Fifth and Sixth Amendments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christina Ascolillo.  Who was involved: Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.  When:  Where: Phoenix, Arizona  Why: Arrested and charged.
Advertisements

The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
What would society look like if Eric Cartman was a police officer.
Rights of the Accused th – Amendment Presumption of innocence Presumption of innocence Manzanar –one of our big failings Reasonable doubt Reasonable.
Do you know your civil rights?
POP QUIZ How did the Courts increase the political power of people in urban areas and those accused of a crime? GIVE AN EXAMPLE.
Miranda v. Arizona.
BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.
Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.
Daniel Moody PD. 3 3/25/10 Miranda VS. Arizona 1966.
Civil Liberties: Due Process Rights of Accused Persons.
The Bill of Rights First 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
15.3 The American Legal System
SUMMARY RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. Why would anyone be accused of or charged with a crime if they are not guilty? Discuss with talk partner? QUESTION.
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
U.S. Constitutional Amendments 1-10
{ Criminal Trial Procedure What happens when the police arrest a criminal suspect?
Bell Ringer Read the article “Searching for Details Online, Lawyers Facebook the Jury” and answer the questions. Be ready to discuss your answers with.
Chapter 22 Rights of the Accused. A. Protections 1.Nothing can protect you against being accused of a crime 2.5 th, 6 th and 8 th Amendments help protect.
Call To Order Complete the following statement: You have the right to remain silent… And take out your homework!!!
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
Criminal Trial Rights Tanner Powell and Eric Tate.
Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
 Dates: Debated: Feb. 28, March 1 and 2, 1966 Decided: June 13, 1966  Ruling: The prosecution could not use Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal.
Tracing Our Rights
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona.
#lawday2016.
Marisa Hanning Emily Bendik Katie Kraeer
Court Cases Brown v. Board of Education
Miranda Rights.
Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual rights
Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.
The Miranda Rights.
Judicial Branch Famous Trials.
Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como
Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
Rights of Criminal Suspects
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Case Study Project
Criminal Justice U.S. Constitution Unit Hermitage Tech Center
DUE PROCESS.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966.
15.3 The American Legal System
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
6th Amendment Right to a speedy trial: Within 90 days of an arrest.
Rights of the Accused Summary.
#lawday2016.
October 18, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:
Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…
Case Studies Chapter 1.
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 The us legal system
AMENDMENTS U.S. Bill Of Rights.
by Marcos Cardona-7th period
5th, 6th, 7th Amendment Rights
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
The Warren Court AP US History.
Marisa Hanning Emily Bendik Katie Kraeer
AMENDMENTS U.S. Bill Of Rights.
By: Michaela Hull and Elena Butler
DUE PROCESS.
Presentation transcript:

Fifth and Sixth Amendments

Right to remain silent

Right to a lawyer

Right to a speedy and public trial

Right to have an impartial jury

Court Case: Miranda v. Arizona

Court Case: Miranda v. Arizona Ernesto Miranda was arrested and convicted of rape without having been informed of his rights.

Court Case: Miranda v. Arizona Ernesto Miranda was arrested and convicted of rape without having been informed of his rights. Supreme Court overturned his arrest, saying that all suspects needed to be informed of their rights.

Looking More Deeply…

Do you believe that our system is fair? http://today.duke.edu/2012/04/jurystudy

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.