Microarchitecture of Superscalars (4) Decoding

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topics Left Superscalar machines IA64 / EPIC architecture
Advertisements

1/1/ / faculty of Electrical Engineering eindhoven university of technology Speeding it up Part 3: Out-Of-Order and SuperScalar execution dr.ir. A.C. Verschueren.
Computer Organization and Architecture
CS 7810 Lecture 22 Processor Case Studies, The Microarchitecture of the Pentium 4 Processor G. Hinton et al. Intel Technology Journal Q1, 2001.
Microarchitecture of Superscalars (3) Branch Prediction Dezső Sima Fall 2007 (Ver. 2.0)  Dezső Sima, 2007.
AMD OPTERON ARCHITECTURE Omar Aragon Abdel Salam Sayyad This presentation is missing the references used.
ARM Cortex-A9 MPCore ™ processor Presented by- Chris Cai (xiaocai2) Rehana Tabassum (tabassu2) Sam Mussmann (mussmnn2)
THE AMD-K7 TM PROCESSOR Microprocessor Forum 1998 Dirk Meyer.
Superscalar Organization Prof. Mikko H. Lipasti University of Wisconsin-Madison Lecture notes based on notes by John P. Shen Updated by Mikko Lipasti.
Spring 2003CSE P5481 Reorder Buffer Implementation (Pentium Pro) Hardware data structures retirement register file (RRF) (~ IBM 360/91 physical registers)
Microarchitecture of Superscalars (7) Preserving sequential consistency Dezső Sima Fall 2007 (Ver. 2.0)  Dezső Sima, 2007.
Register Renaming & Value Prediction. Overview ► Need for Post-RISC ► Register Renaming vs. Allocation Strategies ► How to compile for Post-RISC machines.
EECE476: Computer Architecture Lecture 23: Speculative Execution, Dynamic Superscalar (text 6.8 plus more) The University of British ColumbiaEECE 476©
Trace Caches J. Nelson Amaral. Difficulties to Instruction Fetching Where to fetch the next instruction from? – Use branch prediction Sometimes there.
EECS 470 Superscalar Architectures and the Pentium 4 Lecture 12.
Lecture 8 Shelving in Superscalar Processors (Part 1)
Cisc Complex Instruction Set Computing By Christopher Wong 1.
Microarchitecture of Superscalars (4) Decoding Dezső Sima Fall 2007 (Ver. 2.0)  Dezső Sima, 2007.
Microarchitecture of Superscalars (5) Dynamic Instruction Issue Dezső Sima Fall 2007 (Ver. 2.0)  Dezső Sima, 2007.
High Performance Architectures
Evolution of the ILP Processing Dezső Sima Fall 2007 (Ver. 2.0)  Dezső Sima, 2007.
RISC:Reduced Instruction Set Computing. Overview What is RISC architecture? How did RISC evolve? How does RISC use instruction pipelining? How does RISC.
The Pentium Processor.
Computer Architecture Computer Architecture Superscalar Processors Ola Flygt Växjö University +46.
Nicolas Tjioe CSE 520 Wednesday 11/12/2008 Hyper-Threading in NetBurst Microarchitecture David Koufaty Deborah T. Marr Intel Published by the IEEE Computer.
Stamatis Vassiliadis Symposium Sept. 28, 2007 J. E. Smith Future Superscalar Processors Based on Instruction Compounding.
Anshul Kumar, CSE IITD CSL718 : Superscalar Processors Issue and Despatch 23rd Jan, 2006.
Comparing Intel’s Core with AMD's K8 Microarchitecture IS 3313 December 14 th.
Trace cache and Back-end Oper. CSE 4711 Instruction Fetch Unit Using I-cache I-cache I-TLB Decoder Branch Pred Register renaming Execution units.
1 Processor Architecture Jurij Silc, Borut Robic, Theo Ungerer.
Pentium III Instruction Stream. Introduction Pentium III uses several key features to exploit ILP This part of our presentation will cover the methods.
Computer Structure 2015 – Intel ® Core TM μArch 1 Computer Structure Multi-Threading Lihu Rappoport and Adi Yoaz.
15-740/ Computer Architecture Lecture 12: Issues in OoO Execution Prof. Onur Mutlu Carnegie Mellon University Fall 2011, 10/7/2011.
The Pentium Series CS 585: Computer Architecture Summer 2002 Tim Barto.
Modern general-purpose processors. Post-RISC architecture Instruction & arithmetic pipelining Superscalar architecture Data flow analysis Branch prediction.
Samira Khan University of Virginia Feb 9, 2016 COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE CS 6354 Precise Exception The content and concept of this course are adapted from.
Instruction level parallelism And Superscalar processors By Kevin Morfin.
Microarchitecture of Superscalars (6) Register renaming Dezső Sima Spring 2008 (Ver. 2.0)  Dezső Sima, 2008.
Use of Pipelining to Achieve CPI < 1
Pentium 4 Deeply pipelined processor supporting multiple issue with speculation and multi-threading 2004 version: 31 clock cycles from fetch to retire,
CS 352H: Computer Systems Architecture
Precise Exceptions and Out-of-Order Execution
Instruction Level Parallelism
Visit for more Learning Resources
Computer Structure Multi-Threading
PowerPC 604 Superscalar Microprocessor
Prof. Onur Mutlu Carnegie Mellon University
Computer Architectures M
Dynamic Scheduling and Speculation
Chapter 14 Instruction Level Parallelism and Superscalar Processors
Flow Path Model of Superscalars
Stamatis Vassiliadis Symposium Sept. 28, 2007 J. E. Smith
Drinking from the Firehose Decode in the Mill™ CPU Architecture
Instruction Level Parallelism and Superscalar Processors
I. Evolution of the ILP Processing
Instruction Scheduling for Instruction-Level Parallelism
The Microarchitecture of the Pentium 4 processor
Superscalar Pipelines Part 2
Lecture 8: ILP and Speculation Contd. Chapter 2, Sections 2. 6, 2
Lecture 2 Microprocessor Overview
Alpha Microarchitecture
7. Microarchitecture of Superscalars (5) Dynamic Instruction Issue
* From AMD 1996 Publication #18522 Revision E
A new era in processor evolution
Prof. Onur Mutlu Carnegie Mellon University Fall 2011, 9/30/2011
1. Evolution of ILP-processing
A New Era in Processor Evolution
Prof. Onur Mutlu Carnegie Mellon University
Presentation transcript:

Microarchitecture of Superscalars (4) Decoding Dezső Sima Spring 2008 (Ver. 2.0)  Dezső Sima, 2008

Overview 1. Overview 2. Straightforward parallel decoding 3. Predecoding 4. Decoding with CISC/RISC conversion 4.1 Overview 4.2 Decoding into µops 4.3 Decoding into macroops 5. Using a trace cache 6. Decoding with instruction grouping 6.1 Overview 6.2 Grouping of RISC instructions 6.3 Grouping of CISC instructions

Decoding techniques used in superscalars 1. Overview Decoding techniques used in superscalars Straightforward parallel decoding Predecoding Decoding with CISC/RISC conversion Using a trace cache Decoding with instruction grouping 1. gen. RISC superscalars Beginning with 2. gen. superscalars Beginning with 2. gen. superscalar CISCs P4-family Grouping of RISC instructions Grouping of CISC instructions Decoding into µops Decoding into macroops K7 (Athlon) K8 (Hammer) Pentium M Core Intel AMD (up to two µops) POWER4 POWER5 Beginning with the Pentium Pro Beginning with the K7

2 Straightforward parallel decoding Figure 2.1: The PowerPC 601’s front end Source: Stokes, J.H., „PowerPC on Apple: An architecture history”, Aug. 2004. http://arstechnica.com/articles

3 Predecoding (1) Icache Icache Instruction buffer Instruction buffer Decode / Issue / Check Decode / Issue / Check Scalar issue Superscalar issue Typical FX- pipeline layout D/I F . . . D F . . . I Figure 3.1: Contrasting the decoding and instruction issues in a scalar and a 4-way superscalar processor

3 Predecoding (1) Second-level cache (or memory) Typically 128 bits/cycle When instructions are written into the I-cache, the predecode unit of a RISC processor appends 4-7 bits to each instruction. AMD’s CISC processors append n-bits to each byte (K5, K6: 5 bits/byte ; K7, K8: 3 bits/byte). Predecode unit E.g. 148 bits/cycle I-cache Figure 3.2: The principle of predecoding Source: Sima, D. et al., „ACA”, Addison-Wesley 1997

Source: Sima, D. et al., „ACA”, Addison-Wesley 1997 3 Predecoding (2) Figure 3.3: The introduction of predecoding Source: Sima, D. et al., „ACA”, Addison-Wesley 1997

3. Predecoding (3) Figure 3.4: Variable length instruction decoding in the Athlon Source: de Vries, H., „Understanding the detailed Architecture of AMD’s 64 bit Core”, Sept.2003, http://www.chip-architect.com

3 Predecoding (4) Figure 3.5: Opteron’s instruction cache and decoding Source: de Vries, H., „Understanding the detailed Architecture of AMD’s 64 bit Core”, Sept.2003, http://www.chip-architect.com

4 Decoding with CISC/RISC conversion 4.1 Overview Decoding with CISC/RISC conversion CISC instructions Decoding with CISC/RISC conversion RISC core Retiring with RISC/CISC Modification of the program state conversion after RISC/CISC re-conversion Examples: PPro K6 µops macroops Figure 4.1: Principle of decoding with CISC/RISC conversion Source: Sima, D. et al., „ACA”, Addison-Wesley 1997

4.2 Decoding into µops (1) Figure 4.2: The Microarchitecture of the Pentium Pro Source: Shanley, T. ,”Pentium Pro Processor System Architecture”, Addison-Wesley Press, 1997

4.2 Decoding into µops (2) Figure 4.3: Basic misprediction pipeline of the Pentium III Source: Hinton, G. et al., „The Microarchitecture of the Pentium 4 Processor”, Intel Technology Journal Q1, 2001

4.2 Decoding into µops (3) Figure 4.4: Decoding in AMD’s K6 Source: Shriver, B., Smith,.B.,”The Anatomy of a High-Performance Microprocessor” IEEE Computer Society Press, 1998

4.2 Decoding into µops (4) Figure 4.5: The Microarchitecture of the Pentium M (Yonah) Source: Kanter, D., „Intel’s next Generation Microarchitecture Unveiled”, Real World Tech., 2006 March 9.

4.2 Decoding into µops (5) Figure 4.6: The Microarchitecture of the Core processor family Source: Kanter, D., „Intel’s next Generation Microarchitecture Unveiled”, Real World Tech., 2006 March 9.

4.3 Decoding into macroops (1) Figure 4.7: AMD AthlonTM the Microarchitecture of the Athlon Source: Meyer, D., „The AMD-K7 Processor”, MPF. Oct. 1998

4.3 Decoding into macroops (2) Figure 4.8: Decoding in the Athlon (1) Source: Meyer, D., „The AMD-K7 Processor”, MPF. Oct. 1998

4.3 Decoding into macroops (3) Figure 4.9: Decoding in the Athlon (2) Source: Meyer, D., „The AMD-K7 Processor”, MPF. Oct. 1998

4.3 Decoding into macroops (4) Each MacroOp: 1 or 2 operations (OPs) eg: ADD EAX, EBX 1 ADD OP AND EAX, [EBX+16] 1 LOAD OP 1 AND OP Up to 3 MacroOps per cycle with up to 3 FX + 2 L/S OPs (dual ported D$!) per cycle

4.3 Decoding into macroops (5) Figure 4.10: The Microarchitecture of the Hammer Source: Weber, F., „AMD’s Next Generation Microprocessor Architecture”, MPF. Oct. 2001

5 Using a trace cache (1) Figure 5.1: The Microarchitecture of the Pentium 4 (Willamette)

5 Using a trace cache (2) Figure 5.2: Basic misprediction pipeline of the Pentium 4 (Willamette) Source: Hinton, G. et al., „The Microarchitecture of the Pentium 4 Processor”, Intel Technology Journal Q1, 2001

5 Using a trace cache (3) Figure 5.3: The Microarchitecture of the Pentium 4 (Prescott) Source: Kanter, D., „Intel’s next Generation Microarchitecture Unveiled”, Real World Tech., 2006 March 9.

6. Decoding with instruction grouping 6.1 Overview Decoding with instruction grouping Grouping of RISC instructions Grouping of CISC instructions K7 (Athlon) K8 (Hammer) Pentium M Core arch. POWER4 POWER5

Operation of the Reorder Buffer (ROB) 6.2 Grouping of RISC instructions (1)   Operation of the Reorder Buffer (ROB) index 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 lane 0   lane 1 lane 2      =  Out Of Order finished Instructions,  results still speculative.    =  Instructions being retired now.    =  Retired Instructions,  not speculative anymore.   Up to 3 MacroOps are decoded per cycle, these MacroOps are allocated a line in the ROB The ROB has 24 lines of 3 entries each. The ROB retires a line if it is the oldest one and all MacroOps in that line are completed. Figure 5.3: Instruction grouping in the K7 and K8 Source: de Vries, H., „Understanding the detailed Architecture of AMD’s 64 bit Core”, Sept.2003, http://www.chip-architect.com  

6.2 Grouping of RISC instructions (2) Decoders Schedulers EUs Figure 6.1: Out of order execution of MacroOps from the FX schedulers in the K8L (to be introduced in Q2 2007) (The K8L scheduler has 8*3 entires vs 6*3 in the K8) Source: Malich, Y.„AMD's Next Generation Microarchitecture Preview: from K8 to K8L”, Aug. 2006.

6.2 Grouping of RISC instructions (3) Dispatch instruction groups in-order, forward individual instructions to the issue queues groups Issue queues Execute individual instructions ooo Execution EU EU units Retire isntruction groups in-order, modify program state ROB Retire Figure 6.1: The principle of instruction grouping in IBM’s POWER4 and POWER5 processors

6.2 Grouping of RISC instructions (4) Figure 6.2: Implementation of instruction grouping in IBM’s POWER 5 processor Source: Sinharoy, B. et al. „POWER5 system microarchitecture”, IBM J.,Res.& Dev., July/Sept. 2005.

6.3 Grouping of CISC instructions (1) (Intel: macro-op fusion) Introduced in the Core architecture x86 instructions: macro-ops internal instructions: μops Macro-op fusion: combines two macro ops into a single μop. Specifically: x86 compare or test instructions are fused with x86 jumps to produce a single μop. Any decoder can perform macro-op fusion but only one macro-op fusion can be performed in each cycle. In the Core architecture the max. decode bandwidth is 4+1 x86 instructions/cycle Macro-op fusion can reduce the number of μops by about 10%.

6.3 Grouping of CISC instructions (2) Benefits: Fewer μops Increased performance ooo execution becomes more effective as the instruction window includes now more (~10%) x86 instructions