SuperB Workshop Frascati March 16, 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,
Advertisements

Friday 28 th April Review of the aims and recommendations from the workshop L. Rinolfi.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
JCS e + /e - Source Development and E166 J. C. Sheppard, SLAC June 15, 2005.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
3-March-06ILCSC Technical Highights1 ILC Technical Highlights Superconducting RF Main Linac.
Status of Undulator-based Positron Source Baseline Design Leo Jenner, but based largely on a talk given by Jim Clarke to Positron DESY-Zeuthen,
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
WG3a Sources Summary Jim Clarke on behalf of John Sheppard, Masao Kuriki, Philippe Piot and all the contributors to WG3a.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Polarization issues in SuperB-Factories I.A.Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia Frascati Workshop, March 16-18, 2006.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Oct. 6, Summary of the Polarisation Session J. Clarke, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Riemann 10 November 2006, ECFA Workshop, Valencia.
Polarisation monitoring Sabine Riemann, Andreas Schälicke, Andriy Ushakov (DESY) Positron Source Group Meeting, October, 2009 University of Durham.
CONVERSION EFFICIENCY AT 250 GeV A.Mikhailichenko Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY Presented at Positron Source Meeting Daresbury Laboratory,
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Undulator based polarized positron source for Circular electron-positron colliders Wei Gai Tsinghua University/ANL a seminar for IHEP, 4/8/2015.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
For Layout of ILC , revised K.Kubo Based on following choices. Positron source: Prepare both conventional and undulator based. Place the.
WG3a Sources Update Jim Clarke on behalf of WG3a GDE Meeting, Frascati, December 2005.
김 귀년 CHEP, KNU Accelerator Activities in Korea for ILC.
Positron polarization at the ILC: RDR vs. SB2009 Sabine Riemann, DESY Zeuthen International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, Geneva October 25-29, 2010.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
1 Positron Source Configuration Masao KURIKI ILC AG meeting at KEK, 2006 Jan. Positron Source Configuration KURIKI Masao and John Sheppard  BCD Description.
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Injector and positron source scheme. A first evaluation Thanks to O
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Dr. D. Z. LI & Prof. J. GAO Accelerator Center, IHEP
CLIC Undulator Option for Polarised Positrons
Electron Polarization In MEIC
Pol. positron generation scheme for ILC
BINP Tau-Charm Project
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Electron Source Configuration
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
The project of t-charm factory with crab waist in Novosibirsk
ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons
UPDATE OF POSITRON PRODUCTION CODE KONN
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
Summary of Washington DOE Review
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
Polarization at the Super-B Factory
MEIC Polarized Electron Source
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
Beam-beam simulations
Presentation transcript:

SuperB Workshop Frascati March 16, 2006 CP Measuring Violation in decay at Super B t David Hitlin SuperB Workshop Frascati March 16, 2006 David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

Outline At SuperB we can make measurements sensitive to CP,T or CPT violation in t production or in t decay Eugenio Paoloni has covered the question of CP violation in t production, which can be parametrized as a t EDM I will discuss CP violation in t decay The efficacy of polarized beams in making such measurements Technical options in producing polarized beams Comparision of a t/charm factory with SuperB These measurements require longitudinal polarization David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

CPV in t decay Unpolarized t’s Polarized t’s Measure B’s of t decays with two or more hadrons Interpretation of any observed CPV requires understanding of inelastic final state interactions Measure CP or T-violating correlations in t+t- decays Polarized t’s Search for T-odd rotationally invariant products, e.g. in t+ and t-decays such as Search for T-odd correlation between t polarization and m polarization in decay David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

CP violation in t decay Y.S. Tsai, Phys Rev D55, 3172 (1995) Longitudinal polarization The t polarization is For while for For while for 0.6 0.95 0.9 0.8 0.7 we- we+ 0.99 David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

There was transverse polarization at SPEAR Polarization produced by quantized synchrotron radiation emission Up-down asymmetry in the yield of backscattered g’s is proportional to the transverse beam polarization David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

Transverse polarization at PEP-II is small PEP-II transverse polarization is small due to longer polarization buildup time and more dense depolarizing resonances LER 0.8% max HER 3.5% max Polarization maxima may not coincide with required CM energy David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

Longitudinal beam polarization The ILC baseline >80% linearly polarized e- source Unpolarized e+ source, with an upgrade possible to 60% linear polarization Since a polarized e- source alone is sufficient to make the proposed measurements, and a high intensity unpolarized e+ source is already a substantial technical challenge, I would recommend that we include longitudinally polarized e- capability in the SuperB baseline design, with a polarized e+ source as a possible upgrade David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

The ILC polarized electron source Positron-style room-temperature accelerating section diagnostics section standard ILC SCRF modules sub-harmonic bunchers + solenoids laser E=70-100 MeV Rapid, random helicity flip at source for control of systematics Parameter Symbol Value Units Electrons per bunch1 4x1010 Number Bunches per pulse 2820 Microbunch repetition rate fmicro 3 MHz Pulse Repetition Rate 5 Hz DR energy Acceptance DE/E 1 % (FW) DR Transverse Acceptance A=2J 0.09 m-rad Electron Energy E0 GeV Electron Polarization Pe >80 % OK for storage ring injection An issue for linear collider SBF 1 twice IP requirement David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

The ILC polarized positron source upgrade Produce polarized 20 MeV photons in a helical undulator Double-wound superconducting solenoid Rotated permanent magnet dipoles sections Laser Compton scattering ~60% polarization can be achieved David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

An ILC design with a polarized positron source Primary e- source e- DR Target e- Dump Photon Beam Dump e+ Auxiliary e- Source Photon Collimators Adiabatic Matching Device e+ pre-accelerator ~5GeV 150 GeV Helical Undulator In By-Pass Line Photon Target 250 GeV Positron Linac IP Beam Delivery System 100 GeV Electron Linac Parameter Value Units Positrons per bunch number Bunches per pulse 2820 Pulse Repetition Rate 5 Hz Positron Energy GeV Undulator Length (unpolarized source) 100 m Photon Energy (1st harmonic cutoff) 10.7 MeV Max Photon Beam Power (unpolarized source) 147 kW Max Target Absorption 11 Positron Polarization (upgrade) 60 % David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

Spin control in the damping ring(s) Must rotate longitundinal polarization from source to transverse for insertion into damping ring Coming out of DR, rotate back to longitudinal with complete control of spin orientation David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

The Emma rotator Provides complete control of longitudinal polarization orientation at the IP without emittance dilution All current designs I am aware of are designed for flat beams The reflection sections provide a unity transformation in the horizontal plane and a -1 transformation in the vertical plane, avoiding transverse betatron coupling by the rotation in the solenoids Would the concept work with round beams? David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

The extra wrinkle For control of experimental systematics, it is necessary to randomly switch the polarization for + to – helicity For the polarized electron beam, this is easily done at the source itself by controlling the circular polarization of the laser, and thereby the polarization of the electrons emitted from the photocathode This has already been demonstrated at the SLC and in E158 For a polarized positron beam with photons produced by an undulator, the helicity of the 20 MeV g’s is determined by the (fixed) helicity of the undulator The desired control of polarization can be achieved by an additional LTR bypass that has random control of kickers David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

A polarized positron system David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

Comparison of t/charm and SBF BEPCII L=1033 SBF L=1036 SBF(4GeV) L  1035 FOM for measuring CPV in t decay (Tsai): z component of t polarization averaged over cross section: For equal longitudinal polarization Machine FOM/FOM BEPCII BEPCII@ =4 GeV 1 SBF @ U(4S) 178 SBF @ =4 GeV 100 David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006

Conclusions SuperB with a longitudinally polarized electrons can perform unique searches for New Physics in the lepton sector CP violation searches in both t production and decay are possible Tests of CPT (not discussed here) are feasible as well Production, preservation and control of longitudinally polarized electrons, with polarization ≥80%, is feasible This requires spin rotators in the LTR (injection) and RTL (reinsertion) lines, and must be factored into the design of the damping rings in a linear collider design or the rings in a storage ring design to avoid spin-depolarizing resonances There is some additional benefit in also having longitudinally polarized positrons, at the ~10-20% level Polarized positron capability is probabily best considered as an upgrade David Hitlin Frascati SuperB Workshop March 17, 2006