Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of DDB1 in Complex with a Paramyxovirus V Protein: Viral Hijack of a Propeller Cluster in Ubiquitin Ligase  Ti Li, Xiujuan Chen, Kenneth C.
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Mirjana Lilic, Milos Vujanac, C. Erec Stebbins  Molecular Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Elisa Bergamin, Peter T. Hallock, Steven J. Burden, Stevan R. Hubbard 
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Thomas A Graham, Wilson K Clements, David Kimelman, Wenqing Xu 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Architecture of a Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
The Structure of the GGA1-GAT Domain Reveals the Molecular Basis for ARF Binding and Membrane Association of GGAs  Brett M. Collins, Peter J. Watson,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 564-575 (November 2008) The Skap-hom Dimerization and PH Domains Comprise a 3′-Phosphoinositide-Gated Molecular Switch  Kenneth D. Swanson, Yong Tang, Derek F. Ceccarelli, Florence Poy, Jan P. Sliwa, Benjamin G. Neel, Michael J. Eck  Molecular Cell  Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 564-575 (November 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.022 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of Skap-hom (A) Schematic showing Skap-hom dimerization (DM), PH and SH3 domains, and two intervening linkers (L). Potential tyrosine phosphorylation (Y) sites are indicated, and point mutations studied herein are indicated below. The domain structure of the Skap-hom ΔPH mutant is also shown. (B) Structure-based sequence alignment of the Skap-hom and Skap55 N termini and selected PH domains. Identical residues are shaded red; highly conserved residues are in red type. Residue numbering and secondary structure for mouse Skap-hom are indicated above the alignment. DM and PH domain borders are delineated by brackets. Dashed lines indicate disordered regions in the crystal structure. Blue triangles below the alignment mark Skap-hom residues involved in the dimer interface, black ovals indicate residues in the interface between the DM and PH domains, and black squares mark PH domain residues implicated in lipid head group interaction. PDB entries 1U5D (Skap55), 1H10 (Akt1), 1FAO (Dapp1), 1FGY (Grp1), 1BTK (Btk), and 1W1D (Pdk-1) were used to align PH domain structures. (C) Ribbon diagram of the dimeric DM-PH structure of Skap-hom. The view in the upper panel is along the approximate 2-fold axis of symmetry of the four-helical bundle (top view), and the lower panel is a perpendicular view (front view). The two PH domains are shown in red and yellow; the dimerization domain of one subunit is shown in blue and the other in green. The side chains of Lys125, Arg140, and Tyr151 are shown in stick form to mark the location of the phosphoinositide-binding pocket (see Figure 3C). Molecular Cell 2008 32, 564-575DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.022) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Interface between the Skap-hom PH and DM Domains (A) The PH domain is shown in red and the DM domain in blue and green as in Figure 1C. Salt bridges are indicated by dashed lines. Note the helical conformation of the β1-β2 loop (residues Arg127–Phe135) and the insertion of PH domain residues Phe132 and Leu133 into a hydrophobic pocket on the DM domain. (B) Stereo representation of the DM domain showing the side chains of all residues, with salt bridges highlighted. Representative charged residues are labeled. (C) View of one subunit of the DM domain showing the hydrophobic and charged residues in the dimerization interface. (D) Superposition of the Skap-hom DM (green and blue) and the dimerization domain of nuclear export protein Nep/Ns2 of influenza A (magenta) (Akarsu et al., 2003), which shares a similar overall topology but no clear sequence relationship. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 564-575DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.022) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of the Isolated Skap-hom PH and DM-PH Structures (A) Ribbon diagram showing one of the PH domains in the DM-PH structure. (B) Isolated Skap-hom PH domain. Note the marked difference in conformation of the β1-β2 loop. The helical conformation (α3) seen in the DM-PH structure is incompatible with phosphoinositide binding (see text). (C) Superposition of the Skap-hom PH domain (blue) shown in (B) with the Akt PH domain (magenta) complexed with Ins[1,3,4,5]P4. Akt residues involved in phosphoinositide binding are labeled in bold italic type; the corresponding residues in Skap-hom are in regular type. (D) Electrostatic surface representation of the dimeric DM-PH structure and close-up of one lipid-binding pocket. The highly basic surfaces (shaded blue) of the phosphoinositide-binding pockets are on opposite faces of the dimer and are recessed relative to the DM domain. The expected position of the head group is modeled into one of the PH domains (inset), based on superposition of the Akt PH domain complexed with Ins[1,3,4,5]P4. Note the obvious steric clash with the head group due to the helical conformation of the β1-β2 loop. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 564-575DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.022) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Skap-hom Can Homodimerize (A) Full-length Skap-hom constructs, epitope tagged with either Flag or HA, were expressed in 293T cells. Total-cell lysates (TCL) and anti-HA immunoprecipitates (IP) probed with anti-HA (upper) or anti-Flag (lower) antibodies are shown. The diffuse band present in the anti-HA blots is the 12CA5 heavy chain used for immune precipitation. (B) HA-tagged full-length Skap-hom was expressed with either wild-type (WT) or a dimerization domain mutant (DM∗) DM-PH fragment and immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibodies. The resulting immunoblot was probed with anti-Skap-hom antibodies. The upper bands are HA-Skap-hom and the lower bands are DM-PH fragments. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 564-575DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.022) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Phosphoinositide Binding of the Skap-Hom PH and DM-PH Fragments (A) Dot blot assays of Skap-hom PH and DM-PH fragments with the indicated phosphoinositides. (B) Florescence polarization-based binding assays of the isolated Skap-hom PH domain and its R140M mutant to PI[3,4,5]P3. (C) Florescence polarization-based binding assays of the WT Skap-hom DM-PH fragment and its mutants (D129K, D129A, K56A, R140M) with PI[3,4,5]P3. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 564-575DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.022) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Localization of GFP-Tagged Skap-hom Variants in Skap-hom−/− BMMs Skap-hom−/− BMMs were reconstituted with (A) GFP-tagged WT Skap-hom, (B) GFP alone, or (C–G) the indicated GFP-tagged variants of Skap-hom. (H–N) Cells were fixed and counterstained with rhodamine-labeled phalloidin to visualize the actin cytoskeleton. (O–U) Merged GFP and Rhodamine channels for each infection. WT Skap-hom (A, H, and O) colocalizes with actin-rich ruffles. The DM∗ dimerization domain triple mutant (C, J, and Q) and the R140M PH domain mutant (D, K, and R) are diffusely localized. Deletion of the PH domain (ΔPH; [E], [L], and [S]) results in a protein that localizes to actin ruffles. Skap-hom bearing both the R140M and either the D129K (D129K:R140M, [F], [M], and [T]) or the K56A (K56A:R140M, [G], [N], and [U]) mutations colocalize with actin ruffles. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 564-575DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.022) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions