LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Advertisements

LIGO-G M First Generation Interferometers Barry Barish 30 Oct 2000 Workshop on Astrophysical Sources for Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors.
Gravitational Waves Laser Interferometric Detectors
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO Status and Advanced LIGO Plans Barry C Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04.
Status and Prospects for LIGO Barry C. Barish Caltech 17-March-06 St Thomas, Virgin Islands Crab Pulsar.
Status of the LIGO Project
F. Frasconi I.N.F.N. Pisa for the Virgo Collaboration TAUP2007 Sendai, September 11-15, 2007 VIRGO EXPERIMENT VIRGO: a large interferometer for Gravitational.
LIGO-G W The Status of Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Detectors Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory On behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G W Report on LIGO Science Run S4 Fred Raab On behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
The LIGO Project ( Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) Rick Savage – Scientist LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Current Noise at LHO Worst wire loss inferred from in situ violin mode measurements:  =
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
GEO600 Harald Lück Ruthe, Worldwide Interferometer Network.
Status of Virgo Gabriele Vajente INFN Pisa and Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration 11 th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis.
What are GW’s ?? Fluctuation in the curvature of space time, propagating outward form the source at the speed of light Predicted by Einstein’s GTR Gravitational.
Paik-1 Search for Gravitational Waves Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland and Seoul National University January 12, 2006 Seoul, Korea KIAS-SNU Physics.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
LIGO- G M LIGO David Shoemaker 30 August 05.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.
G Amaldi Meeting 2015, Gwangju, South Korea1 Status of LIGO June 22, 2015 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory (on behalf of the LIGO Scientific.
The Big Bang Observer: High Laser Power for Gravitational- wave Astrophysics Gregory Harry, Peter Fritschel LIGO Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
GEO600 Detector Status Harald Lück Max-Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik, Uni Hannover.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
LIGO-G Z Guido Mueller University of Florida For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration ESF Exploratory Workshop Perugia, Italy September 21 st –23.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
LIGO- G D Gravitational Wave Observations with Interferometers: Results and Prospects Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2 nd.
International Gravitational Wave Network 11/9/2008 Building an Stefan Ballmer, for the LIGO / VIRGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO G
Status of LIGO Andri M. Gretarsson Livingston Observatory LIGO-G L.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
LIGO-G W Prospects for the S5 Run Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory November 8, 2005.
LIGO-G Z1 Using Condor for Large Scale Data Analysis within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Duncan Brown California Institute of Technology.
Searching for gravitational waves with lasers
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
LIGO-G D Commissioning P Fritschel LIGO NSF review, 23 October 2002 M.I.T.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
Edwige Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration The status of Virgo.
Gravitational Wave Data Analysis  GW detectors  Signal processing: preparation  Noise spectral density  Matched filtering  Probability and statistics.
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Next Generation Low Frequency Control Systems
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala
Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory November 8, 2005
Spokesperson, LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of the LIGO Detectors
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of LIGO Patrick J. Sutton LIGO-Caltech
Update on Status of LIGO
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Search for Ringdowns in LIGO S4 Data
Presentation transcript:

LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg

Interferometer Configurations LIGO I

Antenna Pattern + polarization × polarization averaged LIGO I

Sensitivity LIGO I

2001 2003 LIGO I

Seismic Isolation LIGO I

Suspensions LIGO I

LIGO I

Some Requirements Sensitivity: ~10-19 m/√Hz at 150 Hz Controller range: ~100 µm (tides) Control of diff. arm length: ≤10-13 m rms Laser intensity noise: ≤10-7 /√Hz at 150 Hz Frequency noise: ≤3×10-7 Hz/√Hz at 150 Hz Angular Control: ≤10-8 rad rms Input beam jitter: ≤4×10-9 rad/√Hz at 150 Hz LIGO I

Length Sensing and Control Separate common and differential mode Diff. arm Michelson Common arm PR cavity Sensors Anti-symmetric port In reflection PR cavity sample LIGO I

The Auto-Alignment System Optical levers for damping suspension & stack modes Wavefront RF sensors for 10 angular dofs Quadrant detectors for beam positions on ends Video analysis of beam splitter image for input beam position LIGO I

Sideband Images as Function of Thermal Heating No Heating 30 mW 60 mW 90 mW 120 mW 150 mW 180 mW Input beam Best match LIGO I

Time Line 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Inauguration First Lock Full Lock all IFO Now 10-21 10-22 4K strain noise at 150 Hz [Hz-1/2] 10-17 10-18 10-20 E2 E3 E5 E7 E8 E9 E10 E11 Engineering First Science Data S1 S4 Science S2 Runs S3 S5 LIGO I

The 4th Science Run Dates (2005): Duty cycle: Start: 22 Feb Stop: 23 Mar Duty cycle: H1: 80% L1: 74% H2: 81% Triple coincidence: 57% LIGO I

Results from the 1st/2nd Science Run Binary inspirals (S2): Neutron star binary coalescence: range up to 1.5 Mpc, rate ≤ 47/y/MW (90% CL) Black hole coalescence (0.2-1M) in Galactic halo: rate ≤ 63/y/MW (90% CL) Pulsars (S2): Limits on 28 pulsars Upper limits on h as low as 2×10-24 (95% CL) and as low as 5×10-6 on the eccentricity Stochastic background (S1): Energy limit as fraction of closure density: h2100W0 ≤ 23 ± 4.6 (90% CL) PRELIMINARY S2: h2100W0 ≤ 0.018 +0.007-0.003 (90% CL) Burst (S2): Sensitivity: hrss ~ 10-20 - 10-19 /√Hz, rate ≤ 0.26/day (90% CL) GRB030329: hrss ≤ 6×10-21 /√Hz LIGO I

Summary Sophisticated feedback compensation networks are essential in running a modern gravitational-wave interferometer All LIGO interferometers are within a factor of 2 of design sensitivity over a broad range of frequencies For sources like binary neutron star coalescence we can see beyond our own galaxy! Join Einstein@home (einstein.phys.uwm.edu) LIGO I