Lesson 5.6 Deductive Proofs pp. 189-195.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1/15/ : Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between.
Advertisements

Inverses, Contrapositives, and Indirect Reasoning
Types of Triangles Scalene A triangle with no congruent sides
Sec.2-3 Deductive Reasoning
Chapter 2 Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2: Reasoning and Proof.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.3 Valid & Invalid Arguments.
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
Logic. Logical progression of thought A path others can follow and agree with Begins with a foundation of accepted In Euclidean Geometry begin with point,
Unit 2: Deductive Reasoning
2-1 Inductive Reasoning & Conjecture
CHAPTER 1: Points, Lines, Planes, and Angles
Introduction to Geometric Proof Logical Reasoning and Conditional Statements.
Geometry Chapter 2.  This Slideshow was developed to accompany the textbook  Larson Geometry  By Larson, R., Boswell, L., Kanold, T. D., & Stiff, L.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
10/21/2015Geometry1 Section 2.1 Conditional Statements.
2.4 Ms. Verdino.  Biconditional Statement: use this symbol ↔  Example ◦ Biconditional Statement: The weather is good if and only if the sun is out 
THIS IS Vocabulary Parallel and Perpendicular Distance, Area, Perimeter Writing Equations Proofs.
Sections 1.7 & 1.8  Deductive Structures  Statements of Logic.
2.2.1 Analyze Conditional Statements and Proof Chapter 2: Reasoning and Proof.
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
2.4 Deductive Reasoning 2.5 Postulates Geometry R/H Students will be able to distinguish between Inductive and Deductive Reasoning, and to determine the.
Lesson 2 – 5 Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
Geometry Math-0!. If a conditional statement is known to be true, then what must also be true? Question 1.
Chapter 2 Section 2.1 – Conditional Statements Objectives: To recognize conditional statements To write converses of conditional statements.
1.What is the difference between a paragraph proof and a column proof? 2.True or False: If a quadrilateral is a square, then all four sides are congruent.
Reasoning and Proof Chapter – Conditional Statements Conditional statements – If, then form If – hypothesis Then – conclusion Negation of a statement-
Unit 2: Reasoning and Proof
Geometry Journal 2 Nicolle Busto Conditional Statement It is a statement that establishes a necessary condition for a thing to happen. Examples:
Draw a Logical Conclusion:  If you are a lefty then you struggle to use a can opener.  If you like math then you must be smart.  If you are smart then.
Analyze Conditional Statements Objectives: 1.To write a conditional statement in if-then form 2.To write the negation, converse, inverse, and contrapositive.
Chapter 2: Reasoning & Proof Conditionals, Biconditionals, & Deductive Reasoning.
Topic 1: 1.5 – 1.8 Goals and Common Core Standards Ms. Helgeson
Deductive Reasoning Valid Arguments
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
Arguments with Quantified Statements
Deductive Reasoning, Postulates, and Proofs
Unit 2: Deductive Reasoning
Valid and Invalid Arguments
Postulates Lesson 2.5.
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
Logic.
Methods of proof Section 1.6 & 1.7 Wednesday, June 20, 2018
Inequalities In Geometry
Reasoning and Proofs Chapter 2.
2.4 Deductive Reasoning 2.4 Deductive Reasoning.
Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–3) Mathematical Practices Then/Now
Splash Screen.
Y. Davis Geometry Notes Chapter 2.
02-2: Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Chapter 2 Reasoning and Proof.
Splash Screen.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
2 Chapter Introduction to Logic and Sets
Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–4) Then/Now New Vocabulary
Splash Screen.
A Framework with Definitions
Polygons: Triangles and Quadrilaterals
Section 1-5 Postulates and Theorems Relating Points, Rays and Planes
Properties of Equality and Proving Segment & Angle Relationships
An Ideal Euclidean Model
Foundations of Discrete Mathematics
Lesson 6.7 Congruent Triangles pp
Lesson 10.4 Parallels in Space pp
Splash Screen.
Section 1-5 Postulates and Theorems Relating Points, Rays and Planes
Valid and Invalid Arguments
2.4 Conditional Statements
Conditional Statements
Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–3) Mathematical Practices Then/Now
Presentation transcript:

Lesson 5.6 Deductive Proofs pp. 189-195

Objectives: 1. To define and apply four methods of deductive proof. 2. To identify the steps required for a valid deductive proof. 3. To recognize converse and inverse fallacies.

Deductive reasoning can be split into two major sections: proof by direct argument and proof by contradiction. Examples of direct argument proofs include: 1. Law of Deduction 2. Modus ponens 3. Modus tollens 4. Transitivity

Definition The Law of Deduction is a method of deductive proof with the following symbolic form.

Definition The Law of Deduction p (assumed) q1 q2 qn (statements known to be true) r (deduced from statements above) pr (conclusion)

Definition Modus ponens is a method of deductive proof with the following symbolic form. Premise 1: pq Premise 2: p Conclusion: q

Definition Modus tollens is a method of deductive proof with the following symbolic form. Premise 1: pq Premise 2: ~q Conclusion: ~p

Definition Transitivity is a method of deductive proof with the following symbolic form. Premise 1: pq Premise 2: qr Conclusion: pr

EXAMPLE 2 Classify this argument. Premise 1: If man is sinful, then he must die (Rom. 6:23). Premise 2: Man is sinful (Rom. 3:23). Conclusion: Man must die (second death; Rev. 21:8). Modus Ponens; valid

If it rains today, the ball game will be canceled. It rained. the ball game was cancelled. 1. Law of deduction 2. Modus ponens 3. Modus tollens 4. Transitivity

If we eat carrots, then our eyesight will be good. Our eyesight is not good. we didn’t eat our carrots. 1. Law of deduction 2. Modus ponens 3. Modus tollens 4. Transitivity

r(pq) ~p~q ~r 1. Law of deduction 2. Modus ponens 3. Modus tollens 4. Transitivity

A  B B  C C is a right angle A is a right angle 1. Law of deduction 2. Modus ponens 3. Modus tollens 4. Transitivity

Two fallacies result from common misuse of modus ponens and modus tollens. These fallacies are assuming the converse and assuming the inverse.

EXAMPLE 3 Classify the fallacy committed by this argument. All dogs are mammals. Fido is a mammal. Therefore, Fido is a dog. Assuming the converse

Identify the fallacy in the argument. All US presidents are US citizens Ken is a US citizen. Ken is a US president. 1. Assuming the converse 2. Assuming the inverse

Identify the fallacy in the argument. All whole numbers are integers. -5 is not a whole number. -5 is not an integer. 1. Assuming the converse 2. Assuming the inverse

Homework pp. 193-195

►A. Exercises Suppose you want to prove the Vertical Angle Theorem using the Law of Deduction: “If two angles are vertical angles, then they are congruent.” 1. What should you assume? Answer: Two angles are vertical angles.

►A. Exercises Suppose you want to prove the Vertical Angle Theorem using the Law of Deduction: “If two angles are vertical angles, then they are congruent.” 2. What should you derive from the assumption? Answer: The two angles are congruent.

►A. Exercises Suppose you know that 1 and 2 are vertical angles. 3. What would you conclude from the Vertical Angle Theorem? Answer: 1  2

►A. Exercises Suppose you know that 1 and 2 are vertical angles. 4. What rule of logic lets you draw the conclusion? Answer: modus ponens

►A. Exercises Suppose you know that A and B are not congruent. 5. What can you conclude from the theorem? Answer: A and B are not vertical angles.

►A. Exercises Suppose you know that A and B are not congruent. 6. What rule of logic lets you draw the conclusion? Answer: modus tollens

►A. Exercises Suppose you know that A and B are not congruent. 7. If A → B and B → C, then what? Answer: A → C by transitivity

►A. Exercises Identify the fallacy in each of the following arguments. 8. If smoke comes from a house, it must be on fire. No smoke comes from the house. Therefore, the house is not on fire. Answer: assuming the inverse

►A. Exercises Identify the fallacy in each of the following arguments. 9. If the temperature is above 100°C, then the water will boil. The water on the campfire was boiling. Thus, its temperature was above 100°C. Answer: assuming the converse

►B. Exercises Look at the following arguments and state the form of deductive reasoning used. 13. If I break my arm, then I will go to the hospital. I broke my arm. I will go to the hospital. 1. Law of deduction 2. Modus ponens 3. Modus tollens 4. Transitivity

►B. Exercises Look at the following arguments and state the form of deductive reasoning used. 15. If you study for your geometry test, then you will get a high score on the test. If you get a high score on the test, then you will get a good grade on your report card. If you study for your geometry test, then you will get a good grade on your report card.

►B. Exercises Look at the following arguments and state the form of deductive reasoning used. 16. Two lines intersect. Every line contains at least two points. Three distinct noncollinear points lie in exactly one plane. Therefore, two intersecting lines lie in exactly one plane.

►B. Exercises Look at the following arguments and state the form of deductive reasoning used. 17. A cat is mammal. All mammals have four-chambered hearts. A cat has a four-chambered heart. 1. Law of deduction 2. Modus ponens 3. Modus tollens 4. Transitivity

►B. Exercises Look at the following arguments and state the form of deductive reasoning used. 18. If a triangle has two congruent sides, then the triangle is an isosceles triangle. ∆ABC is not an isosceles triangle. ∆ABC does not have two congruent sides.

►B. Exercises [(pq)p]  q Give the symbolic logic form needed to prove each of the following. 19. modus ponens [(pq)p]  q

►B. Exercises [(pq)(qr)]  (pr) Give the symbolic logic form needed to prove each of the following. 20. transitivity [(pq)(qr)]  (pr)

■ Cumulative Review 25. p: A quadrilateral is a square and only if it is both a rectangle and a rhombus. Using s: “the quadrilateral is a square,” r: “the quadrilateral is a rectangle,” and h: “the quadrilateral is a rhombus,” which of the following expressions below best represents statement p?

■ Cumulative Review 25. A. s(rh) B. (sr)h C. s(rh) D. (sr)h E. (sr)(sh)

■ Cumulative Review STATEMENTS REASONS -2x + 5  8 Given Add prop of ineq Mult prop of ineq Assoc prop of mult Mult inverse prop Mult ident prop

Analytic Geometry Graphing Lines

In algebra you learned the slope-intercept form of a line is y = mx + b.

Graph y = 2x - 3 m = b = 2 -3

Find the equation of the line whose slope is 2/3 and the intercept is (0, 5).

Find the equation of the line whose slope is -3 and the intercept is (0, 2).

Find the equation of the line that passes through (3, 4) and (0, -2).

Find the equation of the line whose slope is 3 and passes through the point (-2, 5).