Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Advertisements

Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Bin Wu, Jeffrey A. Chao, Robert H. Singer  Biophysical Journal 
K-Space Image Correlation Spectroscopy: A Method for Accurate Transport Measurements Independent of Fluorophore Photophysics  David L. Kolin, David Ronis,
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Indrajeet Singh, Efrosyni Themistou, Lionel Porcar, Sriram Neelamegham 
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Quantification of Membrane Protein Dynamics and Interactions in Plant Cells by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy  Xiaojuan Li, Jingjing Xing, Zongbo.
Λ-Repressor Oligomerization Kinetics at High Concentrations Using Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy in Zero-Mode Waveguides  K.T. Samiee, M. Foquet,
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (March 2016)
Monitoring Actin Cortex Thickness in Live Cells
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Dynamics of the Serine Chemoreceptor in the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane: A High- Speed Single-Molecule Tracking Study  Dongmyung Oh, Yang Yu, Hochan.
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Aleš Benda, Yuanqing Ma, Katharina Gaus  Biophysical Journal 
Arne Gennerich, Detlev Schild  Biophysical Journal 
A. Delon, Y. Usson, J. Derouard, T. Biben, C. Souchier 
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Static Light Scattering From Concentrated Protein Solutions II: Experimental Test of Theory for Protein Mixtures and Weakly Self-Associating Proteins 
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (March 2018)
Actin Cytoskeleton-Dependent Dynamics of the Human Serotonin1A Receptor Correlates with Receptor Signaling  Sourav Ganguly, Thomas J. Pucadyil, Amitabha.
CW and CCW Conformations of the E
Francesca Pennacchietti, Travis J. Gould, Samuel T. Hess 
V. Vetri, G. Ossato, V. Militello, M.A. Digman, M. Leone, E. Gratton 
Stefan Nehls, Andreas Janshoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 94, Issue 7, Pages (April 2008)
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
V.M. Burlakov, R. Taylor, J. Koerner, N. Emptage  Biophysical Journal 
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
3D Protein Dynamics in the Cell Nucleus
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
FRET or No FRET: A Quantitative Comparison
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Statistics of Active Transport in Xenopus Melanophores Cells
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Stochastic Pacing Inhibits Spatially Discordant Cardiac Alternans
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Real-Time Nanoscopy by Using Blinking Enhanced Quantum Dots
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy of mCherry in Living Cells
High-Pressure Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy
Long-Range Nonanomalous Diffusion of Quantum Dot-Labeled Aquaporin-1 Water Channels in the Cell Plasma Membrane  Jonathan M. Crane, A.S. Verkman  Biophysical.
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Quantification of Fluorophore Copy Number from Intrinsic Fluctuations during Fluorescence Photobleaching  Chitra R. Nayak, Andrew D. Rutenberg  Biophysical.
Nevra Ozer, Celia A. Schiffer, Turkan Haliloglu  Biophysical Journal 
Monitoring Actin Cortex Thickness in Live Cells
Eric D. Siggia, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Stefan Bekiranov 
Stochastic Pacing Inhibits Spatially Discordant Cardiac Alternans
Localization Precision in Stepwise Photobleaching Experiments
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages (September 2018)
David Naranjo, Hua Wen, Paul Brehm  Biophysical Journal 
Gap Junction Coupling and Calcium Waves in the Pancreatic Islet
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 101, Issue 9, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages 1056-1064 (March 2013) Aggregation Distributions on Cells Determined by Photobleaching Image Correlation Spectroscopy  Giuseppe D. Ciccotosto, Noga Kozer, Timothy T.Y. Chow, James W.M. Chon, Andrew H.A. Clayton  Biophysical Journal  Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages 1056-1064 (March 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.01.009 Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Representation of photobleaching image correlation spectroscopy (pbICS, panels A and B). (A) Monomeric dispersed fluorophores (left panel). Partial bleaching of an image leads to a loss of fluorescent-labels and a reduction in density of fluorescent entities (middle panel). Because the amplitude of the autocorrelation function is inversely proportional to concentration of clusters (cluster density), bleaching will lead to an increase in the amplitude of the autocorrelation function (right panel). (B) Clusters of fluorophores (left panel). Partial bleaching in an image leads to a loss of fluorescent labels and a reduction in the intensity per cluster, but not a large change in the density of fluorescent entities (middle panel). As a consequence, the autocorrelation amplitude will not change significantly upon partial bleaching (right panel). Biophysical Journal 2013 104, 1056-1064DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.01.009) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Simulations and theoretical pbICS curves as a function of cluster size. (A) Plots of the cluster density as a function of fluorescence remaining for monomer (green, j = 1), dimer (red, j = 2), tetramer (blue, j = 4), and octamer (pink, j = 8). Plots were generated from computer simulations of 1000 aggregates with fixed and homogenous aggregate sizes. (Solid curves) Plots from the continuum theory using Eq. 6 with j varied from 1 to 8 depending on oligomeric state. (B) Simulated plots of the normalized cluster density as a function of fluorescence remaining for monomer-octamer distributions. Fraction octamer increases from zero (green) to 5% (red), 25% (blue), and 100% (pink). Plots corresponding to theory (black lines) were generated with the software Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) using Eq. 8 and with the normalized cluster density defined as CD(p)/CD(p = 1). (C) Simulated plots of the normalized cluster density as a function of fluorescence remaining for Poisson-distributed aggregate distributions. Mean aggregate sizes corresponding to monomers (green), dimers (red), and tetramers (blue) are shown. Plots corresponding to theory (black lines) were generated with the software Excel using Eq. 6. Biophysical Journal 2013 104, 1056-1064DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.01.009) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Effects of noise and finite particle number on pbICS curves. (A) Effect of increasing Gaussian noise on pbICS curves for a homogenous tetramer system. (B) Effect of finite particle number of simulated pbICS curves for homogenous tetramer. The average deviation (in %) of apparent cluster density simulation results to the analytical theory equations, Eqs. 7 and 8. The average deviation was calculated for every value of p, from 50 simulations. The effect of cluster numbers on the average deviation is clearly seen; as the cluster number increases, the average deviation decreases. This indicates a larger cluster number is preferred for accurate determination of photobleaching profile. The simulations were conducted on homogenous tetramer systems. Biophysical Journal 2013 104, 1056-1064DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.01.009) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Images of intact CF-Aβ42 peptide-treated neuronal cells recorded in single photon counting mode using a Bio-Rad confocal laser scanning microscope (objective 63×, laser 488 nm, FITC filter set). Primary cortical neurons were treated with CF-Aβ42 peptide for a specified time period, fixed, and mounted on a glass slide for imaging. (A) Neuronal cells treated with CF-Aβ42 showing typical punctuate staining of cell processes and cell body. (B) Neuronal cells showing diminished fluorescence intensity after a time-course photobleaching experiment. (C) Fluorescence image of a dead neuronal cell before photobleaching at 24 h after treatment. Scale bar as indicated in image. Biophysical Journal 2013 104, 1056-1064DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.01.009) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 pbICS of a fluorescein-tagged CF-Aβ42 peptide on neuronal cells reveals progressive aggregation over time. Cells were treated with peptide for a specified time period and then fixed. (A) Apparent cluster density as a function of fluorescence remaining for cells treated with CF-Aβ42 for 1 h. (Symbols) Experimental points; (solid lines) fits to a monomer-dimer distribution of cluster sizes according to Eq. 6. (B) Apparent cluster density as a function of fluorescence remaining for cells treated with CF-Aβ42 for 24 h. (Symbols) Experimental points; (solid lines) fits to a monomer-dimer-tetramer distribution of cluster sizes according to Eq. 6. (Dashed lines) Best fit to a monomer-dimer distribution. Note the poor fit compared to the monomer-dimer-tetramer distribution. (C) Apparent cluster density as a function of fluorescence remaining for a cell treated with CF-Aβ42 for >24 h and dead at the time of fixation (rounded cell, no visible dendrites). (Symbols) Experimental points; (solid lines) fits to a monomer-dimer-tetramer-hexamer distribution of cluster sizes according to Eq. 6. (Dashed line) Best fit to a monomer-dimer-tetramer model is clearly a poorer fit than the monomer-dimer-tetramer-hexamer model. Biophysical Journal 2013 104, 1056-1064DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.01.009) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions