Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (May 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Advertisements

Volume 119, Issue 7, Pages (December 2004)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
by Juan M. Cárcamo, Oriana Bórquez-Ojeda, and David W. Golde
Sue Ann Krause, Joseph V. Gray  Current Biology 
Regulation of Ceramide Biosynthesis by TOR Complex 2
Ali Zarrinpar, Roby P Bhattacharyya, M.Paige Nittler, Wendell A Lim 
Nonfilamentous C. albicans Mutants Are Avirulent
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Sue Ann Krause, Joseph V. Gray  Current Biology 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 24, Pages S (December 1998)
Coordinate Regulation of Bacterial Virulence Genes by a Novel Adenylate Cyclase- Dependent Signaling Pathway  Matthew C. Wolfgang, Vincent T. Lee, Meghan.
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Identification and Characterization of an IκB Kinase
Hiromasa Tanaka, Tau-Mu Yi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
The Putative RNA Helicase Dbp4p Is Required for Release of the U14 snoRNA from Preribosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Martin Koš, David Tollervey 
The Cdk-Activating Kinase (CAK) from Budding Yeast
Ashton Breitkreutz, Lorrie Boucher, Mike Tyers  Current Biology 
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Lucy S. Drury, John F.X. Diffley  Current Biology 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast  Song Chou, Lan Huang, Haoping Liu  Cell 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (February 1998)
Regulation of the mating pheromone and invasive growth responses in yeast by two MAP kinase substrates  Kerry Tedford, Sammy Kim, Danne Sa, Ken Stevens,
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
A Rad53 Kinase-Dependent Surveillance Mechanism that Regulates Histone Protein Levels in S. cerevisiae  Akash Gunjan, Alain Verreault  Cell  Volume 115,
Sir2 Blocks Extreme Life-Span Extension
Specialization and Targeting of B-Type Cyclins
S-Adenosylmethionine Synthetase Is Required for Cell Growth, Maintenance of G0 Phase, and Termination of Quiescence in Fission Yeast  Takeshi Hayashi,
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
José Antonio Tercero, Maria Pia Longhese, John F.X Diffley 
Marie Frank-Vaillant, Stéphane Marcand  Molecular Cell 
Terunao Takahara, Tatsuya Maeda  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (June 2000)
Sphingolipid Signaling Mediates Iron Toxicity
Andrew Emili, David M Schieltz, John R Yates, Leland H Hartwell 
Specificity of MAP Kinase Signaling in Yeast Differentiation Involves Transient versus Sustained MAPK Activation  Walid Sabbagh, Laura J Flatauer, A.Jane.
TRADD–TRAF2 and TRADD–FADD Interactions Define Two Distinct TNF Receptor 1 Signal Transduction Pathways  Hailing Hsu, Hong-Bing Shu, Ming-Gui Pan, David.
Stress-Induced Phosphorylation of S
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Flora Ambre Honoré, Vincent Méjean, Olivier Genest  Cell Reports 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Jennifer Terrell, Susan Shih, Rebecca Dunn, Linda Hicke  Molecular Cell 
High Nutrient Levels and TORC1 Activity Reduce Cell Viability following Prolonged Telomere Dysfunction and Cell Cycle Arrest  Julia Klermund, Katharina.
Analyzing Fission Yeast Multidrug Resistance Mechanisms to Develop a Genetically Tractable Model System for Chemical Biology  Shigehiro A. Kawashima,
Control of Lte1 Localization by Cell Polarity Determinants and Cdc14
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
MAX2 Affects Multiple Hormones to Promote Photomorphogenesis
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages (February 2003)
Michael J. Lee, Henrik G. Dohlman  Current Biology 
Sir2 Blocks Extreme Life-Span Extension
Vidhya Ramachandran, Khyati H. Shah, Paul K. Herman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 24, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
D.Michelle Brady, Kevin G. Hardwick  Current Biology 
The Engagement of Sec61p in the ER Dislocation Process
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Ichiro Mitsuhara, Kamal A. Malik, Masayuki Miura, Yuko Ohashi 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages 807-817 (May 1998) Osmotin, a Plant Antifungal Protein, Subverts Signal Transduction to Enhance Fungal Cell Susceptibility  Dae-Jin Yun, José Ignacio Ibeas, Hyeseung Lee, María A Coca, Meena L Narasimhan, Yukifumi Uesono, Paul M Hasegawa, José M Pardo, Ray A Bressan  Molecular Cell  Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages 807-817 (May 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80080-5

Figure 1 Characterization of ore Mutants (A) ore mutants are resistant to osmotin. Cells of a naturally osmotin-resistant control strain GRF167 (1), wild-type osmotin-sensitive BWG7a (2), and the ore mutants ore12, ore13, ore14, and ore4 (3–6, respectively) were grown on YPD with (left) or without (right) 4 μM osmotin. (B) Sterile ore mutants are defective in pheromone-induced growth arrest. The halo bioassay was performed by spotting 15 μl of a 3 μM (left) or 9 μM (right) solution of α factor (Sigma) on a lawn of wild-type BWG7a ([w.t.], left) or ore13 mutant (right) cells, spread on YPD. The plates were photographed after 2 days of incubation at 28°C. (C) Fertility of ore9 and ore11 mutants is recovered by complementation with STE20. Cells of wild-type BWG7a (w.t.), the Δste20 derivative DJ4, mutants ore9 and ore11, and the ore mutants transformed with pSTE20-5, a centromere plasmid containing the full-length STE20 gene (Leberer et al. 1992), were replica-plated on diploid-selective minimal media seeded with mating tester strain F15 (left) or YPD (right) and allowed to grow for 2 days at 28°C. (D) Osmotin sensitivity of ore9 and ore11 mutants is restored by complementation with STE20. The osmotin tolerance of the strains shown in (C) was measured in liquid cultures. Exponentially growing cultures were diluted to OD600 nm of 0.01 and grown for 16–20 hr with shaking at 30°C in the presence of the indicated amounts of osmotin. The final OD600 nm was determined by appropriate dilutions. The values are normalized to the OD600 nm of control cultures grown without osmotin and given as percentages. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 807-817DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80080-5)

Figure 2 Elements of the Pheromone Response Pathway Are Required for Osmotin Sensitivity (A) Suppression of osmotin sensitivity by mutations in genes encoding proteins of the mating signal transduction pathway. Aliquots (2.5 μl) from exponentially growing cultures of BWG7a (w.t.) and the ste mutants indicated (strains DJ1, DJ2, DJ3, DJ4, DJ5, DJ6, DJ7, DJ10, and DJ11; see Table 2) at an OD600 nm of 0.04 and serial dilutions (1:10, 1:100) were spotted on YPD media supplemented with the indicated concentrations of osmotin and allowed to grow for 2 days at 28°C. (B) GPA1 does not function in osmotin sensitivity. A halo bioassay was performed on strain BWG7a transformed with either the high-copy-number vector pAD4M (left) or the same vector overexpressing GPA1 (Dohlman et al. 1996; right). 15 μL of either 5 μM α factor (upper) or 5 μM osmotin (lower) were spotted, and cells were allowed to grow for 2 days at 28°C. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 807-817DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80080-5)

Figure 3 Osmotin-Induced Signal Flux through the STE MAPK Module (A and B) Phosphorylation of STE7 in response to osmotin. Cells of strain BWG7a, without (−) or with (+) pNC267 (Zhou et al. 1993), which contains STE7 fused in-frame with a c-Myc epitope tag and under control of the CYC1 promoter, were treated (+) with either α factor (5 μM) or osmotin ([A], 2 μM; [B], 8 μM) for the indicated time periods at 28°C. Shown are immunoblots of total protein from cell extracts (30 μg per lane) separated by SDS–PAGE, reacted with (A) Myc1-9E10 antibody and (B) STE7 antibody polyclonal antibody, and developed by the ECL method. (C) Pheromone pretreatment enhances the cytotoxic effect of osmotin. BWG7a cells were first incubated with (squares) or without (circles) 5 μM α factor for 1 hr at 28°C and then with the indicated concentrations of osmotin for 3 hr, after which they were diluted and plated on YPD media. After 2 days of incubation at 28°C, the number of viable cells were counted and are shown normalized to the value without added osmotin. Values are the average of two experiments. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 807-817DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80080-5)

Figure 4 sst2 Mutation Affects Pheromone Response and Osmotin-Induced Cell Death (A) Δsst2 mutation increases sensitivity to osmotin. The relative sensitivity to osmotin of BC159 and a congenic Δsst2 mutant (BC180) was assayed in liquid cultures. Values shown are the mean and SE of three independent experiments and are normalized to the OD600 nm of control cultures without osmotin. (B) Overexpression of GPA1 does not affect the osmotin sensitivity of a Δsst2 mutant. Strain BC180 (Δsst2) was transformed with either the high-copy-number vector pAD4M (left) or the same vector overexpressing GPA1 (Dohlman et al. 1996; right), and the halo bioassay was performed with 15 μl of either 5 μM α factor (upper) or 5 μM osmotin (lower). Molecular Cell 1998 1, 807-817DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80080-5)

Figure 5 Mating-Specific Morphogenesis and Transcription Are Not Detected during Osmotin-Induced Cell Death Exponentially growing BWG7a cells ([A] and [B]) or BWG7a cells transformed with pSB231, a centromere plasmid containing a FUS1-lacZ transcriptional fusion (C), were incubated with α factor (5 μM) or osmotin (2 μM, [A] and [C]; 1 μM, [B]) at 28°C for the indicated time periods. Shown are: (A) the microscopic appearance of the cells under Nomarski optics, (B) the DNA contents per cell obtained by flow cytometric analysis, and (C) the β-galactosidase activities of the cells at various time points of the treatments indicated. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 807-817DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80080-5)

Figure 6 STE Genes Regulate Sensitivity to Osmotin through Effects on the Cell Wall Osmotin sensitivity was assayed by spotting 3 μl of 2 μM osmotin solution in 1 M sorbitol directly on a lawn of cells or spheroplasts of strain BWG7a (wild type) and its isogenic Δste7 mutant (DJ7). Cells and spheroplasts were embedded in YPD agar supplemented with 1 M sorbitol as described in Experimental Procedures. Plates were photographed after 2 days at 28°C. The size of the inhibition halo reflects the degree of sensitivity to osmotin. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 807-817DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80080-5)

Figure 7 Model for the Signal Transduction Pathway in Osmotin-Induced Cell Death Osmotin treatment activates a MAPK cascade that shares the components STE20, STE11, STE7, KSS1, and STE12 with the pheromone response, invasive, and pseudohyphal growth pathways, and additionally, STE4, STE5, FUS3, and STE18 with the pheromone response pathway. We propose that osmotin subverts another existing MAPK cascade, with unidentified natural stimulus, by a process that may or may not require a Gα protein and a receptor. Activation of this cascade induces changes in the cell wall that facilitate osmotin access to the plasma membrane and consequently, cell death. Molecular Cell 1998 1, 807-817DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80080-5)