Stakeholder Engagement in Research Priority setting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Healthy Place to Live, Learn, Work and Play:
Advertisements

American Community Survey (ACS) Program Review Webinar March 6, 2012.
The Creative Problem Solving Pack. The following pages provide separate packs that you can use in the following situations. * Creative problem solving.
SEIU Healthcare PA Model for Labor-Management Quality Partnership Process Making Quality Care Partnership Succeed 2011 Quality Care Summit.
Sheffield 0 to 19+ Partnership Children and Young People’s Strategic Partnership Plan.
Framework for success workshop 1 st October 2009.
Module 7- Evaluation: Quality and Standards. 17/02/20162 Overview of the Module How the evaluation will be done Questions and criteria Methods and techniques.
Building Consensus C&S 563. BAD Consensus n Those who oppose do not speak up at meeting. n Everyone nodding in unison but not really agreeing with the.
Health Education England ‘People are the neglected area of reform’ Focus On Education Commissioning Chris Jeffries HEE Finance Transition lead.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Challenge of global foresight: lessons from IMS scenario and roadmapping process Cristiano Cagnin & Totti Könnölä JRC-IPTS & Impetu Solutions The 4th International.
Vaga Associates Emerging Oxfordshire Sports Partnership Enquiries Outcome of Visioning Event Partnership Aspirations.
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course Module 3: Developing the SAP.
PROBLEM SOLVING. Definition The act of defining a problem; determining the cause of the problem; identifying, prioritizing and selecting alternatives.
A company specialising in facilitation, stakeholder engagement, research, evaluation and training. Icarus work across a number of sectors, including the.
Listen engage advise deliver The Facilities Master Plan Process Dorothy McCarty, AIA, LEED AP October 12, 2016 ICCCFO FALL CONFERENCE.
Building and Measuring Community Empowerment
November 11, 2016 Paula Settoon, Dean of Libraries
Tuckman’s Group Development Theory
Haida Gwaii Community Electricity Plan
Celebrating SISCC - the story so far
Business & Management Topic 1 Stakeholders.
Well Trained International
Start End What is a project? Definition from PMBOK -
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
5 steps to align your talent strategy to the organisational strategy
What Is a Project? Projects versus Operations Stakeholders.
Culture and Group decision Making exercise
Character Education for Middle School Students
Effective risk communication
Summary GEOSS Subgroup Teleconference
Introducing the CIPFA Financial Management Model The progression towards world class financial management.
MODULE 11 – SCENARIO PLANNING
Recap of Day 3.
Target Marketing & Segmentation through Research
CLDMS Conference Oct 12 Building a shared understanding of the principles of strengthening communities.
Anna Aghumian and Chris Gerrard IEG World Bank November 13, 2009
Neighbourhood Planning
Macro-regional strategies Rapporteur: Etele Baráth Dr
Locality.org.uk.
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Team Building.
MMU Project Management Community of Practice
Evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of change plans
Brussels, 15 September 2009.
Theory of Change: When the Stars Align…
…and still actual for a post-2010 strategy!
Building a Sustainable Community Collaboration
Lesson 15: Coaching Skills
High level seminar on the implementation of the
Chapter 2 Section 1 Building Life Skills Bellringer
Core Competencies of a World Class Customer Advisory Board
Killer Project Management Best Practices
Transdisciplinary Skills for Self-management Skills
Lifelong Learning Planning for Improvement 1st November 2017
EVIDENCE COLLECTION TECHNIQUES (Interview)
Understanding the Self
Building a needs-based Health & Wellbeing Strategy
Evaluation of the ESF contribution to the EES
Moving Forward Together Strategic planning process update
Lesson 15: Coaching Skills
Reflections on Revising the Guidance: An Evaluation
Overview of assessment approach
Monitoring Effective Development Co-operation: Tailoring for fragile and conflict affected situations 16th Steering Committee Meeting 30 November 2018,
Teams: Bettering the Workplace
The National and Local context
MODULE ON FACILITATION
Moving Forward Together Strategic planning process update
Lesson 3 Goals Bellringer
Strategic Planning Long & Short Term
Presentation transcript:

Stakeholder Engagement in Research Priority setting The three of us jumped out of plane at the same time but we positioned ourselves differently so we ended up at variable heights at the end. There are decisions that we make to prioritise research questions in a certain order, however, there are contextual factors, people’s value and commitments and resources that can change which questions becomes a more important priority overtime.

Who to involve? It will be useful to ask yourself these questions What is the objective of the priority setting exercise? What are the strategic objectives, values and principles of the group or organization that supports, commission or intends to use the research priority setting exercise What are the priorities, objectives and values those sponsoring the priority setting exercise?

Do you have any partnerships or relation with any of the stakeholders? If there are several stakeholders, are there any potential of conflicts? How do you manage conflict of interest in the process?

Who is involved at what stage of the priority setting exercise??

Building partnerships Objective/ Scope Identify Qs Building partnerships Define criteria Information management Identify questions/topics Ranking questions/topics Reaching consensus Getting priorities to research Evaluation

How much do you want to involve them?

Methods Selection

Controversial topic Unexplored topic Controversial topic well-discussed topic Using more interviews and focus groups Acceptable to use surveys and similar approaches

The topics are potentially close together and there is lots of negative and positive sides can marginally make difference The topics are clearly different and there is a general consensus in the community on differences Agree on clear and transparent pre-defined criteria that can differentiate between topics It is acceptable to not have pre-defined criteria and maybe collect information on how people made decisions

How do you ensure that they are interested in the process and feel ownership towards the exercise to engage in it? Does it require certain adaptation in the methodology?