Chloroplast NADP-malate dehydrogenase: structural basis of light-dependent regulation of activity by thiol oxidation and reduction  Paul D Carr, Denis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina  Alekos Athanasiadis, Gregor Anderluh,
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (October 1999)
Crystal Structure of Riboflavin Synthase
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structures of a Novel Ferric Reductase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Its Complex with NADP+  Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Eric.
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Structure of mammalian ornithine decarboxylase at 1
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 1995)
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Crystal Structure of Saccharopine Reductase from Magnaporthe grisea, an Enzyme of the α-Aminoadipate Pathway of Lysine Biosynthesis  Eva Johansson, James.
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Crystal structure of the apoptotic suppressor CrmA in its cleaved form
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Crystal Structure of a Polymeric Immunoglobulin Binding Fragment of the Human Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor  Agnes E. Hamburger, Anthony P. West,
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The crystal structure of an intact human Max–DNA complex: new insights into mechanisms of transcriptional control  P Brownlie, TA Ceska, M Lamers, C Romier,
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 1997)
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Chloroplast NADP-malate dehydrogenase: structural basis of light-dependent regulation of activity by thiol oxidation and reduction  Paul D Carr, Denis Verger, Anthony R Ashton, David L Ollis  Structure  Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 461-475 (April 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80058-6

Figure 1 Pathway and regulation of activation and inactivation of NADP-MDH with respect to photosynthesis. Although the reduction of NADP-MDH by thioredoxin is reversible, the two reactions are shown separately for simplicity. NADP+ inhibits both activation and inactivation whereas NADPH has no effect alone, but does reverse the inhibition of NADP+. The size of the arrows indicating NADP+ inhibition and NADPH reversal of the inhibition are an indication of the relative effectiveness of these molecules and reflect the KD values (see text) of the active and inactive NADP-MDH for NADP+ and NADPH. The steady-state activation of the enzyme will reflect the demand of CO2 fixation for ferredoxin and NADPH. These multiple inputs of NADP(H) as a competing electron acceptor and modifier of activation and inactivation rates should have a major influence on the activation state of NADP-MDH. Structure 1999 7, 461-475DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80058-6)

Figure 2 Structure-based sequence alignment of MDHs. The amino acid sequence of AND-MDH from pig cytoplasm (PDB code 4mdh), T. flavus (1bmd) and six chloroplast NADP-MDHs: F. bidentis (Swiss-Prot: MDHC_FLABI), Mesembryanthemum crystallinum or Ice plant (MDHC_MESCR), pea (MDHC_PEA), spinach (MDHC_SPIOL), sorghum (MDHC_SORVU) and maize (MDHC_MAIZE) are aligned. The sequence numbering above the rows refers to F. bidentis NADP-MDH, whereas the numbers at the end of each row refer to the individual sequences. The numbering for the AND-MDHs follows the numbering in the respective PDB entries. Secondary structure assignments for the F. bidentis structure are shown above the top row: α helices are shown in red and β strands are in light green. The conserved cysteines of NADP-MDH are shown in yellow. Gly80 and Trp272, which are present in the chloroplast sequence and absent from AND-MDHs and discussed in the text, are shown in red. The pig AND-MDH residues highlighted in green are those that are absolutely conserved in the NADP-MDH sequences but differ in either of the two AND-MDH sequences. Active-site and substrate-binding residues are highlighted in blue. The bottom row shows, in magenta, the amino acid residues that are identical in all eight sequences. Structure 1999 7, 461-475DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80058-6)

Figure 3 Graph of the Cα temperature factors, B factors, in Å2 as a function of residue number. Regions of β sheet are indicated in yellow and regions of α helix are in red. Structure 1999 7, 461-475DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80058-6)

Figure 4 The 2Fo–Fc electron density superimposed on the final model. The map is contoured at 1.5σ. The native to derivative Riso = 24% (15.0 to 3.0 Å) for four sites as follows: Site 1: x,y,z (fractional) = 0.042, 0.495, 0.028, Occupancy = 0.80. Site 2: x,y,z (fractional) = 0.567, 0.427, 0.079, Occupancy = 0.94. Site 3: x,y,z (fractional) = 0.381, 0.488, 0.113, Occupancy = 0.26. Site 4: x,y,z (fractional) = 0.894, 0.428, 0.127, Occupancy = 0.07. Rcullis = 0.65 (centric 601 reflections), 0.72 (acentric 10,252 reflections). Phasing power = 1.25 (centric), 1.66 (acentric). Figure of merit = 0.55 (centric), 0.33 (acentric). Carbon atoms are shown in green, oxygen atoms in red and nitrogen in blue. Structure 1999 7, 461-475DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80058-6)

Figure 5 View of the structure. The two protein chains are colored blue and green. The terminal extensions are colored magenta. The NADP cofactor is colored orange and the regulatory disulfides are in yellow. The Arg2 loop (residues 128–143) and the Trp loop (260–277) are shown in white. We propose that these two loops move during the activation process to allow residues Arg130, Arg136 and Ser276 to adopt the correct conformations for optimal binding of the C4 acid substrate. See text for details. This diagram was produced using the program RIBBONS [62]. Structure 1999 7, 461-475DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80058-6)

Figure 6 Superposition of Cα traces from NADP-MDH (green), porcine (white) and Thermus (red) AND-MDH. The terminal extensions of NADP-MDH are shown in magenta. Only the monomer is shown for clarity in a view highlighting the regions of maximum differences. The cofactor NADP is shown in cyan. The C4 acid substrate binds above the cofactor in the space occupied by the C-terminal extension in this oxidised, inactive form. The red arrows indicate the direction of the conformational change that we propose occurs upon reduction to form the optimal conformation in the active site for activity. The white loop on the right-hand side is the larger loop at residues 199–206 in the pig structure – see text for details. This diagram was produced using the program RIBBONS [62]. Structure 1999 7, 461-475DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80058-6)

Figure 7 A surface charge diagram of the protein showing the C-terminal extension. (a) The entire monomer and (b) a close up of the active site/cofactor-binding region are shown. The NADP cofactor is shown in yellow. This diagram was produced using the program GRASP [63]. Structure 1999 7, 461-475DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80058-6)

Figure 8 Cα trace of the protein viewed along orthogonal directions (a) x and (b) z with thioredoxin molecules (red) roughly modeled onto the regulatory disulfide bonds. Although both chains of the protein are shown, for clarity only the thioredoxin molecules binding to the chain colored green are included. Residue Trp272 is shown in magenta. The unusual position of this residue is suggestive of a potential protein–protein interaction site – see text for details. Structure 1999 7, 461-475DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80058-6)