusion of the project ‘Process’ is as important as ‘formal outcomes’

Some issues … This is all about scaling up The evaluation is interactive and will evolve How will the intervention be adapted to each site? We will be accessing all stakeholders What didn’t work is in many respects as important as all the predictable successes