Enabling Frame Body Capture Effect

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /1348 Multiple NAVs for Spatial Reuse Date: Slide 1IITP Authors: Nov 2015 NameAffiliationAddressPhone Evgeny.
Advertisements

Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
AP Power Saving Date: Authors: May 2017 Month Year
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
On AP Power Saving Usage Model
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
SB1000 CID 6304 PHY-CCARESET.request
Wi-Fi Time Sensitive Networking
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
BSSID Information in FCS
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Wi-Fi Time Sensitive Networking
Results for Beacon Collisions
Purpose of MAC calibration test cases
Channel Access Efficiency
SLS Box5 Calibration Results and Discussions
Consideration on WUR Frame Structure
Synchronization with Low Power Antenna
Considerations on Trigger Frame for Random Access Procedure
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
WUR MAC Consideration Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu
Resource Negotiation for Unassociated STAs in MU Operation
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Results for Beacon Collisions
Non-orthogonal Multiple Channel Access in Wi-Fi
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communication over Wi-Fi
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
BSSID Information in FCS
BSSID Information in FCS
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
Non-orthogonal Multiple Channel Access in Wi-Fi
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communication over Wi-Fi
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
Channel Access Efficiency
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communication over Wi-Fi
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Enabling Frame Body Capture Effect
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Experimental Study of NOMA/SOMA in Wi-Fi
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communications over Wi-Fi
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
BSSID Information in FCS
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communications over Wi-Fi
Channel Access Efficiency
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
On AP Power Saving Usage Model
Omission of Probe Request
TXOP Truncation Enhancement
Considerations on Trigger Frame for Random Access Procedure
Power save state transition
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
LC MAC submission – follow up
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Data Sharing for Multi-AP Coordination
LC MAC submission – follow up
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Presentation transcript:

Enabling Frame Body Capture Effect Month Year Doc Title Nov 17 Enabling Frame Body Capture Effect Date: 2017-11-06 Authors: Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Evgeny Khorov IITP RAS; NRU HSE khorov@frtk.ru Alexey Kureev IITP RAS   Ilya Levitsky IITP John Doe, Some Company

Nov 17 Problem In dense deployment, it may happen that a stronger frame from own BSS arrives when a STA is already synched to a weaker frame (e.g. from an alien BSS) Power time IITP

Receive State Machine (DSSS PHY) Nov 17 Receive State Machine (DSSS PHY) In the event that a change in PHYCS or PHYED would cause the status of CCA to return to the IDLE state before the complete reception of the MPDU, as indicated by the PHY LENGTH field, the error condition shall be reported to the MAC using a PHY-RXEND.indication(CarrierLost) primitive. The CCA of the DSSS PHY shall indicate a busy medium for the intended duration of the transmitted packet. IITP

Receive State Machine (OFDM) Nov 17 Receive State Machine (OFDM) IITP

Receive State Machine (11ax) Nov 17 Receive State Machine (11ax) The same happens here IITP

Consequences Power time Nov 17 In this case, both frames will be lost: The green one will be lost because of huge interference The red lime will be lost because the receiving STA was synched to the green frame However, at least red frames could be received IITP

Nov 17 Testbed We evaluated behavior of off-the-shelf devices in this scenario with the following testbed IITP

Frame Body Capture Effect IS NOT Present Nov 17 Frame Body Capture Effect IS NOT Present Frame receive ratio Both frames are lost IITP

Frame Body Capture Effect Is Present Nov 17 Frame Body Capture Effect Is Present Stronger frame is correctly received Frame receive ratio This is not aligned to the standard IITP

Real Devices Analyses Some devices support the feature Nov 17 Vendors and Device names are hidden Some devices support the feature IITP

Nov 17 Conclusion Allowing switching to a stronger frame is fruitful since give an opportunity to a STA to receive at least one frame in case of overlapped frames. This feature is currently implemented in some devices. This feature is not allowed by the standard. We need to allow this feature. In case of a stronger frame arrive, a STA may switch to this frame, operating as if the weaker frame were not received. IITP

Month Year Doc Title Nov 17 Straw Poll Do you agree that 802.11 should allow switching to a stronger frame during frame body of a weaker one Y N A IITP John Doe, Some Company

Nov 17 Motion - Do you agree to add the following para to the end of Sections 15.3.7, 16.2.6, 17.3.12, 19.3.21, 20.9, 21.3.20, 23.3.19 (all entitled ‘PHY receive procedure’)? It may happen that several frames overlap and a stronger frame starts later than the weaker one. To allow reception of at least the stronger frame, at any state of the PHY receive state machine, the STA can perform detection of a new frame start and switch to a new frame with higher power. Y N A IITP