Draft Methodology for impact analysis of ESS.VIP Projects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESS VIP PROGRAMME An overview ESSNet workshopWG LUXEMBOURG 22/11/2012.
Advertisements

ESS reference metadata implementation of standards and interoperability of National/European metadata systems Bogdan Sorin ZDRENTU, Eurostat (B5) Mogens.
ESS VIP project on Validation
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Standardisation in the European Statistical System Barteld Braaksma, Cecilia Colasanti, Piero Demetrio Falorsi, Wim Kloek, Miguel Angel Martínez Vidal,
Sponsorship on Standardisation Main results Barteld Braaksma, Cecilia Colasanti, Piero Demetrio Falorsi, Wim Kloek, Miguel Angel Martínez Vidal, Jean-Marc.
The ESS.VIP Programme: a response to the challenges facing the ESS Mariana Kotzeva, ESS VIP Programme Coordinator Advisor Hors Classe ESTAT.
1 Sponsorship on Standardisation Gosse van der Veen (Statistics Netherlands) Daniel Defays (Eurostat)
Sponsorship on Standardisation Background and overview Daniel Defays Forwardlooking Feedback Workshop, The Hague, 30/31 May 2013.
1 Item 2.1.b of the agenda IT Governance in the ESS and related issues Renewal of mandates STNE Adam WROŃSKI Eurostat, Unit B5.
Partnership Health: Evaluation and possibilities for an adapted structure Agenda item 11 Madhavi Bajekal, ONS (UK) PH coordinator Directors of Social Statistics.
IT Directors’ Group Meeting October 2010 Item 2.2 of the agenda Co-ordination with the DIME Rainer MUTHMANN, Head of Unit B2.
Eurostat Report on SDMX Reference Infrastructure User Group 1 st meeting in Luxembourg Sept 2012 Item 5.2 of the agenda November 2012IT Director's.
Eurostat Standardisation DIME-ITDG 2015 Item 6 DIME-ITDG February
The ESS vision, ESSnets and SDMX
Update on peer reviews Antonio Baigorri, Eurostat ESS RDG 2014 Item 9
Implementing the ESS Vision 2020
Eurostat Quality Management (in the ESS context)
Cost estimates for production of official statistics in the European Statistical System: different approaches CCSA Meeting, March 7, 2016, New York Pieter.
"IT principles" Context, roadmap
ESTP TRAINING ON EGR Luxembourg – December 2014
Methodology and Corporate Architecture
ESS Vision 2020 Validation: Implementation of deliverables
SISAI STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND INTEGRATION
ESS Vision 2020 LDF and HRM Working Group
Developments in European Statistics
Overview of the ESS quality framework and context
ESS Standardisation Process
ESS Vision 2020 Resource Directors Group – June 2015
The ESS.VIP Programme: an update
The ESS VIP programme: a response to the challenges facing the ESS
ESSnet Projects Pascal JACQUES Unit/B5 Methodology and research
ESS Vision 2020: ESS.VIP Validation
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
4th RDG meeting Luxembourg
Item 8 Cost assessment survey of production of statistics in the ESS
3.2 ESS VIP Administrative Data
Draft EP/Council Regulation for processes, standards and
Opinions after the 24/25 February 2016 Plenary
ESS Standardisation State of play
ESS Vision 2020.
ETS WG, 31 January-2 February 2005
Item 7 - Roadmap and mandate for the Task Force on UOE Education Expenditure Data Eurostat Education and Training Statistics Working Group - Luxembourg,
Proposal for setting up a RDG Task Force on Cooperation Models
The ESS reference metadata standards
Peer reviews DIME/ITDG Steering Group 15 February 2019 Claudia Junker
Commission Activities Eurostat : Latest developments
ESS Standardisation DIME / ITDG steering group – Item for information
Meeting of the Directors of Social Statistics
Cost analysis of European Statistics
Working Group on Statistical Confidentiality Item 3 of the Agenda
Resource Directors Group Introduction
ESS.VIPs and IT related aspects
Task Force Household Budget Survey Innovative tools and sources
ESS.VIP Validation Item 5.1
SISAI STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND INTEGRATION
Christine Kormann Eurostat Task Force Integrated Planning ESS RDG
Legislative strategy for cross-cutting ESS legislation
Conclusions of the Sprint session of the RDG Task Force on Cooperation Models within the ESS RDG meeting 17 June 2015.
Implementing the “Vision” within the ESS
ESS Vision 2020.
Business architecture
Extension of the European statistical programme Roadmap
Sponsorship on Standardisation
Methodology for impact assessment of ESS.VIP projects (cost-benefit)
RDG Task Force Cooperation models – Follow up May ESSC
Implementing the ESS Vision 2020
Task Force Peer reviews and quality Eurostat
Implementing the “Vision” within ESS
RDG TF Cooperation models – Action Plan Progress report
Presentation transcript:

Draft Methodology for impact analysis of ESS.VIP Projects Pieter Everaers, Director Eurostat Directorate A, Cooperation in the ESS, International cooperation, Resources ESS RDG 13 June 2014

A methodology for impact assessment is needed ESSnet on Standardisation :establish the business case of European standardisation initiatives November 2012: new ESS.VIP projects have to be evaluated on the implementation costs and future benefits =>task force May 2014: ESS Vision 2020 agreed by ESSC. Projects will be selected on criteria including cost/benefit The ESSnet on Standardisation was launched with the aim to establish the business case of European standardisation initiatives at the strategic level November 2012: ESSC decided that new ESS.VIP projects have to be evaluated on the implementation costs and future benefits =>creation of the TF "Impact analysis of ESS.VIP projects" May 2014: ESS Vision 2020 agreed by ESSC. Projects will be selected on the basis of criteria. The first one is cost/benefit ESSnet on Standardisation launched with the aim to establish the business case of European standardisation initiatives at the strategic level ESS RDG 13 June 2014

Two initiatives assessed the possible approaches Sponsorship on Standardisation (end 2012- September 2013) proposed: Common assessment approach Link to the life cycle of a new initiative Structured qualitative approach Assessment by all stakeholders in the ESS Scoring mechanism Basis for the European business case Common assessment approach for all types of initiatives in the ESS Methodology contributes to the decision steps in the life cycle of a new initiative Structured qualitative approach with a fixed set of items Assessment by all stakeholders in the ESS from their own perspective Use a scoring mechanism to analyse, summarise and present the results Use scores and comments as a basis for the European business case ESS RDG 13 June 2014

Two initiatives assessed the possible approaches Task Force "Impact analysis of ESS.VIP projects" (April-December 2013) proposed: Draft methodology and pilot project Quantitative and qualitative assessments Information collected at NSI level but impact for the ESS Statistical and financial experts + senior management In the quantitative phase: “benefits” = potential cost savings SWOT based on proposal from ESSnet + flexible items Draft methodology and pilot project (PRIX) Combination of quantitative and qualitative assessments Information collected at NSI level but the purpose is to assess the impact for the European Statistical System Requires contributions and cooperation from statistical and financial experts and the involvement of NSI’s senior management In the quantitative assessment “benefits” = potential cost savings The qualitative assessment is a SWOT largely based on the proposal from ESSnet on standardisation but with flexible items ESS RDG 13 June 2014

Reconcile the 2 methodologies ESSC asked RDG and ITDG-DIME for a single methodology Proposal Combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis 2 phases of the methodology linked to the life cycle of the initiative ESSC asked RDG and ITDG-DIME for a single methodology Proposal Combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis in 2 phases Decisions around a new initiative follow a life cycle. The 2 phases of the methodology apply to specific decision points in this life cycle ESS RDG 13 June 2014

Phase 1 Business case including SWOT and Vision general criteria Phase 2 including detailed quantitative analysis

Phase 1 Business case includes criteria from ESS 2020 Vision SWOT analysis based on 3 fixed items and 3 flexible items Rating of the SWOT items Leads to decision to launch the project or to go to phase 2 ESS RDG 13 June 2014

Phase 1: Vision general criteria A. Does the proposal have a positive business case at both ESS and national levels, in the sense that benefits outweigh costs? B. Does the proposal contribute to the needs and drivers identified in the ESS Vision 2020 such as efficiency, quality and promoting public trust? C. Can the proposal be clearly positioned according to our ambitions for collaboration set out in the ESS Vision 2020? D. Does the scope in that sense look manageable? E. Is the proposal consistent with the full set of other proposals? F. Does the proposal take into account generic European principles like proportionality and subsidiarity? G. Is the proposal in line with the European Statistics Code of Practice? H. Does the proposal observe existing legislation, both at national and EU level? I. Is the proposal in line with the ESS reference architectural decision and design principles? J. Does the proposal sustain a simultaneous production of European and national statistics? ESS RDG 13 June 2014

Phase 1: List of SWOT items 1. STRENGTHS a. Saving of resources b. Improved process and systems quality c. Enhanced flexibility d. Increased harmonisation e. Increased level of detail f. Better availability of metadata 2. WEAKNESSES a. Costs (of development, transition, support and maintenance) b. Lack of agility/flexibility of the new system c. Heterogeneity of the starting point between countries and partners d. Complexity e. Impact of changed process (risk of errors, discontinuity of the data) f. Lack of appropriate skills in the NSIs ESS RDG 13 June 2014

Phase 1: List of SWOT items 3. OPPORTUNITIES a. Reduced burden on respondents b. Enhance standardisation c. Better communication with users and stakeholders d. Opportunity to change to cope with resource constraints e. Shared technical developments f. Possibility to provide tailored feedback to data providers 4. THREATS a. Lack of consistency with national policies (including legal) b. Lack of support from stakeholders/financers c. Lack of suitable skill profiles d. Threat to data security e. Competition from other providers f. Dependency from external actors/providers ESS RDG 13 June 2014

Phase 1: SWOT rating ESS RDG 13 June 2014

Phase 2 Quantitative analysis Focus only on business processes affected by change Estimation of current costs, development costs and future costs of production Cost categories: Staff , IT solutions, Overhead, Other costs In case potential savings cannot be quantified: build on concrete experiences from countries which have modernized their production system, develop scenarios + Adaptation of the SWOT analysis ESS RDG 13 June 2014

To be kept in mind Lessons from the pilot on quantitative approach Analysis of current costs is possible for most countries Data not always available for different steps of the GSBPM Difficult for some countries to estimate their costs =>group countries Future costs: impact analysis of the modernization process at Member State level not systematic An analysis of the data on current costs is possible and very fruitful for most countries Data not always available for different steps of the GSBPM level (e.g. in countries which have already integrated their production processes) Difficult for some countries to estimate their costs: proposal to group countries as a fall back solution Future costs: we could not rely on impact analysis of the modernization process at Member State level since they are still not systematically done ESS RDG 13 June 2014

Way forward Proposal discussed today and in ITDG-DIME steering group 18 June Feed the work of the high level Task Force working on the ESS Vision 2020 Implementation strategy (for DGINS) Test on projects implementing Vision 2020 (2014-2015) Evaluate and adapt the methodology Draft methodology discussed today and in ITDG-DIME steering group 18 June Output will feed the work of the high level Task Force working on the ESS Vision 2020 Implementation strategy (for DGINS Sept 2014) Test on projects implementing ESS Vision 2020 (2014-2015) Evaluate and adapt the methodology ESS RDG 13 June 2014